Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,153,120 members, 7,818,361 topics. Date: Sunday, 05 May 2024 at 01:30 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" (38323 Views)
Buhari, Saraki At International Islamic Conference (Pics) / Jonathan At OIC Summit With Leaders From Islamic Countries (photo) / Osinbajo Chides Jonathan For Attending OIC Meeting (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by abiolaabexyo(m): 9:40am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Religion issue can't solve wat is at hand now......, before u comment.. try to diagnose ur brain.... think abt d possible and impossible...... don't just guess....... try to read d post and comments.... and allow ur brain to do thorough understanding...... Vote GMB not to anyone.. it's just a comment :-XReligion issue can't solve wat is at hand now......, before u comment.. try to diagnose ur brain.... think abt d possible and impossible...... don't just guess....... try to read d post and comments.... and allow ur brain to do thorough understanding...... Vote GMB not to anyone.. it's just a comment |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by theV0ice: 9:40am On Jan 02, 2015 |
luvinhubby: You're the poor student of history and trends if you delude yourself into thinking that Nigeria will be islamised in 2015 by a man elected as president. You make it worse comparing the ottoman empire of over 800 years ago with a democracy in 2015. What else will you bring up? That calabar people will start killing twins again while we pray for another Mary slessor right? Then you must be scared they'll capture you and sell you into slavery which ended less than 300years ago too abi? If you want to be honest with yourself, when did turkey become a Muslim nation? Keep regurgitating empty propaganda if you wish 6 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by mikeczay: 9:41am On Jan 02, 2015 |
SeverusSnape:as long as their is improvement in standard of living i dont give a damn if nigeria chairs the commitee. 'islamized' qatar, dubai, malaysia are all miles ahead of our secular nation so wtf? 4 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by PenSniper: 9:41am On Jan 02, 2015 |
SuperModerator: The titbits are verifiable, historical facts while yours is assumption. 2 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Rexyl(m): 9:42am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Not today we get information about the origin of terrorism in Nigeria. Now that many are getting to know the root of their problems, they must challenge the Federal Government to do the needful. 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Galadimabawa: 9:43am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Let me fold my hand as d drame unfold |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by theV0ice: 9:45am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Rexyl: Its not just propaganda but a mischievous one at that. Once again, any adult Nigerian who believes an elected president will make rivers state adopt sharia is a child who needs some growing up to do 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by mustymatic(m): 9:45am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Rexyl:I'd like that Sir! But where? and tell me what I've said is untrue..thanks |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Lilimax(f): 9:45am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Horlawoomey:What does it take to Islamise a nation by this blood thirsty brain washed vampires?? ISIS are still recruiting on a daily basis and and we better not toll this part. |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by BTFormular: 9:46am On Jan 02, 2015 |
mikeczay:Trust me I have friends who school in north. The hausa and fulani man is not like those in qatar and malaysia oh. They will slit your throat and feed ur body to the margots. No risk am. If na yoruba muslim fine or even if na atiku. But not buhari 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by odave: 9:46am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Isiterere: Its all about money bro. If a rep/senator could vote in favour of child marriage, believe me money can buy any legislator, this is nigeria, all they need do is repackaging that its only sharia that can end corruption in nigeria and enough money for bribing, we mases who are against it will just be shouting and many won't join in because it favours them 2 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by tartar9(m): 9:47am On Jan 02, 2015 |
whats even the fuss about joining the OIC sef.christains and their paranoia. 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by ThePENGENIUS(m): 9:47am On Jan 02, 2015 |
SuperModerator: Judging from the last few lines of your post I can clearly tell you're a hustler trying hard to eke a living. I'd suggest you face your work and beg Jah to bless your hustle and stop putting your nose in matters intellectualy way above you!!!! |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by jireh250: 9:48am On Jan 02, 2015 |
drylman: Please what's the paragragh about...I can't seem to find it 2 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by rajiade: 9:48am On Jan 02, 2015 |
