₦airaland Forum

MightySparrow:
That would be fine.
For a nonexistent Robin Hood

HellVictorinho6:
more like other tinz mata more to u. survival has been very hard 4 me.

EMILO2STAY:
you are the dumbo. why should an ant on a basket ball not feel curvature? if the ant moves around the ball at a point the ant would be upside down and sides ways yet you think it would not feel curvature , what dumb example!!'

if the earth is curved 8inch/mile square as given by spherical earth scientist proponents it follows that buildings on the earh should not be standing parallel to each other and bridge collumns should not be parallel too, heck even planes would have to account for curvature by dipping their nose down wards at 5min intervals to account for curvature of the earth.

gravity is nonsense found by one man and proven by non. the only proof for gravity is said to be when a ball with bigger mass attracts another with smaller mass. this example has never been seen anywhere in the world .

what you call science is nonsense and the bible is a book that proves itself both in history and true scientific fact. not the nonsense we are taught in school called science. so shut up.

EMILO2STAY:
you are the dumbo. why should an ant on a basket ball not feel curvature? if the ant moves around the ball at a point the ant would be upside down and sides ways yet you think it would not feel curvature , what dumb example!!'

if the earth is curved 8inch/mile square as given by spherical earth scientist proponents it follows that buildings on the earh should not be standing parallel to each other and bridge collumns should not be parallel too, heck even planes would have to account for curvature by dipping their nose down wards at 5min intervals to account for curvature of the earth.

gravity is nonsense found by one man and proven by non. the only proof for gravity is said to be when a ball with bigger mass attracts another with smaller mass. this example has never been seen anywhere in the world .

what you call science is nonsense and the bible is a book that proves itself both in history and true scientific fact. not the nonsense we are taught in school called science. so shut up.

wegevv:
Lol

Scholars of today study antiquity. They study what happened back then. The scholars of today, who study what happened back then, virtually all agree that Jesus existed. Google is your friend

You don’t have to believe them though ❤️

wegevv:
I’ve just realised you have assumed “scholars of antiquity” meant the “scholars who existed during antiquity” 😂. I guess I can only apologise for the confusion.

A “scholar of antiquity” refers to someone in the present time who studies antiquity (the ancient times). Similar to a “scholar of anthropology” for example.

I’ve assumed you were arguing in bad faith but maybe you’re just not aware of what I’m referencing. You can find various forums, subreddits, YouTube channels etc where the very best scholars of antiquity discuss their evidence for why they believe Jesus existed and on the other hand why they can’t say King Arthur existed at all ❤️. It’s mostly based on study of literature.

CC: mightysparrow, I caused the confusion so apologies to you too ❤️

MightySparrow:
In what ways are people affected by Robin Hood? Who are his followers. What is his interaction with people today.

HellVictorinho6:
they MAY see no flaw till u die with ur atheism. u cant speak 4 them. nah 50-50, u wan coach dem say their mama get wetin u call craze while she call am faith 4 head,omoh she sef go laff u, the religious girl wey i dey call 'friend' just dey make me speechless with her god stuff,i no fit laff,no fit cry, na to change topic be my way out cuz even tho i still dey go church ,life no dey do me reach thank god level again. even if i see 30 billion,i go reason why i suppose need am to survive,as in my brain dey too curious 4 religious tinz, at the end pastor go use money,not bible, run church but those books and articles wey una dey write/quote as ,budaatum,Maynman,etc. all na for drama too,as in,e dey make person dey para ,dey play,dey jonz,dey cap,dey whatever unto infinity.

MightySparrow:
If you read my post well, I said Jesus is both historical and contemporaneous. All other historical figures dried and rotten in their graves. Jesus is alive and still shows Himself to people when necessary. His story is still ongoing. Mohammed died, Confucius, Gatama Bhudda, and all other prophets. Jesus lives on. Not only that He lives, He still shows Himself to people. Who knows? You could be the next.

MightySparrow:
Have you read the books of Tactics 100A.D. Flavius Josephus Herodotus?

wegevv:
What are you saying 😂

You have to combine the meaning of the two words my bro lol

You must be trolling me at this point lol

wegevv:
Lol I posted it there

Here again for you ❤️

antiquity: the ancient past, especially the period of classical and other human civilizations before the Middle Ages.

wegevv:
scholar: a specialist in a particular branch of study, especially the humanities.

antiquity: the ancient past, especially the period of classical and other human civilizations before the Middle Ages.

wegevv:
Type “did Jesus exist” on google and go from there my friend. It’s not some hidden secret ❤️

wegevv:
Type “did Jesus exist” on google and go from there my friend. It’s not some hidden secret ❤️

wegevv:
There is evidence he existed. Just not the type you're looking for lol. According to you there is no evidence for anyone that existed 2000 years ago actually existed.

