front page, content, page 1 and 2

[size=18pt]1.0 Introduction
2.0 Fundamental Facts Of The Case
3.0 How The Supreme Court Of Nigeria Lied Against Professor Tony Ukam
4.0 Recommendations Of The Honourable Justices Of The Supreme Court Of Nigeria On The Restoration Of Suit SC./69/2011
5.0 The Restoration Of The Dismissed Suit No SC./69/2011
6.0 The Procedural Approach to the Restoration Of A Dismissed Appeal.
7.0 Would The Proposed Restored Suit Starts Afresh In The Supreme Court Of Nigeria On 7th Of October, 2014?
8.0 Conclusion[/size]




[size=18pt]1.0 Introduction[/size]

[size=16pt]On behalf of The Chairman & The Chief Executive Officer Of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, King Professor (Emeritus) CJA Uwemedimo, I appreciate your question in view of its importance to the generality of patentees who might have been misinformed or confused at this crucial stage of the case.

In actual fact, my respond to your question will go a long way to clear air on some rumours in circulations with respect to the erroneously dismissed Appeal filed by CCNL in the Supreme Court of Nigeria. [/size]

[size=18pt]2.0 Facts Of The Case[/size]

[size=16pt]On 5th of May, 2014, Honourable Justice Walter Nkanu Samuel Onnoghem (JSC) progressed in a grievous error to dismiss the Appeal (SC./69/2011) filed by CCNL on the ground that the Former Legal Counsel of CCNL (Professor Tony Ukam) had filed a notice of case withdrawal as far back as 24th of March, 2011.

All efforts made by the CCNL lawyer (Rev. Jesse-Daniel Onuigbo ESQ) to convince the court to the effect that the Former CCNL Counsel (Professor Tony Ukam) was neither filed nor authorized to file any notice of case withdrawal proved abortive before the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

Honourable Justice Walter Nkanu Samuel Onnoghem (JSC) was even happy to dismiss the case despite the facts that there was no evidence before the court to show that Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited was served a copy of the fake/alleged notice of case withdrawal. And most importantly, there was no evidence before the court to show that both CCNL and Mobil Oil consented to withdraw the case from the Supreme Court of Nigeria. [/size]

[size=16pt]It is on record that the Supreme Court of Nigeria had entertained the Appeal in question in four (4) distinct times in the past without any notice of case withdrawal in the Case File. Court Observers and Case Analysts doubted the integrity and impartiality of the Supreme Court Judges on how the notice of case withdrawal resurrected in the Case File while hearing the appeal in the fifth (5) times.

Honourable Justice Walter Nkanu Samuel Onnoghem (JSC) erroneously dismissed the appeal when he said and I quote.
“There is nothing to be adjourned as the appeal withdrawn has ceased to exist. In the circumstance, appeal SC./69/2011 withdrawn is hereby dismissed.” [/size]

[size=18pt]3.0 How The Supreme Court Of Nigeria Lied Against Professor Tony Ukam[/size]

[size=16pt]On 5th of May, 2014, in the open court of the Supreme Court Of Nigeria, Honourable Justice Walter Nkanu Samuel Onnoghem (JSC) publicly displayed a document termed “Notice of Case withdrawal” allegedly written by the former Counsel of CCNL (Professor Tony Ukam) which formed the legal bases upon which the appeal in question was dismissed.

It is on record that on 12th of May, 2014, King Professor Emeritus CJA Uwemedimo officially wrote a letter to Professor Tony Ukam questioning him on his justifications to withdraw CCNL Appeal without his instructions to that effect. Below is an extract of the letter. [/size]

[size=16pt] “My shock and surprise stemmed from the fact that I never instructed you to apply to withdraw the aforesaid appeal; neither did you notify me of your having done the same till date.” [/size]

[size=16pt] Professor Tony Ukam completely denied filing any notice of case withdrawal in his respond dated 16th of May, 2014 when he said and I quote an extract of the letter.

Permit me to say that; [/size]
[size=16pt] (c) Apart from the processes you mandated me to file in 2011 as a fall-out meeting with former President Obasanjo, I’ve never filed anything since 2012 when you decided to abandone me for lawyers who knew not the sweat/history of Comandclem and the innocent patentees”. [/size]

[size=16pt] It is the submission of Anti-Corrosive Vanguard that the allegation of case withdrawal leveled against Professor Tony Ukam by the Supreme Court of Nigeria cannot be substantiated in view of the fact that the court could not find the alleged notice of case withdrawal in the case file in the first four times the court entertained the matter.

In one word, The Honourable Judges of the Supreme Court of Nigeria lied against Professor Tony Ukam only to dismiss the Appeal filed by CCNL. [/size]



[size=18pt]4.0 Recommendations Of The Honourable Justices Of The Supreme Court Of Nigeria In Suit Sc./69/2011. [/size]

[size=16pt]It is on record that The Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria recommended that if actually CCNL didn`t authorize the former Counsel to file any notice of case withdrawal, CCNL should file an application subsequently to restore the dismissed appeal when the court said and I quote, [/size]

[size=16pt] “if you want your appeal re-listed, you will bring an application subsequently on the bases that the former appellant`s counsel was not authorized to file a notice of case withdrawal, as simple as that.”
Per: Supreme Court of Nigeria
Suit No: sc./69/2011
Date: 5/5/2014[/size]


[size=18pt]5.0 An Overview Of The Question Posted By Ikechukwu Bonik. [/size]

[size=16pt] Haven explained in details the circumstances that led to the erroneous dismissal of the Appeal filed by CCNL; I consider it pertinent to critically tackle the question adduced by Ikechukwu Bonik.

Question And Answer[/size]

[size=16pt] In view of the recent erroneous dismissal of CCNL Appeal in the Supreme Court of Nigeria by Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onneghen (JSC) on 5th of May, 2014, and the possible restoration of the appeal any moment from now in the apex court of the land, would the appeal start afresh in the Supreme Court of Nigeria on 7th of October, 2014?
Per: Ikechukwu Bonik
Member: Comandclem Patentees` Association, Nigeria. [/size]

[size=16pt] From the above question, it is manifestly cleared that Ikechukwu Bonik tenaciously believed that the erroneously dismissed Appeal filed by CCNL has one hundred percent (100 %) assurance and possibility of being restored any moment the legal term of CCNL files an application to that effect.

