₦airaland Forum

zayidhs:
Go back to school

That is for you. Prof yakubu highlighting challenges with deployment of e-collation didnt say it wasn't done.
INEC don by market.

The video actually proved that there was server and it was used perhaps with challenges.

GoodGovernance:
Big lies!!

SMS message to a computer server,without network connectivity?

If all Results were transmitted at polling unit level,so why are the polling units results not shown on the fake server?All we have are state totals for only PDP and APc! Other parties did not take part in the election!



Atiku supporters are truly hypnotized!

The result is comprehensive what you are referencing are extracts.

Koolking:
If you believe elections results were transmitted to INEC at each polling unit, you can't believe anything.

Forget politics and propaganda, as a supposed educated fellow, ask yourself, if elections were e-transmitted, does the electoral act approved it?
2. There were over a hundred thousand polling units across the country, how were the results transmitted electronically in areas where there was no network? You can't etransmit results in some areas and not in all areas if your quest is credibility.
The idea of etransmission of results were dropped by stakeholders due to identified challenges.
The propaganda does not add up at all

Inec staff were asked to ensure transmission of results at the earliest point of network availability.

This matter is an albatross on INEC.

Max8:
If he is right that means INEC had a server since the introduction of the card reader in 2011, so why did INEC budget include server for the 2019 elections

Yes INEC has server since . The budget for 2019 is for maintenance, training and upgrade as well as expansion.

Max8:
U are the empty and dead brain here,your Atiku and PDP laying claims to a server that they never set their eyes on except a paper print out,use your head, o de oponu ni e,the invisible or maybe na u them send go do the print out,na fools like u Atiku and PDP will decieve with their theory

How did you know they never saw the server? Watch and be educated the matter is just starting and it will be quite revealing.

gabicon:
If I may ask, what is the mode of connection between the card readers and the servers when the card readers are in polling station?

What is the mode of connection between your ATM card and a POS machine? Therein lies your answer.

gabicon:
This server issue is becoming very annoying, first of all what exactly is a server? A server is a central computer that stores data imputed from several computers, the storage can be done via online, local area network or manual data inputs.

That said, we do not vote electronically, are card readers are only meant to verify voters, after verification a pice of paper carrying all political parties is given to us to thumb print. The thumb printed paper is our vote.

After every verified voters must have cast their votes, the votes are counted and party agents sign on the result sheet and the results are forwarded to collation centers.

There is nowhere the results are imputed into the card readers along the process neither do are our card readers internet enabled so how on Earth does a server give results to the PDP?

This case is dead on arrival, if the argument was that the number of accredited voters was less than the votes cast then there is a case.

The only valid argument will be that INEC manually input the election result into their server, that will take some time to achieve.

Your last paragraph is the basis for the server result. INEC officials were mandated to transmit the results after the manual collation.

Max8:
See foolish talk, mumu,so na card reader u take do your own registration of PVC abi na computer, fool like u na card reader data transmission issues we dey talk here no be PVC registration
Card reader is not for registration of PVC it's for accreditation, abi u no sabi English

He is right you are the one missing the point. The PVC registration data are stored in the server and the Smart Card reader is link to it that is why it can authentic/accredit voters. Without server the card reader won't work. It is therefore very straightforward that SCR receives and transmits data to the server QED

PHILipu1:
Can card readers tell the candidate that each voter did vote for?
Were card readers not just for accreditation?
Was there electronic voting for Atiku to get his result in a server?

If he is talking about the number of voters that did accreditation, I may accept that he got the number from the accreditation server or so but the votes he allocate to himself is what I don't know how he got that because there was no electronic voting.

It has interface for that which INEC staff will simply upload the result into.

Max8:
This Dino guy na buffon, showing us card reader means INEC have a server?,PDP claimed they have results sheet printed from the server, who ever that gave them the print out should be an insider, why can dey also show us pictures or video of the computer room and the server where they are located, rather than all this cock and bull story about server or no server

The matter hasn't reach that point yet but, the INEC denial will soon push the matter to that point.

Don't worry yourself the PDP making the claim has its ground.

cinoedhunter:
Nigeria has a problem especially our so called leaders . Na cuz of 30k, all these drama . But NASS just got sworn in and welcome package of billions is waiting for them.... until political offices stop being attractive , naija is in trouble... rubbish insensitive leaders.

