Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,194,418 members, 7,954,660 topics. Date: Saturday, 21 September 2024 at 05:26 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1024588 Views)
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 9:56pm On Aug 03, 2016 |
chinese8107: another version called VN11 has a 100mm cannon can fire Russian bastin ATM at max range 4000m ,30mm gun,7.62mm gun.It's an variant version of BMP3 can accommodates 7 peoples..70 km/h speed.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:00pm On Aug 04, 2016 |
china next gen concept fighter emulator with (HMD)Head Mounted Display not sure JF17 block 3 or 4 can equipt ,very likely block 3 at least has HMD and IRST 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:07pm On Aug 04, 2016 |
nemesis2u: do you have video of it's actual performances ? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:10pm On Aug 04, 2016 |
for jungle desert or sand beach patrol
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 7:41pm On Aug 04, 2016 |
chinese8107: |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 12:43pm On Aug 06, 2016 |
Odunayaw: What does he say ? As I mentioned earlier, it has both disadvantages and advantages. I heard pakistan is observing waiting for the plane to upgrade.It's payloads close to Su-30 with very competitive price and some stealth technology,despite the weaker manuverablity.it's has a protential to be a good bomber if not a good fighter. The plane is designed primarily to sank battle-ship like frigate or covertte.It has a sea skimming mode that fly only 100- 300m above sea,which is very hard to be detected by enemy rader. Also, the avionic has been upgraded to FBW, and rader upgraded. And Chinese engine used,a twin-engine is safer than one engine plane,which means if one engine stops the other engine may still works.That gives some confidences to users who doesn't very trust Chinese engines. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 4:12pm On Aug 06, 2016 |
nemesis2u: A beautiful chariot. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:29pm On Aug 06, 2016 |
chinese8107:anyway..His disgust was on its maneuverability I used to adore d bird cuz of its payload...well since my country doesn't need a platform that its capabilities fills...I hereby withdraw my love for it |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:30pm On Aug 06, 2016 |
chinese8107:can this be used to train jf-17 pilots? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:56pm On Aug 06, 2016 |
Odunayaw: JF-17 has it's own emulator.The cockpit of block I and Block II is different from this,block III is unkown. Theoretically speaking you can emulate any plane on an emulator,to some extent,if you can bear the difference in cockpit, it's just some software problem. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:01pm On Aug 06, 2016 |
China Type 04A IFV (ZBD-04A) current arment simillar to VN11 ,it too big and tall modular APC plantform designed for desert or high plateau can add different weapons or armor
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 6:04pm On Aug 06, 2016 |
chinese8107:alryt bruh |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:42pm On Aug 06, 2016 |
chinese8107: no but i found a video of its namesake https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CHAhyZ6OyM |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 11:28am On Aug 07, 2016 |
This platform based on WZ534 or WZ501 chassis simillar to T-55 or BMP2 chassis it's lower in hight no easy to be seen by enemy or exposed to close fire. The type86A is lower than BMP2 in hight.pic 3. The BMP 1/2 is a good desigen not only can carry extra troops on it's top, but also function as a bunker sometimes
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:47pm On Aug 07, 2016 |
Ukraine refurbish T-72 /T 64 from junk stock.This is an indutry.American also do this.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:55am On Aug 08, 2016 |
New British IFV 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:58am On Aug 08, 2016 |
Old infographic Project Yansen
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 9:43am On Aug 08, 2016 |
German IFV not bad,even if not new,the problem is the price, even 2 hand not cheap.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 1:11pm On Aug 08, 2016 |
2015 tank Biathlon final http://player.youku.com/embed/XMTMxNTA2NTU2MA== https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMVu54MXW3M |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 1:30pm On Aug 08, 2016 |
