₦airaland Forum

Aemmyjah:
I should go to the lab to experiment that life can emerge from non-life. (something coming from nothing)

Truly I say unto thee, de play

YES It did.
It's fact that the whole accepts except cretin creationists who never entered the lab to check it 😂😂

Evolution is fact, if you don't like it, go into the lab and bring counter-evidence. You will win a Nobel prize with some cash money in dollars

LordReed:
LoLz. Abi o! He should print his Nairaland arguments and give it to the Nobel prize committee so that they can nominate him.

He wins here, evolution still keeps being accepted as fact.

I have begged him to enter the lab to find some actual evidence against it. No one takes internet ranting of cretin creationists seriously 😂

Aemmyjah:
Because evolution has met scientific approach successfully. And scientists have been able to produce life from non life and seen a monkey give birth to a human or they have found interlinking fossils or even a protozoa has evolved into a metazoa right?
Once upon a time, the whole world believed the earth was flat and hanging on some objects.
Cos a theory is common does not make it fact

You cannot disprove evidence by arguing all day on nairaland.
Why can't you get into the lab and bring some actual evidence against it? 😂😂
Let's see you try

Aemmyjah:
When atheists jam wetin pass them, they start talking nonsense
Why not Jesus of Wales?

Hope you realize that winning an argument on nairaland doesn't mean that evolution is not fact 😁

You just won on nairaland, the world will still see evolution as fact 🤣🤣

Aemmyjah:
Are you asking me?
I'm not an evolutionist sir
The thread is yours
Prove it to all

So you don't want evidence that can get by yourself?
You just want to be arguing all day on nairaland?
Son of Christ 😊

Aemmyjah:
Evolution as to the origin of life and diversity of species bah?

Do you want to perform the experiment or not? worshipper of Jesus christ of England

MightySparrow:
Evolution is an idea about how things evolve from virus to human..

I have been thinking about it, how is it that only dinosaurs and similar animals were objects of death by by whatever?

Evolution is not about how things evolve frm virus to humans.

Can you take some times to actually read about it instead making things up?

Maynmann:
I know you do, just saying, Stop been sympathetic sha

okay

Maynmann:
Stop been sympathetic sha.

If i come up to you and say “Jpqsd” exist, will you say “you don’t know”?, cause what is the difference between “God” and “Jpqsd”?
I can also fabricate features of Jpqsd, one of its features is omnikinesis.

If you are truly agnostic, you will be to everything, even leprachaun, santa and cartoon characters and not only to the English word “god”.

I agree with you na 😂
See wahala

Aemmyjah:
Atoms and gravity can be experimented in the lab using scientific approach
Who even questions Gravity and Atoms today?
Yet, they say Evolution is not just a theory but a fact and those who can't accept it are not intelligent.
Is that not brainwashing?

Abiogenesis which is their explanation to how life begun was long defeated by Louis Pasteur. note this, the probability of an accurate map of Nigeria with all the states and other details appearing by just pouring a paint on the wall is far higher than life emerging by chance.

The foundation of evolution is deadly shaky but they embrace it cos they love the philosophy behind it - live as you like, you're accountable to yourself only

evolution can be explained in the lab also.

I can give you an experiment that proves it that you can perform on your own if you have enough brain power to do it.

MightySparrow:
Evolution still remains a theory, a supposition that the truth about it is not fully known. Some guys were trying to go beyond procedures to make us believe that theory is verity. It is not. Evolution theory has too many questions to answer.

There are so many extrapolations scientists have to make to plot a straight line graph to justify their claims.
Evolution is not as easy as 'gravity'. Even, gravity is a fact but not fully known. Atoms are a fact, but not fully known. Big bang looks reasonable to scientists but still a theory. Billions of dollars are being spent to find out if what was conjectured is true. The more you search, the complex the outcome becomes.
Will we know everything? Never!

Atomic Theory, is atom a theory?
Cell theory, is cell a theory?
Gravitational theory, is gravity a theory?

Don't you think that you have a wrong interpretation of what a "scientific theory" is?

Evolution is fact and also a theory in science.

Maynmann:
That’s been sympathetic, if you say a thing exist, you will have to define that thing first , state the features and prove that it does exist.
If you can’t prove it with evidence, it can be rejected without evidence.

Also in religion, Zeus is a God, so if you were asked if there is evidence for zeus, you will say you don’t know?
Not to forget that zeus was worshipped in ancient israel longer than we have worshipped Abrahamaic gods.

If i come up to you and say “Jpqsd” exist, will you say “you don’t know”?, cause what is the difference between “God” and “Jpqsd”?

I don't want to engage you because you like long and unending arguments. So I agree with you for peace to reign.

kkins25:
No. If i say there is no God, I'd be right because, indeed, there's none. No single human can prove it.

