senatordave1:

Guy,reason well please.is it today that the appeal panel was formed ? Was it not abdul aboki that gave the ruling allowing pdp access to inec material? Who is more dumb between you and cupp ?

Don't mind them. Odili's wife has been influencing judgement in favour of Wike and has anybody asked her to vacate her seat at the supreme court.? CUPP has become an appendage of PDP and crying more than the bereaved.

MadeInTokyo:
CUPP has credible informants and insiders in Buhari's government, they keep exposing the evil regime

The earlier you people accept the defeat then the better for you and your cronies. Stop ranting

MadeInTokyo:
CUPP has credible informants and insiders in Buhari's government, they keep exposing the evil regime

What credible informants and insiders are talking about? The so called CUPP has been crying about over split milk that never be. Read very well and you will understand their junk allegations are because the judges legally rejected their request for forensic auditing of the electoral materials. The want every decision to go their ways and when it is not they would resort to blackmailing is the game plan; a part of Dubai plan and especially since the arrow head, onnoghun is not more there.
Wait and see how more crying they have ahead.

cucumbae:
If buhari believe that he is a man of integrity and incorruptibleand that he truly won the election in a credible manner he should allow forensic analysis to be carryout on the ballot papers.

So the executive can now grant such prayer? you r talking like a fool, at least you shld keep quiet if you don't know what's happening .

So for us who are not lawyers...my question is what is problem with allowing a forensic examination of the electoral materials?

From legal perspective please.....

senatordave1:

The appeal panels for all tribunals was constituted shortly after the acting cjn swore them in.moreover those same judges granted the ex parts motion granting pdp access to inec materials.what is cupp ranting about

Are we talking about the one the Atiku team cannot forensically examine?

senatordave1:

Guy,reason well please.is it today that the appeal panel was formed ? Was it not abdul aboki that gave the ruling allowing pdp access to inec material? Who is more dumb between you and cupp ?

Quit the insults! partial justice is no justice at all

muykem:
What are we going to do now? You failed election and we asked you to congratulate winner you said no and went to court. You didn't allow court to sit before starting carrying why you will loose in court. OK in spirit of justice let Atiku personally take the case to US is he think the money paid to enter America has not expire.

What's this?

senatordave1:

The appeal panels for all tribunals was constituted shortly after the acting cjn swore them in.moreover those same judges granted the ex parts motion granting pdp access to inec materials.what is cupp ranting about

Wait and see. Na morning be dis. Day go soon dark!

divineappo:
u are a bloody liar, Abdul aboki was against forensic analysis of election materials

Na lie go kill u and APC

You are not getting me.cupp are talking as if the list of judges for the tribunal came out today or this week.meanwhile,their names were out before the presidential poll.is that not ridiculous ? Finally,the electoral act is against forensic examination in elections therefore the judges were right.

JOMAX:

Wait and see. Na morning be dis. Day go soon dark!

Seems you are blind.

Ekaka1:
So for us who are not lawyers...my question is what is problem with allowing a forensic examination of the electoral materials?

From legal perspective please.....

The constitution is against it.

profbayo:
So the executive can now grant such prayer? you r talking like a fool, at least you shld keep quiet if you don't know what's happening .

Thats how all of them reason out of hatred for buhari.

erico2k2:

Are we talking about the one the Atiku team cannot forensically examine?

The electoral act forbids forensic

PrecisionFx:


Do u have a northern brain?

You predicted atiku to win.you are back again.

senatordave1:

You predicted atiku to win.you are back again.

All sane Nigerians knew there was no election on 23rd Feb 2019.

I dunno about the insane ones .

Meanwhile do u have a northern brain?

shukudi:

Go ask people for your village square who Mary Odili is.
Is zainab bulkachawa too chairing any court case concerning her husband? Abi she is the 2nd wife of buhari?

I now understand ur forum name

senatordave1:

Seems you are blind.

Thank you Mr Nobody?

senatordave1:

Guy,reason well please.is it today that the appeal panel was formed ? Was it not abdul aboki that gave the ruling allowing pdp access to inec material? Who is more dumb between you and cupp ?

He allowed access but denied forensic analysis. Who is most dumb between you and the person you mentioned??

senatordave1:

The constitution is against it.

Which constitution??

