₦airaland Forum

r231:
well she wan do you simple

what do you mean[b] simple[/b]? if it is sex? i doubt if i can go that low to act cheap

sexkillz:
4 rounds of what, if i may ask bro?

she said 4 rounds of sex, and about to go on another, the guy got angry and cut the call, i was already rolling on my bed then,,, facing down cox my body self do one kinddd

when i say seducive , mini sk, n top whch that bossoms are lil exposed and was all jumping on my front, infact i didnt even know what to do when she followed me to my bed cox i was using laptop to browse on top,, my thoughts is just ''' THIS IS NOT JUST RIGHT'' , how come i never see this girl joking out but shes this desperate in my room, again, is she in fun bed fun or more than that

there is this pretty damsel who lives in same estate with me, a big one though, seperated from each , and we have being seeing each oda for about two years now, without talking, kind of '' i dont send altitude'' dont see guys talk to her too, shes an independent type who is kinda respected cox she minds her stuff and maybe her angellic nature scare guys away, i was in total shock when today? she knocked on my door at the time i was getting ready for church, i had to know her intention and didnt go anymore, invited her in and just talked, from my view, i discovered that shes have been into me all these while, i need views what you think her intention is,

Reason: she came back to my house this evening and just left not long ago, very seducive, when calls came in through her phone, she was making me look like her boyfriend, for example, saying odd stuffs like am in my boyfriend's house, we had gone 4 rounds already, Please help on what you think she might be up to,

Why are you guys giving these girls hope?

link : http://www.sunnewsonline.com/webpages/features/newsonthehour/2011/sept/09/newsbreak-09-09-2011-001.html

link: http://www.sunnewsonline.com/webpages/news/national/2011/sept/09/national-09-09-2011-001.html

A glimpse of what may have led to the split decision victory that confirmed the late Umaru Yar’Adua as winner of the 2007 presidential election emerged yesterday from the latest dispatches of WikiLeaks.

Latest US diplomatic cable reports leaked by the wire spy suggests that the Yar’Adua team may have coughed out a whopping $57 million to procure a favourable judgment.
It further alleged that the judgment may have actually been written in the Presidency and handed to the jurists to read to the public. A named minister was said to have done the writing.
However, this claim is sharply at variance with an earlier dispatch from the same source which confirmed how resolute and incorruptible the leadership of the Supreme Court at that in time was, having refused all manner of inducements from the presidency.

It is, therefore, inconsistent that the same judiciary, which refused to stop Atiku in the build up to the election, would now turn around to accept bribe to uphold Yar’Adua’s election.
However, the controversial report, which claimed to be quoting a former Board of Trustee (BoT) member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) also claimed that the presidency directed that some of the bribe money be handed to top military chiefs as well. But it did not say if it was eventually given.
The dispatch reads in part:

A founding member of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and PDP Board of Trustees member, but also a strong critic of the party’s current ruling group, alleged that President Yar’Adua directed the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation to divert $57 million to bribe some justices to uphold his April 2007 election.
The informant claimed that, as of February 18, some of the election tribunal justices were privately signaling an intention to overturn Yar’Adua’s election, and a minister (and not the justices) in fact drafted the judgment. The informant also asserted that a Supreme Court Justice told him February 29 the Supreme Court would rule to overturn Yar’Adua’s election since it regarded the election as massively rigged and the Tribunal’s judgment “embarrassing and pathetic.” The PDP chieftain described the March 8 PDP Convention as a battle of wits between Obasanjo and Yar’Adua, to determine who would emerge as having greater influence within the PDP.

Should Obasanjo’s choice, Sam Egwu, emerge the PDP National Chair, it would indicate not only that the PDP remains firmly within Obasanjo’s grip, but also that Yar’Adua is a “nobody” within the party.
The source also believed Yar’Adua may possibly choose former Senate President Pius Anyim for National Chair. He said Yar’Adua has authorized the disbursement of $3 million to be dispatched across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones to forestall the possibility of Egwu emerging the victor. The squealer also told PolOff that Yar’Adua had met with PDP governors March 3 and would again meet with them March 7, to pressure them to vote against Egwu.

