Freemanan:

Very correct.... Applied mathematics concerns all facets of human discipline.... Theoretical mathematics is more streamline to science and social sciences....

all4naija:
It seems to be the other way round.

Freemanan:

Expatiate please

Teempakguy:
Ah, I have seen it. I do believe it is referred to as Hololens. From Microsoft.

Hololens . . . might actually have a lot of potential. Especially for engineers. Not just mars scientists.

That innovation will change everything and our communication system will wear a different face………Really can't wait

Teempakguy:
Hmm!
I hope that isn't homework

Anyway, let's get on with it.

We are given, from your question,
Frequency =256
Length of tube =33.2

We are required to find v , velocity

However, there is a relationship between these values. Given as

f=v/4l. Where f is frequency, l is length, and of course, v is velocity which we are looking for.

At this point, we rearrange the equation to our satisfaction. In this case, we need v solitary on one side. We simply multiply both sides by 4l

Getting v = 4 x l xf

Substituting in given values,

v = 4 x 33.2 x 256

Allowing the calculator to work its magic,

v = 33996.8

It is then up to you to convert the above value, which is in cm/s to any unit you want.

I would go with 340m/s though




Cheers!

Teempakguy:
Hmm!
I hope that isn't homework

Anyway, let's get on with it.

We are given, from your question,
Frequency =256
Length of tube =33.2

We are required to find v , velocity

However, there is a relationship between these values. Given as

f=v/4l. Where f is frequency, l is length, and of course, v is velocity which we are looking for.

At this point, we rearrange the equation to our satisfaction. In this case, we need v solitary on one side. We simply multiply both sides by 4l

Getting v = 4 x l xf

Substituting in given values,

v = 4 x 33.2 x 256

Allowing the calculator to work its magic,

v = 33996.8

It is then up to you to convert the above value, which is in cm/s to any unit you want.

I would go with 340m/s though




Cheers!

timonski:
Plzzz, who can integrate x^x dx with respect to x?

all4naija:
That is the velocity of wave. The wave formula.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf5aESZ0Fzg

You are correct, if it is for an open tube with one end closed because it is the air that will be vibrating and there would be an odd integer(for the antinode). The wavelength is 1/4 the length of the tube. It would be F=nV/4L in that case with the way you addressed it before.

P.S. I didn't see what he wrote though. I used what you wrote to solve the problem.

Chrisbenogor:


Exactly, actually you find that the world of finding out what happened can be very interesting. With data you try to deduce what happened, you avoid traps like “Correlation does not imply causation”


Anyways I will watch from the sidelines as you guys talk of esoteric stuff.

I am looking for a street way to explain to a kid why our DSTV satellites face the same direction even though the earth is spinning. He asked uncle is it that the DSTV stations are in heaven

timonski:
Plzzz, who can integrate x^x dx with respect to x?

Teempakguy:
if we are to integrate using the formula method, we would arrive at



X^x+1
--------
X+1

Am I right? @ FrancisTony ?

johnydon22:


That innovation will change everything and our communication system will wear a different face………Really can't wait

but still, like every other technology, it will come with it's own set of problems.

For instance, the device is shaped like a head band. This is bound to cause headaches and pain in the parietals.
Also, whatever that is seen through the glass, is virtual. This is bound to cause some awkward situations . . .

Not to mention the interface. To an external observer, the wearer will appear ridiculous. Also, arm aches.

FrancisTony:

Who said i'm good @Integration?
And i'm an aspirant like you.

Teempakguy:

It's all about collaboration.
Try and cross check it.

FrancisTony:

I'm not good at Applied/Further Mathematics e.g Integration & Differentiation.

Teempakguy:
if we are to integrate using the formula method, we would arrive at



X^x+1
--------
X+1

Am I right? @ FrancisTony ?

Teempakguy:
neither am I in probability and permutations.

FrancisTony post=351877 18:

Who said i'm good @Integration?
And i'm an aspirant like you.

sodson11:
You Would Take The Log To Base E Of Both Sides And Then Do Implicit Differebtiation

Queed:



lol, we could share ideas here
Am also an aspirant too

Teempakguy:
I don't think so . . . there is only one variable here. Also only one function.

Teempakguy:
okay. no problem. As long as it is science based.

sodson11:
Thats The Way To Do It. You will get in y = x in x..... Then after differentiation 1/y times dy/dx = x/x + inx.... Dy/dx = x^x ( 1 + in x)

Teempakguy:
lol
Look again. He didn't ask us to differentiate. He asked us to integrate.

Teempakguy:
Hi there!

Teempakguy.

I just discovered an amazing thread. Really, it's one of those concepts that makes you want to think, why didn't I think of that?

Anyway, the thread simply wants you to use your imagination. Think wild!
What do you want science to do for you in your lifetime? Do you want flying cars? Time travel? Whatever you want!!
Just tell us there.

Here is the link. . https://www.nairaland.com/2408461/fantasy-fiction-world-no-rules#35193894

Then, we can all come back and discuss just how we can make all that possible.

Cc

Anyi5
Fejikudz
Slimzjoe
Freemanan
Finniblinks
ELYMAXiimus
Mrbillz
Genes
Emperormero
Khattab02
Rockiedink
Laykorn
BigBen10
Intergral
Nurd
Soloxxng
Taharqa
Baggylips
Harmvirus
RobinHez
Oathman
Gorimakpa1
Dhsfbi
Cindino20
Xploraben
Horlufemi
1miccza
Hollarsmith
All4naija
Niyeal
Kingcity
Geofavour
Lushcream
Bhenehdikt

Patiently waiting.

Taolyn4lif:
Good day lovers of science. It's so cool to be here.

I'm presently working on remediation studies of heavy metals contaminated soils using the method of immobilization of the heavy metals with some materials that are going to be used as additives in the soil.

I need the precious ideas of people who have previously done the same or similar work or those that are currently involved in similar research.

Please quote me whenever you want to respond to my message.

Thanks