Mrbolt555:
haha. ur prostitute mother abi

shatap ya mouth there!

if I tell you to calculate the average number of girl per month you will start sweating. mofo

oshay barreestttt !!!!!!


...#Orobodobodo!!!...

You Aint Serious

ubunja:

misswrite u think its easy getting sex as a man?
try finding gals for your brother or male friend and see how hard it is for men. the guy is a stud.but if u do it u are a slut.no points for you for being cheap,but points for him for making you cheap
dont u just love double standards

.

Anyways, he says he prefers to pay for it. There's nothing studdish about that; it's the easiest way to get it.

MissWrite:



.

Anyways, he says he prefers to pay for it. There's nothing studdish about that; it's the easiest way to get it.

true true
but arent all women basically pr0stitutes?
i mean you do expect gifts and all for access to pvssy. the main difference being that the gal on the street corner is cheaper than the gal who moves in.

dont be offended misswrite.

Martin0:

I don hear u Razor How ur side na?u don relocate go Abj? Abi na there u dey since

not really Na camouflage lolzzz

How i smile when i know someone is lying

debspauly:
not really Na camouflage lolzzz

Hahahahah ok ooo,carryy on with ur camo oo

U are finished

Martin0:


Hahahahah ok ooo,carryy on with ur camo oo

oshey baba

debspauly:
oshey baba

I hail u oo

ordinary 50, is it not your mates that are hitting 150, pls try harder you still have about 2wks left. btw congratulations.

very poor achievement. 50 girls out of over 20million girls and you said you are happy. guy go and hide your face in shame.

Abeg na who you offend wey no gree forgive you? See our own eeyan Mayweather dey celebrate a great achievements for 50 undefeated knockouts while you dey celebrate 50 gals wey you don hammer, hmmm na wa ooo

.

ubunja:

true true
but arent all women basically pr0stitutes?
i mean you do expect gifts and all for access to pvssy. the main difference being that the gal on the street corner is cheaper than the gal who moves in.

dont be offended misswrite.

Lol! I'm not offended. I set myself up for that one and I saw it coming. Women who aren't in the prostitution business may still deplete a guy's pocket (not all of them though) but the sex is dependent on so much more than that. The guy actually has to have a personality or appearance that the girl appreciates. It's not a trade of sex for money. But if you want to be that simplistic about this.........

I've actually written something similar, so I might not be the best person to negate this notion. The MMM guy supposes that everyone who exchanges cash for any kind of service is basically doing something dirty. People should work for free and fvck for free in a perfect world. But in this world, a person is often bound to end up on either the debit or credit side of money, and should they really be shamed for it if they've given value for cash? What's the deal with money? Why does it rubbish a person's integrity? Or is this just some scheme to keep people 'cheap'? To tell them that zero is bigger than one; but one is still smaller than two. The peculiar economics of sex.

I'm just thinking out loud. Don't answer.

MissWrite:



Lol! I'm not offended. I set myself up for that one and I saw it coming. Women who aren't in the prostitution business may still deplete a guy's pocket (not all of them though) but the sex is dependent on so much more than that. The guy actually has to have a personality or appearance that the girl appreciates. It's not a trade of mobey for mo. But if you want to be that simplistic about this.........

I've actually written something similar, so I might not be the best person to negate this notion. The MMM guy supposes that everyone who exchanges cash for any kind of service is basically doing something dirty. People should work for free and fvck for free in a perfect world. But in this world, a person is often bound to end up on either the debit or credit side of money, and should they really be shamed for it if they've given value for cash? What's the deal with money? Why does it rubbish a person's integrity? Or is this just some scheme to keep people 'cheap'? To tell them that zero is bigger than one; but one is still smaller than two. The peculiar economics of sex.

I'm just thinking out loud. Don't answer.

sorry for jumping on your mention like this
Good arguments, but not all ladies looking for financial reward for sex are on the debit side of money. So what about them?
Is it just the mentality of the society or the mentality of the ladies involved ( sex for money logic). Anyone expecting money for sex is basically a p......

NeeKlaus:

LOL! Nawa o... is that one a man whöre? 365 ke?

Lol no mind op ... some guys brag about 1 girl a day ... see his yeye life his fellow whöres are on 300 and something

ubunja:

true true
but arent all women basically pr0stitutes?
i mean you do expect gifts and all for access to pvssy. the main difference being that the gal on the street corner is cheaper than the gal who moves in.

dont be offended misswrite.

Ok so does that include your mother , sister, aunts m grandma , cousin ... just asking o

greiboy:
sorry for jumping on your mention like this
Good arguments, but not all ladies looking for financial reward for sex are on the debit side of money. So what about them?
Is it just the mentality of the society or the mentality of the ladies involved ( sex for money logic). Anyone expecting money for sex is basically a p......

Oh no, I wasn't referring to poor women. I mean within the context of the relationship: whether you're looking for it or not; when gifts and other considerations are exchanged throughout a relationship, one person ends up having outspent the other (only through conscious effort would it be balanced). It's not about expectations now but simply about accounting. The person who's outspent (typically/traditionally the woman) is on the credit side of money in the relationship. This doesn't make her a prostitute.