The source decried Yar’Adua as a “ruthless, cunning” individual who has done nothing for the Nigerian people since he took office last May. While the squealer’s antipathy for Obasanjo is well-known, he averred that Yar’Adua was even more “dangerous” and “corrupt” than Obasanjo, and suggested that First Lady Turai Yar’Adua, at the possible behest of President Yar’Adua, controlled access to the President and did it well. Moreover, the PDP chieftain confided that in mid-January discussions in Paris, he advised former Head of State Ibrahim Babangida to remain outside Nigeria and not attempt a political comeback since he lacked any significant base of support either within the PDP or the military.

The source claimed that President Yar’Adua instructed the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), on February 20 to release $57 million to a minister. In turn, the informant noted, the minister would disburse the funds among top judges and military chiefs. As of February 18, three justices had declared privately an intention to overturn Yar’Adua’s election, contending the election was massively rigged and flawed. As well, the PDP chieftain alleged the Tribunal judgment had been written by the minister from North Central zone. (Comment: While we have maintained that the provisions of the 2006 Electoral Act necessarily make it difficult for any petitioner to prove that electoral malfeasance “substantially” affected the outcome of elections in 2/3 of Nigeria’s 36 states, and that that meant a judgment against Yar’Adua’s election was unlikely, this is the first allegation we have heard of Yar’Adua directly interfering in the Presidential Election Tribunal process. End Comment.)

The informant confided that a Supreme Court justice told him over a private lunch February 29 that the Supreme Court will overrule the tribunal’s verdict to uphold Yar’Adua’s April 2007 election since, according to the jurist, the tribunal’s judgment was “embarrassing and pathetic.” In such an eventuality, the informant stated, the Constitution may be interpreted to suggest that the Senate President would take over as interim president for a period of no more than 90 days. The squealer told PolOff that the opposition All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP) and Action Congress have signaled privately that they will not support this reading of the Constitution, particularly if Obasanjo-loyalist and current Senate President David Mark’s (PDP) election is upheld at the Court of Appeal.

(The Benue State Election Tribunal overturned Mark’s election February 23, ordering elections in two local government areas (LGAs) to be re-run. Mark’s opponent Usman Abubakar (ANPP) filed a counter-appeal to Mark’s appeal March 3, petitioning the court to declare Abubakar the victor since he had received the greater number of votes across seven LGAs (See Ref A).)

Note: PolOffs witnessed February 26 at the Presidential Election Tribunal that both the minister from North Central zone and a son of one of the justices walked through to chambers to meet with the justices. Under law, however, justices must be sequestered during deliberation and especially prior to delivering a judgment. A Reuters foreign correspondent resident in Abuja told PolOff March 2 that a source inside the Villa had read the judgment verbatim to the correspondent February 25 (a day before the actual ruling was delivered). An Adviser to General Muhammadu Buhari (ANPP), told PolOff February 28 the General had received information from contacts within the Villa on February 24 that the Tribunal would uphold the election.

, Kutigi rejected N600m bribe to stop Atiku
Fresh dispatches from WikiLeaks have revealed how the Obasanjo presidency in the build up to the 2007 presidential election, tried to compromise the then Chief Justice of Nigeria, Idris Kutigi, in its desperation to stop Atiku Abubakar from contesting the election.
According to the latest postings on the raging WikiLeaks expose, the Obasanjo presidency voted as much as N600 million to bribe the now retired eminent jurist.
Incidentally, Kutigi was said to have rejected all, including a later offer to nominate his son for federal appointment.

According to the WikiLeaks cable believed to have emanated from the US Embassy, there was serious danger that the bribe offers would colour the outcome of the myriad of “lawsuits brought by President (Olusegun) Obasanjo and Vice president Atiku (Abubakar) in their political battle,” as the former desperately tried to stop the latter from standing election.
The dispatch noted that a controversial former senior special assistant to Obasanjo initially offered a bribe of N200 million to Kutigi during a private visit to the then CJN but that the jurist walked both the SSA and the equally controversial Anambra billionaire businessman who came with him, out of his office.
According to the unconfirmed WikiLeaks report, the presidency again tried to get the jurist to bend the law through a traditional ruler whom both the presidency and the jurist had enormous respect for. This time, the bribe money was upped to N400 million, but again, Kutigi turned it down and proceeded to do the right thing.

