₦airaland Forum

Capaldi:
Leave story for Mattias. When he wasn't successfully you denied him and said you wanted Rohr out and Renard appointed not
Pes. Have some shame and rest.

Did you see the "my opinion" there? The bone of contention is Rohr. He needed to go. I even stated that I DON'T CARE WHO REPLACES HIM. I would recommend Renard. But Rohr has to go.

We are in the AFCON final now. Is Rohr in the dugout?

raumdeuter:
Is this guys tactic different from Rohrs own

None of you believe that someone else will better Rohr in Super Eagles.

airmark:
I predicted it.

Timbros is a coward and shameless.

Shut up you too!

Stop bringing Peseiro into the argument.

Check the date of this screenshot. Who was the post about? Where did all this talk start from? Who is talking of Peseiro here?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Don't embarrass yourself, tonight

We dragged you for supporting anybody apart from Rohr.

You told us you didn't pick Peseiro, and dragged it for days. Quite shameful for you to come here and do "I told you so"

Please go and edit all those comments you made up there.

[/color]

Shut up!

This has been my stand from day one.

Did you just jump into a conversation you don't know the beginning?

popizaino:
The only thing everyone sees is that you said you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

Thank God you understood what Ieant.

I don't care who replaces Rohr. Let him leave the dugout, Super Eagles will move to blthe next level.

How far bros?

Capaldi:
It's very comical. Same person that argued for days how he never supported peseiro wants to use his achievement to brag. No atom of shame whatsoever.

How is Rohr out the same as Peseiro in?

I keep hammering it from day one. Rohr out! What is wrong with all of you?

You tried to hang Peseiro on my neck, which I don agree now.

My talk from day one is SACK ROHR. SACK ROHR. I even said it that I don't care who replace him. Sack Rohr and Super Eagles will be better. SACK ROHR. How is it my concern that it's Peseiro who finally took Super Eagles to the next level?

Sack Rohr!

izzou:
[color=royalblue]You that denied Peseiro, and dragged it for more than 10 pages.

Na you wan come dig?


[/color]

I wanted Rohr out for Super Eagles to get better. Rohr out. Rohr out. Rohr out ooooo...

Did you see me dig Peseiro in? I said Rohr out. ROHR OUT ROHR OUT.

Do I need to translate Rohr out in your mother tongue?

Rohr out.... The next coach, whoever he is will take Super Eagles to the next level. It happens that it's Peseiro.

My argument was ROHR OUT! How else do u want me to say it before you finally understand? ROHR OUT!

airmark:
When they announced Peseiro, did you spit fire and brimstones?

There's no hiding place for you sir, L must hug you.

Why should I spit fire and brimstone when he will finally take us to AFCON final?

airmark:
Timbros : "But if Nigeria wants to move forward, Rohr has to go".




Rohr never go?

Rohr don go bros.... And we are in the finals.

Has Rohr ever taken us to the finals? Have Super Eagles. Not moved forward now? Fraud!

airmark:
You said the team would move forward once they fire Rohr. Now, Rohr was fired, have we moved forward?

They should inscribe a big green white green L on your forehead.

Have we moved forward, Airmark?

Who gets the big green white green L on the forehead now?

airmark:
Timbros no wan collect koboko for his 'Rohr out' shout. 😃

Evidence too yapa...

Who need this koboko now?

Ibime:
Timbros, read this. Those of us wey know Naija football politics know why we backed Rohr. He was a breath of fresh air after 2 decades of seeing 40 years old players getting call up

Now we are bringing out calculator again in group where Lesotho, Zimbabwe and SA are our only challenges

I hope you are still backing Rohr bros...

This air we are breathing now isn't fresh at all.

popizaino:
Since you don't want to address this mail,let me help you @timbros.

Mail recieved.

How far bros?

raumdeuter:
Those of you wey dey shout on top Rohr neck hope you are enjoying this new entertaining Eagles

Time don reach o...

Dayo, how far? Hope you are enjoying this new entertaining Eagles?

Ibeme:
Timbros, come outside!!!

airmark:
I have already proved the ineffectiveness of our attack compared to United's.

Your post exposed the reason you have been arguing blindly since you believe our attack has been scoring impressively and it's shocking coming from a Chelsea fan.

At this point, I doubt if you've watched 70% of our matches this season.

How many goals have Man United scored? What of Chelsea, how many goals?

afrodoc2:
Brutallion come outside!

You dey call Brutallion because you win am or what?

Check the scores well o bros... Flekken don do you dirty

airmark:
How many goals did you score against Everton, Nottingham forest, Brentford, Bournemouth? Zero.

How many goals did you score against Aston Villa both in Fa cup and league? We fired blank.

Your team miserably converted 16 out of 63 big chances, you are not even ashamed.

Get out!

That post was not for you. See how you jumped into a post that is not yours. Meanwhile you are avoiding the direct question posed to you...

What are you scared of?

raumdeuter:
Dem don dey give us warning in South Africa

Seriously if I am in South Africa, I won't even come out till a week or two after the match.

