Why should treaties of yester year to which we were not party come into play. This is not Britain and China over Hong Kong. Nigerians and Camerounians were not party to those treaties and we did not ratify the modern declarations, so they are not binding.

The ICJ judgment was backed up by the United Nations, whose charter potentially allowed sanctions to enforce the courts ruling.

They stepped in as mediator. In all this time, there was opposition from the Bakassi inhabitants to being transferred to Cameroun.

They are Nigerians, whose ancestors have lived on that land since time immemorial. Their claim to the land is as indigenes, not settlers as the case with the Falkland Islands and yet the British protected their rights and have stated that unless they agree in a referendum to be part of Argentina, their sovereignty will always be protected.

They went to war to protect the islanders right to self-determination. We did not make a stand. We did not fight for our people, for the indigenous people of Bakassi.http://leadership.ng/nga/hamza_atta/39134/2012/11/04/betrayal_bakassi.html

F-U-C-K 0Ff and move on....btw stop typing sh..iot.. Cameroonian Gendarmes never ra.ped nigerians(children nd women) ..enough will the bs .u keep feeding people with lies .whats ur mission..what u guys want...m going to Write to seun.. u can accuse people without backing up it with proofs...

Stop talking about Bakassi...whydou care about a Cameroonian land

Go and Gorilla the Nigeria media. Anumanu!

Bush woman get educated and stop playing with nigerians sentiments Bakassi belongs to Cameroon...Ewu...nso zut