Dbrainiac1:

Did I call u useless?
Did d Bible say God created two men?
Abi Bible dey lie wen it said God created Adam, the first man?

Dbrainiac1:

Did I call u useless?
Did d Bible say God created two men?
Abi Bible dey lie wen it said God created Adam, the first man?

porka:


[size=13pt]Beliefs!

Everyone is entitled to his/her belief.

People who don't believe in creation claim they believe in the big bang theory.

So who recorded the bang?

And how can a tiny particle bust and become so big as the earth and all the galaxies?[/size]

porka:


[size=13pt]Beliefs!

Everyone is entitled to his/her belief.

People who don't believe in creation claim they believe in the big bang theory.

So who recorded the bang?

And how can a tiny particle bust and become so big as the earth and all the galaxies?[/size]

Barnabaseloka:

If I understand you well, is it that there was no first man or woman according to the 'word of God' or according to 'science'?

Barnabaseloka:

There is no probability in God's word. It is very prercise. God created Adam as the first man and Eve as the first woman. From both of them, all humans come into existence. Science cannot explain the number of people that evolved from these primates but gives speculations and assumptions.

Barnabaseloka:

Yes the bible might contain bullshit stories but I believe them. Science cannot give accurate account of how humans begin existing in the world. They lay claims to natural selection and evolution to substantiate its theories. But the bibilical truth is very simple and precise, no assumptions, no change, no natural selection or evolution in the creation of man by God. It has remained unedited, and unchanged since the beginning of the world and will always remain so, no matter the scientific discoveries.

PAGAN9JA:


you mean bible gives accurate lies.


bible is stubborn and doesnt evolve. becomes it is fillwd with stupidity of dead men.

PAGAN9JA:

According to Science.

PAGAN9JA:


Those are the words of men . God did not go to school to speak or write in human tongues and God is not a jew. those are the words of jewish men.

Science is not a person. science changes. its a subject of study and research, trial and error. it yields results. your device u r using now to type is a product of science.

sylarsquins:
The Big question is " How did Man come into existence"?. The many religions we have today and those of the old gods possesses different beliefs on how Man came into being.

As a Christian, i learnt through the bible how Man came into life and I don't have to share it because I believe everyone knows that including non Christians because am not here to quote the Bible as am not that religious.

The generally known belief on how man came into the world is best explained through academia which states the evolution of man proposes that humans and apes derive from an apelike ancestor that lived on earth a few million years ago. The theory states that man, through a combination of environmental and genetic factors, emerged as a species to produce the variety of ethnicities seen today, while modern apes evolved on a separate evolutionary
pathway.

My BIG question is, which should we believe and if Truly Adam came 1st from God, how then did he populate the world to what it is right now?.

sylarsquins:


Only wen u open ur eyes will u see the light

Barnabaseloka:

The funny aspect is that they call all these 'theories'. These scientists are not yet sure of what they have propounded. Ask them how the earth itself came into existence and you will get other laughable stories describing it.

leke12:
No! Why? Because if Adam was d first man we would have the same DNA,ur genealogy is trace only by DNA and its unique to each family tree line even if it is 10,000 old.

Gold45:


Things have changed,
Then, brothers married their blood sisters and gave birth to healthy offspring. Incest now in this modern time is likely to produce children with DNA defects.

mikron:
OP the light here is the word of the Almighty God, its clear u dont believe the bible. the Bible said Adam was the first man on earth and eve his wife was the first woman. im a christian so i believed what the holy scriptures said concerning that.

argob44:
smh

naijadeyhia:
OP i would like to talk with you one on one on this forum. Please everyone else just sit back and enjoy reading our back and forth. He says he is enlightened, well enlighten me or vice versa. You stand against God and I stand with him. I pray you may we begin? So what really is your grouse with creation?

sylarsquins:
Dnt quote me wrong, aint standin against God. I just let every1 believe in wateva stories about this topic buh don't conflict my beliefs with urs or make me tink urz is d beta version.

naijadeyhia:

Then kindly state clearly what your grouse is

sylarsquins:


U read my post, does it sound like I've a p?

4X4:


VERY STUWPID ANSWER D QUESTION MUMU . UR D KIND DAT BELIEVE STORIES WITHOUT INVESTIGATING . EVEN IF THEY HAD MANY CHILDREN THAT DOES NOT EXPLAIN THE HUNDREDS OF RACES AND DNA UNIQUENESS TO EACH FAMILY . EVEN IF THEY COMMITED INCEST BY SLEEPING WITH EACH OTHER THEN ALL RACES AND HUMAN BEINGS WOULD HAVE THE SAME FAMILY DNA . INCEST IS WRONG AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN WRONG . I DONT FOLLOW RELIGION BLINDLY LIKE SO MANY PEOPLE . THATS WHY YOU HAVE A LOT OF STUWPID FANATICS ALL OVER THE PLACE .

naijadeyhia:


I did not say you had a P but for the sake of this dialogue give me point by point what your issues are about and i will respond. Who knows you may get some followers through this or i just might.

sylarsquins:


Didn't post this coz I wanted followers, well I don't believe in the bible"s theory of Adam and Eve buh aint criticizing it.

naijadeyhia:


So if you did not post it to enlighten others or disprove others what then is your real purpose of making the submission?

leke12:
No! Why? Because if Adam was d first man we would have the same DNA,ur genealogy is trace only by DNA and its unique to each family tree line even if it is 10,000 old.