₦airaland Forum

airmark:
I just used the boring international break to highlight Timbros' big L. If Naija fail to qualify for the world cup, na to gather tyres for him, next year.

Now back to Popizaino and Pochettino.

Which L? In your wildest imagination.

After more than a week, both of you couldn't link my name to Peseiro. Isn't that a big shame?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]I go personally come thief Timbros phone and laptop.

[/color]

Agenda no fly again, abi...

popizaino:
Do you really care about who replaces Rohr?

Yes. And I made my opinion known.

popizaino:
Show me where you recommended Renard without being asked?

Is it a must to recommend without being asked? Does it change anything?

popizaino:
You gave your opinion on Rohr without anyone asking you.

Where is your opinion on the recommendation without anyone asking you.

Is that the press? Is that the coerce?

Popizaino what do you even mean by pressing? Let's start there.

popizaino:
In my case nobody pressed me before i gave my opinion unlike yours.

You are confused and shameless.

In one breath you are asking me if I quoted someone in my post, the next breath you are saying you gave your opinion freely.

So if someone ask you a question and you answered, it's pressing? Are you okay?


Show me the pressing here

popizaino:
Did you quote anyone here?

Was I pressed? Is all your comment on this thread a quote?

popizaino:


What an expose . !!! Yimu.

I will not allow you change discussion. Accept your L then we will come back to me and Pochettino.

I am not changing any discussion.

Is it okay for you to change your opinion of Pochettino? But I can't say I don't care then later specify a name?

popizaino:
No.....and why should you always remind us what you said to Diss.troy. show us your recommendation of Rohr's replacement without been pressed.

Was I pressed here?

airmark:
Without Disstroy asking you, you wouldn't have mentioned a name as part of the solution. Don't lie.

Are you saying I would have wanted Super Eagles to go coachless because I wanted Rohr sacked?

airmark:
Because that's the major solution from your heart, before any subsequent query on your preferred coach. I believe you wouldn't have said without Renard, Eagles wouldn't progress.

So if you propose sack for a coach, that is your final solution for that team? No other coach will replace the sacked one?

airmark:
Na Disstroy question brought Renard into the picture. Man was all about Rohr must go. The mantra was loud and clear, as the solution until Disstroy's question breezed in.

Did I or did I not say who I want to replace Rohr? Even if it takes policemen to get it off me, the fact remains that I recommended Renard.

Why then are you insisting on what is being said earlier?

airmark:
If Disstroy or anybody didn't ask you, nobody would have heard about him. You were all about 'Rohr must go, to move forward'.

We were having genuine football discussion with no bias or motive of trolling. He wanted to know my opinion which I gave to him. How is that a problem?

Are you saying you cannot air your view on a team which you don't support? Whether that view is applied or not, you are indifferent about the team. You just commented based on a football fan you are.

airmark:
Timbros is still my guy sha. On this one, he missed big time.

You are the one that missed big time.

Only God knows what would have been happening here if I didn't bring proof that I mentioned a guy I wanted for the job.

But here you have it in black and white and yet you are still forcing what doesn't exist.

airmark:
But you knew the solution (Rohr must go) to the problem of a team you don't support?

You didn't criticise because the solution (Rohr must go, to move forward), was executed. But as fate would have it, the team haven't moved forward since.

Rest, Timbros.

You can't impose on me why I didn't criticise. I have told you why. Whatever way you twist it, is your own cup of tea.

Why are you only concerned about the Rohr must go aspect? What of the "appoint a tested and trusted guy who knows African football to the core"? Isn't that the main solution?

This is your eternal ally Airmark sef

airmark:
How did we get here?

Popizaino, where do you want your thunder?

airmark:
Popizaino, can you please use the same channel you used to recommend Pochettino, to recommend his sack?

We looking like a senseless club to other clubs.

Popizaino do you want more evidence? E still yapa...

Popizaino let me use few minutes to teach you what "evidence yapa" means.

Calmly go through the posts below. This is Popizaino stand on Pochettino...

popizaino:
See ball.

Well done Pochettino.

popizaino:
Abeg make una allow Pochettino do him work now. He didn't get us playing beautifully like this to be told what to do on nairaland. [/b]Let's be guided.

popizaino:
Cry from now till eternity, [b]Pochettino is a far better tactician than your stupid god forsaken Tuchel that almost ran this club to the ground.

I love this one especially...

popizaino:
You are dreaming if you think i will take back my words on Pochettino as the right man for this job.

Then, few games later,the same Popizaino...

popizaino:
Pochettino isn't ready for the job.

popizaino:
Tbh, this game has just made me lose any iota of hope i have in Pochettino. This is the same thing i lambasted that idiot in bayern Munich for thinking Pochettino is coming to correct it,only to see him doing the same thing with different players. And just like you,i want my ugly football back.

popizaino:
I am very much aware of this, maybe we should just sack Pochettino after two games and call Nagglesman,Ancelotti, Pep guardiola to come and develop this players after two games.

popizaino:
No club in Europe should ever hire Pochettino if he fails here. Idiot.

