Mogidi:



Others with different talents (Discernible knack) would disagree.
Knack: a special skill, talent, or aptitude

omenka:
Your application is totally wrong. Pele.

Oga, abeg nor use am for public outside.

#Stay simple.

lastpage:


No Sir,
We did it after he was dead and the likes of Turai and Segun Adeniyi and some other Cabal-members were plotting on making Turai the De-facto President (against the letter of the constitution) by deceiving the Nation that he was still doing 100 push-ups per minute.
Our Protest was for Jonathan to be sworn-in, LONG AFTER the Death of his principal, as stipulated in the Constitution.
(Oshiomole promptly did that as well)

I am saying we WAITED UNTIL HE DIED.

I am not sure if you know the underground details of what went on during that period or when Yar Ardua actually passed-on in a Saudi Hospital because if you do, you wont compare both situations.

Let me also point out that the dead man actually witnessed a RIOT/PROTEST taking place in the Hospital he was being treated, on the same day he died. I dont want to insinuate that the event may have contributed to his death via increased BP or Depression.
I am not a Doctor but those are the differences.

Cheers.


Lastpage!

radgenez:
Let the hypocritical apc plebs come and defend teir employer, he justbroke the so called law they have been screaming about
Hypocrites!!!

wellmax:


Don't advertise your ignorance. The law requires that he swears in the Deputy on the death of the office holder. Punishment for whatever reasons can come later as in this case.

lastpage:


Relax and dont be too eager to criticize!

For one, the Constitution mandates him to swear-in the Vice, once the substantive LGA Chairman is dead.
He cannot wait and MUST NOT WAIT for investigation to be started and finished.
In that, Osho-Baba has followed the law, to the letter. (recall he said "I was pained to do what l did, but that is the law).

Secondly, it is still an allegation and the suspended man might be proved innocent!
By "suspension", as opposed to "outright deposition" (removal), Osho-Baba is also obeying the law of natural Justice.
All are assumed to be innocent until proven guilty!
Even if we are almost (99%) sure of what the man did, we must give him the benefit of a "fair hearing", which is what the Panel will do.
In this again, l think Osho-Baba is fair.

Finally, if the allegation is found to be true, l think the man should then be removed so as to serve as a "moral lesson" to others, something that is gradually becoming extinct in our Nation, that yo dont get overzealous and too greedy for material things.
If God says you will be there, with hardwork and patience, you will get there eventually, at God's appointed time .... and you will succeed.
Gov. Fashola is an example of this Patience and Hardwork.
Jimi Agbaje is an example of that "anxiousness and greed". Where is he today? I cant remember!

Cheers.....

And your spelling is terrible!


Lastpage!

oshiosense:
Are you blind or you can't read, atleast for common sense? He sworn in the Vice chairman and later got petition that he organized a protest against his sick boss which led to the suspension. You are here commenting stupidly. Where are you from by the way?

agarawu23:
suspend him due to allegations that he fomented a protest against the late former Chairman, Alhaji Kadiri, trying to get him to step down while he (Kadiri) was battling for his life, a battle he lost

yes! he has a good reason. not our presido way dey sack/suspend without good reason.

why he (gej) suspended sanusi then isn't clear to Nigerians till date

agarawu23:
suspend him due to allegations that he fomented a protest against the late former Chairman, Alhaji Kadiri, trying to get him to step down while he (Kadiri) was battling for his life, a battle he lost

yes! he has a good reason. not our presido way dey sack/suspend without good reason.

why he (gej) suspended sanusi then isn't clear to Nigerians till date

agarawu23:
suspend him due to allegations that he fomented a protest against the late former Chairman, Alhaji Kadiri, trying to get him to step down while he (Kadiri) was battling for his life, a battle he lost

yes! he has a good reason. not our presido way dey sack/suspend without good reason.

why he (gej) suspended sanusi then isn't clear to Nigerians till date

agarawu23:
suspend him due to allegations that he fomented a protest against the late former Chairman, Alhaji Kadiri, trying to get him to step down while he (Kadiri) was battling for his life, a battle he lost

yes! he has a good reason. not our presido way dey sack/suspend without good reason.

why he (gej) suspended sanusi then isn't clear to Nigerians till date

CoCoLav:
Nigerians and emotional/sentimental judgment. So if someone is suspected of a wrongdoing and the person is sick, you have to chill for the person to recover before you take any action? What does that even mean? What is unethical about that?

I'm not heartless but sometimes what has to be done has to be done. This is politics.


Lmaooooo!!!

sucess001:



No sir.

you are incorrect. go and do some google research. we protested when he was on the sick bed in saudi arabia.


so there is absolutely no difference.


lets not criticize others for what we also do...that makes us same as them.

iyatrustee:
He was chairman for some minutes!

His name would be included in the ex-Chairmen's list forever

CoCoLav:


You are kidding right?? Moral lesson? In politics? Politics that is governed by law? And if God says its the right time?

