For a/an primitive inspired writer who had no access whatsoever to basic science education or sophisticated space gadgets to give a scientifically accurate information,
For a primitive inspired submission to stand up to scientifically accurate facts,

I strongly believe Bernard Ramm was right when he quoted:
“A thousand times over, the death knell of the Bible has been sounded, the funeral procession formed, the inscription cut on the tombstone, and committal read. But somehow the corpse never stays put.”

“No other book has been so chopped, knifed, sifted, scrutinized, and vilified. What book on philosophy or religion or psychology or belles lettres of classical or modern times has been subject to such a mass attack as the Bible? With such venom and skepticism? With such thoroughness and erudition? Upon every chapter, line and tenet?”


Watch this 4 minute piece of information i stumbled upon on the net and think about how the writer of Genesis got such information:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KMd-5MVF_E




"There is abundant evidence that the Bible, though written by men, is not the product of the human mind. By countless multitudes it has always been revered as a communication to us from the Creator of the Universe".
“We must not build on the sands of an uncertain and everchanging science…but upon the rock of inspired Scriptures.”-Sir Ambrose Flemming , British electrical engineer and inventor, 1849-1945



The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever. Isaiah 40:8

God bless you as you watch the above clip.

When we say The Word of God, it's not just that the authors of the books write from mere understanding... They are simply connected with the source of knowledge.. Moses wrote the first five books based on the touch and inspiration of the Holy Spirit and this brought about the whole science of a thing... Hit like if you are a proud committed Christian... Share if you aren't a believer in Christ yet so that your peeps will help you out to believe in Christ...

winner01:

God bless you.

There is no science in the Bible. Not a single piece of science. Don't just say there is. SHOW there is.

merzybenedict:

Moses wrote the first five books based on the touch and inspiration of the Holy Spirit and this brought about the whole science of a thing...

Moses is the father of science?

sonOfLucifer:

There is no science in the Bible. Not a single piece of science. Don't just say there is. SHOW there is.

did you understands quantum physics

RealAdewole:
did you understands quantum physics

I do not. I am not a physicist. Does the Bible explain quantum physics?

Genesis tells us that there is water above sky. As in, it tells us that the sky is like a solid canopy with water above it. I don't think that your definition of science is in line with the general definition of it.

sonOfLucifer:

I do not. I am not a physicist. Does the Bible explain quantum physics?

I shouldn't trouble myself trying to explains things to u

sonOfLucifer:

I do not. I am not a physicist. Does the Bible explain quantum physics?

see name,,end tym homo sapien

RealAdewole:
I shouldn't trouble myself trying to explains things to u

Because you have none? I understand.

sonOfLucifer:

Because you have none? I understand.

am slipy eyed now,but i wud show u loads of scientific facts in d bible wen am wide-eyed 2moro ok.
Eg.
The bible explicitly claimed d world was round,y science was saying d world was flat,
science now agrees
buk of psalms/jobs

The bible says mans made frm dust,
science disprovd bt now d facts dir!!
Man may just b made truly frm dust; buk of genesis

man a product of semen,coitur interuptus posibu 2 stop pregnancy ; buk of judges

d world wud /could be dstroyd by fire!
Science now agrees dat d earth has enough nitrogen in d atm,and enof heat at its core to blow up d earth; revelation

sonOfLucifer:

Because you have none? I understand.

bacause I cant beat sense into u. Did u know how matter look like

sonOfLucifer:

There is no science in the Bible. Not a single piece of science. Don't just say there is. SHOW there is.

Dude, I have nothing to show you. I can only tell you to use your brains, I cant show you how.

stanvesco:

am slipy eyed now,but i wud show u loads of scientific facts in d bible wen am wide-eyed 2moro ok.
Eg.
The bible explicitly claimed d world was round,y science was saying d world was flat,
science now agrees
buk of psalms/jobs

The bible says mans made frm dust,
science disprovd bt now d facts dir!!
Man may just b made truly frm dust; buk of genesis

man a product of semen,coitur interuptus posibu 2 stop pregnancy ; buk of judges

d world wud /could be dstroyd by fire!
Science now agrees dat d earth has enough nitrogen in d atm,and enof heat at its core to blow up d earth; revelation

In Isaiah 40 verse 22. The term circle of earth is used. The last time I checked a circle is flat.
The biblical view of the earth is that is a flat disk resting upon pillars that Cant be moved and with the sun revolving round it. As shown in psalm 93 verse 1 . and FYI oxygen is meant for combustion and not nitrogen. Nitrogen limits combustion because it is inert. The scientific view of the end of the world is that the sun would destroy it. And also other religions claim to have alleged scientific facts in their scriptures.

urahara:


In Isaiah 40 verse 22. The term circle of earth is used. The last time I checked a circle is flat.
The biblical view of the earth is that is a flat disk resting upon pillars that Cant be moved and with the sun revolving round it.