The only area of confusion to Ikechukwu Bonik and other patentees is whether or not the Proposed Restored Appeal filed by CCNL will start afresh in the Supreme Court of Nigeria on 7th of October, 2014, the date specifically set aside for the hearing of the cross appeal filed by Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited. [/size]

[size=18pt]6.0 The Procedural Approach to the Restoration Of A Dismissed Appeal. [/size]

[size=16pt] For your information, it is not a big deal to dismiss an appeal in error because of the fact that such an appeal has high potential of being restored the moment an application is forwarded to the Supreme Court Of Nigeria in that regard.
The above truism is supported by the rules of the Supreme Court Of Nigeria, 1985 (as amended), order 8, rule 8 (4) and I quote. [/size]

[size=16pt] “An Appellant whose appeal has been dismissed under this rule may apply by notice of motion that his appeal be restored. Any such application may be made to the Court and the Court may, where exceptional circumstances have been shown, cause such appeal to be restored upon such terms as it may think fit.” [/size]
 

[size=16pt] The exceptional circumstances the Legal Team of CCNL is expected to exhibit before the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria to actualize the restoration of the erroneously dismissed appeal are stated below. [/size]

[size=16pt] (1) No evidence before the court to show that Mobil Oil was served a copy of the fake notice of case withdrawal. (Order 8, Rule 6 (1) Of The Supreme Court Rule, 1985 As Amended).

(2) No evidence before the court to show that both CCNL and Mobil Oil consented to withdraw the appeal from the Supreme Court of Nigeria. . (Order 8, Rule 6 (4) Of The Supreme Court Rule, 1985 As Amended).

(3) Haven ruled on the appeal four (4) times in the past without the alleged/fake notice of case withdrawal in the case file, the apex court is left with no option than to restore the erroneously dismissed appeal in the interest of justice. [/size]


[size=18pt]7.0 Would The Proposed Restored Suit Starts Afresh In The Supreme Court Of Nigeria On 7th Of October, 2014? [/size]

[size=16pt]In the eye of the law, a restored appeal cannot start afresh before the honourable justices of any court of competent jurisdiction. A restored appeal will be brought back to his previous proceeding position before dismissal. A restored appeal is not treated as a new case because treating it as such will amount to rendering the past orders/pronouncements of the court mere academic exercise.

The above opinion is corroborated by the judicial pronouncement of Honourable Justice Aboki (JCA) in the case of D.Y.S Trocca Valsesia & Co versus Osaghae 2008 ALL FWLR Pt. 413 when the court said and I quote. [/size]

[size=16pt] “Restore is defined as re-establishing, renew, bring back into use, replace, put back, bring to former place or condition. Restoring an appeal cannot catapult such an appeal to the statute of being entered or listed. Thus, to restore a dismissed appeal is to bring back the dismissed appeal.”

Per: Honourable Justice Aboki (JCA)
Case: D.Y.S Trocca Valsesia & Co versus Osaghae 2008 ALL FWLR Pt. 413[/size]


[size=18pt]8.0 Conclusion[/size]

[size=16pt]On 7th of October, 2014, the date specifically set aside for the hearing of the Cross Appeal filed by Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited, the Honourable Justices Of The Supreme Court of Nigeria will not treat the proposed restored appeal filed by CCNL as a new appeal or start afresh to entertain the appeal in question. But the court will bring the appeal in question back to its previous position or condition before dismissal. [/size]

[size=16pt]It is on record that The Legal Team Of CCNL applied for accelerated hearing of the case on 14th of October, 2013 in the Supreme Court of Nigeria. The said application was entertained by the Supreme Court of Nigeria on 30th of October, 2013, in the inner chamber of the apex court of the land, and the case subsequently adjourned to 5th of May, 2014 before the appeal was dismissed in error by Honourable Justice Walter Nkanu Samuel Onnoghem (JSC) on 5th of May, 2014. [/size]

[size=16pt]In one word, the appeal in question will assume the status of accelerated hearing as adjudicated upon by the Supreme Court of Nigeria on 30th of October, 2013 after restoration of the appeal any moment from now. [/size]


[size=16pt]Name: Yusuf Nurudeen (B. Sc, AAT, ACA)
Head Office Address:
CCNL Zonal Headquarters,
Position: CCNL Marketing Manager
Number 4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos State.
Ondo State Office:
Position: CCNL Ondo State Manager
No 32. Oba-Adesida Road,
Opposite Airtel Office,
S.O. Area,
Akure.
Mobil Number: +2347032522248

CCNL Twitter Handle: www.twitter.com/Comandlem_Nig
CCNL Facebook Name: Comandclem Patentees
CCNL Corporate Facebook Address: www.facebook.com/ComandclemNigeriaLimited
CCNL Corporate Website: www.comandclemonline.com
CCNL Forum: www.comandclemonline.com/forum/index.php?
Facebook Publication Page: www.facebook.com/PatenteesOnlineNewsPaper[/size]

FRONT PAGE , CONTENT, PAGE 1 , PAGE 2

PAGES 3,4,5, AND 6

Pages 7, 8, 9 and 10

Pages 11, 12, 13 and 14

Page 15

gladys olotu is under njc and efcc investigation for corruption and having over N2b in her bank account.

EFCC Probes Justice Olotu For N2Billion Accounts

JULY 7, 2014 BY ADE ADESOMOJU (Punch News Paper)

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has told a Federal High Court in Abuja that it was investigating a compulsorily-retired judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Gladys Olotu, over allegation that she had over N2bn in various bank accounts.

A non-governmental organisation, Civil Society Network Against Corruption, had petitioned the EFCC alleging that Olotu and two other judges of the Federal High Court were holding “huge sums of money” in various bank accounts.
The bank accounts were said to be within and outside the country as the judges were also accused of having assets and investment interests both within and outside Nigeria, contrary to provisions of the Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.


The EFCC confirmed that it had invited Olotu for investigation in a counter-affidavit dated April 1, 2014, which it filed in opposition to Olotu’s suit.

The retired judge had, through her counsel, Mr. Okey Obikeze (SAN), on March 24, 2014, instituted the fundamental human rights suit to restrain the EFCC and other security and anti-corruption agencies from investigating her.

The commission, in its counter-affidavit filed before Justice Adeniyi Ademola, denied being instigated by the National Judicial Council and the Attorney-General of the Federation against Olotu.


It said the CSNAC’s petition against Olotu, over which it was investigating her, was dated September 10, 2013.

Its counter-affidavit deposed to by its investigating officer,Habufari Yahaya, read in part, “That contrary to paragraph 12 of the applicant’s affidavit, the 1st respondent’s (the EFCC) investigation was in response to a petition from the Civil Society Network Against Corruption dated September 10, 2013.

“That I know for fact that in the course of investigation, certain issues arose for further clarification which had to do with documents and the applicant therefore requested for time to bring them and she was obliged.”

The anti-graft agency denied Olotu’s allegation that she was humiliated or detained on honouring its invitation.

The counter-affidavit also read, “That contrary to paragraph 14 of the applicant’s application, the applicant was interviewed on March 18, 2014 and asked to return on April 1, 2014 with some documents to clarify issues arising from the previous interview.

She was never humiliated or detained.
“That the 1st respondent was only carrying out its statutory power of investigation.”

The agency said it had not breached the fundamental human rights of the retired judge, as she had only filed the suit to seek protection from being investigated.

The counter-affidavit further read, “I know for a fact that the applicant’s fundamental human rights have in no way been breached or jeopardised.