There is evidence in literature that Jesus existed. Mostly non-religious people have researched this and have consensus. But I guess it is all just one big conspiracy.

wegevv:
The general public is mostly anti-christian. That is not news. Virtually all scholars who have done research say he existed

wegevv:
The general public is mostly anti-christian. That is not news. Virtually all scholars who have done research say he existed

wegevv:
It's not true. Virtually all scholars believe he existed based on research not faith

wegevv:
There's no evidence it is a fallacy lol

You refuse to accept that any historical figures from a certain time exists based on your standards. That is fine my bro. Free country

wegevv:
There's no evidence it is a fallacy lol

You refuse to accept that any historical figures from a certain time exists based on your standards. That is fine my bro. Free country

wegevv:
I've previously admitted I'm a zombie. Just don't see the logical consistency in looking for the type of evidence that no one expects to exist for historical figures of a certain time lol

wegevv:
Historical scholars do not have consensus on Robin Hood even though he was thought to exists after Jesus. That's how strong the literature evidence is for historical figures like Jesus and Alexander the Great who existed much earlier

wegevv:
Historical scholars do not have consensus on Robin Hood even though he was thought to exists after Jesus. That's how strong the literature evidence is for historical figures like Jesus and Alexander the Great who existed much earlier

wegevv:
Again I obviously accept that Newton existed. My arguments are to show that based on your standard one could easily argue that Isaac Newton didn't exist because there is no empirical evidence. And he only died a couple hundred years ago.

But the standard that most scholars use for historical figures is different. The further back you go the harder it is but still virtually all scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed because there is enough written about them from various sources.

Based on your standard no one can prove that any historical figure from over a thousand years ago existed lol.

MightySparrow:
There are a lot of evidences of His existence. I have argued with some people that claim that there is no God. If the claim is true, why does He have many messagers and His history meanders through all civilizations?
Even now, as Moses, Paul, Ezekiel had encounters with Jesus, many still have same today. After an encounter, you don't doubt. The outcome of such encounters made people to believe in them.


Jesus is not only a historical person, He is also a contemporary person. All other Gods speak only by oracles, Jesus is different.

However, you don't compel His encounters. He gives to whoever at His discretion.

So, Jesus exists.

MightySparrow:
There are a lot of evidences of His existence. I have argued with some people that claim that there is no God. If the claim is true, why does He have many messagers and His history meanders through all civilizations?
Even now, as Moses, Paul, Ezekiel had encounters with Jesus, many still have same today. After an encounter, you don't doubt. The outcome of such encounters made people to believe in them.


Jesus is not only a historical person, He is also a contemporary person. All other Gods speak only by oracles, Jesus is different.

However, you don't compel His encounters. He gives to whoever at His discretion.

So, Jesus exists.

wegevv:
We have gone from "Jesus never existed because there is no evidence" to "Aside from the bible".

But despite moving the goal post, majority of scholars in this area do point to evidence outside the bible that Jesus existed. A quick google will tell you that.



PS: pretty sure your believe that Isaac Newton did exist is based on your reliance on authority on the matter not any evidence you have seen lol

wegevv:
We have gone from "Jesus never existed because there is no evidence" to "Aside from the bible".

But despite moving the goal post, majority of scholars in this area do point to evidence outside the bible that Jesus existed. A quick google will tell you that.

PS: pretty sure your believe that Isaac Newton did exist is based on your reliance on authority on the matter not any evidence you have seen lol

wegevv:
Saying you don't know he existed is different to saying you don't believe he existed. I believe we have made some progress lol ❤️

wegevv:
I mean I don't think so either. But someone could follow the same reasoning you're following and conclude that Isaac Newton didn't exists. The fact that there is a house somewhere that people claim he lived in or there are humans today claiming to be his descendants is not "empirical evidence" is it lol.

wegevv:
You said you don't believe he existed. Do you have evidence he never existed? lol

You say you couldn't find evidence he existed. I'm assuming you read the reasons why virtually all those scholars believe he existed. But you decided to believe he never existed without evidence he didn't exists?

Doesn't seem like a logically coherent position to take to me