ConcernedWife:
Job search for Hubby - Help a Concerned wife

Pls nairalanders, I thought about this for a long time before I decided to make this announcement. I made sure I exhausted every possible means before coming down here. Please do not crucify me.

I can't divulge everything here . I am looking for a job for my sweetheart . You know when a man with children is out of job.

Anyone please help.

location - lagos

He was a former banker-not sacked.

contact me on affiliatemess@gmail.com

SISTER I SALUTE YOUR COURAGE AND LOVE FOR UR HUBBY....
I JOIN MY VOICE IN REQUESTING FOR ASSISTANCE FOR THIS LADY.....
ANYONE WHO CAN OFFER SHOULD PLEASE OFFER...
YOU ARE BLESSED

Bloggers and fabrication of stories. this headline is misleading. No where in the video did he mention that he can't be removed by a coup.

The fall of the self-acclaimed mighty.

jus imagine if buhari had been trappin us since 1980 til date.
rapture for don take place since.
ppl go don kill themselves throway.
lagos lagoon for don full up pass barca stadium
wtf
mugabe
strong man.

no one lives foreva
we all gonna grow old someday and be damn weak

MrValentineIF:
@InsideOutBlog

www.nairaland.com/attachments/6259511_1_png4a47a0db6e60853dedfcfdf08a5ca249

At the moment, Zimbabwe is in turmoil. The whereabout of its 93-year old president, Robert Mugabe is unknown but the military assures that he's in safe hands with his family.

There's unusual military movement in the capital and many punidts suspect it may be a coup and despite taking over the state owned media house, ZBC, the military insists all is well.


Below is a 1980 interview that Mugabe granted to BBC shortly after he took power. In the interview, he said no military can remove him as he intends to rule the country with firmness.


Watch below...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKXn2JR-RuY



http://insideout247..com.ng/2017/11/1980-video-of-robert-mugabe-saying-no.html

let the military take over after all does he want to die there? Greedy africa man.

I thouth one lecturer here says the youth cant read, that mugabe is still in power hmmm

But now it has. Glory be to God.

There come a time even the people you bribe to stay in power will say no as yall have become a laughing stock to the world. Imagine him saying he wants his wife to succeed him.
Rubbish!

And to think that Rochas has already erected his statue. Oh well, another 500mil down the drain.
As for Mugabe, abeg go and rest.

Well, if only he hadn't lost sight of why he came to power in the first place. At the moment, almost everyone in that country and elsewhere see this as a welcomed relief.

lol

.

xxx5433:

Jesus can save you from sin.

Repent

AMERICA HAS A HAND IN THIS.
THERE MUST BE SONETHING IN ZIMBABWE THATS INTERESTING THEM

niceprof:
He is right,for 37 years the military couldn't do anything and now that he is an old man,they are busy blocking roads.Mugabe and Gaddafi still remains the best African Leaders,if not for the imperialist ,zimbabawe could have developed more than this.

Excuses are the hallmark of failures.

9jakohai:


A country cannot develop using an economy based on selling raw materials, and using the revenues to import.

Libya was exporting oil, and using the money to import foreign stuff, including foreign military hardware. Instead of making its own.

Zimbabwe economy was based on exporting agric produce and diamonds. Plus Mugabe's land redistribution wrecked the economy by depriving it of forex which lead to inflation and a weakened economy, and the currency becoming worthless.

Gaddafi and Mugabe.... All those years in power, and their countries cannot make cars, guns, computer, etc. Meanwhile, Deng of China and Park of South Korea spent twenty years in power, and both their countries became manufacturing hubs, now powers.

Sorry, but Gaddafi and Mugabe were the cause of their country's problems by their import dependent policies. Which made their countries more vulnerable to the same imperialist powers.

Blantant nonsense. Libya was a desert pre Gadaffi, he ensured every Libyan lived a great life. They laid no bills on water or electricity and they were always paid educated or not. Gaddfit reduced the employment and illeteracy rate of Libya and in the midst of all these, he was at war with NATO.

The same NATO ousted him and turned the country to a failed state. Know your facts right

That's good

9jakohai:


A country cannot develop using an economy based on selling raw materials, and using the revenues to import.

Libya was exporting oil, and using the money to import foreign stuff, including foreign military hardware. Instead of making its own.

Zimbabwe economy was based on exporting agric produce and diamonds. Plus Mugabe's land redistribution wrecked the economy by depriving it of forex which lead to inflation and a weakened economy, and the currency becoming worthless.

Gaddafi and Mugabe.... All those years in power, and their countries cannot make cars, guns, computer, etc. Meanwhile, Deng of China and Park of South Korea spent twenty years in power, and both their countries became manufacturing hubs, now powers.

Sorry, but Gaddafi and Mugabe were the cause of their country's problems by their import dependent policies. Which made their countries more vulnerable to the same imperialist powers.

Gbam!

You nailed it

Take this

zicoraads:
Well, if only he hadn't lost sight of why he came to power in the first place. At the moment, almost everyone in that country and elsewhere see this as a welcomed relief.

How do you know that?

ollah1:


Blantant nonsense. Libya was a desert pre Gadaffi, he ensured every Libyan lived a great life. They laid no bills on water or electricity and they were always paid educated or not. Gaddfit reduced the employment and illeteracy rate of Libya and in the midst of all these, he was at war with NATO.