Those guys that wake up one morning and start xenophobic attack without any reason, will have a "reason" to attack Nigerians after the match.

popizaino:
Big teams don't score one and lock shop Abobi. You are not in 2000,when we weren't an elite team. Now we are,we should be able to score at will. We are not scoring at will,that should give you more headache than anything else. Man united conceded two goals against Aston villa and came back to win. Did the same against Nottingham forest. Can your team ever?

Before now we weren't a team that use to concede much,we just couldn't break teams that easily. That should worry you more.

We are not scoring at will, but we are scoring, no?

We are not just conceding, we are being battered left right centre.

And, stop deceiving yourself. We are NOT an elite team RIGHT NOW.

Kimbeast:
Oh waoh. This is even the 2nd time we have conceded 4 goals in back to back games this season.

And airmark have the audacity to make this silly challenge..

airmark:
Mention one match in which we conceded 5 goals or 4 goals without a red card, this season then I will agree with you.

I won't be surprised if you even blame our defence for the barren draw we played yesterday. You are the elder brother of Lordfalcao.

Airmark is a shameless clown.

After agreeing with me, he is still shamelessly typing jargon up and down, instead of begging for forgiveness the way Popizaino, his disciple, did.

popizaino:
The only thing i am ashamed of is the fact that you support Chelsea with your rubbish takes. How can a Chelsea fan look at our team before now and be preoccupied with defending.

Let me just school you tonight. A big team coach should be more focus on how to score than how to defend. If i have to break this concept to you then all yours of watching football is a waste. You never gained anything from watching the ball. In fact it is save to say na the football dey watch you abobi.

I rest my case.

popizaino:
I prefer a team that outscored their opponents. Real Madrid will concede goals but they would score more than you. That is the level i wish Chelsea aspire to be. You can't be going into games thinking of how to stop your opponent from scoring. When you do that,you miss the ploy.

Why are you suddenly shifting the goal post?

You have gone from NOT THINKING OF DEFENCE AT ALL to soft landing by focusing on defending less.

If Pochettino should go into a match and NOT bother himself thinking how to stop his opponent from scoring, then he shouldn't field Silva, Badashile, Disasi, Chilwell, Gusto and Co.... Lets go into all matches with 11 attackers... Since attack is our only problem. The more attackers we field, the better chances we outscore our opponents.

airmark:
I have given you the answer that proved my theory as i compared the two teams' big chances created and big chances converted.

Asking for goal scored doesn't prove any efficiency as other essential criteria must be considered.

Stop lying to yourself. You have NOT given me the answer to my question. How do you even sleep at night peacefully?

I need figures from you. Why is it too hard for you to post the number of goals Man Utd have scored so far and the number of goals Chelsea have score? Are you scared of something?

airmark:
I have answered you the question about why I believe United's attack is more efficient. I don't have time for who scored what when it's not enough to judge efficiency.

Give me a direct answer like I did to you in the screenshot below.

How many goals have Man United and Chelsea scored respectively?

I believe you are educated enough to understand what it means when a "direct answer" is needed.

airmark:
[s]Tottenham created 62 big chances and converted 30

Man UTD created 68 big chances and converted 37

Chelsea created 63 big chances and converted 16.

Timbros won't be able to use these data to stop his embarrassing argument.[/s]

If you like run round and round and round, you see this your neck? I go press am well well. I no go leave am.

How many goals did Man Utd and Chelsea scored respectively?

airmark:
Disheartening and disgraceful, but Timbros is barking the wrong tree looking for balancing rim.

If you really trust and believe your line of reasoning, it shouldn't be hard for you to answer a simple question for over 12 hours now.

Unlimited22:
As a PH manchii, freestyle that G abeg

Una don make am dey view this thread in guest mode.

Abeg.

#FreePopizaino

Even if I free am for Poch matter, I dey wait for am for AFCON.

Popi dey cap too much.

airmark:
I showed you the big chances missed chart and you saw Chelsea topping and Man UTD not there. Now look at the image below, that's top 5 teams in Epl with big chances created and you can see United there. What does that tell you about their attack and ours?

I understand your football knowledge is limited, that's why you depend on Dayo's views most times. But you won't die if you accept you goofed in the face of convincing proofs.

Our major problem is attack, others are minor.

Why all the shalaye in a simple question? Did you see how I directly answered your question? What is stopping you from reciprocating it?

How many goals did Man Utd and Chelsea score respectively?

I didn't ask why they scored such amount of goals.... The question is simple, how many goals? Airmark, how many goals did Man Utd and Chelsea scored respectively?

Any yoruba speaking person here to translate the question for Airmark?

AdisaOwala:
Airmark can be so annoying and frustrating atimes sha

Lmao

No mind am.

But trust me, I go press him neck. I no go leave am... He can wriggle but him no fit escape.

airmark:
Good that you finally agreed.

For educational purpose, I will answer yours with the image below that shows why we are drowning because of our attackers that are poor in front of goal, with big chances.

If you can't agree with the informed conclusion that attack is our major problem, from the image, then you are not ready to learn.

How many goal have Man United scored? How many goals have Chelsea scored?

I gave you a direct answer, no. Can you give me a direct answer? Just two set of figures. You don't need all this shalaye.

airmark:
Since their defence and ours are not Ok, but they are leading us on the table, safe to say they have a better attack that probably knows how to score first or score winners. Period.

Can you answer my own question? I have answered yours.

Let's test both attacks.