“That I know for a fact that the applicant is seeking the protection of the courts from investigation.

“That the applicant cannot use the instruments of the law to shield herself from being investigated. That it will be in the interest of justice to grant the applicant’s application as it relates to the 1st
respondent.”

The said petition was said to have been signed by Olanrewaju Suraju, but the commission did not give details of the petition in its counter-affidavit.

The petition had alleged that Justice Olotu “holds various accounts in GTB, Access Bank, First Bank (United Kingdom) and investment interests in various companies and various property in
Abuja, Lagos and Benin and is alleged to be worth over N2bn.”

Olotu was recommended by the National Judicial Council for a compulsory retirement in February 2014 on the grounds of gross misconduct. President Goodluck Jonathan had since ratified the NJC’s recommendation.

The retired judge subsequently filed a fundamental human rights enforcement suit seeking to restrain the EFCC, the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission and other security agencies from further “harassing” her with arrests or investigations.

She had in her supporting affidavit accused the NJC and the Attorney-General of the Federation of instigating the EFCC along with other anti-corruption and security agencies against her.

She said both the NJC and the Attorney General of the Federation, Mr. Mohammed Adoke, were using the agencies to harass her because she dared to challenge her compulsory retirement in court.

But the NJC had through its counsel, Mr. Philips Jimoh-Lasisi (SAN), denied the allegation and filed a separate application, urging the court to compel Olotu to appear in court to face cross- examination over her claim.

The retired judge’s lawyer had indicated to oppose the application, insisting that it was not part of the procedure of such suit to compel her client to be cross-examined personally in court.

The retired judge had earlier filed a separate suit before the same judge seeking an order nullifying NJC’s recommendation for her compulsory retirement and the subsequent acceptance of the recommendation by President Goodluck Jonathan
.
In her affidavit supporting the fundamental rights enforcement suit, Olotu averred that her being invited, detained and interrogated by the EFCC in Abuja on March 18, 2014, followed an earlier threat by Adoke and the NJC to deal with her for challenging her compulsory retirement in court.

The plaintiff listed the EFCC, the ICPC, the State Security Service, the police and the Code of Conduct Bureau, which are the first to the fifth respondents in the suit, as the agencies being used against her by the NJC and Adoke.

She insisted that her invitation by the EFCC on March 18, 2014, was orchestrated by Adoke and the NJC along with 10 other respondents.

She said after the EFCC had invited her, officers of the ICPC, SSS, the police, and the Code of Conduct Bureau were now on her trail making it difficult for her to move freely and to freely and safely









www.punchng.com/news/efcc-probes-justice-olotu-for-n2bn-accounts/

SANs Guilty Of Encouraging Corruption In Judiciary –CJN



The Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Mariam Aloma
Mukhtar, yesterday accused some Senior Advocates of Nigeria
(SANs) of encouraging corruption in the Judiciary.


TheCJN wondered why so many SANs would agree to represent a judge who has been accused of graft at a mere disciplinary
hearing of the National Judicial Council (NJC).


Consequently, she said: “I think the SANs are equally guilty”.
Justice Aloma Mukhtar spoke yesterday in Abuja at the
opening ceremony of a three-day Judicial Reforms Conference,
with the theme: “Putting Our Best Foot Forward: The Judiciary
and the Challenges of Satisfying Justice Needs of the 21st
Century”.


The conference was jointly organised by the Nigerian Bar
Association’s (NBA’s) Judiciary Committee, the United
Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and Access to
Justice, with support from Open Society Initiative for West
Africa and the NJC’s Performance Evaluation Committee.
The CJN noted that such senior lawyers must be “working in
tandem” with the judges under probe.


According to her, corruption remains the Judiciary’s major
bane and NJC ensures that judges found culpable “are shown
the way out”.


She said: “Corruption has become a real cankerworm that has
refused to depart. We receive petitions and we have always
tried to hear from both sides because many times, many
affected judges complain that they are not given fair hearing.


“Some judges come with as many as six SANs to defend them.
I think the SANs are equally guilty. There was one that came
with about six SANS, which showed they were working in
tandem”.


The CJN further berated many legal practitioners for always
accusing the judiciary of being corrupt, yet, refuse to report
corrupt judges to the NJC.


Justice Mukhtar said: “You (lawyers) all know those judges
that are corrupt. You all do but you won’t report. You will be
the one who will raise the issue that the Judiciary is corrupt,
but you will not do your part”.


On independence of the Judiciary, the CJN said insufficient
funding should not be an excuse for a Chief Judge to make a
“nuisance” of himself at Government House.


“I tell chief judges to manage what they have. Chief Judges
should maintain a distance. We should try as much as
possible to resist interference from the two other arms of
government. The constitution guarantees our independence
and we should strive to establish this”, she said.


A guest speaker at the conference and Chief Justice of South
Africa, Justice Mogoeng Reetsang Mogoeng, said the Judiciary
has what it takes to lead in the turnaround of Africa’s image.


He urged the Judiciary to be “ruthless” in dealing with
corruption, adding that this was the only way it could develop
the moral courage to deal with corruption in the society.


“If there is one institution that can demonstrate that power can
be exercised without corruption, it is the Judiciary. We have to
start it. Only then can we deal as harshly as possible with
corrupt people when they’re brought before us”, Mogoeng
said.


NBA President Okey Wali (SAN) said: “The government must
recognise that the Judiciary is the third arm of government”.
He urged the Federal Government to obey a recent judgment of
the Federal High Court, Abuja, which ordered that the Judiciary
be funded directly rather than through the Executive.


“The NBA reiterates that government must recognise that it is
only existence of a virile, fearless and independent judiciary
that can guarantee an enduring democratic government and
the maintenance of law and order”, Wali added.



www.informationng.com/2014/07/sans-guilty-of-encouraging-corruption-in-judiciary-cjn.html

Comandclem Marketing Manager
Explained The Reasons Why Comandclem Appealed In The Supreme Court

Content
1.0 Introduction …………………………………………………………… Page 1 of 7
2.0 Contents Of The Meeting…….………………………………..Page 2 of 7
3.0 Opening Address………………….…………………………………..Page 3 of 7
4.0 The Pronouncement Of Honourable
Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs (JCA)……..…………….Page 4 of 7
5.0 The Pronouncement Of Honourable
Justice Christopher Mitchell
Chukwuma-Eneh (JCA)……………………………….……………..Page 5 of 7
6.0 Reason Why The Appeal Filed
By Comandclem Nigeria Limited
Will Succeed In The Supreme
Court Of Nigeria…………………………………………………………Page 6 of 7
7.0 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………Page 7 of 7

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Marketing Manager of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, Yusuf Nurudeen, has explained in details the reasons why Comandclem Nigeria Limited appealed the rulings of Honourable Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs (JCA) of the Federal Court of Appeal, Calabar Judicial Division in the Supreme Court of Nigeria in the third monthly meeting organized by the Ondo State Patentees on 29th of March, 2014.