If you, Popizaino, can change lane on Pochettino this fast, who gave you the "moral right" to question me if I say I don care who replaces Rohr and later, mentioned who I want to replace him? Do you see why I called you a hypocrite earlier?

And for your info, evidence still yapa... I just selected this few for now.

popizaino:
What are you clarifying?

Have you ever clarified an opinion you hold before?

popizaino:
Who did you quote here Abobi?

Still confused. Must I quote somebody to air my view?

Where are the evidences of me supporting Peseiro that you said yapa everywhere?

popizaino:
Because it is futile doing so after you have already conceded that you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

Have you ever clarified an opinion you hold before?

popizaino:
At least it can be seen you quoted Diss.troy there who did you quote in the screenshot below?

You are completely confused. Nothing else can explain this gibberish above.

Where is the evidences you promised Airmark? Remember you said they yapa... Lets see them.

popizaino:
Who asked you before making your frustration known about Rohr?

Don't you know how to dig again? Can't you trace the genesis of that conversation?

Even if you trace it, you will still look for a way to turn amala... So I'm not surprised.

BTW why haven't you bring out a particular post where I support the appointment of Peseiro?

popizaino:
Let me go with the one you said willingly and not the you were coerced to say.

First pressed, now coerced.

English professors like Izzou and Griffon will not come out and talk to Popizaino. It's when "replace" is the topic, all of una go jump out...

Who coerced me here?

popizaino:
Did anyone asked for your opinion when you were all over the pages of nairaland asking Rohr to be sacked? Why should you wait for destroy to ask for your opinion before making your recommendations?

So asking a question is now pressing? Did diss.troy asked me repeatedly and I evade the question before finally answering it? What do you mean by press?

popizaino:
This your attempt at been trying to be clever by half can only work when you are in Rumuokoro and not on the pages of nairaland.

Do you need to have a chat with me before i know that you were not enjoying the SE and that led you to consistently asked for the coach to be sacked?

Does the person who wrote the screenshot below sound like one who was enjoying the game under Rohr?

Then why bring that up when you know we never had such chat before?

Have you ever held an opinion and changed it later? Why are you avoiding this question? Is it because you know it will come back and bite you in your backside?

Below is my opinion on Super Eagles moving forward. Why you keep going backwards I don't know..

popizaino:
You were not pressed when you asked for Rohr's sack.why should wait till you were pressed before making recommendations?

Well I don't even want you to answer. Because there is already evidence that you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

What do you mean by press? Choose your words wisely man.

So Diss.troy asking my opinion is now press?

popizaino:
Before now,his defence was that he never had any chat with me about Rohr or not when i called him out,today he has seen a perfect straw of did he recommend Jose. .

Such a shameless man .

Classic case of clutching at straws.

That post was made March. Like the comment imply, Show me anywhere you and I had a chat about Super Eagles, if I enjoy them with or without Rohr. I'm waiting.

Why haven't you posted one single post I made supporting Peseiro. All your post is me talking about Rohr. Don't you have an atom of shame?

popizaino:
I know you are found of looking out for nuance in statement for your next clutch but sorry to disappoint you it won't work.


Tell us what the screenshot meant .

I have answered you this question before. Or should I repeat myself for the 1,001 time?

You have not told us what this screenshot mean...

airmark:
Let's even assume it wasn't after you were pressed to mention your favorite coach for the job, that you mentioned Renard. When your preferred coach wasn't signed, what was your reaction?

When VVD wasn't signed by Chelsea, it's on record that I scolded the decision here vehemently. When Renard wasn't signed, one would expect you to have criticized the decision, if truely your "I don't care who replaces Rohr" stand, was just a joke.

You don't need to shy away from the fact that you were all about "Rohr must go", to move forward. Now that no progress after he was sacked, accept you goofed and move on. It doesn't make you an eternal failure.

If you engage in a football discussion about a team not doing well that you DO NOT support, can't you as a football fan point out what is wrong with that team and make recommendations? Now, if those you recommendations are not follow, will you come out and vehemently criticise them? Or will you be indifferent on what is happening there?

You scolded VVD decision because it had to do with a club you support, Chelsea.

Why must you expect me to vehemently criticise the decision of a team I do not support just because I discussed that team with fellow football fans?

popizaino:
See I don't care here.

See Rohr leaving and the team automatically moves forward.

Show me where I said the team "automatically" moves forward. I recommended a replacement that will move the team forward.

popizaino:
You know the reason why? ........it is simply because you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

I do care about who replace Rohr. And I have evidence to that.

You shamelessly accused me and you are finding it hard to bring evidence of your accusation for a week now.