BTFormular: I know say you na Christian. When Muslim vote Obasanjo, no wahala. WheN dem vote GEJ 2011 no wahala. When all the Governors of South West be christain no wahala. Na now wey people come support a better person against d daft president na dt time religion come be issue. Why PDP no give Pat Utomi ticket against Buhari or whoever APC present . Abi na only the ode fromantic utueke be the best Christian for PDP? 3 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by mustymatic(m): 9:48am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Gfrey6:Prove me wrong my brother. The pastors are even buying arms to kill the same masses. 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by aspirebig: 9:48am On Jan 02, 2015 |
God will not allow their plans to come to pass, that is why some foreigners think that Nigeria is an Islamic country,since they always have people from that religion as leaders.It is things like sports that even make some countries know that there are other tribes in Nigeria. When will this madness stop? Is time we separate,let the south go their way,let the north go their way too. So each region can be ruling their people,control their resources,manage their wealth and employ their people. This marriage of the two is not working,all the issues that led to civil war 1967 to 1970 are still unresoved after 45yrs plus. No serious country in the world today is governed by old men,check US,UK,Qatar, etc. 2 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by makhez019(m): 9:48am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Remarks by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu During General Debate of the 68th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. The United Nations, New York City. Tuesday, October 1, 2013 PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: Thank you, Mr. President. I feel deeply honored and privileged to stand here before you today representing the citizens of the state of Israel. We are an ancient people. We date back nearly 4,000 years to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. We have journeyed through time. We’ve overcome the greatest of adversities. And we re-established our sovereign state in our ancestral homeland, the land of Israel. Now, the Jewish people’s odyssey through time has taught us two things: Never give up hope, always remain vigilant. Hope charts the future. Vigilance protects it. Today our hope for the future is challenged by a nuclear-armed Iran that seeks our destruction. But I want you to know, that wasn’t always the case. Some 2,500 years ago the great Persian king Cyrus ended the Babylonian exile of the Jewish people. He issued a famous edict in which he proclaimed the right of the Jews to return to the land of Israel and rebuild the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. That’s a Persian decree. And thus began an historic friendship between the Jews and the Persians that lasted until modern times. But in 1979 a radical regime in Tehran tried to stamp out that friendship. As it was busy crushing the Iranian people’s hope for democracy, it always led wild chants of “death of the Jews.” Now, since that time, presidents of Iran have come and gone. Some presidents were considered moderates, other hard-liners. But they’ve all served that same unforgiving creed, that same unforgiving regime, that creed that is espoused and enforced by the real power in Iran, the dictator known as the supreme leader, first Ayatollah Khomeini and now Ayatollah Khamenei. President Rouhani, like the presidents who came before him, is a loyal servant of the regime. He was one of only six candidates the regime permitted to run for office. See, nearly 700 other candidates were rejected. So what made him acceptable? Well, Rouhani headed Iran’s Supreme National Security Council from 1989 through 2003. During that time Iran’s henchmen gunned down opposition leaders in a Berlin restaurant. They murdered 85 people at the Jewish community center in Buenos Aires. They killed 19 American soldiers by blowing up the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. Are we to believe that Rouhani, the national security adviser of Iran at the time, knew nothing about these attacks? Of course he did, just as 30 years ago Iran’s security chiefs knew about the bombings in Beirut that killed 241 American Marines and 58 French paratroopers. Rouhani was also Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator between 2003 and 2005. He masterminded the — the strategy which enabled Iran to advance its nuclear weapons program behind a smoke screen of diplomatic engagement and very soothing rhetoric. Now I know: Rouhani doesn’t sound like Ahmadinejad. But when it comes to Iran’s nuclear weapons program, the only difference between them is this: Ahmadinejad was a wolf in wolf’s clothing. Rouhani is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, a wolf who thinks he can pull the eyes — the wool over the eyes of the international community. Well, like everyone else, I wish we could believe Rouhani’s words, but we must focus on Iran’s actions. And it’s the brazen contrast, this extraordinary