I don't think it's right for you to say there's no God if there is no evidence for or against it. It makes sense to just say "I don't know" if we should consider every concept of God.

Forcing a child to "believe" is brainwashing. If there is no cup on the table and i teach the child that there is no Cup, is that brainwashing?

you should also not force children to believe there's no God until we have evidence.

excanny:
A little about my background. I was raised as a religious Christian and made to read the Bible from start to end continuously on a yearly basis. This deep studying exposed me to seeing the many inconsistencies in the Bible and question my beliefs.

I also spent some time studying some other religious texts from Islam(English versions of Quran and haddiths), Buddhism and some Hinduism, before accepting Atheism as what works for me.

My utmost desire is to raise my children as straight up Atheists, no need wasting thing on fake concepts like religions, but at same time with good morals(logical, truthful, kind, trustworthy, and a couple of good societal values).

But I've been wondering whether it's ideal to expose them to religious texts, so they can easily see the fallacies of religions or to completely ignore religious texts and focus on scientific reasoning and logic?

Anyone in same boat?

you have to allow them explore religion by making them know what it entails, as they are studying religion it makes it easier for you talk them against being religious based on logic.
If they don't understand religion, they might end up falling for it someday.
Train them to always question everything including what they have learnt from religion

Aemmyjah:

it's funny because you are sciolist.
Darwin theory has been superceded by modern synthetic theory of evolution the moment we discovered genetics.

Darwin theory didn't know about genetics. Get yourself updated, Jesus worshiper

Aemmyjah:
You don't know how to read?
How many of darwin's theories have been demonstrated in the lab using the 'scientific approach' and they came to be true? None.
But cos it is your father, Darwin, there is no problem

Darwin's theory is outdated. Since about 75years now.

Get yourself updated

basilo101:
Comparing straight line without curved line. Also comparison length with width

if I do the curve, Onitsha is still small. Should I?

[quote author= post=124260472]You are measuring the road download Google satellite map and do proper measure, stop confusing yourself, have you drive from headbridge Onitsha to Awka via old road I hope you know you can't see forest although your journey, it been built up, do the measurement with Google[/quote]to shows your that the longest road n onitsha is nowhere near those in other bugs cities.
If gives an insight as to how large onitsha is

Putinofrussia:
Maybe or is it oil?
Governors policies at times but I know that Makinde in Oyo will seat up when he sees that Oyo is retrogressing under him.

Well, let's see

basilo101:
Onitsha was the earliest established city around that axis

😂😂😂😂
Delta state is part of Onitsha according to you 🤣🤣

author= post=124260216]

Onitsha to ogidi 12km

Borokiri to oyigbo in port Harcourt, 30km

Onitsha is small

[quote author= post=124260071][/quote]Onitsha to ogidi is shorter than these distance within Aba, abia state.

Aba is about more than 3 times the size of Onitsha

basilo101:
That is where your ignorance originates from. When they rate Onitsha high, it's not because of Onitsha but all population clusters in that axis. So you can now rest

So why is not that Onitsha is part of Asaba metro 😂😂

basilo101:
We are talking about Nnewi to Orlu you are talking about Obosi

orlu is alps part of Onitsha metro. Should we add Enugu as well 😂

basilo101:
Do you have continuous sprawl between them? Do you know better than Google

this guy, you are funny 😂

Asaba is part of Onitsha metro 😂😂

[quote author= post=124259728]You're wrong, Onitsha is not the only ubernized town in Anambra state, Anambra is second densely populated state in Nigeria after Lagos[/quote]Onitsha is too small to be

basilo101:
What of the Oba, Ojoto, Nnewi, Orlu axis the you deliberately cut off from your map?

going your logic, umuahia is part of Aba metro 😂😂

basilo101:
What of the Oba, Ojoto, Nnewi, Orlu axis the you deliberately cut off from your map?

Nnewi is part of Onitsha metro 😂😂🚉

Where are you from? 🤣

basilo101:
The data is a well known data. Onitsha two LGA is 52 km square

add Ogidi and Obosi, Onitsha is not up to 350km.

Should I do it?

basilo101:
You lack in depth understanding of the subject matter. For your information Asaba is part of Onitsha metro. Owerri is close to joining. The point here is population clusters not cultural affinity

😂😂😂
Adding Asaba to onitsha is foolish

basilo101:
Now that is where your ignorance is coming from. Those places are part of Onitsha metro

I know your map, I know Anambra state very well. Trust me, you can't fool me

basilo101:
That figure is for Onitsha South and Onitsha north LGA.

Ogidi and Obosi is not in Onitsha South or North, they are in idemili.

Onitsha metropolitan area is made up of Onitsha south and north, Obosi, Nkpor and some parts of Ogidi.

I know onitsha very well, it's small