The third monthly meeting organized by the Ondo State Patentees availed hundreds of Patent-Right Investors in the intellectual property of King Professor Emeritus CJA Uwemedimo ample of opportunities to know the cogent reasons why the appeal filed by Comandclem Nigeria Limited will succeed in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

The Ondo State Patentees organized the third monthly meeting in a secondary school which accommodated the teaming lovers and ardent supporters of King Professor Emeritus CJA Uwemedimo.

Advertisement
Investment in Comandclem Nigeria Limited Simplified
Investment Procedures
(1) Identify Your Investment planes
(2) Pay to Company`s Account
Bank: Access Bank Nigeria PLC
Account Name: Comandclem Nigeria Limited
Account Number: 0042926342.
(3) Call Yusuf Nurudeen (CCNL Marketing Manager) on 07032522248 for your investment documents and receipt.
Patentees Or Clement Foundation Registration

Amount Of Registration
N30,000:00 And 4 Passport Photographs

Benefits
(1)   N30,000:00 As A Monthly Ticket Under CCNL Social Security Scheme
(2)   Guaranteed Employment In
(A)   Oil And Gas Industries,
(B)   New 155 Cottage Industries
(C)   An Airline Company To Be Floated By CCNL.

It was an interesting and interactive avenue coupled with favourable discussion environment to enumerate the substantial progress recorded by Comandclem Nigeria Limited in the legal suit (SC./69/2011) filed against Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited over patent right infringement of RP:13522 and breach of sole supplier status agreement in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.


2.0 CONTENTS OF THE MEETING
The conversation below exhibited the reasons why Comandclem Nigeria Limited filed an appeal against the verdict of Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs (JCA) in the Supreme Court of Nigeria as explained by the CCNL Marketing Manager in the meeting held in Ondo State on 29th of March, 2014. Happy reading.

3.0 OPENING ADDRESS

“The esteemed Patentees Of the King Clement Foundation,
I am happy to announce to you that the days of our celebrations and joy over the victory of Comandclem Nigeria Limited in the Supreme Court of Nigeria are very near.
We appreciate your understandings and endurances for the past years in the legal battle to overcome the enemy of Nigerians over the use of the patented invention of the King without paying royalty.


4.0 THE PRONOUNCEMENT OF HONOURABLE JUSTICE KUMAI BAYANG AKAAHS (JCA)

Honourable Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs (JCA) of the Federal Court of Appeal, Calabar Judicial Division in 2009, claimed that the case of Comandclem Nigeria Limited was statute barred, and the Judge woefully failed to award the long awaited royalties against Mobil Oil over the unauthorized use of the patented invention called Anti-Corrosive Special paint for QIT QAD RP: 13522 of King Professor Emeritus CJA Uwemedimo.

Precisely, Honourable Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs (JCA) pronounced that the case of Comandclem Nigeria Limited was statute barred when he said and I quote,

“As it turned out the purported infringement occurred in the early 1980s and since the action was commenced in 2000, it is statute barred even if they had proved their case as there is no evidence that the infringement has continued after the Patent for the invention was registered.”
Per: Honourable Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs JCA( CA/C/15/2009.)



REASON WHY COMANDCLEM NIGERIA LIMITED APPEALED IN THE SUPREME COURT

Comandclem Nigeria Limited filed an appeal in the Supreme Court of Nigeria to exhibit before the Honourable Justices Of The Apex Court Of The Land that Paragraph 29 (iii), (iv), (V) And (Viii) Of The Amended Statement Of Claim filed by Comandclem Nigeria limited are not statute barred so that the court can award royalties, compensations, and damages against the patent right infringer, Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited.


Technically speaking, Comandclem Nigeria Limited is in the Supreme Court of Nigeria to challenge the jurisdiction of Honourable Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs (JCA) to entertain, review and re-litigate the settled verdict of another court of coordinate or concurrent jurisdiction (Honourable Justice Christopher Mitchell Chukwuma-Eneh (JCA)) between the same parties and on the same subject matters.

5.0 THE PRONOUNCEMENT OF HONOURABLE JUSTICE CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CHUKWUMA-ENEH (JCA),

For your information, in the Federal Court of Appeal, Calabar Judicial Division in 2005 Suit No.:CA/C/6/2003 before Honourable Justice Christopher Mitchell Chukwuma-Eneh (JCA), the court ruled categorically that the case of Comandclem Nigeria Limited was not statute barred when the court said and I quote.

“I have examined paragraph 29 of the Amended Statement of Claims and I agreed with the respondents (CCNL) there were relieves i.e. cause of actions not caught by the limitation law and it will be unwise to ask the court to strike dawn the claim with relieves as contained (iii), (iv) (v) and (viii) of paragraph 29 of the Amended statement of Claim. It must be observed that relieves (iii), (IV) (v) and (viii) of paragraph 29 of the Amended statement of Claim have not been affected by the limitation law. I do not see the propriety of dismissing the respondents` (CCNL) action in the light of those relieves.”
Per: Honourable Justice Christopher M. Chukwuma-Eneh (JCA)
SUIT NO.: CA/C/6/2003
Advertisement
Investment in Comandclem Nigeria Limited Simplified
Investment Procedures
(1) Identify Your Investment planes
(2) Pay to Company`s Account
Bank: Access Bank Nigeria PLC
Account Name: Comandclem Nigeria Limited
Account Number: 0042926342.
(3) Call Yusuf Nurudeen (CCNL Marketing Manager) on 07032522248 for your investment documents and receipt.
Committee Of Friends In The Ruling Council Of CCNL Registration As :

Amount Of Registration

(1)   Prince / Princess = N150,000
(2)   Lady / Sir= N200,00
(3)   Noble= N2 Million
(4)   Baron= N3 Million
(5)   Knight= N4 Million

Plus Additional 2 Passport Photographs


   Benefits
(1)   Monthly Salaries For Those In Those Ruling Councils Are Sa Follows.
                  Basic             Total Allowance
(1)   Prince / Princess  = N100,000      N400,000
(2)   Lady / Sir                  = N300,000       N500,000
(3)   Noble                      = N500,000      N700,000
(4) Baron                        = N500,000      N800,000
(5) Knight                      = N500,000      N800,000


6.0 REASON WHY THE APPEAL FILED BY COMANDCLEM NIGERIA LIMITED WILL SUCCEED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA.

From the eyes of the law in Nigeria, no judge of equal power/ coordinate authority has jurisdiction to over-rule another judge of equal power / coordinate authority.

Technically speaking, all the Federal Court of Appeal Judges have equal powers, and none has jurisdiction to over-rule another most especially between the same parties and on the same issues in dispute.

The above principle of law was demonstrated by Honourable Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen, J.C.A. when he said and I quote.