4 Ways Russia's Military Technology Is More Advanced Than You Might Think Vladimir Putin is not a man to back down from provocation, especially a direct, lethal provocation like the shooting down of a Russian Su-24 aircraft by Turkey on Tuesday. Such an attack raises the possibility of a direct military confrontation, and makes you wonder just what Russia could do if you rattled its cage. How dangerous are they? Russia's defense complex may be just a shadow of the old Soviet Union, with defense spending only about 12 percent of the USA's. As such, many in the West tend to see Russian hardware as second-rate—stuck with 1970's electronics, crude manufacturing standards, and no money to improve matters. If the Russians make anything good, the thinking goes, they must have copied it from the West. The poor performance of the Russian-equipped Iraqi army in 2003 (and Russian-supplied Arab forces against the Israelis) reinforces the idea of inferior Russian military tech. In reality, Russia can be innovative in weapons design, and sometimes ahead of the West. Occasionally the country pursues crazy ideas than cannot work, like mind control weaponry. Yet just as often they develop weapons with no counterparts in the U.S. ROCKETS Nobody should doubt Russian rocket science. After all, they have provided all the manned flights to the International Space Station since the retirement of the Space Shuttle in 2011, and Russia's military rockets have a long pedigree. In 1973, new Soviet-built guided anti-tank missiles carried by Egyptian infantry decimated Israeli armor in their first large-scale use on the battlefield. Similarly, Russian SA-7 "Strela," a shoulder-launched heat-seeking surface-to-air missile, gave the Israeli Air Force real problems in the same 1973 conflict. They did not shoot down many aircraft, but forced pilots to change tactics. Portable missiles meant a plane could not just cruise over looking for targets. The SA-7 was the contemporary of an American missile, the FIM-43 Redeye. Both weapons were limited to shooting at the jet exhaust of receding aircraft only; the Russians introduced an upgraded Strela-3 which could tackle aircraft head-on in 1974, a capability which the US could not match until the FIM-92 Stinger arrived in 1982. Russian surface-to-air missiles are still formidable, hence the long-running concerns over the possible supply of the advanced S-300 system to Iran. The Russians themselves have a more sophisticated air-defense system, the S-400, which they are now set to deploy in Syria. These are dangerous weapons. Far from being backward, the Russian developers have "mastered the difficult embedded software technology so critical for radar and electronic warfare system," according to analyst Carlo Kopp. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 1:36pm On Aug 08, 2016 |
CONTINUATION AIR-TO-AIR In air-to-air combat, the Russians have long pursued an approach of firing salvoes rather than single shots. Planes like the Su-27 Flanker may carry a dozen missiles, launching two or three at a time. The missiles have different guidance types—a mixture of infra-red and radar-guided—that makes jamming or avoiding all of them difficult, and gives a high chance of a kill. A radar-guided missile may be fired alongside another missile that homes in on radar jamming, guaranteeing a hit whether or not a jammer is used. Russian aircraft's missiles are sophisticated, too. The Russian Vympel R-73 dogfight missile has an "off-boresight" capability to hit targets not directly in front of the aircraft. It was introduced in 1982, and NATO planners soon noted the advantage it gave Russian pilots in a close-quarters fight compared to their equivalent, the AIM-9 Sidewinder. U.S. pilots did not gain the same off-boresight capability until the AIM-9X version of the Sidewinder more than 20 years later. Meanwhile, the Russian R-73 has enjoyed several upgrades, and missile buffs still argue about which is better. For longer-range air combat (40 miles or more) the Russians have the Vympel R-77, another advanced piece of hardware. The latest version has an Active Phased Array Antenna that gives it "zero reaction time to unexpected evolutions of the target," according to the designers. Called the "can't miss missile", the K-77M appears to be more sophisticated than the current version of the West's equivalent, the AIM-120 AMRAAM. War Is Boring writes that, "The U.S. military doesn't have anything like it … or adequate defenses." The K-77M was revealed in 2013 and may already be in production. In any conflict, US warplanes will be heavily dependent on stealth technology to make them invisible to radar and give them the edge. Of course the Russians have long been working on counter-stealth systems. For example the Russian 55Zh6ME air defense radar released in 2013 has multiple radar modules working at different wavelengths. It is easy to design an aircraft that is invisible at one wavelength, but progressively harder the more wavelengths involved. We do not know how well this counter-stealth radar works, but aviation guru Bill Sweetman points out that the Russians have had 25 years to work on it. THE WEIRD STUFF The