NagodeAllah1:


IS has about 2 billion USD in run money from things like oil (2 million USD a day in revenue) and private sources. Much of the military equipment was gained in battle.

The taliban is a separate group and not part of AQ or IS. They are mujahideen in Afghanistan and they have videos, magazine, etc. They do not do foreign recruitment like IS so do not have same need.

Isis captured the main Iraqi oil refinery at Baiji early this year(june 24th) to be precise. Where was the funding coming from before the sale of oil in the black market? What does the taliban stand to gain from the conflict?
I know the taliban founded by mullah omar is different from AQ. There's been a fusion of ideology and tactics between the two since the american invasion.
If the Iraqi army had those weapons originally, I don't think ISIS would have captured them in the first instance. Why did the US insist that nura al malaki must leave before they will help the iraqi army fight ISIS.
The Us is running with the hare and hunting with the wolves at the same time.

seagulsntrawler:

Isis captured the main Iraqi oil refinery at Baiji early this year(june 24th) to be precise. Where was the funding coming from before the sale of oil in the black market?

Before the oil IS had other assets. Money from when they were with AQ. Other battles. Private funding.

seagulsntrawler:

What does the taliban stand to gain from the conflict?

Nothing except that IS (and JN) are their brothers in jihad.

seagulsntrawler:

I know the taliban founded by mullah omar is different from AQ. There's been a fusion of ideology and tactics between the two since the american invasion.

Yes. But the taliban and AQ were never one group, only have fought side by side. IS was part of AQ at one time but never taliban who are mujahideen in Afghanistan.

seagulsntrawler:

If the Iraqi army had those weapons originally, I don't think ISIS would have captured them in the first instance.

Remember before Iraq IS had weapons from Syria. They were prepared.

seagulsntrawler:

Why did the US insist that nura al malaki must leave before they will help the iraqi army fight ISIS.
The Us is running with the hare and hunting with the wolves at the same time.

The USA wants to destroy Muslims and run the middle-east, that is no secret. But they are not with IS. USA supports the FSA rebels in Syria. In Iraq I do not know who USA are backing only it is not IS or AQ.

NagodeAllah1:


Before the oil IS had other assets. Money from when they were with AQ. Other battles. Private funding.




Nothing except that IS (and JN) are their brothers in jihad.



Yes. But the taliban and AQ were never one group, only have fought side by side. IS was part of AQ at one time but never taliban who are mujahideen in Afghanistan.



Remember before Iraq IS had weapons from Syria. They were prepared.



The USA wants to destroy Muslims and run the middle-east, that is no secret. But they are not with IS. USA supports the FSA rebels in Syria. In Iraq I do not know who USA are backing only it is not IS or AQ.

I agree with some of your analysis, however, the thinking in the middle east is that ISIS is a big american-israeli psyop. The aim is to taint
islam and make moslems look bad.
It may surprise you that AQ, JN,AQIM,al shaabab, LET in pakistan and a host of others are western backed and actively financed through proxies. The french govt has a very strong link with islamist in algeria and the mayhem unleashed in the 90s cannot be rivaled by what JN is doing in Nigeria presently. ISIS is a big psyop targeted at moslems with fundings coming from qatar, KSA, US and its allies and their over all agenda is to unleash terror in the middle east and to drag shia iran,syria, and hezzbollah into a much wider conflict that may last the next 10 years or more.

The big military contractors in the US tend to profit from conflicts involving the US, all around the world. The Bin laden family and Bush family jointly own and coordinate the activities of Carlyle group a military hardware manufacturer and contractor. The bin laden terrorist image was milked to the fullest by the Bush family even though he died in late 2001 and never claimed responsibility for 9\11. If you check the FBI website, you will find a $25m bounty on his head but 9/11 was not listed among the numerous crimes alleged against him. Just like ISIS 9\11 was equally a psyop by the US and Israeli cos no Jewish life was lost.
The bin laden family were the only one allowed to fly their private jet out of the US in spite of the complete lock down on flights. I think you should do some more findings about ISIS.

Cheers

US never created IS but they support small groups like kurds and others that will later grow bigger than IS and then giving the world a more sleepless night.

US is evil.

femmy2010:


US Never created Islami State(ISIS or ISIL), they emanated from the Taliban.
Get your facts right and not mislead peeps.
The Kurds and many other moderate are the ones the US and it's allies have always supported and are currently fighting the progression of the IS fighters.
Thanks to the US alliance area bombardment they have been able to repel IS advancement into a strategic Syrian town of Kobani.
NOTE - IS declared Caliphate spread through Iraq and Syria.
IS is a thread to the world and their fellow Muslims inclusive as Muslims have been 80% of their victims so far.