"It is not competent for a court to over-rule the decision of another court of co-ordinate jurisdiction. Thus, in absence of statutory authority, a court has no power to set aside or vary the order of another court of co-ordinate or concurrent jurisdiction.
No court can, therefore, sit on appeal over its own decision of courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction.”

Per: Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen, J.C.A.
Suit No.: CA/IL/54/2001
Parties: Professor Albert Folorunsho Ogunsola V. Alhaji Mohammed
Abiodun Usman


The reason why the appeal filed by Comandclem Nigeria Limited will succeed in the Supreme Court of Nigeria is that Honourable Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs JCA( CA/C/15/2009.) of the Federal Court of Appeal, Calabar Judicial Division entertained, over-ruled, reviewed and re-litigated the settled verdict of Honourable Justice Christopher M. Chukwuma-Eneh (JCA) SUIT NO.: CA/C/6/2003 of the same Federal Court of Appeal, Calabar Judicial Division between CCNL and Mobil Oil with respect to whether or not relieves as contained (iii), (iv) (v) and (viii) of paragraph 29 of the Amended statement of Claim are statute barred.

CONCLUSION

From the eyes of the law applicable in Nigeria, Honourable Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs JCA( CA/C/15/2009.) is not competent or has no jurisdiction to overrule the settled verdict of Honourable Justice Christopher M. Chukwuma-Eneh (JCA) SUIT NO.: CA/C/6/2003 on the grounds that both judges have equal power.

Any decision of a court without a jurisdiction is a nullity as demonstrated by Honourable Justice Fabiyi (JSC) when he said and I quote.

The issue of jurisdiction is very fundamental and radical.
It should be determined at the earliest opportunity when it is raised.


It forms the foundation or bedrock of adjudication and where a court lacks jurisdiction, there is want of competence to try the matter.


If a court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine a case, the proceedings remain a nullity ab initio no matter how well conducted and decided.
Per: Honourable Justice Fabiyi (JSC)
Suit No: SC/44/2010. (Page 13)



Name: Yusuf Nurudeen (B. Sc, AAT, ACA)
Head Office Address:
CCNL Zonal Headquarters,
Position: CCNL Marketing Manager
Number 4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos State.
Ondo State Office:
Position: CCNL Ondo State Manager
No 32. Oba-Adesida Road,
Opposite Airtel Office,
S.O. Area,
Akure.
Mobil Number: +2347032522248
CCNL Twitter Name: www.twitter.com/Comandlem_Nig
CCNL Facebook Name: Comandclem Patentees
CCNL Corporate Facebook Address: www.facebook.com/COMANDCLEMNIGERIALIMITED
CCNL Corporate Website: www.comandclemonline.com
CCNL Forum: www.comandclemonline.com/forum/index.php?

I strongly believe that our voices have not been heard and that is why this case has lingered till date. if there had been a radical measure and approach...then Dis would have been bygone. how many people come to nairaland or other small forums? We need to be radical in our approach or else.... this vase is a s good as lost...because nobility will continue to drag Dis case till God knows when....

As King Uwemedimo Celebrates 84th Birthday,
He Appreciates Almighty God For The Consistent Progress Recorded To Realize The Unpaid Royalties.


It was a session of celebration, joy, and prayers in the entire family of King Uwemedimo on Monday, 14th of July, 2014, when The Chairman & The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, King Professor (Emeritus) CJA Uwemedimo celebrated his 84th birthday in a stable and good health condition.

Friends, well-wishers, associates, family members, and ardent supporters of King Professor (Emeritus) CJA Uwemedimo felicitated with him in view of the uncommon blessings and divine favour of Almighty God on him over his stable health condition and long life.

One of the Marketing Managers in Comandclem Nigeria Limited, Yusuf Nurudeen (ACA), interviewed him on some critical issues pertaining to the ongoing case of Patent Right Infringement Of RP:13522, and Breach Of Sole Supplier Status Agreement allegations against Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited. Below is the interview, and happy reading.

Marketing Manager,
Asked a question as follows.
Everybody stands beside you today, celebrating with you over your 84th birthday. How do you feel?

King Professor (Emeritus) CJA Uwemedimo
Replied as follows.
“I am extremely excited today because Almighty God has been so good to me. I appreciate Almighty God for elongating my life span irrespective of the delay strategies adopted by Mobil Oil to delay the final determination of my appeal before the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

I will be ingratitude if I fail to appreciate the irreversible efforts and undivided loyalties of all the patentees in my foundation who have supported me financially and spiritually to realize my unpaid royalties from the first user of my patented invention, Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited.

I am the true, and the statutory inventor of Anti-Corrosive Special Paint for QIT QAD, RP: 13522, the only enabling paint that allows the extraction of Crude Oil, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Condensate, And Other Barrel Gases in Nigeria.

There is a cogent need to ostensibly expatiate the difference between a true inventor and a statutory inventor. A true inventor is the first person to conceptualize inventive ideas to solve a particular problem, while a statutory inventor is the first person to file inventive documents in the Patent Office of the Federal Ministry of Commerce And Industry in Nigeria.

In reference to Anti-Corrosive Special Paint, Mobil Oil neither conceptualizes inventive ideas nor files any inventive documents in the Patent Office in Nigeria, but consigned samples of my invention to their subsidiary company in Amsterdam, Holland, where my invention was pirated and shipped back to Nigeria in large quantities.

Harry Fredrick Hawkins (staff of Mobil Oil) in Consulate General in New York during Examination in Chief by Atake confirmed this criminal act of patent right infringement when he said and I can vividly quote him.

“Great quantities of coating paint were shipped from Holland. We used up to 2,000 – 3,000 barrels.”

Marketing Manager,
Asked another question as follows.
In the course of your explanations, you claimed that Mobil Oil has been adopting all strategies to delay the final determinations of your appeal before the Supreme Court of Nigeria. What do you mean by that?

King Professor (Emeritus) CJA Uwemedimo
Replied as follows.
My case has been in various courts both in Nigeria and Consulate General in America for the past fourteen years (14). My case has been adjudicated upon twice (2) both in The Federal High Court, Uyo Judicial Division, and The Federal Court of Appeal, Calabar Judicial Division.

This is the second times the Supreme Court of Nigeria will entertain my case. The first times The Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria ruled over my case was before Justice Sylvester Umaru Onu (JSC) (SC./198/2005), where I defeated Mobil Oil completely.

Mobil Oil supposed to have filed and served “Cross Appellant Reply Brief” in the Supreme Court of Nigeria as far back as 14th of June, 2013, but deliberately delayed for two hundred and eighteen (218) days, and only served us twenty-four hours (24) to the hearing of the appeal on 5th of May, 2014. And paid a penalty of =N=2,270:00 for filing late. What a delay strategy?

Marketing Manager,
Asked another question as follows.
Why do you think Mobil Oil has adopted delay strategy to frustrate the speedy determination of your appeal in the Supreme Court of Nigeria?

King Professor (Emeritus) CJA Uwemedimo
Replied as follows.