OMG!




You have no idea what common law is about. Common law has no business with morals or ethical code, As in NO BUSINESS.

You only suspend someone when the person had breached the public officers code of conduct or committed a crime. The law is the law, keep your personal moral code to yourself. By instigating a protest when the chairman was on his sick bed...pls tell me what law he has broken.

20bc:
.
[i]Sorry about the spelling..... But your point is 98%valid but in the case of someone having suspicion about someone wishing another person dead especially when it involves the LGA chairman....should at least be made known to the governor

sucess001:



No sir.

you are incorrect. go and do some google research. we protested when he was on the sick bed in saudi arabia.


so there is absolutely no difference.


lets not criticize others for what we also do...that makes us same as them.

otunbakolawole:
I think what Oshiomole did was wrong. In normal societies, the late Chairman should have handed over powers to the Vice Chair in acting capacity if he's in good health, better still, resign on the grounds of illness. This sit tight mentality of the black man must change.

otunbakolawole:
The allegation made against the suspended chairman that he financed a protest against an individual on sickbed could be investigated but, what will he be charged or accused of, 'breach of public peace'.

otunbakolawole:
A leader should not govern by emotions, yes, a leader should empathise, but his decision and judgements should be based on solid proofs.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Common+law. Common-law courts base their decisions on prior judicial pronouncements rather than on legislative enactments. Where a statute governs the dispute, judicial interpretation of that statute determines how the law applies. Common-law judges rely on their predecessors' decisions of actual controversies, rather than on abstract codes or texts, to guide them in applying the law. [b]Common-law judges find the grounds for their decisions in law reports, which contain decisions of past [/b]controversies. Under the doctrine of Stare Decisis, common-law judges are obliged to adhere to previously decided cases, or precedents, where the facts are substantially the same. A court's decision is binding authority for similar cases decided by the same court or by lower courts within the same jurisdiction. The decision is not binding on courts of higher rank within that jurisdiction or in other jurisdictions, but it may be considered as persuasive authority.


Because common-law decisions deal with everyday situations as they occur, social changes, inventions, and discoveries make it necessary for judges sometimes to look outside reported decisions for guidance in a case of first impression (previously undetermined legal issue). The common-law system allows judges to look to other jurisdictions or to draw upon past or present judicial experience for analogies to help in making a decision. This flexibility allows common law to deal with changes that lead to unanticipated controversies. At the same time, stare decisis provides certainty, uniformity, and predictability and makes for a stable legal environment.
Under a common-law system, disputes are settled through an adversarial exchange of arguments and evidence. Both parties present their cases before a neutral fact finder, either a judge or a jury. The judge or jury evaluates the evidence, applies the appropriate law to the facts, and renders a judgment in favor of one of the parties. Following the decision, either party may appeal the decision to a higher court. Appellate courts in a common-law system may review only findings of law, not determinations of fact.
Under common law, all citizens, including the highest-ranking officials of the government, are subject to the same set of laws, and the exercise of government power is limited by those laws. The judiciary may review legislation, but only to determine whether it conforms to constitutional requirements.



.

lastpage:

Sharrap, Eediat!

I dont discuss with riff-raffs like you.
Go and study it first and get some good education, if you want to engage me on such issues.
I may recommend a few "Beginners" Law Books for you.

Now Gerrout of my face before l .....
Mtchew.



Lastpage!

lastpage:


I was just joking about the spelling, its no biggy!

Back to the issue:
It actually went beyond "suspicion".
The Ex-Chair allegedly took concrete actions by inciting, funding and organising a riot against his "Boss".
It is an act of gross irresponsibility. If you do such in the corporate world, you get sacked.

Let me ask you: What do you think the "dead Chairman" will do to the suspended Chair, had he recovered from his illness?
Dont forget that it is the Chairman that gets "elected" by the public (Like Governors) while the Chairman simply picks/nominates his Vice, at his choosing!

Did l hear you say Sack him?

Like l said, it is a revolting thing to do and should not be allowed to go un-investigated.
And to begin to investigate someone in public office, first thing that happens is that the person must "temporarily vacate" that office but in Nigeria, l am aware that "office no dey resign or step-down" for investigations to take-off since it is do-or-die, as the man is already showing.


Osho has taken the right step, IMO.


Lastpage!

lastpage:


I will believe and accept your position if you can tell me THE EXACT DATE Yar Ardua DIED" in Saudi Arabian Hospital.
The implication of that is that "you knew he was still alive", when you were protesting" .
You can as well provide a link to the "google research" you are talking about, ....which confirms such date

NB: I am not asking for the date the cabal decided to bring him back in the dead of the night, from Saudi Arabia, or "officially announce" that he was dead..... he was long dead ( a few months) before then.

Okay, Up to you, ball is in your court



Lastpage!