Russians also have a surprising ability to think out of the box—for good and bad. For example, the Shkval rocket-torpedo forms a bubble around itself, reducing friction to travel at an amazing 230 mph under water – more than four times as fast as any Western torpedo. The same work produced a unique underwater assault rifle for Special Forces; US development in similar "supercavitating" projectiles lags behind. This oddball thinking extends to the strategic arena. In 2012, Putin wrote an article for Rossiiskaya Gazeta on the strategic military balance in which he advocated "weapons systems based on new principles: beam, geophysical, wave, genetic, psychophysical and other technology." Some of this is dubious. In the field of new wave principles, the Soviets started research into Torsion field weapons in 1987. These are supposed energy fields (not recognized by Western science) with electrical and gravitational effects, and researchers promised to use them to shoot down ballistic missiles. A review by the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1991 concluded that torsion fields were a scam to get money, having attracted some five hundred million roubles of state funding (roughly $15 billion dollars). Russian research into so-called "psychotronic" weapons for mind control has been similarly fruitless. "Geophysical weapons" to create earthquakes remain imaginary, though one Russian analyst suggested earlier this year that the Yellowstone supervolcano might be triggered with a nuclear strike to destroy the US. So there's that. THE UNKNOWN We can still expect the unexpected. A recent Russian TV news report appears to have leaked Putin's plans for a unmanned submarine carrying a 10-megaton dirty bomb. This would be detonated at a port city, submarine base, or other coastal site, spreading a lethal radioactive cloud over a wide area. The main purpose of this unusual delivery method seems to be bypassing any possible antimissile defences. Scare stories notwithstanding, the Russians are unlikely to have any exotic superweapons. But it is dangerous for the rest of the world to underestimate its capability. A regional conflict in Syria may not be a pushover against second-rate forces with outdated equipment, but could turn into something very much bloodier. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:24pm On Aug 08, 2016 |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:01pm On Aug 09, 2016 |
http://player.youku.com/embed/XMTY3NDY4MDg4OA== 2016 August 6 tank biathlon Zimbabwe/Russia/China T-72B3/T-72B3M/Type-96B Russia starts from 14:42 ,China ends 39:00 The T-72 series are( MT )manual transmition while Type-96B is (AT )automatic transmition,that's why has different manuverablity. It has steeling wheel like another Chinese tank VT-4,driving like a car.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:35am On Aug 10, 2016 |
2016 Suworov assult Russia Kazakhstan China BMP-2 VS Type-86A http://player.youku.com/embed/XMTY3MjkwMzU5Mg== |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:46am On Aug 10, 2016 |
Japan Toyota HMMWV
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:55am On Aug 10, 2016 |
nemesis2u: no suprise Russia Ukraine China can or maybe Iran can make US China Germanny is developing supercavitating submarine. USA already has experimental fast attack craft based on this technology [img]http://easyread.ph.126.net/bsvNDx0UqO6k-2OF-8WVlQ==/8796093022575322606.jpg[/img]
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:47am On Aug 10, 2016 |
CIWS
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:06pm On Aug 10, 2016 |
pic 1 2 south korean patrol vessel pic 3 4 F16 block 70 proposed for made in india
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:10pm On Aug 10, 2016 |
Elbit Systems completed recently a trial test torpedo launch from its Seagull multi-mission, autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel(USV) system. The trial, performed out of Israel's Haifa port,demonstrated the capability of Seagull to install and launch lightweight torpedoes, adding to the advanced capabilities of the USV, which is designed to carry out unmanned maritime missions, such as protection of critical sea areas and high-value assets against submarines and sea mine threats. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:12pm On Aug 10, 2016 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IFSlnaAe6k good weapon systems shown here , some very good especially for CT ops |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:19pm On Aug 10, 2016 |
pic 1 Tejas flying with Python-5! Python-5 + DASH HMD . pic 2 3 naval varient tejas https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR88zf50vAU airshow display at Bahrain
|
(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) ... (668) (Reply)
American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 72 |