Jungle justice is the act of taking laws into our hands without bringing the law enforcement into the matter, some set of people supported this act while some people are against it as well as the government. The argument for those that supported this act "jungle justice" is that most of them have been victim in one way or the other with the activities of this robbers which has caused things that cannot be forgotten in their life.
Another thing is that they believe that killing people who committed such crime will serve as a deterrent to others in such act to decease from it. All this reasons with many others have supported the set of people that want jungle justice.
The second set of people who are against jungle justice gave reasons why this act shouldn't be welcome, one of their point is that, practicing jungle justice won't stop crime in the country rather it may arouse the anger of some people who are doing such act even to do more and in addition they are several ways in which we can punish this set of people like sentencing them to prison and while they are there, the government can set a scheme to educate them so that they can see reason for them to stop the act.
The question is, is jungle justice good or bad? Will the stop in jungle justice help reduce crime or enhance it the more? Are we not supporting crime if we are against jungle justice? All this questions and many more need answers so as the people will be directed.

This is the handwriting of Shola akinpelumi.

Jungle justice is borne out of corruption in our security system and lack of trust

CHOPUP411:
Jungle justice is borne out of corruption in our security system and lack of trust

Hmm, whst you are saying now is that the people are afraid that they may be free if they bribe the law enforcement unit.