MissWrite:


Oh no, I wasn't referring to poor women. I mean within the context of the relationship: whether you're looking for it or not; when gifts and other considerations are exchanged throughout a relationship, one person ends up having outspent the other (only through conscious effort would it be balanced). It's not about expectations now but simply about accounting. The person who's outspent (typically/traditionally the woman) is on the credit side of money in the relationship. This doesn't make her a prostitute.

true,
Women more often than not, end up on the credit side of the relationship by default, but some ladies make it a priority in a relationship. They don't end being the beneficiaries by default but by calculation. The comments of ladies regarding the financial stability of a guy before thinking about marriage on this forum is a testament to that fact. Should that be seen as an attempt at prosituting ?

onye ara

greiboy:
true,
Women more often than not, end up on the credit side of the relationship by default, but some ladies make it a priority in a relationship. They don't end being the beneficiaries by default but by calculation. The comments of ladies regarding the financial stability of a guy before thinking about marriage on this forum is a testament to that fact. Should that be seen as an attempt at prosituting ?

No, it's gold-digging not prostitution. While prostitutes trade sex for money, gold-diggers are simply women who prioritize a man's finances above every other quality he possesses when entering into a relationship in the hope that it would improve their quality of life. Who are we to say that a woman should value a man's face over his pocket, or his brains over his face? It's her personal decision.

MissWrite:



No, it's gold-digging not prostitution. While prostitutes trade sex for money, gold-diggers are simply women who prioritize a man's finances above every other quality he possesses when entering into a relationship in the hope that it would improve their quality of life. Who are we to say that a woman should value a man's face over his pocket, or his brains over his face? It's her personal decision.

What is the difference? Same logic if you ask me . Sex for money . Those ladies in question only have their body to offer on most occasion. It is just a more refined form of prostitution, Like corrupt leaders and thieves they are similar in their trade.

True, we are not to tell people what do with their lifes

greiboy:
What is the difference? Same logic if you ask me . Sex for money . Those ladies in question only have their body to offer on most occasion. It is just a more refined form of prostitution, Like corrupt leaders and thieves they are similar in their trade.

True we are not tell people what do with their lifes

The difference between a digger and a prostitute ...........There's a world of difference between them. And before you mete out your outrage equally on them, you might want to specifically identify what makes the prostitute 'Cheap'. She has sex and profits off it. Only sex. She doesn't form an emotional bond with her clients nor develops any kind of long-term relationship. She doesn't even have to know the name of her John. He's in and out and it's on to the next one. Maybe even within the hour. A digger, on the other hand, actually invests emotionally in someone and builds a relationship with him. The thing is: he must be wealthy to keep her life cushy. She profits off the relationship; it isn't just a bout of sex for cash. She owes her time, support and every other thing that girlfriends do.

Profiting from a relationship with a man isn't just a concept associated with diggers. Women used to be given out in marriage so that they could be cared for by their husbands; and a man's ability to care for a woman effectively was a prime factor in deciding his suitability as a husband. The prettier a girl was, the wealthier her suitors were expected to be. It wasn't about love; the match was made by parents. It isn't that women have nothing else to offer than their bodies, it's rather that most men don't value much else about women. This is why beauty and youth are a woman's selling point. If women were to choose, they would not decide to make such ephemeral qualities so important.

Mrbolt555:
Mostly igbo girls though.

Congrats to your dick

Mrbolt555:
Mostly igbo girls though.

HIV positive male spotted.

MissWrite:



The difference between a digger and a prostitute ...........There's a world of difference between them. And before you mete out your outrage equally on them, you might want to specifically identify what makes the prostitute 'Cheap'. She has sex and profits off it. Only sex. She doesn't form an emotional bond with her clients nor develops any kind of long-term relationship. She doesn't even have to know the name of her John. He's in and out and it's on to the next one. Maybe even within the hour. A digger, on the other hand, actually invests emotionally in someone and builds a relationship with him The thing is: he must be wealthy to keep her life cushy. She profits off the relationship; it isn't just a bout of sex for cash. She owes her time, support and every other thing that girlfriends do.

Profiting from a relationship with a man isn't just a concept associated with diggers. Women used to be given out in marriage so that they could be cared for by their husbands; and a man's ability to care for a woman effectively was a prime factor in deciding his suitability as a husband. The prettier a girl was, the wealthier her suitors were expected to be. It wasn't about love; the match was made by parents. It isn't that women have nothing else to offer than their bodies, it's rather that most men don't value much else about women. This is why beauty and youth are a woman's selling point. If women were to choose, they would not decide to make such ephemeral qualities so important.

What about professional escorts?. Those prostitutes who have really rich men as clients. I am pretty sure some are very aware of the client's name.

Gold diggers invest emotions, really?!
Most gold diggers are only there for the money. Immediately they notice the money is gone, they are probably going to leave. Most diggers hardly love their victims.

Looks the same to me

Lalas247:


Ok so does that include your mother , sister, aunts m grandma , cousin ... just asking o

u just agreed with me, by failing to prove women ARE NOT PR0STIRUTES. but counted on family bonds as an arguement. murder is wrong.and murder cannot suddenly be right coz a close family member committed it.you would make a very bad lawyer with that lame approach.
remember when u say "men are dogs" your own father,brother,uncles and grandpa are also in there.but it would be very weak of me to argue that reasoning by sayin :" does that mean your own father is a dog too?"
state points.dont use emotions as manipulation.thats for weak people.

ubunja:

u just agreed with me, by failing to prove women ARE NOT PR0STIRUTES. but counted on family bonds as an arguement. murder is wrong.and murder cannot suddenly be right coz a close family member committed it.you would make a very bad lawyer with that lame approach.
remember when u say "men are dogs" your own father,brother,uncles and grandpa are also in there.but it would be very weak of me to argue that reasoning by sayin :" does that mean your own father is a dog too?"
state points.dont use emotions as manipulation.thats for weak people.

Lol @ Ubunja