contradiction, between Rouhani’s words and Iran’s actions that is so startling. Rouhani stood at this very podium last week and praised Iranian democracy — Iranian democracies. But the regime that he represents executes political dissidents by the hundreds and jails them by the thousands. Rouhani spoke of, quote, “the human tragedy in Syria.” Yet, Iran directly participates in Assad’s murder and massacre of tens of thousands of innocent men, women and children in Syria. And that regime is propping up a Syrian regime that just used chemical weapons against its own people. Rouhani condemned the, quote, “violent scourge of terrorism.” Yet, in the last three years alone, Iran has ordered, planned or perpetrated terrorist attacks in 25 cities in five continents. Rouhani denounces, quote, “attempts to change the regional balance through proxies.” Yet, Iran is actively destabilizing Lebanon, Yemen, Bahrain and many other Middle Eastern countries. Rouhani promises, quote, “constructive engagement with other countries.” Yet, two years ago, Iranian agents tried to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s ambassador in Washington, D.C. And just three weeks ago, an Iranian agent was arrested trying to collect information for possible attacks against the American embassy in Tel Aviv. Some constructive engagement. I wish I could be moved by Rouhani’s invitation to join his wave — a world against violence and extremism. Yet, the only waves Iran has generated in the last 30 years are waves of violence and terrorism that it has unleashed in the region and across the world. Ladies and gentlemen, I wish I could believe Rouhani, but I don’t because facts are stubborn things, and the facts are that Iran’s savage record flatly contradicts Rouhani’s soothing rhetoric. Last Friday Rouhani assured us that in pursuit of its nuclear program, Iran — this is a quote — Iran has never chosen deceit and secrecy, never chosen deceit and secrecy. Well, in 2002 Iran was caught red-handed secretly building an underground centrifuge facility in Natanz. And then in 2009 Iran was again caught red-handed secretly building a huge underground nuclear facility for uranium enrichment in a mountain near Qom. Rouhani tells us not to worry. He assures us that all of this is not intended for nuclear weapons. Any of you believe that? If you believe that, here’s a few questions you might want to ask. Why would a country that claims to only want peaceful nuclear energy, why would such a country build hidden underground enrichment facilities? Why would a country with vast natural energy reserves invest billions in developing nuclear energy? Why would a country intent on merely civilian nuclear programs continue to defy multiple Security Council resolutions and incur the tremendous cost of crippling sanctions on its economy? And why would a country with a peaceful nuclear program develop intercontinental ballistic missiles, whose sole purpose is to deliver nuclear warheads? You don’t build ICBMs to carry TNT thousands of miles away; you build them for one purpose, to carry nuclear warheads. And Iran is building now ICBMs that the United States says could reach this city in three or four years. Why would they do all this? The answer is simple. Iran is not building a peaceful nuclear program; Iran is developing nuclear weapons. Last year alone, Iran enriched three tons of uranium to 3 1/2 percent, doubled it stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium and added thousands of new centrifuges, including advanced centrifuges. It also continued work on the heavy water reactor in Iraq; that’s in order to have another route to the bomb, a plutonium path. And since Rouhani’s election — and I stress this — this vast and feverish effort has continued unabated. Ladies and gentlemen, underground nuclear facilities, heavy water reactors, advanced centrifuges, ICBMs. See, it’s not that it’s hard to find evidence that Iran has a nuclear program, a nuclear weapons program; it’s hard to find evidence that Iran doesn’t have a nuclear weapons program. Last year when I spoke here at the UN I drew a red line. Now, Iran has been very careful not to cross that line but Iran is positioning itself to race across that line in the future at a time of its choosing. Iran wants to be in a position to rush forward to build nuclear bombs before the international community can detect it and much less prevent it. Yet Iran faces one big problem, and that problem can be summed up in one word: sanctions. I have argued for many years, including on this podium, that the only way to peacefully prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons is to combine tough sanctions with a credible military threat. And that policy today is bearing fruit. Thanks to the efforts of many countries, many represented here, and under the leadership of the United States, tough sanctions have taken a big bite off the Iranian economy. Oil revenues have fallen. The currency has plummeted. Banks are hard-pressed to transfer money. So as a result, the regime is under intense pressure from the Iranian people to get the sanctions relieved or removed. That’s why Rouhani got elected in the first place. That’s why he