Can people see this desperation?
So when you hear the word "circle", flat comes to your mind. Okay then, Knock yourself out.

winner01:
Can people see this desperation?
So when you hear the word "circle", flat comes to your mind. Okay then, Knock yourself out.

When I hear the word circle round and flat comes to my mind

In early Mesopotamia mythology the earth was a flat disk floating on water covered by a spherical sky.

urahara:


When I hear the word circle round and flat comes to my mind

So you have included the word "round" so as to validate your claim.
Leave desperation, Circle and flat are not the same ehn

urahara:
In early Mesopotamia mythology the earth was a flat disk floating on water covered by a spherical sky.

Okay, try harder next time.

winner01:
Okay, try harder next time.

Leviticus 11 verse 6

And the hare, because it chews the cud but does not divide the hoof; it is unclean to you.



The Hare does not chew it's cud. How can an omniscient God not know this.

[quote author=winner01 post=40180963][b][i]"There's far more truth in the Book of Genesis than in the quantum theory"-Malcolm Muggeridge


Sorry, quantum theory actually explains existence and reality more than the bible. Quantum mechanics in fact prove the existence of God. The bible and other religious books are simply documents that mass murderers used to cover up their atrocities. If you want to know God, look for Him in science. That's the only place He is true and the Almighty.

4 And God said, Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them be signs and tokens [of God’s provident care], and [to mark] seasons, days, and years,

15 And let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light upon the earth. And it was so.

16 And God made the two great lights—the greater light (the sun) to rule the day and the lesser light (the moon) to rule the night. He also made the stars.

17 And God set them in the expanse of the heavens to give light upon the earth,


Point 1 the moon has no light. It reflects light from the sun.

Point 2. The sun moon and stars are not in any sky. If they were we would be dead by now.

urahara:


In Isaiah 40 verse 22. The term circle of earth is used. The last time I checked a circle is flat.
The biblical view of the earth is that is a flat disk resting upon pillars that Cant be moved and with the sun revolving round it. As shown in psalm 93 verse 1 . and FYI oxygen is meant for combustion and not nitrogen. Nitrogen limits combustion because it is inert. The scientific view of the end of the world is that the sun would destroy it. And also other religions claim to have alleged scientific facts in their scriptures.

i am supa busy now,however i wil come bak with detailed n beta facts for u ok

winner01:
So you have included the word "round" so as to validate your claim.
Leave desperation, Circle and flat are not the same ehn

d earth in geographys actually spherical....bt dats nt d point now.
Dir r more mind blowing facts frm d bible

[quote author=oglalasioux post=40195753][/quote]You might nee to tell that to malcom muggeridge.

winner01:
You might nee to tell that to malcom muggeridge.

Good to know you don't subscribe to his warped idea

urahara:
4 And God said, Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them be signs and tokens [of God’s provident care], and [to mark] seasons, days, and years,

15 And let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light upon the earth. And it was so.

16 And God made the two great lights—the greater light (the sun) to rule the day and the lesser light (the moon) to rule the night. He also made the stars.

17 And God set them in the expanse of the heavens to give light upon the earth,


Point 1 the moon has no light. It reflects light from the sun.

Point 2. The sun moon and stars are not in any sky. If they were we would be dead by now.

Very vacuous comment . So If I say I love the moonlight I have no idea that the moon is opaque and reflects the sun's light ? Have you wondered how the moon got its ability to reflect the sun's light ? I mean since according to you , there is no creator and everything just happened to be .

And the point2 , is just a misconception

KingEbukasBlog:


Very vacuous comment . So If I say I love the moonlight I have no idea that the moon is opaque and reflects the sun's light ? Have you wondered how the moon got its ability to reflect the sun's light ? I mean since according to you , there is no creator and everything just happened to be .

And the point2 , is just a misconception

pronunciation(IPA): /ˈmunlaɪt/noun (uncountable)The light reflected from the moon.(attributive) Illuminated by the light from the moon.

So yes if you talk of moonlight I know what u are talking of. But in this case what is been talked of is not moonlight. It's the moon having its own light. And FYI I am not an atheist. U Christians don't realise that Muslims can also point out that error x means y. U bend the truth so you can keep believing in your crappie book

urahara:

pronunciation(IPA): /ˈmunlaɪt/noun (uncountable)The light reflected from the moon.(attributive) Illuminated by the light from the moon.

So yes if you talk of moonlight I know what u are talking of. But in this case what is been talked of is not moonlight. It's the moon having its own light. And FYI I am not an atheist. U Christians don't realise that Muslims can also point out that error x means y. U bend the truth so you can keep believing in your crappie book

Trying to pontificate one's translation forcefully can be deleterious to the mind . Stop wallowing in misconceptions and see the truth . The moon having its own light was never implied .

Dont get me stated with splitting of the moon