MJBOLT:

quit crying on my mentions,are you not the person who was bashing the black panther movie on the 'what movie are you watching' thread,so you have forgotten when you guys were bashing marvel on the DCEU thread the problem with most dc fans on this forum is that you guys are as clueless as buhari infact i dont even know who's more confused between you guys and buhari

yeah,lets forget how dc fans also try to sabotage black panther rotten tomatoes audience score

BlackManta:


Go check that thread.
Most people on that thread gave Black Panther an average rating of 6/10.
Some gave it 7/10.

Only few people gave it 8/10 and above.

I'm not the only one.

Go and check IMDB user reviews.
You go see 2/10 3/10 4/10.

Average rating for black panther dey plenty for IMDB.

All those reviewers are DC fans abi

MJBOLT:

yeah,lets forget how dc fans also try to sabotage black panther rotten tomatoes audience score

Xavier5:


That's exactly what I said. Since they know they will using him as the villain in Captain Marvel, why did they still have to use him again as the Villain in The Guardians Of The Galaxy vol.1. Why didn't they use another Villain to prevent repeating of Villains.

And black panther is more successful than any dc film in history

BlackManta:


At the end of the day critics dashed Black Panther 97% while the movie of the year -Infinity War got only 84%.

Btw the audience score for Black Panther is 79%.
A far cry from the 97% that critics bestowed on the movie.

But hey according to MCU fanatics logic.- anybody that doesn't give your film 10/10 is a DC fan.

BlackManta:


At the end of the day critics dashed Black Panther 97% while the movie of the year -Infinity War got only 84%.

Btw the audience score for Black Panther is 79%.
A far cry from the 97% that critics bestowed on the movie.

But hey according to MCU fanatics logic.- anybody that doesn't give your film 10/10 is a DC fan.

MJBOLT:

And black panther is more successful than any dc film in history

See painment o is it my fault DCEU is a failure black panther sh!ts on that over rated TDK critically and commercially

BlackManta:


Yeah more successful than the legendary TDK.
Because MONEY > SUCCESS


Joker won an Oscar.
Thanos sef never get Oscar not to talk of Killmonger.

TDK was the best CBM accross past 10 years.
Only Infinity War comes close.

Not to talk of Black Panther.

MJBOLT:

See painment o is it my fault DCEU is a failure black panther sh!ts on that over rated TDK critically and commercially

are we discussing joker or TDK you see why you guys are as clueless as buhari but its not your fault,the joker was the only good thing about the movie

BlackManta:


TDK is overated.
This is the first time i'm hearing of such even from an MCU fanboy.

Even your fellow MCU fanboys agrees that Joker was the best CBM villain until Thanos.

MJBOLT:

are we discussing joker or TDK you see why you guys are as clueless as buhari but its not your fault,the joker was the only good thing about the movie

na that one pain you pass Black Panther 97% on RT,$1.3billion+ worldwide,yes i'm correct black panther is more successful than any DC film in history

BlackManta:


TDK was never part of this argument.

I never wanted to bring up TDK until you lied that Black Panther is better than every DC film in HISTORY.

Everybody knows the movie that ruled CBM's for 10 years running.

MJBOLT:

na that one pain you pass Black Panther 97% on RT,$1.3billion+ worldwide,yes i'm correct black panther is more successful than any DC film in history

story for the gods i hope you wont get a heart attack when black panther take home an oscar

BlackManta:


The 97% is a fraud when Infinity War got only 84%.

But no one wants to be called RACIST so RT handled Black Panther sentimentally like an egg.

MJBOLT:

story for the gods i hope you wont get a heart attack when black panther take home an oscar

Yeah but there is no hope for the DCEU

BlackManta:


That's okay.
The worst DC film Suicide Squad got an Oscar.
So i think there is hope for Black Panther

Sultan5:


This your matter tire me. MCU is one with active characters who have a past, present and in some cases future lives. Ronan did something in the past before he ever encountered GOTG. So because of your dislike for repeating villains, that story shouldn't be told or should be recycled just to suit you? Guy think am now

You spoke of Loki, did his story end after the first Thor? That is why it is a cinematic universe things happens concurrently. So basically if we should follow your logic, Thanos shouldn't be the villain of the next Avengers just so they could avoid repeating villains.

Heck if repeating villains was such a bad thing how come the first Avengers movie did better than the first Thor movie? This just shows that you self claimed fact is just that self claimed. You see I have come to accept not everyone can be pleased, if after the first Thor movie, Loki disappeared am sure you will come here and question Marvel for it.

(Let me be a little petty ) Bro Marvel is so awesome that they can make even the silliest thing awesome. Assuming your fact was actually a fact then Marvel has once succeeded in making said fact meaningless due to their awesomeness and be sure they will do it again. Do you know why? Cause they are simply AWESOME!

#believe

badinfluence:

Well I think they know better than you about their movies...

mykeljosef:





using ronan isnt repeating

if anything ronan appearing in GOTG1 would have been the one with the case of repeated villan

captain marvel is like throwback to GOTG1

coz in the timeline it existed b4 GOTG1 only unfortunate guardians was released before it



tho if ronan is the villan to captain marvel it means that just like thanos in infinity wars part 1 that the villian is actually going to get a win

Xavier5:



#FACT:
Whether they make money or not, it doesn't change the fact that repeating Villains in a franchise SUCKS.

