tintingz:
It is not chicken out, it shows your deity Jesus Christ was just a human after all.

A divine person existed and doesn't have any physical evidence, what a joke!

Do the secular scorlars said they found Jesus archaeological evidence eh?

Quiet please.
I can see "Myth" is gradually vanishing from your comments.
If you had any shame, you will be quiet by now.

Even Richard Dawkins the most outspoken critic of Christians and atheist has openly apologized for writing in his book that Jesus didnt exist.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5EjA-JNiVk


You have now slided into the argument of "divine"
Instead of quietly swallowing your mythic shame.
Mscheeeewwww

felixomor:


Quiet please.
I can see "Myth" is gradually vanishing from your comments.
If you had any shame, you will be quiet by now.

Even Richard Dawkins the most outspoken critic of Christians and atheist has openly apologized for writing in his book that Jesus didnt exist.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5EjA-JNiVk


You have now slided into the argument of "divine"
Instead of quietly swallowing your mythic shame.
Mscheeeewwww

Lol, why is it short and didn't give full details about the debate?

Dawkins might just probably said "Jesus existed" for the sake of discussion and focus on his divine person, he didn't admit Jesus Christ existed, his first word said "let's leave aside" he want to grant the Christian guy Jesus existed for the sake of argument. Just like I did here.

Sometimes people grant their opponent their wish to wallow in their delusion.

tintingz:
Lol, why is it short and didn't give full details about the debate?
Thanks
Dawkins might just probably said "Jesus existed" for the sake of discussion and focus on his divine person, he didn't admit Jesus Christ existed, his first word said "let's leave aside" he want to grant the Christian guy Jesus existed for the sake of argument. Just like I did here.

Sometimes people grant their opponent their wish to wallow in their delusion.

Grant opponent wish indeed
In a televised debate,
A professor?

Allow shame to catch u my dear

felixomor:

Grant opponent wish indeed
In a televised debate,
A professor?

Allow shame to catch u my dear

Stop acting dumb as if it doesn't happen in a debate or argument. The video is short, they must have been arguing about the existence of Jesus for long and he said OK "let's leave it aside(you know what fučk that), Jesus existed but not divine(let's focus on your delusion), and we see the christian guy spewing some superstitious crap about Jesus.

He granted the Christian guy his wish to see how irrational he sounds.

I did that to a flat earther, I grated him his wish by saying ok let me agree the earth is flat bla bla bla and at the end he sounds irrational and confused.

Read comments of the video and read those that have watched the full length.

tintingz:
Stop acting dumb as if it doesn't happen in a debate or argument. The video is short, they must have been arguing about the existence of Jesus for long and he said OK "let's leave it aside(you know what fučk that), Jesus existed but not divine(let's focus on your delusion), and we see the christian guy spewing some superstitious crap about Jesus.

He granted the Christian guy his wish to see how irrational he sounds.

I did that to a flat earther, I grated him his wish by saying ok let me agree the earth is flat bla bla bla and at the end he sounds irrational and confused.

Keep quiet
You think that is the only video where Dawkins apologize d for his mistake....
I only gave you that video,
because u would have continued to sound foolish...
If i had not.

Stop acting dense!

felixomor:


Keep quiet
You think that is the only video where Dawkins apologize d for his mistake....
I only gave you that video,
because u would have continued to sound foolish...
If i had not.

Stop acting dense!

Do I care about other videos? We are talking about this short video you presented that is out of context.

You're the one acting dense. Mr Felix.

It's quite amazing how much you know about this "Imaginary" God.

dalaman:


You keep buttressing my point. Zuckerberg isn't omnipotent. Wikipedia and the media tells us about his ownership of Facebook because they know that he is very limited. Your imaginary God is claimed to be omnipotent and wants people to know that he exist. Not just that he wants people to know about his special place and message for them and wants to be in a personal relationship with them. Yet it is only incompetent and empty people like you that are always telling people about him and using ancient books to make its case for it, for an alleged God that is real, alive, all powerful and wants people to know about its existence and be in a relationship with it. Only an imaginary God will do that.

tintingz:

He granted the Christian guy his wish to see how irrational he sounds..

Atheists can be seriously deluded , repulsively deluded even

In front of hundreds of observers including his colleagues , students , historians , scientists etc he wanted to grant his interlocutor his wish ?