Political office will forever be attractive cos it connote power.

asfrank:
The computation of presidential election results
filed before the elections petition tribunal by the
presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic
Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, shows that all
accredited votes cast in 33 states of the
federation were shared between him and
President Muhammadu Buhari.
Mr Buhari was declared the winner for a second
term of four years with 15,191,847 votes to
defeat Mr Abubakar who polled 11,262,978 votes.
The two got lion share of the 27,324,583 valid
votes recorded in the election.
Over 1.2 million votes were also voided in the
course of the election.
However, excerpts of court filings published by
PREMIUM TIMES give Mr Abubakar’s state by
state breakdown of votes which, he claims,
placed him ahead of Mr Buhari with 18,356,732
against the incumbent’s 16,741,430 votes. The
result is exclusive of figures from Rivers State.
The Flaws
Mr Abubakar’s purported result implies that no
invalid votes were recorded in the 33 states, and
none of the 71 other presidential candidates
obtained any score.
In three states; Abia, Bauchi and Cross River, the
documents show that the two candidates
collectively got votes higher than the number of
accredited voters.
Mr Abubakar claims that he obtained the results
from the server of the electoral commission,
INEC.
The document is included in the petition filed by
Mr Abubakar in a suit seeking his declaration as
the validly elected president.
The purported result shows that Mr Abubakar
defeated the incumbent president by a margin of
1.6 million votes.
The ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) has
dismissed the alleged figures as a product of the
opposition’s “hallucination.”
Mr Buhari’s campaign later accused Mr Abubakar
and the PDP of gaining illegal access to the INEC
server.
An analysis of the alleged INEC server result by
PREMIUM TIMES show that the figures given as
total accredited voters in at least 33 of the 36
states and the capital, Abuja, show a clean sweep
of the entire figures between the two major
candidates.
A different result
Contrary to Mr Abubakar’s computation, INEC’s
official result obtained from the electoral
commission’s website show that all the 73
candidates who participated in the election
scored some votes.
The result showed that 71 other candidates in
the election shared the remnants of 869,758 valid
votes collated.
The person who came a distant third in the
election, Felix Nicholas, of the Peoples Coalition
Party (PCP) scored a total of 110,196 votes.
He was followed by Obadiah Mailafia of the
African Democratic Congress (ADC) who polled
97.874.
Gbor Terwase of the All Progressives Grand
Alliance (APGA) clinched the fifth position with
66,851 votes.
Candidates with least scores are Angela Johnson
of Alliance for a United Nigeria (AUN) with 1,092,
Abah Elaigwu of Change Advocacy Party (CAP)
with 1,111 and Edosomwon Johnson of the
Nigeria Democratic Congress Party (NDCP) with
1,192 votes.
The Atiku result
In Mr Abubakar’s home state of Adamawa, where
INEC officially declared Mr Abubakar winner with
412,266 against Mr Buhari’s 377,488, Mr
Abubakar claims that he got 646,080 out of the
total 815,680 accredited voters with Mr Buhari
scoring 161,600. The result show only the two
got all the possible votes.
In Akwa Ibom, Messrs Abubakar and Buhari,
according to the computation, received all the
votes by the 925,370 accredited voters with Mr
Abubakar polling 587,431 votes ahead of Mr
Buhari’s 337,939.
It is another clean sweep in Enugu as Mr
Abubakar claimed that the state’s 965,940
accredited voters gave him 698,119 as against
267,821 for Mr Buhari.
The 1,169,303 voters accredited in Sokoto State,
according to the purported result, all shared their
votes between Mr Abubakar (552,172) and Mr
Buhari (617,131).
Mr Abubakar’s 442,380 votes allegedly polled in
Taraba and Mr Buhari’s 188,389 votes put
together represent 630,769 total accredited votes
for the state.
Yobe’s 750,745 accredited votes, Mr Abubakar
claims, were shared in total between him and Mr
Buhari who got 443,904 against Mr Abubakar’s
306,841
In Zamfara, the result shows that total accredited
votes of 792,796 were shared between Messrs
Abubakar and Buhari with the former having
379,022 while the latter got 413,774.
Irregularities?
Aside the exactitude between summation of
figures for the two candidates and the number of
accredited voters, there are other issues that are
either arithmetic errors or over voting.
In Abia, for example, 853,050 were recorded as
“accredited voters (actual)” but the sum of the
votes allotted to Messrs Abubakar and Buhari
alone, outshot the accredited voters by 10,000.
Mr Abubakar, according to the result, polled
664,659 while Mr Buhari obtained 198,391.
It is a similar case in Bauchi, where the total for
Messrs Abubakar and Buhari’s purported votes
outnumber total accredited voters by 287 votes.
Mr Abubakar claims 187,668 votes a far cry from
854,037 the document said Mr Buhari obtained.
The summation comes to 1,041,705 while the
document gives the total accredited voters as
1,041,418.
In Cross River, the document shows that votes
obtained by the two leading candidates amount
to 691,640 which is higher than the 690,890
accredited voters’ figure by a total of 750 votes.

https://www..ng/news/several-flaws-identified-in-atikus-presidential-election-server-result

Those are extracts the documents are bulky and detailed.

nabiz:
lol the inec office was talking and opening his mouth without knowing what will happen later

He was brutally honest.