Xavier5:
I heard Ronan The Accuser is gonna be the villain in Captain Marvel. If that is true, I ask, what is it with Marvel and repeating Villains. Why do they love repeating or reprising villains. Is it that they've ran out of Villainous characters?

Repeating villains makes the movie look uninteresting. That's what they did with Loki. He was the villain in Thor, he then reprised his role as the villain in Avengers again, to be sincere, that turned me off. This is the same thing they wanna do with Ronan The Accuser. He was the villain in The Guardians Of The Galaxies vol.1 and now they wanna make him the villain in Captain Marvel. REALLY!!!!!!!!!!

Whenever Fans or people see a new movie from a particular franchise they expect to see new plots, storylines, actions, stunts, twist, suspense and characters (partially aside from the heroic characters) most especially the villain. They want to see a new villain that they've never seen in that particular franchise because they get to know him more and probably kill the curiosity they have about that Villainous character, and that's a big turn on for them. It makes the movie more interesting.
BUT
Repeating a villain that they've seen in a previous movie of that said franchise turns them off most especially me. It makes the movie seem and look uninteresting. This is because they wanna see something new.

Making Ronan The Accuser the villain in the upcoming Captain Marvel movie is totally a bad idea and wack for me. They should give us another Captain Marvel's villain, one that hasn't been seen before in the MCU rather than repeating Villains. It's not as if they've ran out of Villains.

#XAVIER.

Xavier5:


So Ronan The Accuser appearing as the Villain in Captain Marvel (about to actually) and in The Guardians Of The Galaxies vol.1, Movies that are not directly related, that do not have the prequel sequel relationship, that do not have similar plots or storyline, is called what? Let me guess, it is called Grand Appearance of Villainous Character.

Please don't mention the case of Thanos because the case of Thanos isn't repetition of villain because Avengers 4 is the direct sequel to Avengers: Infinity War. Which means Avengers 4 is the continuation of Avengers: Infinity War. They both have similar plot and storyline and as such similar Villain should be in them.
But in the case of Captain Marvel and The Guardians Of The Galaxy, they are not directly related, they do not have the prequel sequel relationship, they do not have similar plot and storyline. So why use similar Villains for them both?

Xavier5:


The case of Thanos isn't repetition of villain because Avengers 4 is the direct sequel to Avengers: Infinity War. Which means Avengers 4 is the continuation of Avengers: Infinity War.
They both have similar plot and storyline and as such similar Villain should be in them.

I ask, is Captain Marvel a direct prequel or sequel to The Guardians Of The Galaxies vol.1? Do they have similar plot or storyline? of course not. So why use same Villains for both Movies that are not directly related? or is marvel running out of Villainous Characters?

Just like Thor and The Avengers were not directly related. They didn't have the prequel sequel relationship aside from the fact that they were in the same universe.
When I saw The Avengers movie and discovered that Loki (who was the villain in Thor) was the villain in it, it automatically turned me off. I lost interest in the movie. I only had to see it for seeing sake and also for the fact that my money shouldn't be in vain or wasted.

Even if they are to bring back a Villainous Character, let him or her not be the Primary or main or major Villain in that movie. He or she could be a supporting Character just like the case of Loki after The Avengers.

#FACT:
Whether they make money or not, it doesn't change the fact that repeating Villains in a franchise SUCKS.

MJBOLT:

who's anticipating the debut of cloak and dagger?

chrisbaxtian:


nobody

MJBOLT:

Xavier5:


The case of Thanos isn't repetition of villain because Avengers 4 is the direct sequel to Avengers: Infinity War. Which means Avengers 4 is the continuation of Avengers: Infinity War.
They both have similar plot and storyline and as such similar Villain should be in them.

I ask, is Captain Marvel a direct prequel or sequel to The Guardians Of The Galaxies vol.1? Do they have similar plot or storyline? of course not. So why use same Villains for both Movies that are not directly related? or is marvel running out of Villainous Characters?

Just like Thor and The Avengers were not directly related. They didn't have the prequel sequel relationship aside from the fact that they were in the same universe.
When I saw The Avengers movie and discovered that Loki (who was the villain in Thor) was the villain in it, it automatically turned me off. I lost interest in the movie. I only had to see it for seeing sake and also for the fact that my money shouldn't be in vain or wasted.

Even if they are to bring back a Villainous Character, let him or her not be the Primary or main or major Villain in that movie. He or she could be a supporting Character just like the case of Loki after The Avengers.

#FACT:
Whether they make money or not, it doesn't change the fact that repeating Villains in a franchise SUCKS.

Xavier5:


So Ronan The Accuser appearing as the Villain in Captain Marvel (about to actually) and in The Guardians Of The Galaxies vol.1, Movies that are not directly related, that do not have the prequel sequel relationship, that do not have similar plots or storyline, is called what? Let me guess, it is called Grand Appearance of Villainous Character.

Please don't mention the case of Thanos because the case of Thanos isn't repetition of villain because Avengers 4 is the direct sequel to Avengers: Infinity War. Which means Avengers 4 is the continuation of Avengers: Infinity War. They both have similar plot and storyline and as such similar Villain should be in them.
But in the case of Captain Marvel and The Guardians Of The Galaxy, they are not directly related, they do not have the prequel sequel relationship, they do not have similar plot and storyline. So why use similar Villains for them both?

SMUAG:


Spoiler alert! Ronan the Accuser will survive as the villain in Captain Marvel....