mikeansy:

Lol Jonathan was elected in 2011 and willie was elected in 2013

Did you pay attention to the total number of registered voters in Anambra?

Did it occur to you that it is possible for less people to take part in anambra guber election being that their election is held in a different year that is not the nationwide election year?

This is how you guys gather conjectures and present them as facts

Interesting how less people take part in gubernatorial election

Obiagelli:
Interesting how less people take part in gubernatorial election

It happens everywhere even in America

Less people take part in mid term elections than general elections

In any case your argument will not stand up to scrutiny in a court of law that is why no one has taken it up!

I was expecting you to show me where it says there are 400k registered voters in anambra or that only 400k voted in anambra in 2011 but somehow Jonathan got 1.4 million votes?

You can't compare 2 unrelated events and present the difference as though there is a direct correlation! You need to try harder!

This is why we ask for your evidence. You have been exposed!

mikeansy:

It happens everywhere even in America

Less people take part in mid term elections than general elections

In any case your argument will not stand up to scrutiny in a court of law that is why no one has taken it up!

I was expecting you to show me where it says there are 400k registered voters in anambra or that only 400k voted in anambra in 2011 but somehow Jonathan got 1.4 million votes?

You can't compare 2 unrelated events and present the difference as though there is a direct correlation! You need to try harder!

This is why we ask for your evidence. You have been exposed!

Disparity of over 600k voters begs questions

agabaI23:
Well I am one of those who believe that it is still possible to tame them. If the tamil tigers were rounded up and disarmed, then I think anything is possible

Just so you know,it took the government of Sri Lanka thirty (30) years to beat the Tamil rebels.Do not make it seem like it happened in one go.

EMANY01:

Just so you know,it took the government of Sri Lanka thirty (30) years to beat the Tamil rebels.Do not make it seem like it happened in one go.

But they were defeated. It doesnt have to take 30 years here.

Obiagelli:
Interesting how less people take part in gubernatorial election

Yes it does, even the 2011 poll showed similar trend in Northern States . . . .

Gubernatorial Presidential

Bauchi 1,219,269 1,610,094

Benue 559,134 1,047,709


Similar trend can be found in Gombe, JIgawa, Kano e.t.c . . .

dridowu: So Ihejirika has no proof yet he name El-Rufai has one of the brain behind boko ? Then while naming without concrete proof but El-Rufai on the hand provide the link to its news where Ihejirka was named not that he categorically mention Ihejirka name , the link is AriseTv , a sister company to Thisday Newspaper, which most PDP lovers believe they are unbias in their work ?
Now who do we blame El-Rufai, AriseTv, Ihejirika , Australian Negatiator or Boko Boiz ?

Have you never had the term"actionable intelligence" ?
In a nutshell it means you suspect an individual / group is responsible for something and your intelligence "sources" indicate that they are indeed responsible .Your intelligence service also has the fortune of finding evidence that confirms the suspicions and intelligence.With actionable intelligence you can act:arrest,prosecute and war(in the case of nation states).
Finding evidence for something you know someone is doing/has done is not as easy as you think it is.The target of the suspicion only needs to be halfway intelligent to avoid creating a connection between themselves and the act(s) they are suspected off.Examples of this situation abound:
In the US most of the mafia bosses could not be arrested not to mention prosecuted even when everyone and their mother knew how dirty and evil they were in some cases the FBI used tangential case like tax evasion to send a major crime boss to jail for 25 years because they couldn't "link him" (note the phrase) to the crimes of racketeering,murder,drug dealing and smuggling that they "knew" he was forehead deep involved in.They "knew" but couldn't touch him just like the president said he "knows" BokoHaram sponsors.
In the US and Europe there are individuals who are known to the intelligence services as being involved in terrorism and plans to commit terrorist attacks but the only put them on surveillance because while they "know" the can not prove it especially when such suspects know the they are "persons of interest" .Even with the massive surveillance some of them still get to do what they plan to do.
Knowing and proving are two different things in these days of "CIVIL Rights".You may know and be 100% right in what you know but if you can't prove it then you can not "ACT".
Knowing is not the problem ,getting proof is the challenge the world over a situation made all that much harder for Nigeria with the deliberate underdevelopment the security services had to put up with since 1985 mind you.
If GEJ or the SSS or the COAS or any other security service head come on stage to list out the sponsors they are sure of but have not gotten actionable Intel on ,you will crucify them saying its political.

.

EMANY01:

Have you never had the term"actionable intelligence" ?
In a nutshell it means you suspect an individual / group is responsible for something and your intelligence "sources" indicate that they are indeed responsible .Your intelligence service also has the fortune of finding evidence that confirms the suspicions and intelligence.With actionable intelligence you can act:arrest,prosecute and war(in the case of nation states).
Finding evidence for something you know someone is doing/has done is not as easy as you think it is.The target of the suspicion only needs to be halfway intelligent to avoid creating a connection between themselves and the act(s) they are suspected off.Examples of this situation abound:
In the US most of the mafia bosses could not be arrested not to mention prosecuted even when everyone and their mother knew how dirty and evil they were in some cases the FBI used tangential case like tax evasion to send a major crime boss to jail for 25 years because they couldn't "link him" (note the phrase) to the crimes of racketeering,murder,drug dealing and smuggling that they "knew" he was forehead deep involved in.They "knew" but couldn't touch him just like the president said he "knows" BokoHaram sponsors.
In the US and Europe there are individuals who are known to the intelligence services as being involved in terrorism and plans to commit terrorist attacks but the only put them on surveillance because while they "know" the can not prove it especially when such suspects know the they are "persons of interest" .Even with the massive surveillance some of them still get to do what they plan to do.
Knowing and proving are two different things in these days of "CIVIL Rights".You may know and be 100% right in what you know but if you can't prove it then you can not "ACT".
Knowing is not the problem ,getting proof is the challenge the world over a situation made all that much harder for Nigeria with the deliberate underdevelopment the security services had to put up with since 1985 mind you.
If GEJ or the SSS or the COAS or any other security service head come on stage to list out the sponsors they are sure of but have not gotten actionable Intel on ,you will crucify them saying its political.

Thank you.