Okijajuju1:



Oga..

I have been working for over 5 years.. Tell me again how Tax Clearance that your Company deducts at sorce can be arranged?

Most especially Tax of a State or Federal Civil Servant..


Bros,I don't want to reveal-I dey do am!




I am not talking about P.I.T that you pay based on income declared o!! I am talking of your salary where tax is deducted at source.

PhockPhockMan:
But Buhari, in the document titled, ‘I pledge to Nigeria’ had also said that all his political appointees would only earn salaries and allowances as prescribed by the Revenue and Mobilisation and Fiscal Allocation Commission.

He said, “I pledge to publicly declare my assets and liabilities, encourage all my appointees publicly declare their assets and liabilities as a pre-condition for appointment. All political appointees will only earn the salaries and allowances determined by the RMFAC. I pledge, as Commander-in-Chief, to lead from the front and not behind in the comfort and security of Aso Rock, to boost the morale of fighting forces and the generality of all Nigerians.”

http://www.punchng.com/news/buhari-vp-fail-to-declare-assets-publicly/

TamedWolf90:



Is it that you have problem comprehending written English or you lack adequate thinking facilities??,
So the part where he stated that they were not subpoenaed or inviting by uche ogar or the court pending the case is oblivious to you??

One problem is that we always argue without thinking rationally... I don't side anybody but atleast no knowledge is a waste... #NdiMmadu Sef

nwadiuko1:
th same thing I was saying the other day and one boy that feeds through his anus was making noise....

wheredemdey abeg come and receive a lecture on ACC 312

seunmsg:


The problem with people like you is that you dont understand how the court works and still, you openly display your ignorance to the entire world. Why should the court subpoena the state internal revenue service when neither the prosecuting nor the defence team listed them as a witness? When you have a case to prosecute or defend in court, you call as many witness as possible to help your case. It is not the duty of the court to help you come up with witnesses to defend your case, that is the duty of your legal team.

NgeneUkwenu:
Medicine After Death....You can only convince the overly sentimental IPOB Vandals with this afterthought....

bestestgirl:
I wonder O!! if the court forgot to subpoena the revenue service, what happened to Ikpeazu's lawyers?? are they that daft??

Johnrake69:



You don't have to be like this all the time... Now, how was it possible to invalidate the said document without confirming with the issuer of the said document? Don't you think it's fishy.

seunmsg:


The problem with people like you is that you dont understand how the court works and still, you openly display your ignorance to the entire world. Why should the court subpoena the state internal revenue service when neither the prosecuting nor the defence team listed them as a witness? When you have a case to prosecute or defend in court, you call as many witness as possible to help your case. It is not the duty of the court to help you come up with witnesses to defend your case, that is the duty of your legal team.

kahal29:


Nwadiuko my brother the Gov has a bad case the earlier you realize this fact the better for you my brother. The legal team of the Governor messed up this case - what they should have done at the trial stage of this case they are just doing now. For argument sake let us even assume without conceding that the state Board of internal revenue was not invited to state it's own side of the story - What effort did they make to get them testify as to help their case or tender this statement that was just issued as evidence in court? Even if they tried and the court refused them why didn't they order the Board to release this statement since or at least before the judgment was given? Now they waited till this morning which to me is an after thought.

Like some said here and which I totally agree with - the court cannot help a party in suit to prosecute it's case, it will only give judgment based on the facts presented before it and the question I have for you Ikpeazu supporters is - WHAT FACTS DID THEY PRESENT IN COURT cos it seems to me the legal team of the Governor just woke up from sleep.

seunmsg:
Nonsense, they should have presented this evidence in court before the judgement was given.

kahal29:


Nwadiuko my brother the Gov has a bad case the earlier you realize this fact the better for you my brother. The legal team of the Governor messed up this case - what they should have done at the trial stage of this case they are just doing now. For argument sake let us even assume without conceding that the state Board of internal revenue was not invited to state it's own side of the story - What effort did they make to get them testify as to help their case or tender this statement that was just issued as evidence in court? Even if they tried and the court refused them why didn't they order the Board to release this statement since or at least before the judgment was given? Now they waited till this morning which to me is an after thought.

Like some said here and which I totally agree with - the court cannot help a party in suit to prosecute it's case, it will only give judgment based on the facts presented before it and the question I have for you Ikpeazu supporters is - WHAT FACTS DID THEY PRESENT IN COURT cos it seems to me the legal team of the Governor just woke up from sleep.

kahal29:


Nwadiuko my brother the Gov has a bad case the earlier you realize this fact the better for you my brother. The legal team of the Governor messed up this case - what they should have done at the trial stage of this case they are just doing now. For argument sake let us even assume without conceding that the state Board of internal revenue was not invited to state it's own side of the story - What effort did they make to get them testify as to help their case or tender this statement that was just issued as evidence in court? Even if they tried and the court refused them why didn't they order the Board to release this statement since or at least before the judgment was given? Now they waited till this morning which to me is an after thought.

Like some said here and which I totally agree with - the court cannot help a party in suit to prosecute it's case, it will only give judgment based on the facts presented before it and the question I have for you Ikpeazu supporters is - WHAT FACTS DID THEY PRESENT IN COURT cos it seems to me the legal team of the Governor just woke up from sleep.

pedrilo:
wat stopped the court from approaching abia state board of internal revenue for verification of the tax clearance before passing judgment?

nwadiuko1:
let's wait for the appeal court judgement my brother

seunmsg:


Read my earlier submissions on this thread. The court cannot go out of its way to look for witness for parties in a case, that is the duty of the legal teams of the parties. The court will then decide the case based on the evidence of the witnesses called by the contending parties. What is there that you people dont understand?

seunmsg:
Nonsense, they should have presented this evidence in court before the judgement was given.

seunmsg:


The problem with people like you is that you dont understand how the court works and still, you openly display your ignorance to the entire world. Why should the court subpoena the state internal revenue service when neither the prosecuting nor the defence team listed them as a witness? When you have a case to prosecute or defend in court, you call as many witness as possible to help your case. It is not the duty of the court to help you come up with witnesses to defend your case, that is the duty of your legal team.

MadamExcellency:
No matter on whose side you are in support, if the last paragraph is true then something is wrong somewhere.



Is it possible to declare a document fake without inviting the issuing authority?

seunmsg:


Read my earlier submissions on this thread. The court cannot go out of its way to look for witness for parties in a case, that is the duty of the legal teams of the parties. The court will then decide the case based on the evidence of the witnesses called by the contending parties. What is there that you people dont understand?

NgeneUkwenu:
Medicine After Death....You can only convince the overly sentimental IPOB Vandals with this afterthought....

KissCODE:
you disgust me so much.

Why didnt the court or Ogar invite them at least as second or third defendant okay maybe as just a witness?

How did the court or Ogar know that the tax return Ikpezu filed is fake or falso when the “supposedly“ issuer was not invite to authenticate or orderwise the receipt?

You are just an illiterate.....Dont quote me next time..
My challenge with ZOMBIES is that you people think we all are like you that dont use your heads.

Tufia too bad.

aguone:
Yes, "IF there is any irregularity with the tax certificate, the issuing authority will be the ones to explain" when they are invited to do so. So why did Ikpeazu legal team fail to invite the tax authority to appear as defence witness?

frankline5:
from what ikpeazu lawyer said on channel TV,his team recommended that Ibia tax agency to come and testify but,the judge denied them the opportunity.

You should now did the judge do so.