MadeInTokyo:
CUPP has credible informants and insiders in Buhari's government, they keep exposing the evil regime

What if they are just speculating, based on the fact that these justices are the possible members to be selected?

DerrickzB:
Hehehe.. the informant is bae.. i can see zombies already displaying their usual.. I believe if PDP isn't confident of a fair judgement by the panel they can raise objections.. let the aforementioned judges please excuse themselves..

Zombies can quote me tho.. but ur life would be ruined the way buhari and apc is ruining that of nigerians by the wrath of God.. Amen

i pray your life is looted the way PDP looted Nigeria.say amen

senatordave1:

The electoral act forbids forensic

please I would like to know which part of the Act

senatordave1:

You are not getting me.cupp are talking as if the list of judges for the tribunal came out today or this week.meanwhile,their names were out before the presidential poll.is that not ridiculous ? Finally,the electoral act is against forensic examination in elections therefore the judges were right.

Wrong! Forensic examination was knocked out technically for lacking in merit since the constitution did not clearly provide for it. So it was simply a decision that could go eighther ways

JOMAX:


Wrong! Forensic examination was knocked out technically for lacking in merit since the constitution did not clearly provide for it. So it was simply a decision that could go eighther ways

You dey mark exams ? You are even corroborating me.anything not provided by the constitution is unconstitutional actually the constitution has provided for manual examination which stands.the judges even quoted sections of the electoral law justifying their position.atiku lawyers should have also quoted relevant statutes to support their claims but they failed so i wonder what your problem.atiku lost,get that.

Awoo88:

He allowed access but denied forensic analysis. Who is most dumb between you and the person you mentioned??

You ofcourse since you cant differentiate simple terms.you are wailing more than atiku.

erico2k2:

please I would like to know which part of the Act

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal has rejected the request by the candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar and his party to be allowed to conduct forensic analysis and scanning of materials used for the conduct of the February 23 presidential election.
The tribunal said such request for forensic analysis and scanning by experts, of computers, card reader machines, server, among others deployed for the election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), was beyond the scope of the provisions of Section 151(1) & (2) of the Electoral Act (as amended), which permits the inspection of election materials.
In a unanimous ruling on an ex-parte application by Atiku and his party, a three-man panel of the tribunal said Section 151 of the Electoral Act, which allows an intending petitioner to inspect materials used for an election only allows inspection and the obtaining of certified true copies of such materials.
In the lead ruling by Justice Abdul Aboki, who led the panel, the tribunal granted the prayers which allow the applicants the permission to only inspect the materials and obtain certified true copies (CTC) of the materials.
The tribunal also granted the applicant’s prayer for leave to be allowed to bring such application at the pre-hearing stage of the tribunal’s sitting.
Read also: Poll: Parties join forces in Oyo, Kwara, Benue, Lagos
It said the request by Atiku and PDP to call experts to engage in forensic analysis and scanning of INEC gadgets, computers, among other materials was outside the scope of the meaning of inspection under Section 151(1) and (2) of the Electoral Act.
Justice Aboki said: “After a careful examination of the reliefs sought on the motion paper and a perusal of Section 151 of the Electoral Act (as amended), and the decision of this court in cases of Aregbesola v. Oyinlola, Akintayo v. Jolaoye, Senator Hope Uzodinma v. Senator Osita Izunaso,, it is hereby ordered as follows.
“Leave is granted to the applicants to bring this application at this stage,
“The first respondent (INEC) shall forthwith, allow the applicants and or their representatives to inspect polling documents and obtained certified true copies of all polling documents in the custody of the first respondent, used for the just-concluded presidential election, to enable the applicants institute and maintain an election petition.
“Prayers three, four, five and six on the motion paper are hereby refused.
“Forensic audit, examination and analysis by forensic experts cannot be regarded as an inspection of those documents within the ambit of Section 151 of the Electoral Act (as amended),” Justice Aboki said.
He agreed with lawyer to the applicants, Chris Uche (SAN) that the Court of Appeal had, in previous decisions, permitted the scanning of election documents used during the election at the stage of hearing in election petition.
He added that such scanned documents must be certified by INEC as true copies of the documents in its custody or held in the custody of INEC.
Justice Aboki faulted Uche’s reliance on an earlier decision in the case of Senator Uzodinma and Senator Izunaso, and noted that the Court of Appeal has since set aside the permission granted by a lower tribunal for the scanning and forensic audit and analysis of election material at pre-hearing stage.
He said: “In that case, the lower tribunal granted the pervasive orders brought under Section 151 of the Electoral Act.
“The respondent to the said application, appealed to this court, which found that the excessive orders granted with respect to the inspection of polling documents and sundry other materials,.. were found to be totally outside the scope of Section 151 of the Electoral Act.
“This court found that the orders made violated the rights of the respondents to fair hearing under Section 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).The orders made by the lower tribunal, in that case were set aside by this court. And orders were made, by this court, within the ambit of Section 151 of the Electoral Act.”