The report reads in part:
In the upcoming weeks, the mood of the Supreme Court may well be an important factor in determining how many of the recently concluded “elections” stand. In the past three weeks, court rulings on the myriad lawsuits brought by President Obasanjo and Vice President Atiku over the political battle between the two top elected leaders may provide an indication of its future direction. In the two biggest cases, one determining whether the National Electoral Commission (INEC) had the right to disqualify candidates, and the second on the validity of the hastily convened Administrative Panel to indict Atiku, the court came out against the use of the Presidency’s powers to manipulate the electoral environment. And Chief Justice Kutigi, in establishing the elections tribunals several weeks ago, stressed to the judges selected for the panels the importance of dealing with cases quickly.

He also warned the electoral tribunal judges against being influenced by bribery and political pressure, stating that those who succumbed could be dealt with through the National Judicial Council, and those found wanting could be removed from their positions.

Kutigi appears to be reacting strongly to several credibly reported attempts to sideline him or to co-opt him for political purposes. A member of the Chief Justice’s staff told PolCouns that the Presidency had attempted to bribe Kutigi twice before the elections. In the first case, it contacted Kutigi to offer CJN’s son an appointment as a Federal judge. Kutigi is said to have demurred, saying that he wanted nothing that might be seen as favoritism and was concerned that his son should be appointed in the future on his own merits. Nevertheless, Kutigi’s son was nominated.

According to the same source, the second attempt came when the President’s former aide who was later a governor, visited Kutigi’s office on April 10 accompanied by a controversial businessman and at one time, the godfather of Anambra polities. The aide says the two offered Kutigi 200 million Naira (about $1.6 million) to drop the suit by Atiku and leave him off the ballot. Kutigi, according to the aide “reacted strongly” to the offer and escorted them out of his office. The next day, President Obasanjo declared a two-day holiday ahead of the April 14 elections effectively delaying the decision in the Atiku suit until the following week.

A third attempt reportedly took place on April 24, when Kutigi was summoned to meet a paramount traditional ruler from his home state. According to a member of the monarch’s council of chiefs, the monarch offered Kutigi N400 million (about $3.2 million) from “the Presidency” in exchange for “control” over which specific cases the elections tribunals would overturn results.

According to the source, Kutigi was livid. He told the king that he had no desire to explain to his family “where this kind of money comes from” and pointed out that, at his age, he would be “meeting the angels” to answer for his life very soon. And they will not be asking me for Naira.” When the monarch discussed the situation with his council, several of them reportedly berated him for “even suggesting” that Kutigi could be bribed and advised him to return the cash to its source as soon as possible.

On April 26, rumours began circulating that Kutigi’s official vehicle had come under attack in Abuja by “unknown gunmen.” Reportedly, shots were fired at the Chief Justice’s car and he was whisked to safety by his security aide. Post has been unable to confirm this rumour, but it is widely believed by Nigerians to be true.

On the same evening, PolCouns overheard phone calls from three Supreme Court Justices, including the Chief Justice, to members of ANPP presidential candidate Muhammadu Buhari’s entourage. Two of them were expressing sympathy with Buhari over the elections and assuring him of the judiciary’s impartiality. The third call-a Justice from the Southwest- also encouraged Buhari personally to forge ahead with the elections tribunals because, in the words of the Justice, “we are fed up with the pretense of democracy” pushed by President Obasanjo.

Lawmakers of the Lagos State House of Assembly yesterday declared support for the Speaker of the House, Ikuforiji Adeyemi over the Economic Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC) investigations on allegations of N7 billion levelled against him.

Speaking at a press briefing yesterday, the Deputy Speaker, Kolawole Taiwo who presided over the meeting stated that, contrary to the allegations that Ikuforiji embezzled N7 billion, the House had received only N6 billion in the past years and as such it was impossible for the speaker to have single-handedly taken the said amount.

His words: “The speaker has been accused of misappropriating a total sum of N7 billion, but the fact is that the House became self-accounting in April 2010 and has not received up to the said amount at the time of the petition. It is ridiculous for anybody to believe that the speaker simply collects and expends the N500 million monthly running cost of the House of Assembly as he pleases.

The monthly running cost covers the entire expenditure of the House comprising the elected legislators and the bureaucracy of over 600 members of staff. For the avoidance of doubt, the Lagos State House of Assembly fully supports all efforts of the EFCC and other anti-graft bodies to rid the country of the menace of corruption.”