I thank Almighty God for giving me Reverend Jesse Daniels Onuigbo Esq because he has demonstrated high level of professionalism in the course of handling the case.

Reverend Jesse confronted the entire legal department and external legal consultants of Mobil Oil with weapons of laws, and he successfully rendered them useless on points of law.

Mobil Oil conspicuously admitted to have held series of meetings before they could react to the brief of argument filed by my lawyer in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

Please give me my glasses, and let me read it to you.
Paragraph 4.0 (xii) of the affidavit in support of argument on time extension to file
“That the defendants`/respondents’` legal team comprising their law department and team of external counsel had to hold series of meetings in order to agree on the draft amended brief of arguments and cross appellant reply brief of arguments to be filed on behalf of the defendants/respondents.”

The simple interpretation to the above is that my lawyer has been able to successfully give the entire legal team including the external legal consultants of Mobil oil series of headaches and sleepless nights for over 218 days before they could reply.

With this among other things, I have achieved a consistent progress in the course of realizing my unpaid royalties. Very soon patentees will have reasons to rejoice with me. Mobil Oil has been delaying the speedy determination of the case because they have nothing to say.
To be continued……………………………………………..

Name: Yusuf Nurudeen (B. Sc, AAT, ACA)
Head Office Address:
CCNL Zonal Headquarters,
Position: CCNL Marketing Manager
Number 4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos State.
Ondo State Office:
Position: CCNL Ondo State Manager
No 32. Oba-Adesida Road,
Opposite Airtel Office,
S.O. Area,
Akure.
Mobil Number: +2347032522248
CCNL Twitter Handle: www.twitter.com/Comandlem_Nig
CCNL Facebook Name: Comandclem Patentees
CCNL Corporate Facebook Address: www.facebook.com/comandclemnigerialimited
CCNL Corporate Website: www.comandclemonline.com
CCNL Forum: www.comandclemonline.com/forum/index.php?

Who can battle with the Lord? Definitely nobody. God has been faithful. He has continued to preserve the life of His servant King Prof. (Emeritus) CJA Uwemedimoh. If wishes were horses, truly, beggars would ride. If the life of King Uwemedimoh was to be in the hands of Mobil or Mike Ozekhome, they would have taken it long ago. But for God being what He is, He controls the life of every man. Remember that the average life span of a male Nigerian is forty (40) years and biblically, seventy (70) years remains maximum number of age and any addition a blessing. Tremendously, God has blessed King Uwemedimoh with additional fourteen (14) years so far and that is the beginning of the addition. In the book of Kings, King Hezekiah cried to God about his prophesied death but the Almighty in His magnanimity added fifteen (15) years to his life span.

In the case of King Uwemedimoh, the prophesy has not come and whenever it comes, God will not only add fifteen (15) years to his life span but will triple the number.

Once again, Happy Birthday to the true and statutory inventor of Anti Corrosive Special Paint, the King of the wealth of the oceans, the Grand Marshal of peace pursuit in Africa, the inventor of the World Energy, King Prof. (Emeritus) CJA Uwemedimoh. May God bless you as you celebrate your 84th birthday. We shall all get their in Jesus name...Amen.

As for Mobil, they are preparing our royalties because there is no peace for the wicked.

Fellow Patentees, kindly join me in wishing King Uwemedimoh whatever he wishes himself. Cheers.

Hmm. What a case! The wait continues.

Question and Answer

Awoniyi Afeez> Comandclem Patentees

I doubt 7th october,2014 for hearing as that day wl be declared as holiday for Nigerian muslims to celebrate their eidil-kabir. What is the next thing to do pls?

Give us time to investigate.

www.facebook.com/PatenteesOnlineNewsPaper

Judicial workers demand written undertaking to end strike
AUGUST 1, 2014 BY ADE ADESOMOJU





Judicial workers, whose nationwide strike has entered the third
week, have demanded a written undertaking from both the federal and state governments for the implementation of a judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, on the funding of the judiciary.


The President of the Judicial Staff Union of Nigeria, Mr. Marwan
Adamu, while speaking with our correspondent on Thursday, partly blamed the crisis on the Accountant-General of the Federation, Mr. Jonah Otunla, for failing to begin implementing the judgment of the court.


Justice Adeniyi Ademola had in the said judgment ordered the
Accountant-General of the Federation to deduct the funds meant for the states’ judiciary directly from the Consolidated Revenue Fund and pay it to the National Judicial Council for onward disbursement to various heads of court as provided for in the constitution.


The court had in the judgment delivered on January 13, 2014,
declared as unconstitutional the piece-meal approach of funding of the state judiciary by various state governors.


JUSUN, which was the plaintiff in the case, had proceeded on the strike after state governments failed to yield to the union’s
agitation for compliance with the judgment.


Adamu told our correspondent on Thursday, “Our demand is
simple. JUSUN will suspend the strike if we get a cogent, concrete and presentable commitment from the government.


“We are not saying they should pay the money instantly. If for
example, both the representatives of the federal and state
governments say that they agree there is a court judgment and that they have not complied with it but that they need one week, two weeks or even one month to comply. That is a commitment.


“The commitment should be in a written form. It can no longer be in verbal form because we have had a number of verbal
assurances which have failed. We were even given a written
memorandum, which failed.”


The union leader said one of the failed verbal assurances given by the government was the promise to set up a technical committee that would consider the budgets of various states in view of plan to implement the judgment.
He added that no state government had sent any representatives to the meetings held at the instance of the Minster of Labour, Mr. Emeka Worgu, since February when discussions on the issue started.


He said the union only embarked on strike after government’s
refusal to honour the 21 days ultimatum it had twice issued since February and also on the basis of the government to show enough willingness to start implementing the court order.


Blaming the Accountant-General of the Federation for the crisis,
Adamu said his recent letters to the various state governors,
urging them to comply with the judgment of the Federal High
Court, was not the action expected of him by the court judgment.


He said, “More importantly, the Accountant-General of the
Federation caused about 25 per cent of the problem. This is
because the provisions of Section 162(9) of the 1999 Constitution empower him to deduct the money meant for the judiciary from the source and pay to the NJC for onward disbursement to heads of courts.


“In as much as he did not challenge the judgment, he has no moral right to disobey the order. If he deducts the money from the state governments’ funds (from the source) and any governor complains, it is for the state governors to accept it or go to court to challenge the judgment.”




http://www.punchng.com/news/judicial-workers-demand-written-undertaking-to-end-strike-2/

Judicial workers suspend strike after 21 days

By Ali Adoyion August 2, 2014 @dailypostngr

After 21 days of no work, the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN) on Friday suspended its strike due to the intervention of relevant stakeholders, especially that of the Minister of Labour and Productivity, Chief Emeka Wogu.

The truce was however reached after a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed at the end of a meeting between the Minister and JUSUN leadership in Abuja on Friday.

