FINAL LAW EXAM PAPER (extracted from a real exam)

A woman was driving an old Honda City car when she mistakenly hit a 2017 Range Rover Evoke..

The lady came out from her Range Rover insulting the other lady for not being careful, asking her to repair her Range Rover.

The woman with the Honda City called her husband, he replied that he was busy, that she should try fix up things and that they will meet later at home.

The lady with the Range Rover called her boyfriend and said "sweetheart someone just hit the birthday gift you gave me, I am so angry, please come over."

Few minutes later her boyfriend arrived. Guess what? He is the husband to the lady with the Honda City car.

Discuss the possible legal consequences for all 3 parties.. (20 Marks).�������

Lol make a comedy video wit tis fam!

Is this actually supposed to make someone even smile atol

Total waste of mb

Wahala

Emmanuella will do well in this skid. Me, I no know law o

Hmm the husband of that woman that refuse to come is already in hot peppersoup

Honda woman will charge the husband for divorce and she will get half of the husband's assets.
Range woman will charge Honda woman to court for carelessness.
Husband will be divorced then girlfriend will date another man.

The man: Here you've a traitor. He betrayed his wife by undermining his marriage vows, cheating on his wife and neglecting her. He deserved a life imprisonment.

The range rover mistress: She's a husband snatcher and a troublemaker. She's a troublemaker because she invited a non authorized person - her unlucky boyfriend - instead of the police or road safety to the scene of the accident. She deserved a 10 years imprisonment.

The legal wife/Honda woman: She has no case, because no authorized person or organization found her wrong in the alleged vehicle bashing. . . She remains innocent until proven guilty by a law court of competent jurisdiction.

Lol

LordKO:
The man: Here you've a traitor. He betrayed his wife by undermining his marriage vows, cheating on his wife and neglecting her. He deserved a life imprisonment.

The range rover mistress: She's a husband snatcher and a troublemaker. She's a troublemaker because she invited a non authorized person - her unlucky boyfriend - instead of the police or road safety to the scene of the accident. She deserved a 10 years imprisonment.

The legal wife/Honda woman: She has no case, because no authorized person or organization found her wrong in the alleged vehicle bashing. . . She remains innocent until proven guilty by a law court of competent jurisdiction.

What a sentimental judgment.

I pull call for your lordship

Alero3Arubi:

What a sentimental judgment.

I pull call for your lordship

Lol. Actually, I made my presentation on the basis that the Honda woman was smart enough to diplomatically picked on the husband on his arrival at the accident scene and if she left the scene immediately afterwards. And also was prompt to have her lawyers to file for a case of treachery against her husband and joined the mistress as a co-defendant. Then, a honourable mention of the accident scene will be to substantiate her claims.

Meanderings not lies win cases for smart lawyers.

How are u alero