The same NATO ousted him and turned the country to a failed state. Know your facts right

Gadaffi was a problem that needed to be dealt with

And the mission has been accomplished

You gadaffi sympathisers can cry all you want

ollah1:


Blantant nonsense. Libya was a desert pre Gadaffi, he ensured every Libyan lived a great life. They laid no bills on water or electricity and they were always paid educated or not. Gaddfit reduced the employment and illeteracy rate of Libya and in the midst of all these, he was at war with NATO.

The same NATO ousted him and turned the country to a failed state. Know your facts right

1.Gaddafi was able to do all that with liberal oil revenues. Libya has 5 million people, and was producing ten times more oil than Nigeria.

2.My ultimate point which you missed was that countries that are not manufacturing powers, especially in terms of military weapons are weak countries

See China and Iran. Both who learned the hard way to invest in industrial development, and as a result are not vulnerable at all to imperialist powers.

Zimbabwe now just exports diamonds, imports all it needs, thereby destroying it's local industry and job creation power, creating discontent, which leads to crisis

As King Gezo said two centuries ago..
He who makes the gunpowder wins the war.

Gaddafi fought NATO with weapons made in NATO countries. Recipe for disaster if you ask me.

See my point?

niceprof:
He is right,for 37 years the military couldn't do anything and now that he is an old man,they are busy blocking roads.Mugabe and Gaddafi still remains the best African Leaders,if not for the imperialist ,zimbabawe could have developed more than this.

silly ! very silly
which imperialists? before Mugabe came to power most Zimbabweans were millionaires. the citizens were one of the richest in the world .
he crumbled the economy due to his greedy, stupidity and selfishness and you are here writing gibberish

Ugosample:


Gbam!

You nailed it

Thanks.

You can be pro or anti US for all I care. So long as you rely on other countries manufacturing products, you are a weak country.

9jakohai:


1.Gaddafi was able to do all that with liberal oil revenues. Libya has 5 million people, and was producing ten times more oil than Nigeria.

2.My ultimate point which you missed was that countries that are not manufacturing powers, especially in terms of military weapons are weak countries

See China and Iran. Both who learned the hard way to invest in industrial development, and as a result are not vulnerable at all to imperialist powers.

Zimbabwe now just exports diamonds, imports all it needs, thereby destroying it's local industry and job creation power, creating discontent, which leads to crisis

As King Gezo said two centuries ago..
He who makes the gunpowder wins the war.

Gaddafi fought NATO with weapons made in NATO countries. Recipe for disaster if you ask me.

See my point?

I see your point very clearly

If he was so loved by his people, why was it only his tribesmen from sirte and environs fighting for him?

42 years in power, and you could not build a sustainable institution that will continue to work even when you are no longer there.

And people hail gadaffi

Anyways I don't blame them, they are from Sub Saharan Africa, where they have things worse

9jakohai:


1.Gaddafi was able to do all that with liberal oil revenues. Libya has 5 million people, and was producing ten times more oil than Nigeria.

2.My ultimate point which you missed was that countries that are not manufacturing powers, especially in terms of military weapons are weak countries

See China and Iran. Both who learned the hard way to invest in industrial development, and as a result are not vulnerable at all to imperialist powers.

Zimbabwe now just exports diamonds, imports all it needs, thereby destroying it's local industry and job creation power, creating discontent, which leads to crisis

As King Gezo said two centuries ago..
He who makes the gunpowder wins the war.

Gaddafi fought NATO with weapons made in NATO countries. Recipe for disaster if you ask me.

See my point?

You can't just start making weapons and the rest of then without adequate resources and knowledge. China developed today thanks to border closure and sending the best minds overseas for knowledge.

South Korea was backed by USA. Who was supporting Gadaffi? The African leaders that had no balls or NATO that he was against. If Gadaffi was still alivez terorrism wouldn't have skyrocketed to this level and I'm damn sure he would have made Russia and China allies.

Gadaffi didn't make weapons but he gave Libyan the very best. What's the purpose of making those weapons while the majority of the population would be hungry? Or you want a North Korea version of Libya?

Ugosample:


Gadaffi was a problem that needed to be dealt with

And the mission has been accomplished

You gadaffi sympathisers can cry all you want

Oh ok. Since Gaddafi was a problem and the mission has been accomplished, Libyans now live heaven on Earth right?

Ugosample:



I see your point very clearly

If he was so loved by his people, why was it only his tribesmen from sirte and environs fighting for him?

42 years in power, and you could not build a sustainable institution that will continue to work even when you are no longer there.

And people hail gadaffi

Anyways I don't blame them, they are from Sub Saharan Africa, where they have things worse

Jesus was also fought by people that lived close him and one of his closest sold him out. Your point?

bedspread:
At Least up till this Moment, He is still in Power....
MUGABE IS A BLESSING TO AFRICA.... HIS BEING ALIVE IS FOR A REASON....
IF NOT FOR A MAN AS THIS, Obama would hv Forced his Abominable gay/lesbian laws on nations here...

Very correct

niceprof:
He is right,for 37 years the military couldn't do anything and now that he is an old man,they are busy blocking roads.Mugabe and Gaddafi still remains the best African Leaders,if not for the imperialist ,zimbabawe could have developed more than this.

They both lost the plot....don't be a slowpoke. Engage your brain cells.