You don't seem to realize how ineffably stupid this sounds .

Ogbeni , he conceded and apologized , take your "L" and disappear from here !

KingEbukasBlog:


Atheists can be seriously deluded , repulsively deluded even

In front of hundreds of observers including his colleagues , students , historians , scientists etc he wanted to grant his interlocutor his wish ?

You don't seem to realize how ineffably stupid this sounds .

Ogbeni , he conceded and apologized , take your "L" and disappear from here !

Lol, have you watched the full length of the video? Those that have watched the video in the comments even said he only granted the christian guy his wish by admitting Jesus existed for argument sake.

It doesn't matter if 1 billion people were present there, people use this scope to get points in an argument to counter.

"Let's leave it aside" - let's leave the discussion/question aside for a while.

The question is do they go back to the existence of Jesus discussion? From the short video felixomoro presented we don't know.

tintingz:
Do I care about other videos? We are talking about this short video you presented that is out of context.

You're the one acting dense. Mr Felix.

Cop out..
The summary is he took back his mistake.
And did it elsewhere also.


Unlike you shamelessly drowning in your pride and grasping straws.......

KingEbukasBlog:


Atheists can be seriously deluded , repulsively deluded even

In front of hundreds of observers including his colleagues , students , historians , scientists etc he wanted to grant his interlocutor his wish ?

You don't seem to realize how ineffably stupid this sounds .

Ogbeni , he conceded and apologized , take your "L" and disappear from here !

Lol
That guy is A joker

tintingz:
Lol, have you watched the full length of the video? Those that have watched the video in the comments even said he only granted the christian guy his wish by admitting Jesus existed for argument sake.

It doesn't matter if 1 billion people were present there, people use this scope to get points in an argument to counter.

"Let's leave it aside" - let's leave the discussion/question aside for a while.

The question is do they go back to the existence of Jesus discussion? From the short video felixomoro presented we don't know.

I have the full video on my laptop that's why I how knew . The debate took place at Oxford university's museum. Richard Dawkins showed how evasive he can be with questions he can't answer .

felixomor:

Lol
That guy is A joker

That's an atheist for you. It was obvious Richard Dawkins was ashamed that the denied Christ's existence , he immediately apologized . What he bluntly refused to accept is that Christ resurrected

felixomor:

Cop out..
The summary is he took back his mistake.
And did it elsewhere also.


Unlike you shamelessly drowning in your pride and grasping straws.......

Lol, again it is out of context.

In another video, Dawkin said, Jesus was a great and good man followed by people, but he is nowhere to be traced, he can only be traced in people's mind and no traces of Jesus as an individual person...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhflPR-ck0M

So, let me agree Jesus existed, he was never a divine person as there are no evidence for it, he's just a man.

KingEbukasBlog:


I have the full video on my laptop that's why I how knew . The debate took place at Oxford university's museum. Richard Dawkins showed how evasive he can be with questions he can't answer .

Oh yeah the video exist in your laptop.

butterflylion:


Do you see why I said your confusion has swagger?

Moses asked God "who shall I say has sent me"?

God responded tell them that I AM THAT I AM has sent you. I Am that I Am was God describing himself to Moses. He could not offer his name because he is everything and in everything and nothing exists without him so the easiest way to relate to his divine nature is through his many attributes and not his name.

What God told Moses was like saying I am the beginning. I am the ending. I am Alpha. I am Omega. I am pure consciousness. I am the Universe. I am everything. Everything is mine. I am the body. The body is mine. I am the soul, and the spirit. The soul and the spirit is mine. I am the creator of all things, and all things are mine. I am the father, the son, and the holy Ghost. I am the window of the soul. The soul is me.


God told Moses I am THAT I am. Do you know what the word THAT stands for?

OLODO. YVWH is the tetragrammation that God annouced himself with. I am what I am, I am who I will be, etc is YAWEH. YVWH identifies God as the un knowable. According to the jews this is Gods name and the jews dont pronounce YVWH because of "thou shall not take the name of God in vain"....

tintingz:
Oh yeah the video exist in your laptop.