PrecisionFx:


All sane Nigerians knew there was no election on 23rd Feb 2019.

I dunno about the insane ones .

Meanwhile do u have a northern brain?

Was there any elections in 2007 ? When i told you clearly that atiku would lose by any means,did you agree ? Didnt you say that the elections cant be rigged? Guy respect your shameless self and give up

Awoo88:

Which constitution??

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal has rejected the request by the candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar and his party to be allowed to conduct forensic analysis and scanning of materials used for the conduct of the February 23 presidential election.
The tribunal said such request for forensic analysis and scanning by experts, of computers, card reader machines, server, among others deployed for the election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), was beyond the scope of the provisions of Section 151(1) & (2) of the Electoral Act (as amended), which permits the inspection of election materials.
In a unanimous ruling on an ex-parte application by Atiku and his party, a three-man panel of the tribunal said Section 151 of the Electoral Act, which allows an intending petitioner to inspect materials used for an election only allows inspection and the obtaining of certified true copies of such materials.
In the lead ruling by Justice Abdul Aboki, who led the panel, the tribunal granted the prayers which allow the applicants the permission to only inspect the materials and obtain certified true copies (CTC) of the materials.
The tribunal also granted the applicant’s prayer for leave to be allowed to bring such application at the pre-hearing stage of the tribunal’s sitting.
Read also: Poll: Parties join forces in Oyo, Kwara, Benue, Lagos
It said the request by Atiku and PDP to call experts to engage in forensic analysis and scanning of INEC gadgets, computers, among other materials was outside the scope of the meaning of inspection under Section 151(1) and (2) of the Electoral Act.
Justice Aboki said: “After a careful examination of the reliefs sought on the motion paper and a perusal of Section 151 of the Electoral Act (as amended), and the decision of this court in cases of Aregbesola v. Oyinlola, Akintayo v. Jolaoye, Senator Hope Uzodinma v. Senator Osita Izunaso,, it is hereby ordered as follows.
“Leave is granted to the applicants to bring this application at this stage,
“The first respondent (INEC) shall forthwith, allow the applicants and or their representatives to inspect polling documents and obtained certified true copies of all polling documents in the custody of the first respondent, used for the just-concluded presidential election, to enable the applicants institute and maintain an election petition.
“Prayers three, four, five and six on the motion paper are hereby refused.
“Forensic audit, examination and analysis by forensic experts cannot be regarded as an inspection of those documents within the ambit of Section 151 of the Electoral Act (as amended),” Justice Aboki said.
He agreed with lawyer to the applicants, Chris Uche (SAN) that the Court of Appeal had, in previous decisions, permitted the scanning of election documents used during the election at the stage of hearing in election petition.
He added that such scanned documents must be certified by INEC as true copies of the documents in its custody or held in the custody of INEC.
Justice Aboki faulted Uche’s reliance on an earlier decision in the case of Senator Uzodinma and Senator Izunaso, and noted that the Court of Appeal has since set aside the permission granted by a lower tribunal for the scanning and forensic audit and analysis of election material at pre-hearing stage.
He said: “In that case, the lower tribunal granted the pervasive orders brought under Section 151 of the Electoral Act.
“The respondent to the said application, appealed to this court, which found that the excessive orders granted with respect to the inspection of polling documents and sundry other materials,.. were found to be totally outside the scope of Section 151 of the Electoral Act.
“This court found that the orders made violated the rights of the respondents to fair hearing under Section 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).The orders made by the lower tribunal, in that case were set aside by this court. And orders were made, by this court, within the ambit of Section 151 of the Electoral Act.”

