senatordave1:

Thank you,you now got my drift and message but you missed something.since forensics isn't captured,the judges have the right to allow or reject it.intact its better they reject it to be on the safe side.the forensic issue is exactly like the card reader,its alien to the constitution and cant be relied upon to build a case.just like the card reader,the forensic results will be rejected.atiku has no case.the video evidence he's bringing is very minute.

DerrickzB:
Hehehe.. the informant is bae.. i can see zombies already displaying their usual.. I believe if PDP isn't confident of a fair judgement by the panel they can raise objections.. let the aforementioned judges please excuse themselves..

Zombies can quote me tho.. but ur life would be ruined the way buhari and apc is ruining that of nigerians by the wrath of God.. Amen

senatordave1:

Was there any elections in 2007 ? When i told you clearly that atiku would lose by any means,did you agree ? Didnt you say that the elections cant be rigged? Guy respect your shameless self and give up

PrecisionFx:


I told u that a Nigerian elections can't be rigged?

Ur madness is far worse now

erico2k2:

btw U n me, are you sure we cant deduct total accredited votes from numbers of votes? even this State govt election people were able to press calculators to know the numbers of votes were more than accredited. However talking about the card readers, this might work against APC since some reasons for rejected votes where lack of card readers, so that too might pose a problem in court.I would like to think the next senate legislate on forensics in cases like this.

erico2k2:

btw U n me, are you sure we cant deduct total accredited votes from numbers of votes? even this State govt election people were able to press calculators to know the numbers of votes were more than accredited. However talking about the card readers, this might work against APC since some reasons for rejected votes where lack of card readers, so that too might pose a problem in court.I would like to think the next senate legislate on forensics in cases like this.

senatordave1:

t.”

cucumbae:
If buhari believe that he is a man of integrity and incorruptibleand that he truly won the election in a credible manner he should allow forensic analysis to be carryout on the ballot papers.

Lovemaester:


so high profile judges who have been in the
court for decades should excuse themselves because of some lowlife fools with no credibility raising dumb objections, you must be a nincompoop

DerrickzB:
Hehehe.. the informant is bae.. i can see zombies already displaying their usual.. I believe if PDP isn't confident of a fair judgement by the panel they can raise objections.. let the aforementioned judges please excuse themselves..

[s]Zombies can quote me tho.. but ur life would be ruined the way buhari and apc is ruining that of nigerians by the wrath of God.. Amen[/s]

cucumbae:
If buhari believe that he is a man of integrity and incorruptibleand that he truly won the election in a credible manner he should allow forensic analysis to be carryout on the ballot papers.

dre11:
Urge Justices Bulkachuwa, Aboki, Ige to opt out





https://punchng.com/atikus-appeal-cupp-leaks-names-of-election-petitions-panel-members/

senatordave1:

The appeal panels for all tribunals was constituted shortly after the acting cjn swore them in.moreover those same judges granted the ex parts motion granting pdp access to inec materials. what is cupp ranting about

senatordave1:

You are not getting me.cupp are talking as if the list of judges for the tribunal came out today or this week.meanwhile,their names were out before the presidential poll.is that not ridiculous ? Finally,the electoral act is against forensic examination in elections therefore the judges were right.

Awoo88:

Instead of quitting the relevant section of the constitution, you pasting a reported text. A text a pro pdp could have written differently.

divineappo:
its a lie

electoral act is never against forensic examination

na lie go kill u & APC

this regime u support will kill u, its a curse

jamesharryson:


So it is now a privilege to allow PDP have access to the election materials?
Can you tell me the tribunal that never allowed the access?

Let us use our heads, in as much as her husband is a senator elect under APC, that alone nullifies her membership of the panel. It is not a rocket science. She must definitely be biased.
More so, if a candidate suspects the credibility of a judge, it is his right to reject him before a judgement

DerrickzB:


Hehehe.. indeed there is a difference between being educated, enlightened and exposed in life.. and from ur statement, u r just educated but the rest are missing.. when u r in a hospital as a patient, u have d right to reject any doctor or nurse you do not anf they'd get u anotyer one.. so it is in law court.. pdp feels the judges would oervert judgement.. hence their outcry...

U r obviously a kid.. cause the last time i checked, atiku's life is 1000 times better than that of your whole family!!

senatordave1:

Rants of a loser,troll.

profbayo:
So the executive can now grant such prayer?I am a big fool. At least you shld keep quiet if you don't know what's happening .

senatordave1:

Are you this dumb? Even a kid will easily see the relevant acts there.intellectual laziness

respect80:

No one denys that. The problem CUPP is having is that they lack faith in her in delivering a fair and just judgment which is why they are asking her and aboki to recuse themselves from the Atiku's case

PrecisionFx:


Who is Mary Odili?

And which course case concerning wike has his wife chaired as judge?

Ekaka1:
So for us who are not lawyers...my question is what is problem with allowing a forensic examination of the electoral materials?

From legal perspective please.....

DerrickzB:


Hehehe.. indeed there is a difference between being educated, enlightened and exposed in life.. and from ur statement, u r just educated but the rest are missing.. when u r in a hospital as a patient, u have d right to reject any doctor or nurse you do not anf they'd get u anotyer one.. so it is in law court.. pdp feels the judges would oervert judgement.. hence their outcry...

U r obviously a kid.. cause the last time i checked, atiku's life is 1000 times better than that of your whole family!!

jamesharryson:


So it is now a privilege to allow PDP have access to the election materials?
Can you tell me the tribunal that never allowed the access?

Let us use our heads, in as much as her husband is a senator elect under APC, that alone nullifies her membership of the panel. It is not a rocket science. She must definitely be biased.
More so, if a candidate suspects the credibility of a judge, it is his right to reject him before a judgement

Awoo88:

An ur papa be dumb abi my mate for your family?? Where is the relevant fact!? A conjunction full of inference is what you are calling relevant fact?? You even gave the moral gut to post the bolded!! Ode!!