cococandy:
I've a problem with the term 'husband's money'
If they were married it belonged to both of them.

But as is pointed out in the story. The judge was obviously biased towards the woman and against the man.

65-35 ke?
Alapamasise
What happened to 50-50?

Is it because he allegedly wasted 2million of the family money before it could be shared?

Look at this sucker .
Olè , Òle

Fkforyou:
0

Reminds me of one episode in 'Suits
which was about louis litt's sister and her soon to be ex-husband, he was demanding their assets be shared equally just because he had to forfeit going to medical school, even though he lied about the medical school ish.and for that reason was only entitled to 20% as stated in the pre-nup, Litts sister was mad because she couldn't bare the thought of him taking 50% of all she had worked for.
My point is, it's not as easy as it sounds to lose half of you sweat to someone just because you are married to them.

Indeed.

But when it's the man losing the money
They say it's okay and normal