I really do not understand what they are on about. Of course there was a man behind the Jesus mythology. So what of Dawkins believe that Jesus existed. He clearly stated that he doesn't believe that Jesus was a divine figure and all the things attributed to him are mythological.

kkins25:

OLODO. YVWH is the tetragrammation that God annouced himself with. I am what I am, I am who I will be, etc is YAWEH. YVWH identifies God as the un knowable. According to the jews this is Gods name and the jews dont pronounce YVWH because of "thou shall not take the name of God in vain"....

I tire for him o.

dalaman:


I really do not understand what they are on about. Of course there was a man behind the Jesus mythology. So what of Dawkins believe that Jesus existed. He clearly stated that he doesn't believe that Jesus was a divine figure and all the things attributed to him are mythological.

That's just it, in fact there were a lot of people bearing Jesus, the mythological Jesus cannot be traced, there is no evidence for Jesus "Christ", but there are possibility a man named Jesus with loving and charismatic behavior. I don't see how Jesus "Christ" is real, same goes for Moses.

Ayanfeoluwaoba:
It's quite amazing how much you know about this "Imaginary" God.

You sent me a pm. Sorry, I don't have access to that mail anymore. Kindly reach me via whatsapp 09090287555. Thanks

felixomor:


The atheist problem is the reality of God

Many of them will not debate creation, if it was written to be done by aliens
So long as you dont mention God, they are ok burying their heads in the sand, like ostriches.....


Nice one, Op

God bless you my brother. At the heart of atheism is a desire to pursue sin and avoid God. They should watch this movie. www.AtheistMovie.com

I concur.
After much study, that was my discovery too.
Atheists are repugnant sinners. They hate God cos they failed Him...
What rebellion against a loving God!!!
The end is near...Let all fear and reverence Him who has power to cast into hell forever...

felixomor:


Keep quiet
You think that is the only video where Dawkins apologize d for his mistake....
I only gave you that video,
because u would have continued to sound foolish...
If i had not.

Stop acting dense!

lols...typical Christian mentality.

You guys can't never argue sensibly without resorting to using invectives and insults to attack your opponents.

xxxtedyxxx:


lols...typical Christian mentality.

You guys can't never argue sensibly without resorting to using invectives and insults to attack your opponents.

I think you got things wrong. The proponents of insults and invective are atheists and for some even their monikers are deliberately coined as insults.

butterflylion:



I think you got things wrong. The proponents of insults and invective are atheists and for some even their monikers are deliberately coined as insults.

Have you been blind to the vulgarities of ishitlove, Anal-Alice, Felixomoron et al?

JackBizzle:


Have you been blind to the vulgarities of ishitlove, Anal-Alice, Felixomoron et al?

As proof against your own comment, your post here is full of vulgarities with words like shiit, anal and insult like mor0n evident.

butterflylion:



As proof against your own comment, your post here is full of vulgarities with words like shiit, anal and insult like mor0n evident.

I am not denying that atheists can be vulgar. The issue here us that christians do it too. Most of the time, they are the cause and they are worse than atheists.

xxxtedyxxx:


lols...typical Christian mentality.

You guys can't never argue sensibly without resorting to using invectives and insults to attack your opponents.

Oh so, the atheists should be left to roam freely cyberbullying religious pple here ba?

Abeg, dont allow me say what is in my mind.

JackBizzle:


I am not denying that atheists can be vulgar. The issue here us that christians do it too. Most of the time, they are the cause and they are worse than atheists.

Christians are never the cause of such. Even here if I was not in control of myself I would have responded in kind with the vulgarities YOU BEGAN.

or did you not BEGIN the vulgarity and insults right here and right now?

butterflylion:




Christians are never the cause of such. Even here if I was not in control of myself I would have responded in kind with the vulgarities YOU BEGAN.

or did you not BEGIN the vulgarity and insults right here and right now?

Should i quote your past comments? Your jumbo dumbo era?


And like i saud, you probably went blind to felixomor, ishitlove and anallices vulgar tirades

felixomor:


Oh so, the atheists should be left to roam freely cyberbullying religious pple here ba?

Abeg, dont allow me say what is in my mind.

lol...go ahead, Christian cyber war-lord.

Vent your anger.

xxxtedyxxx:


lol...go ahead, Christian cyber war-lord.

Vent your anger.

Ssssh!