₦airaland Forum

sholypopz: Is that a diss??

sholypopz: lol....
No, I haven't seen that. Will watch soon. Seriously thinking of buying his book though

sholypopz: I posted a video to you last night. You're the only seemingly semi-intelligent person I know on this thread, I thought u would find it interesting.

sholypopz: 2legit's boo just said eba makes one's boobz grow bigger

Hollup, I need to order garri online

2legit2qwt: Why?

ibkaye: I'm young o, I'm 14, I know child marriage has been a trending topic for a while but...

sholypopz: ^^Banned!

rich_john: @ZN and datz a careless oversight that institution may never recover from
There's no law that says T& Cs can't be altered the challenge here is there's isn't a previous similar case like this! Both sides have valid grounds lets see how it goes anyway
Banks and financial houses are delicate places customers might feel their funds aren't safe anymore if this magnitude of error can occur!
The creditcompany is only swimming in more murky waters if they continue with a legal tussle with this crook!

Kgdavid: wrong! obviously there was no such clause and even if there was, it would be meaningless. both parties have a right to review a contract before signing and like someone earlier said the amendment to the contract would be viewed not as an amendment to the original contract but as a counter offer to the original contract. therefore, such a clause is completely meaningless except if the amendment was physically made on the original contract agreement. it is absolutely not the responsibility of the offeror to highlight the provisions and clauses of a contract. that is the reason why you are given a contract agreement to read and sign on. ceteris paribus, there is no case against the man.

eddiebruk: Some of ya'all just want to comment to feel good, rather you failed to read and understand that the bank actually read the agreement and accepted his conditions knowingly if not they wouldn't have provided him with an Unlimited Credit Card which was one of his terms in that agreement.

Crassus: Every time the bank failed to comply with the rules, he would fine them 3m rubles (£58,716). If Tinkoff tried to cancel the contract, it would have to pay him 6m rubles. Tinkoff apparently failed to read the amendments, signed the contract and sent Mr Argakov a credit card .

HARDDON: who is really at fault?

shouldnt the bank have re read the docs b4 signing just to be sure?

his argument would be that he made adjustments and forwarded it to the bank for consideration, which they did concur to.

hook on the neck .cant cough it out, cant swallow it.hehehe

francisbiz: It's a very tricky a one, not going to be a straight case. The case is going to drag afar, involving the best of it proof and counter proof.
1, The bank must proof beyond doubt that the credit card was tampered with and that the card could indeed be tampered with.
2, The producers of the credit card for the bank are going to face an uphill task to prove that the impute in the card was re-written and would also face serious business risk by admitting publicly that there version of credit card can be so easily manipulated .
3, The bank customer can deny that he did not tamper with the card impute, after-all their were no witnesses. But his background must be dug into and they may find out that he could be a trained IT expert and majored in software hacking. If similar activities could be traced to him, then he ma go in for it.
The property owners may have a back-up prototype of the credit card.
[b]THIS CASE WILL BRING OUT THE BEST OF I.T. BRAIN STORMING![/b]

What are you yammering about?

Who said anything about the plastic card? Did you even read the darned article?

Wu Zetian: Yeah, I bought one.

When playing a Youtube video with a resolution as low as 480, the video still lags on my tv screen. It's slow, and I can't be bothered. The audio is at the same pace as what is showing on my laptop screen though..........

Oh well, this is their first try. I should hv gotten roku, heard it works better.

Wu Zetian: So who has bought the chrome cast??