launched his charm offensive. He definitely wants to get the sanctions lifted; I guarantee you that. But he doesn’t want to give up Iranians’ nuclear — Iran’s nuclear weapons program in return. Now here’s a strategy to achieve this. First, smile a lot. Smiling never hurts. Second, pay lip service to peace, democracy and tolerance. Third, offer meaningless concessions in exchange for lifting sanctions. And fourth, and the most important, ensure that Iran retains sufficient nuclear material and sufficient nuclear infrastructure to race to the bomb at a time it chooses to do so. You know why Rouhani thinks he can get away with this? I mean, this is a ruse. It’s a ploy. Why does Rouhani think he — thinks he can get away with it? Because — because he’s gotten away with it before, because his strategy of talking a lot and doing little has worked for him in the past. He even brags about this. Here’s what he said in his 2011 book about his time as Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator, and I quote: “While we were talking to the Europeans in Tehran, we were installing equipment in Isfahan.” Now, for those of you who don’t know, the Isfahan facility is an indispensable part of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. That’s where uranium ore called yellowcake is converted into an enrichable form. Rouhani boasted, and I quote, “By creating a calm environment — a calm environment — we were able to complete the work in Isfahan.” He fooled the world once. Now he thinks he can fool it again. You see, Rouhani thinks he can have his yellowcake and eat it too. And he has another reason to believe that he can get away with this. And that reason is called North Korea. Like Iran, North Korea also said its nuclear program was for peaceful purposes. Like Iran, North Korea also offered meaningless concessions and empty promises in return for sanctions relief. In 2005 North Korea agreed to a deal that was celebrated the world over by many well-meaning people. Here’s what the New York Times editorial had to say about it, quote: “For years now, foreign policy insiders have pointed to North Korea as the ultimate nightmare, a closed, hostile and paranoid dictatorship with an aggressive nuclear weapons program. Very few could envision a successful outcome, and yet North Korea agreed in principle this week to dismantle its nuclear weapons program, return to the NPT, abide by the treaty’s safeguards and admit international inspectors.” And finally, “diplomacy, it seems, does work after all.” Ladies and gentlemen, a year later, North Korea exploded its first nuclear weapons device. Yet, as dangerous as a nuclear-armed North Korea is, it pales in comparison to the danger of a nuclear-armed Iran. A nuclear-armed Iran would have a choke hold on the world’s main energy supplies. It would trigger nuclear proliferation throughout the Middle East, turning the most unstable part of the planet into a nuclear tinderbox. And for the first time in history, it would make the specter of nuclear terrorism a clear and present danger. A nuclear-armed Iran in the Middle East wouldn’t be another North Korea. It would be another 50 North Koreas. Now, I know that some in the international community think I’m exaggerating this threat. Sure, they know that Iran’s regime leads these chants, “death to America, death to Israel,” that it pledges to wipe Israel off the map. But they think that this wild rhetoric is just bluster for domestic consumption. Have these people learned nothing from history? The last century has taught us that when a radical regime with global ambitions gets awesome power, sooner or later its appetite for aggression knows no bounds. That’s the central lesson of the 20th century. And we cannot forget it. The world may have forgotten this lesson. The Jewish people have not. Iran’s fanaticism is not bluster. It’s real. The fanatic regime must never be allowed to arm itself with nuclear weapons. I know that the world is weary of war. We in Israel, we know all too well the cost of war. But history has taught us that to prevent war tomorrow, we must be firm today. And this raises the question, can diplomacy stop this threat? Well, the only diplomatic solution that would work is one that fully dismantles Iran’s nuclear weapons program and prevents it from having one in the future. President Obama rightly said that Iran’s conciliatory words must be matched by transparent, verifiable and meaningful action. And to be meaningful, a diplomatic solution would require Iran to do four things. First, cease all uranium enrichment. This is called for by several Security Council resolutions. Second, remove from Iran’s territory the stockpiles of enriched uranium. Third, dismantle the infrastructure for nuclear breakout capability, including the underground facility at Qom and the advanced centrifuges in Natanz. And, four, stop all work at the heavy water reactor in Iraq aimed at the production of plutonium. These steps would put an end to Iran’s nuclear weapons program and eliminate its breakout capability. There are those who would readily agreed to leave Iran with a residual capability to enrich uranium. I advise them to pay close attention to