It will be recalled that the EFCC had summoned Ikuforiji to answer to a petition written against him, alleging embezzlement of N7 billion after which his passport and travel documents were seized pending the outcome of the investigation. The commission had also summoned five principal officers and the clerk of the house to present the documents of financial transactions of the House.

In their petition, the petitioners also alleged that the Speaker, in filling his INEC forms in 2007 and 2011 committed perjury by denying alleged records of conviction for credit card fraud and drunken driving in the United States in 2001 and 2005. They also claimed that the Speaker owns a company named Brown Motors to which he diverts the funds of the House.

However, Taiwo faulted this claim, saying that the leadership of the House had hired a private firm to investigate the Speaker’s activities in the US and it was found that the allegations were unfounded as the Speaker had resolved the credit card dispute he had.

“From the investigation a private firm we hired conducted, it was found out that the Speaker had since resolved a credit card dispute he had with a private credit service company in the US and has been absolved by the court of any criminal infractions,” Taiwo stated.

:-x :-x :-x :-x :-x

;d ;d ;d ;d ;d ;d ;d ;d ;d

wat is thisssss

true talk

Written by Idowu Samuel, AbujaWednesday, 07 September 2011



THE verbal war between former military president, General Ibrahim Babangida and former president, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, has continued to fester as Babangida said on Tuesday that he stood by his earlier statement on Obasanjo’s alleged squandering of national resources.

Babangida said this while debunking reports that he recanted on the allegation he made that Obasanjo wasted the sum of $16 billion on power sector as revealed by a National Assembly probe.

Babangida spoke through his media aide, Kassim Sule Afegbua, stating that he meant what he said on Obasanjo and never recanted at any time.

Babangida was recently quoted as accusing the media of quoting him out of context on Obasanjo on the interview he granted to newsmen on the eve of his 70th birthday in Minna, stating that he had lost many of his friends since the media war between him and Obasanjo broke out.

Afegbua, in his statement said Babangida “wishes to state clearly and without fear of contradiction that there is nothing like “recant” on his part. What General Babangida stated on the 30th August, 2011 was that the media misquoted him on his earlier interview granted prior to his birthday of 17th August, 2011.

“The contents of the newspapers’ reports were different from the screaming headlines that were carried. That perhaps informed Chief Olusegun Obasanjo’s misplaced outburst to the effect of calling General Babangida a fool at 70.

“General Babangida still stands by the contents of that interview where he made allusion to the squander-mania that characterised Chief Obasanjo’s government with particular reference to the $16 billion reportedly wasted on a fruitless power project, as revealed by the National Assembly power probe panel.

“There was nothing extraordinary in what General IBB said to warrant Chief Obasanjo’s outburst and scathing remarks on the person of General Babangida.

“In the light of the above, he wishes to state arlier position.



unequivocally that the idea or notion or impression of a recant does not arise at all. His response to Chief Obasanjo’s outburst remains in force and valid, hence it will be wrong for anyone to report that “IBB recanted” on his earlier position.

“He will not allow history to record it for him that he kept mum when someone reportedly called him a fool. All the issues raised in his earlier response have not been contradicted by Chief Obasanjo save that he resorted to name-calling and abuse.

“He still holds the position very strongly that former President Obasanjo’s regime recorded the highest revenue in the history of Nigeria from independence in 1960 till 1999 when his government came into force. Over N16 trillion was shared among the three tiers of government during Obasanjo’s government, out of which about N7.4 trillion was spent by the Federal Government.



came into force. Over N16 trillion was shared among the three tiers of government during Obasanjo’s government, out of which about N7.4 trillion was spent by the Federal Government.

“This is aside from other non-oil income that accrued to his government within the same period. Needless to state that the government went on a spending spree, which culminated in several sharp practices and abuses, particularly in the privatisation exercise. The records are gradually becoming glaring for all to see, thanks to the National Assembly probe panel.

“IBB will be prepared to offer further clarification should the need arise but let it be recorded that there was nothing like recantation as previously reported.”

na generational curse, for all girls/women, no be thier fault

add rokiatu to the list @Mr. Cork lols

:d :d :d :d

good for her, but i would need some tools anyway. lolz,,,

nonsnse

eyahhhhhhh

nyc one