They will soon start to malign them. It is a matter of time.

asfrank:
Thanks 4 Your detailed explanation. But I have some questions. The Election Results that Atiku claimed he got from the sever showed that all votes for the election were shared between him and Buhari, How genuine is that claim? And again from the same results, there were no canceled votes and all accredited voters voted. How are all these possible? Were the results recorded into the Card readers by the POs according to Parties that participated, in this case over 70 parties? For me these are questions that Atiku's sever results has not fully answered. Since u participated in the Process and had some knowlege have these questions been answered by their claim? Enlighten me please.

It shows results of all parties/candidates including invalid/rejected votes. What you are referencing were abridged.

Beninempire:
start building mega churches all over their environment like how we did it in auchi.

See apostle suleman, a former Muslims same with oshiomole before we Christianize them. Now suleman own the biggest church in Nigeria and oshiomole is a confirmed catholic in Benin

Trash

Servers exist and were used even before 2019 general elections.

INEC just keep looking curiously Compromised.

senatordave1:
The zamfara judgment made no mention of the specific votes.the constitution says total votes cast and the supreme court clearly followed them.the only difference is that the apc votes were voided and invalidated and therefore were never part of the calculations

Therefore they were invalid?

senatordave1:
Ihedioha got nothing whether total votes cast or valid votes cast.our calculations were even based on valid votes among the 4 parties,we didnt take record of the other parties which will worsen his case.

In that case except a withdrawal or abandonment of the matter by the contending parties, a runoff between Iheioha/pdp and Nwosu/AA is imminent.

However, no shaking Ihedioha/pdp shall win again.

ericsmith:
Then tell those your people in inec to provide the "server", perhaps you should borrow pdp/atiku brain ... i know say you sabi corpers wey know were inec hid there servers bring them to court
Assignment : Were card readers use in the 2015 election? If card readers used in 2015 election did not require a server why should card readers from the 2019 election have a server ? 30marks

Even in 2015 the card reader used server! The fact that GEJ conceded gave the flawed election legitimacy.

Tundevictor0613:
Check-out

MOD ban this guy please.

benugbana:
The INEC server issue has some resemblance with the 2019 CAF Champions League final VAR controversy. The only difference is that one is happening in politics, the other happened in football.

In that game, a team (Wydad Casablanca) scored a seemingly legitimate goal that was cancelled by the centre referee for offside. Wydad protested that the referee must consult the VAR to affirm his decision. The referee refused, and the game turned into a chaos. It was later discovered that referee had refused the call because the video system wasn't working.

Inside sources would later claim that the team already knew from the start that the VAR was not functional; that their insistence on consulting the VAR was part of a plan to show to the whole world how facetious the continental football body has turned the sport into.

I dare say that PDP is doing same to INEC.

Does anyone remember how it all played out before the presidential and NASS polls? How that INEC seemed so unprepared but continued to assure Nigerians that they are ready to conduct the elections?

INEC talked so much about its servers and card readers, and how they're going to use technology to make sure all that happens at the polling stations in terms of voting will automatically reflect in a central unit.

Fam, there was actually no server. Y'all should stop asking INEC for what they don't have.

My hunch tells me PDP knew of this from the onset. In fact, the moment the party quoted those outrageous figures it claimed to have gotten from INEC servers, I knew something was fishy. The umpire didn't really respond to that accusation, only APC did.

Both parties knew. INEC knew too, but they had lied to us from the beginning and so wanted to keep it that way. It's just unfortunate that PDP still brought the matter up again at the tribunal.

Again, I say, there is no server! INEC clearly wasn't ready for the 2019 presidential election. They had over three years to plan, but they failed.

It's sad.

There is server and it functioned if not, the card reader won't work.

senatordave1:
The constitution talks of total votes cast.seems your a poor student of maths,he got it in 12 lgas

The zamfara judgement amplified valid votes not total votes as the basis for measurement.

Ochendo1:
Stop spreading falsehood to drive your point.
Again i will repeat: Ihedioha got 25% of 18 LGA's (2/3rd spread) of total valid votes and was returned as dully elected by a professor statistics which is also the INEC returning officer.
What maybe the bone of contention at the Tribunal would be if its total votes or total valid votes.

If he gets 25% of 2/3 valid votes spread, it is game over for Nwosu.

ericsmith:
IF inec didnt make it look so real or collect allocations to maintain a nonexistence server who would av believed them. the joke is on pdp they took the bait.
Theee is no where in the electoral act that acknowledged or made provision for "server" where there is no law there is no crime. shikena

To you the people working at INEC are insulated from the rest of Nigerians abi? Abegi inec has server and it won't be able to use smart card reader without a server.

Avsegzy:
Wake me up when a tribunal judge ask a sitting president to vacate his sit in Nigeria. Download this love song. http://www.naijapals.com/music/Searching_for_love_Xpol-89179

A CCT judge issued ex-parte order to remove a CJN. So, it won't be out of place Should the court upturn or annul a presidential election.