what Rouhani said in his speech to Iran’s supreme cultural revolution — Supreme Cultural Revolutionary Council. This was published in 2005. I quote. This is what he said: “A county that could enrich uranium to about 3.5 percent will also have the capability to enrich it to about 90 percent. Having fuel cycle capability virtually means that a country that possesses this capability is able to produce nuclear weapons.” Precisely. This is why Iran’s nuclear weapons program must be fully and verifiably dismantled. And this is why the pressure on Iran must continue. So here is what the international community must do: First, keep up the sanctions. If Iran advances its nuclear weapons program during negotiations, strengthen the sanctions. Second, don’t agree to a partial deal. A partial deal would lift international sanctions that have taken years to put in place in exchange for cosmetic concessions that will take only weeks for Iran to reverse. Third, lift the sanctions only when Iran fully dismantles its nuclear weapons program. My friends, the international community has Iran on the ropes. If you want to knock out Iran’s nuclear weapons program peacefully, don’t let up the pressure. Keep it up. We all want to give diplomacy with Iran a chance to succeed, but when it comes to Iran, the greater the pressure, the greater the chance. Three decades ago, President Ronald Reagan famously advised, “trust but verify.” When it comes to Iran’s nuclear weapons program, here’s my advice: Distrust, dismantle and verify. Ladies and gentlemen, Israel will never acquiesce to nuclear arms in the hands of a rogue regime that repeatedly promises to wipe us off the map. Against such a threat, Israel will have no choice but to defend itself. I want there to be no confusion on this point. Israel will not allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. If Israel is forced to stand alone, Israel will stand alone. Yet, in standing alone, Israel will know that we will be defending many, many others. The dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran and the emergence of other threats in our region have led many of our Arab neighbors to recognize, finally recognize, that Israel is not their enemy. And this affords us the opportunity to overcome the historic animosities and build new relationships, new friendships, new hopes. Israel welcomes engagement with the wider Arab world. We hope that our common interests and common challenges will help us forge a more peaceful future. And Israel’s — continues to seek an historic compromise with our Palestinian neighbors, one that ends our conflict once and for all. We want peace based on security and mutual recognition, in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the Jewish state of Israel. I remain committed to achieving an historic reconciliation and building a better future for Israelis and Palestinians alike. Now, I have no illusions about how difficult this will be to achieve. Twenty years ago, the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians began. Six Israeli prime ministers, myself included, have not succeeded at achieving peace with the Palestinians. My predecessors were prepared to make painful concessions. So am I. But so far the Palestinian leaders haven’t been prepared to offer the painful concessions they must make in order to end the conflict. For peace to be achieved, the Palestinians must finally recognize the Jewish state, and Israel’s security needs must be met. I am prepared to make an historic compromise for genuine and enduring peace, but I will never compromise on the security of my people and of my country, the one and only Jewish state. Ladies and gentlemen, one cold day in the late 19th century, my grandfather Nathan and his younger brother Judah were standing in a railway station in the heart of Europe. They were seen by a group of anti-Semitic hoodlums who ran towards them waving clubs, screaming “Death to the Jews.” My grandfather shouted to his younger brother to flee and save himself, and he then stood alone against the raging mob to slow it down. They beat him senseless, they left him for dead, and before he passed out, covered in his own blood, he said to himself “What a disgrace, what a disgrace. The descendants of the Macabees lie in the mud powerless to defend themselves.” He promised himself then that if he lived, he would take his family to the Jewish homeland and help build a future for the Jewish people. I stand here today as Israel’s prime minister because my grandfather kept that promise. And so many other Israelis have a similar story, a parent or a grandparent who fled every conceivable oppression and came to Israel to start a new life in our ancient homeland. Together we’ve transformed a bludgeoned Jewish people, left for dead, into a vibrant, thriving nation, a defending itself with the courage of modern Maccabees, developing limitless possibilities for the future. In our time the Biblical prophecies are being realized. As the prophet Amos said, they shall rebuild ruined cities and inhabit them. They shall plant vineyards and drink their wine. They shall till gardens and eat their fruit. And I will plant them upon their soil never to be uprooted again. (In Hebrew.) Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel have come home never to be uprooted again. (Applause.) 2 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Lilimax(f): 9:49am On Jan 02, 2015 |