The M0U reads: “The meeting noted that the issues in dispute are constitutional matters in which judgments had been given in a suit No FHC/ABJ/CS/667/13 between JUSUN and the National Judicial Council (NJC).

“The Federal Government was not in breach of the constitution, and therefore, the judgement cannot be enforced against it.

“The state governments are obliged to respect the provision of the 1999 Constitution as amended and comply with the aforementioned judgement of the court,’’.

It equally directed the Technical Committee to work out modalities for the implementation of the judgement dated Jan. 13, 2014.

It further stressed that the committee should work out best ways for the effective implementation of the MoU from Friday Aug. 1 to Monday, Aug. 4.

It stated clearly added that no JUSUN member shall be victimised for being part of the strike.

The Nigeria Labour Congress President, Abdulwaheed Omar; JUSUN President, Mustapha Adamu; Director, National Judicial Council, Eugene Odukwu; and Chairman, Accountant General’s Forum, Mr Udo Isobara signed the MoU.

Others who also appended their signatures were Mr Adetokunbo Kayode, Nigerian Bar Association; Bola Odugbesan, Ministry of Justice; Mrs Chinedu Dike, Ministry of Labour, and Abdullahi Zubair, Office of the Accountant General of the Federation.

DailyPost recalls that JUSUN embarked on strike since July 11 due to state governments’ failure to implement the subsisting judgement delivered by the Federal High Court seven months ago.

http://dailypost.ng/2014/08/02/judicial-workers-suspend-strike-21-days/

CCNL To File Restoration Application
As The Supreme Court Of Nigeria
Suspends Strikes

Pieces of information at the disposal of Anti-Corrosive Vanguard show clearly that there are strong indications that the Leading Legal Counsel of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, Rev. Jesse Daniels Onuigbo ESQ, has finally concluded all the outstanding technical issues necessary to file a Restoration Application in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

This progress report was made known to our correspondent during an interview with the Leading Legal Team of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, Rev. Jesse Daniels Onuigbo ESQ. Below is the interview, happy reading.



CCNL Marketing Manager Asked A Question as follows.
Now that the strike embarked upon by the administrative staff in the Supreme Court of Nigeria has been suspended, what are the positive steps taken by the Legal Department of CCNL to ensure that necessary application is filed on this case?

Rev. Jesse Daniels Onuigbo ESQ replied as follows
The recently suspended strike embarked upon by the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria delayed the filing of an application to restore our dismissed appeal in the Supreme Court of Nigeria. We have dotted our I`s and crossed our T`s in the application.


The Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria will favourably consider our application in the interest of justice so that both the Cross Appeal filed by Mobil Oil, and our Appeal can be entertained together of 7th of October, 2014 because both appeals are co-join twice. You cannot hear one in isolation of another.



CCNL Marketing Manager Asked A Question as follows.
This case is fourteen (14) years old. When would it come to an end?


Rev. Jesse Daniels Onuigbo ESQ replied as follows
It is quit unfortunate. Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited has adopted all forms of delay strategies to frustrate the speedy determination of this appeal. Mobil Oil capitalized on loop holes in our laws to unnecessarily delay the case.

For example, Dr. Eyimofe Atake filed A Cross Appeal dated 20th of May, 2012 claiming that Mobil Oil invented Anti-Corrosive Special Paint for QIT QAD RP:13522. I filed a Cross Respondent Brief on 13th of May, 2013.

Mobil Oil supposed to have filed a Cross Appellant Reply Brief as far back as 10th of June, 2013, but deliberately delayed for two hundred and eighteen (218) days, and only served us twenty-four hours (24) to the hearing of the appeal on 5th of May, 2014. And paid a penalty of =N=2,270:00 for filing late. This oil giant capitalized on the loop holes in our laws to frustrate the speedy determination of the case.

This case will come to an end very soon because all the necessary motions /replies have been filed by parties. CCNL filed Appellants ` Brief of Argument and Mobil Oil has replied by filing a Respondent`s Brief Of Argument, and I have responded to it by filing Appellants` Reply Brief On Point Of Law.

Conversely, Mobil Oil filed A Cross Appeal and I filed A Cross Respondents` Brief to react to it. Mobil Oil has reacted to it by filing a Cross Appellant`s Reply Brief.

All the necessary motions/replies are available for the apex court of the land to use as tools to deliver judgment on this appeal. I am sure by the special grace of Almighty God, the cross appeal will be dismissed while CCNL`s Appeal will succeed.

To be continued……………………………………………..

Name: Yusuf Nurudeen (B. Sc, AAT, ACA)
Head Office Address:
CCNL Zonal Headquarters,
Position: CCNL Marketing Manager
Number 4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos State.
Ondo State Office:
Position: CCNL Ondo State Manager
No 32. Oba-Adesida Road,
Opposite Airtel Office,
S.O. Area,
Akure.
Mobil Number: +2347032522248
CCNL Twitter Handle: www.twitter.com/Comandlem_Nig
CCNL Facebook Name: Comandclem Patentees
CCNL Corporate Facebook Address: www.facebook.com/comandclemnigerialimited
CCNL Corporate Website: www.comandclemonline.com
CCNL Forum: www.comandclemonline.com/forum/index.php?

I read somewhere on Facebook that the king is late....I hope this is not true....
someone pls comment...

CCNL Finally Files Restoration Application
To Resurrect The Fallaciously Dismissed
Appeal (SC./69/2011).

The Management of Comandclem Nigeria Limited has recorded another substantial legal progress in the realization of unpaid royalties expected to be accrued to patentees over the unauthorized, continuous use, and massive importation of the patented invention of King Professor CJA Uwemedimo (RP: 13522) by Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited through a successful Restoration Application recently filed in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

While filing the Restoration Application in the Supreme Court of Nigeria, one of the Marketing Managers in Comandclem Nigeria Limited, Yusuf Nurudeen (ACA) interviewed the CCNL Legal Counsel, Reverend Jesse Daniels Onuigbo ESQ on some critical issues relating to the aforesaid application. Below is interview, happy reading.

Questions.
(1) From the perspectives of Patentees who have invested in the intellectual property of CCNL for years, what is the importance of this restoration application to them?

(2) The decision of the Supreme Court of Nigeria is final, and it is not subjected to any review or re-litigation going by the principle of stare decises. How can you convince the Supreme Court of Nigeria to set aside its order made on 5th of May, 2014, dismissing CCNL Appeal?

(3) Now that Comandclem Nigeria Limited has filed a Restoration Application in the Supreme Court of Nigeria. When would the Supreme Court of Nigeria make a pronouncement of this application?

Keep in view……………………………………………………………….


Name: Yusuf Nurudeen (B. Sc, AAT, ACA)
Head Office Address:
CCNL Zonal Headquarters,
Position: CCNL Marketing Manager
Number 4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos State.
Ondo State Office:
Position: CCNL Ondo State Manager
No 32. Oba-Adesida Road,
Opposite Airtel Office,
S.O. Area,
Akure.
Mobil Number: +2347032522248
CCNL Twitter Handle: www.twitter.com/Comandlem_Nig
CCNL Facebook Name: Comandclem Patentees
CCNL Corporate Facebook Address: www.facebook.com/comandclemnigerialimited
CCNL Corporate Website: www.comandclemonline.com
CCNL Forum: www.comandclemonline.com/forum/index.php?

