inspiredbyGOD:.:
what exists between two universes in a multiverse is v and e
Uni ve rse
v & e are in the middle so they exist between two universes, therefore since ve is sometimes used to indicate positive and negative, we can deduce that both positi[b]ve[/b] and negati[b]ve[/b] atoms exist between two universes. ve is what exists between two universes in a multiverse.

________________________
Okay, I'm just kidding. I also want to know the answer to that question (not that I even understand it).

Mr_Anony:
Lol, I'll explain it to you in a nutshell:

The universe is believed to have started because of the big bang which is said to be the origin of space and time. Usually when a theist argues the that if space and time began to exist, then the cause of space and time must be one that transcends space and time.(Kalam cosmological argument)
The atheist usually disagrees saying that it is impossible to make sense of any being that is spaceless and timeless.

The next argument that a theist presents is that the fine-tuning of the universes in the sense that the universe follows a very specific order is an indication that the universe has a designer.
The atheist usually counters by citing the multiverse theory which is that the universe is not alone but is part of an infinitely large number of universes ordered in many different ways.

I believe that the big bang theory contradicts the multiverse theory because if space and time started locally in each universe, then whatever is inbetween any two universes cannot possibly be space so what is it?

It seems to me that on one hand the atheist denies that a spaceless and timeless realm exists but on the other hand indirectly admits spaceless and timeless realm when he/she cites the multiverse theory (which by the way has no scientific proof/evidence whatsoever). I am really interested in finding out how his/her explanation for reality works.

Do you follow?

inspiredbyGOD:.:
ehrm..... ehrm.... *scratches head* I think I will manage the creation story in the bible, straightforward and precise. All in a bid to disprove the existence of God, scientist keep coming out with all these baseless theories. (anyway, I'm following)

Mr_Anony:
if space and time started locally in each universe, then whatever is inbetween any two universes cannot possibly be space so what is it?

Logicboy03: Thank god for this thread........


More and more threads have come up showing that christians have a fundamental misunderstanding and dislike for atheism;

atheism = science.




Furthermore, the moment science cant explain something, atheism is false and God is real (argument from ignorance). This is where the dubious christian comes ine.



Knowing that the multiverse theory is only a hypothesis with many versions, the dubious christian comes in and asks a question that has no solid answer. What sane reason could we give for asking such a question?



Should this question be here or in the science/technology section?

Reyginus: So much talk but no answer.

Logicboy03:


1) You people hate to read anything that doesnt confirm your bias. Read my comment again


2) Read the first sentence of your signature.

Logicboy03: Thank god for this thread........


More and more threads have come up showing that christians have a fundamental misunderstanding and dislike for atheism;

atheism = science.




Furthermore, the moment science cant explain something, atheism is false and God is real (argument from ignorance). This is where the dubious christian comes ine.



Knowing that the multiverse theory is only a hypothesis with many versions, the dubious christian comes in and asks a question that has no solid answer. What sane reason could we give for asking such a question?



Should this question be here or in the science/technology section?

Mr_Anony:
Yawn...........I have not made an argument, I have only asked a question that suggests that the big bang theory and the multiverse theory are logically incompatible. You can either accept one and reject the other or you can explain how they are not logically incompatible. Since you claim there are many versions, feel free to point at any of the versions of the multiverse hypothesis that does not contradict the big bang theory.

It is very dubious of you to call someone dubious for asking a very straightforward question just because it is difficult for you to answer it. You have to understand that there are some things you are ignorant about and a person is not dubious because he/she asked questions that exposed your ignorance.

....and no this question does not belong in the science and technology section because the arguments the question points to are mainstays regularly featuring in the religion section in theist/atheist debates.

I asked a question. You gave no answer.

Logicboy03:
1) The big bang theory and the multiverse hypothesis are not incompatible

Reyginus: Mr logic, do you understand the question at all.
1. By implication, you hold them to be true and compatible. Now, the question is, before the big ba.ng, what interface was connecting our universe with the others?
2. What is dubious about the question?

Mr_Anony:
Please tell us exactly how so

Mr_Anony: Hi everyone, just a question I've been pondering over. Here it is:


If the multiverse theory is true, what exists between any two universes?

Logicboy03:



What was the point of the video in my comment?

Logicboy03:
A black hole?

Or what if there are no boundaries, just distance? Did u think of that?

Logicboy03:


Do I hold the multiverse hypothesis to be true?

Yawn. note the word "hypothesis".




You can either read my earlier comment and see why the question is dubious or you can continue acting the fool.

Logicboy03:


A black hole?


Or what if there are no boundaries, just distance? Did u think of that?

Mr_Anony:
I didn't glean anything that answers my question from the video. If you insist there is, please cite the times in the video so I can watch it again.

Mr_Anony:
Lol, Really?

Mr_Anony:
what do you mean by distance? I thought distance was a spatially defined property. . . .but space and time started with the big bang so where is this "distance" between two universes originating from?

Reyginus: huh? Now you hold the multiverse to be true?
To your question, do you bother asking yourself what makes a distance?

Logicboy03:

Can you tell your dumbazz brother to shut up, Anony?


Anony, stop this christian hypocrisy and be ready to tell the truth to christians who are ignorant of science. Tell this guy to keep quiet and let the big boys do the debate?

Reyginus: Lololol.
Your problem is with elementary physics. Distance equals change in displacement over a period of time. How then can the boundary be distance when the points of displacement are yet to be pronounced? Talk more time

Logicboy03:

Ode, that was the point; what if there is no boundary, only distance?

Reyginus: Logicboy, I wonder how you learn. You made a blunder instead of offering an apology, you're to spin the points into retardation.
Their is no way it can be distance when their is no space to accomodate the gap.

Logicboy03:

Mr_Anony: Hi everyone, just a question I've been pondering over. Here it is:

If the multiverse theory is true, what exists between any two universes?

Logicboy03:
When Dan Barker was talking about planck time were you deaf? Seconds which we dont know what happened in the beginning. Dan Barker was saying that within that time anything could have happened- we just dont know.


Remember, the multiverse is a hypothesis, no evidence for it exists.

I meant a wormhole

The unknown seconds after the big bang? Did you think of that?

Also, what if this universe came from the blackhole of another universe?

This is the problem with hypothesis/educated guesses, you run into many imaginary/philosophical answers.

Logicboy03:

Can you tell your dumbazz brother to shut up, Anony?


Anony, stop this christian hypocrisy and be ready to tell the truth to christians who are ignorant of science. Tell this guy to keep quiet and let the big boys do the debate?