mikeczay:I doubt if you're a Christian Don't be like Esau that sold his birthright just for a pot of pottage Get it? 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by kekeolu(f): 9:49am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Nigerians should shine their eyes. Little wonder the self acclaimed messaiah is always weeping any time he loses. O ye omo to nke. Jeremiah 10:11 "the gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, even they shall perish from the earth , and from under these heavens". 2 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by omenka(m): 9:49am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Ariel20:Tell them my sister!!! The same IBB that took us to the OIC is the man Jonathan called his "Father". The same Islamic Development Bank from which our country has been drawing loans and even plans to draw loans from next year is a structure set up by the OIC, and no one has said anything regarding Jonathan or Okonjo Iweala trying to Islamize Nigeria for doing so. What about Jonathan calling Boko Haram whose agenda is to "Islamize" the country his "family" and his "siblings"?? Has anyone talked about it?? These guys are completely out of their depths on what to campaign with. A lot of Jonathan's supporters have deserted him due to this extremely divisive and volatile mode of campaign they've chosen. We don't even hear a word from TAN any more!! 1 Like
|
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by SeverusSnape(m): 9:50am On Jan 02, 2015 |
mikeczay:Why don't you just relocate to one of those countries?... Look here, Nigeria is multi religious and it will never work. Never! THESE COUNTRIES YOU LISTED ARE ALL ISLAMIC COUNTRIES, SO NO PROBLEM IF THEY ARE MEMBERS. The North(Arewanistan) can carve out their own territory and chair the organization. 4 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Nobody: 9:50am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Lilimax:Okay. But if I were to be the one writing what you've written, I won't put "islamise this nation" Because what they are doing is NOT islam. Regardless of the victims. #peace |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by ikweremilitant: 9:50am On Jan 02, 2015 |
theV0ice:na so una dy talk till e go hapan.....just dont vote 4 buhari,shekaina 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Elculio: 9:51am On Jan 02, 2015 |
thekingsmen:All these clearly show that indeed there is a hidden Islamic agenda for Nigeria. There's just more to all these than meet d eye. It is just very unfortunate that people have allowed sentiments and unnecessary hatred to cloud their sense of reasoning and so cannot see beyond their nose. 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by lastmessenger: 9:51am On Jan 02, 2015 |
And now there is Bokoharam and they point accusing fingers to Gej. When they sold the seeds of terrorism they never taught of Bokoharam and now here it is and the president is to be blamed. 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Rexyl(m): 9:52am On Jan 02, 2015 |
mustymatic: Get yourself a copy of Bible read and invite Holy Spirit to guide you thru you will discover Christ gospel can't be messed up, Christ himself warned that true Christians should beware of false teachers and preachers 1 Like |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Doyin2(m): 9:52am On Jan 02, 2015 |
I just pray that GEJ and his supporters would not end up breaking up Nigeria along religious line.Is Nigeria the only secular member of OIC? Why are the PDP propagandist always provoking religious sentiments? Religion is the major preoccupation of the president and his supporters. GEJ now uses the church's pulpit to make public statement on issues concerning both Christians and non-Christians,at a frequency never experienced in the history of this great nation,yet no body has described him as a religious zealot or fundamentalist. GEJ's presidency,no matter how long or short will end one day,but the bad religious legacy could disunite Nigeria forever. 2 Likes |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by Lilimax(f): 9:53am On Jan 02, 2015 |
MuhdG:But Bokoharam has an agenda....they want to Islamise their region. Don't you get it. |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by just2endowed: 9:53am On Jan 02, 2015 |
AreaFada2: K |
Re: Nigeria History with the "Organization Of Islamic Conference (oic)" by PatrickPhilip(m): 9:55am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Nigerians think well, take example from turkey, read and see their history joinin OIC is possible it depends on decision during dis election 1 Like |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (Reply)
Edward Onoja Replaces Simon Achuba As Kogi Deputy Governor / Asking Us To Disobey Buhari’s Directive On Ballot Box Snatching Unfortunate- Arm / EndSARS: Protesters Block All Routes Going In And Out Of Lagos
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 101 |