Na wa o

Buhari is enjoy himself in aso rock while atiku and pdp are running around looking for what was not lost

No peace for the looters

senatordave1:

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal has rejected the request by the candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar and his party to be allowed to conduct forensic analysis and scanning of materials used for the conduct of the February 23 presidential election.
The tribunal said such request for forensic analysis and scanning by experts, of computers, card reader machines, server, among others deployed for the election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), was beyond the scope of the provisions of Section 151(1) & (2) of the Electoral Act (as amended), which permits the inspection of election materials.
In a unanimous ruling on an ex-parte application by Atiku and his party, a three-man panel of the tribunal said Section 151 of the Electoral Act, which allows an intending petitioner to inspect materials used for an election only allows inspection and the obtaining of certified true copies of such materials.
In the lead ruling by Justice Abdul Aboki, who led the panel, the tribunal granted the prayers which allow the applicants the permission to only inspect the materials and obtain certified true copies (CTC) of the materials.
The tribunal also granted the applicant’s prayer for leave to be allowed to bring such application at the pre-hearing stage of the tribunal’s sitting.
Read also: Poll: Parties join forces in Oyo, Kwara, Benue, Lagos
It said the request by Atiku and PDP to call experts to engage in forensic analysis and scanning of INEC gadgets, computers, among other materials was outside the scope of the meaning of inspection under Section 151(1) and (2) of the Electoral Act.
Justice Aboki said: “After a careful examination of the reliefs sought on the motion paper and a perusal of Section 151 of the Electoral Act (as amended), and the decision of this court in cases of Aregbesola v. Oyinlola, Akintayo v. Jolaoye, Senator Hope Uzodinma v. Senator Osita Izunaso,, it is hereby ordered as follows.
“Leave is granted to the applicants to bring this application at this stage,
“The first respondent (INEC) shall forthwith, allow the applicants and or their representatives to inspect polling documents and obtained certified true copies of all polling documents in the custody of the first respondent, used for the just-concluded presidential election, to enable the applicants institute and maintain an election petition.
“Prayers three, four, five and six on the motion paper are hereby refused.
“Forensic audit, examination and analysis by forensic experts cannot be regarded as an inspection of those documents within the ambit of Section 151 of the Electoral Act (as amended),” Justice Aboki said.
He agreed with lawyer to the applicants, Chris Uche (SAN) that the Court of Appeal had, in previous decisions, permitted the scanning of election documents used during the election at the stage of hearing in election petition.
He added that such scanned documents must be certified by INEC as true copies of the documents in its custody or held in the custody of INEC.
Justice Aboki faulted Uche’s reliance on an earlier decision in the case of Senator Uzodinma and Senator Izunaso, and noted that the Court of Appeal has since set aside the permission granted by a lower tribunal for the scanning and forensic audit and analysis of election material at pre-hearing stage.
He said: “In that case, the lower tribunal granted the pervasive orders brought under Section 151 of the Electoral Act.
“The respondent to the said application, appealed to this court, which found that the excessive orders granted with respect to the inspection of polling documents and sundry other materials,.. were found to be totally outside the scope of Section 151 of the Electoral Act.
“This court found that the orders made violated the rights of the respondents to fair hearing under Section 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended). The orders made by the lower tribunal, in that case were set aside by this court. And orders were made, by this court, within the ambit of Section 151 of the Electoral Act.”

Ok I see what you meant but it does not prohibit it its just did not mention it,I still think they could have allowed them to as far as there is nothing to hide,In other words, it needs amendment ie for the word forensic to be added if not it is subject to a vote whether to allow or not to allow as the law did not make provision for it!.

erico2k2:

Ok I see what you meant but it does not prohibit it its just did not mention it,I still think they could have allowed them to as far as there is nothing to hide,In other words, it needs amendment ie for the word forensic to be added if not it is subject to a vote whether to allow or not to allow as the law did not make provision for it!.

Thank you,you now got my drift and message but you missed something.since forensics isn't captured,the judges have the right to allow or reject it.intact its better they reject it to be on the safe side.the forensic issue is exactly like the card reader,its alien to the constitution and cant be relied upon to build a case.just like the card reader,the forensic results will be rejected.atiku has no case.the video evidence he's bringing is very minute.