BlackMerchant:
Serving judges, as a matter of professional conduct and ethics, do not grant interviews to the press. So this purported interview is a HOAX. PDP and Wike trying to justify the travesty that was the Supreme Court judgment on Rivers State.

BlackMerchant:
Serving judges, as a matter of professional conduct and ethics, do not grant interviews to the press. So this purported interview is a HOAX. PDP and Wike trying to justify the travesty that was the Supreme Court judgment on Rivers State.

BlackMerchant:
Serving judges, as a matter of professional conduct and ethics, do not grant interviews to the press. So this purported interview is a HOAX. PDP and Wike trying to justify the travesty that was the Supreme Court judgment on Rivers State.

APCzombie:


I just had to quote your foolishness again.

Was the justice not replaced?

Was the tribunal not relocated from Rivers to Abuja?

You partisan goat. When will you understand that politics is not like football where you stick to your useless relegation level club?

For every lie you spread here may it take root on your person and character

Tout

talktimi:
this so called interview was waaaay before the supreme court judgement

BlackMerchant:


Yes, it was, and it is being recirculated now after the Supreme Court judgment. When it first came out, I read it and I remembered that it was disputed at the time. Have you even wondered why the op did not cite a source or url of the interview? Because it is fake.

BlackMerchant:


Naturally, I don't respond to trolls, not to talk of thrash but let me set the records straight for those who might be swayed by your ignorance:

A judge does not grant interviews. It is a matter of professional conduct that can attract disciplinary measures against an erring judge. His Lordship, Pindiga, is a current judge. Even though he had a grouse with his removal as Chairman of the Tribunal, he cannot come out and speak to the press about this removal. Because he was not removed as a judge but a chairman of a tribunal, he still comes under the disciplinary field of the law profession. The highest he can do, should he want to vent his displeasure in a public manner, is to do that via a public lecture or during a valedictory session for a retiring judge, as the CJN recently did. Even at that, he can only make oblique references to the incident, not a direct reference to it, as the CJN did.

As to whether the judgment of the tribunal was procured or not, that is left for anybody to believe or not to believe. It is not my business. My business is that the interview is a hoax and must not be disbelieved by reasonable people, except trolls. Shikena.

BlackMerchant:


Yes, it was, and it is being recirculated now after the Supreme Court judgment. When it first came out, I read it and I remembered that it was disputed at the time. Have you even wondered why the op did not cite a source or url of the interview? Because it is fake.

APCzombie:


The only fake thing here is your weak argument.

You are hinging your straw man argument on the lame excuse that judges do not grant press interviews.

That is a big lie as the. Press gag is reatricted to if a case is pending in court.

The justice raised alarm after he was forced out of the case and this was long before the Supreme Court ruling.

Did you even hear him comment on the proceedings?

The judge only commented on circumstances surrounding him being relieved from the case


Make you know henceforth that you are not talking to illiterate Tajus and adamus.

BlackMerchant:


I don't repeat arguments.

My question is, Can you cite the source of this interview? I mean, a verifiable source. Not a blog or the like. A real url source.

BlackMerchant:


I don't repeat arguments.

My question is, Can you cite the source of this interview? I mean, a verifiable source. Not a blog or the like. A real url source.

APCzombie:


Now you are begging for source?

Typical

Deny the event ever happened

Discredit source, author or OP

Deflect to Jonathan by assigning blame to his administration

Derail to an e war

Ask for thread Deletion

We know una style

Useless shill

Clerverly:


Mynd44 Enforce Rule 2 asap!

BlackMerchant:



Why are you scared of providing a source? After all the hot air you blew, after all the thrash you spewed, you cannot provide a source to back up your points. Lol! LEARNER.

APCzombie:


Keep deflecting to me


Dem tell you say I be OP?

Google it for yourself

Nobody is here to convert your zombie brain

BlackMerchant:


Naturally, I don't respond to trolls, not to talk of thrash but let me set the records straight for those who might be swayed by your ignorance:

A judge does not grant interviews. It is a matter of professional conduct that can attract disciplinary measures against an erring judge. His Lordship, Pindiga, is a current judge. Even though he had a grouse with his removal as Chairman of the Tribunal, he cannot come out and speak to the press about this removal. Because he was not removed as a judge but a chairman of a tribunal, he still comes under the disciplinary field of the law profession. The highest he can do, should he want to vent his displeasure in a public manner, is to do that via a public lecture or during a valedictory session for a retiring judge, as the CJN recently did. Even at that, he can only make oblique references to the incident, not a direct reference to it, as the CJN did.

As to whether the judgment of the tribunal was procured or not, that is left for anybody to believe or not to believe. It is not my business. My business is that the interview is a hoax and must not be disbelieved by reasonable people, except trolls. Shikena.

praxisnetworks:





This is the most hypocritical, greedy, violent, malevolent, vengeful, cowardly, deadly, mendacious, meretricious, loathsome, despicable, belligerent, opportunistic, barratrous, contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic,
brain-damaged, imbecilic, insane, arrogant, deceitful, demented, lame, self-righteous, byzantine, conspiratorial, satanic, fraudulent, libelous, bilious, splenetic, spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb, evasive, double-talking, devious, revisionist, narrow, manipulative, paternalistic, fundamentalist, dogmatic, idolatrous,
unethical, cultic, diseased, suppressive, controlling, restrictive, malignant, deceptive, dim, crazy, weird, dystopic, stifling, uncaring, plantigrade, grim, unsympathetic, jargon-spouting, censorious, secretive, aggressive, mind-numbing, arassive, poisonous, flagrant,
self-destructive, abusive, socially-slow, puerile, clueless, and generally NOT GOOD STATEMENT from you.

BlackMerchant:


But you haven't said anything here.

praxisnetworks:

At least you can't run to the mods with this one.... Like cleverly... Message was attacked not messenger.....

BlackMerchant:


Not interested in running to mods for help. I fight my own battles myself.

praxisnetworks:

At least you can't run to the mods with this one.... Like cleverly... Message was attacked not messenger.....replace the "This is" at the opening with something like "you are"

BlackMerchant:

Not interested in running to mods for help. I fight my own battles myself.

APCzombie:


Keep deceiving yourself


A justice was threatened, blackmailed and offered a bribe and later removed unceremoniously and you expect him to shut up?


You will get your useless nijeriya under full despotism very soon but not with us in the better south


Bloody sycophantic rice craving shill