[size=18pt]The Reasons Why Patentees Should Not Express Any Fear In The Case Of Comandclem Nigeria Limited In The Supreme Court Of Nigeria.[/size]





[size=16pt] Comandclem Nigeria Limited appealed in the Federal Court of Appeal, Calabar Division after the Federal High Court, Uyo ruled on the 28th day of November, 2008 denying us


(1) the patent right, RP:13522

(2)the monetary compensation and royalty
to their patent invention, in patent certificate No. RP 13522 issued to them on the 5th day of August, 1999 by the Federal Government of Nigeria.


The Court of Appeal, Calabar Division restored the rights of Comandclem Nigeria Limited to the patent, as Statutory Inventors of the Anti-Corrosive Special Paint For Q.I.T (Mobile Blue Oil Enamel Paint) in their Judgment of 8th Dec, 2009.


However, the Federal Court of Appeal, dismissed the monetary aspect of CCNL`s Appeal, basically on the grounds that


(1) the CCNL`s case was statute barred, and

(2) the alleged infringement was not continuous,
hence the Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited was not liable to pay the royalty/compensation which CCNL sought from the court.


Not being satisfied with the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal, Calabar division, CCNL appealed to the Supreme Court of Nigeria.


My duties as A Professional Lawyer are to demonstrate before the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria on 7th of October, 2014 that


(1) the case of CCNL is not statute barred as pronounced by Honourable Justice Chukwuma-Eneh (CA/C/6/2003).

(2) throughout the length and breadth of the case, Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited has never deny continuous infringement of our patented invention.



With the above on our side by the special grace of Almighty God, we shall get our compensation and royalty. On October 7th, 2014, you will see more actions in the Supreme Court of Nigeria. God is on our side.[/size]




Interviewed From:

Name: Yusuf Nurudeen (B. Sc, AAT, ACA)
Head Office Address:
CCNL Zonal Headquarters,
Position: CCNL Marketing Manager
Number 4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos State.
Mobil Number: +2347032522248
CCNL Twitter Handle: www.twitter.com/Comandlem_Nig www.facebook.com/comandclemnigerialimited

CCNL Finally Files Restoration Application
To Resurrect The Fallaciously Dismissed
Appeal (SC./69/2011).



The Management of Comandclem Nigeria Limited has recorded another substantial legal progress in the realization of unpaid royalties expected to be accrued to patentees over the unauthorized, continuous use, and massive importation of the patented invention of King Professor CJA Uwemedimo (RP: 13522) by Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited through a successful Restoration Application recently filed in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.


While filing the Restoration Application in the Supreme Court of Nigeria, one of the Marketing Managers in Comandclem Nigeria Limited, Yusuf Nurudeen (ACA) interviewed the CCNL Legal Counsel, Reverend Jesse Daniels Onuigbo ESQ on some critical issues relating to the aforesaid application. Below is the interview, happy reading.



Marketing Manager, Asked a question as follows.

From the perspectives of Patentees who have invested in the intellectual property of CCNL for years, what are the importances of this restoration application to them?



Revered Jesse Daniels Onuigbo Replied as follows.

The importance of this restoration application cannot be overemphasized with respect the resurrection of our dismissed appeal in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.


For record purposes, on 5th of May, 2014, the Supreme Court of Nigeria before Honourable Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen (JSC) drew my attention to a Notice of Withdrawal dated 17th day of March, 2011, but filed on 24th day of March, 2011, which was allegedly emanated from Professor Tony Ukam (the formal legal counsel).


Based on the aforesaid Notice of Withdrawal, the Supreme Court of Nigeria dismissed the Appeal filed by Comandclem Nigeria Limited on the 5th day of May, 2014 but adjourned the Cross Appeal filed by Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited for hearing to the 7th day of October 2014.


Now to answer your question, the importance of this Restoration Application is to pray the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria to set aside its order made on the 5th day of May, 2014 dismissing the appeal filed by CCNL on the bases of aforesaid Notice of Withdrawal.


Furthermore, this Restoration Application is also praying the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria to restore the mistakenly dismissed appeal filed by CCNL in the interest of justice and equity.


The legal implication of this restoration application is to resurrect the mistakenly dismissed appeal filed Comandclem Nigeria Limited. This application will make the appeal filed by CCNL come back alive again. Thank you very much for this question.




Marketing Manager Asked a question as follows.

The decision of the Supreme Court of Nigeria is final, and it is not subjected to any review or re-litigation going by the principle of stare decises. How can you convince the Supreme Court of Nigeria to set aside its order made on 5th of May, 2014, dismissing CCNL Appeal?




Revered Jesse Daniels Onuigbo Replied as follows.

Fundamentally, the Supreme Court of Nigeria does not set aside its own judgment once delivered, it becomes final and conclusive. But in some special circumstances, the Supreme Court of Nigeria has inherent jurisdiction to set aside its own judgment or decision in the interest of justice and equity.


In a conspicuous scenario where the Honourable Justices Of The Supreme Court Of Nigeria have been misled to give an order, decision or judgment under a mistake belief totally contrary to the facts and figures on ground, the Supreme Court of Nigeria has inherent jurisdiction to set aside such an order, decision and judgment in the interest of justice and equity.


Like the case of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria were misled to give an order dismissing the appeal of my employer (CCNL) because of A Notice of Withdrawal presumed to have been filed by Professor Tony Ukam who expressly denied haven filed such a malicious application in a letter dated 16th of May, 2014.


In addition, the Supreme Court of Nigeria also has inherent jurisdiction to set aside its judgment where it is obvious that such a judgment is default, and most importantly where such a judgment is not predicated on merit.


Like the case of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria dismissed the appeal filed by CCNL where there is no evidence before the court to exhibit that Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited was served a copy of the alleged Notice of Withdrawal. It is very important to express categorically that both parties, (CCNL and Mobil Oil), never consented to withdraw the case from the Supreme Court of Nigeria.


It is crystal clear that an order dismissing the appeal filed by CCNL was not only default but also not predicated on merit because Mobil Oil was never served the alleged Notice of Withdrawal, and most importantly, parties never consented to withdraw the case from court.


Under the above stated situations, the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria have inherent jurisdictions to set aside its own judgments, orders, and decisions in the interest of justice and equity. Thank you very much for this question.



Marketing Manager Asked a question as follows.

Now that Comandclem Nigeria Limited has filed a Restoration Application in the Supreme Court of Nigeria, when would the Supreme Court of Nigeria make a pronouncement on this application?



Revered Jesse Daniels Onuigbo Replied as follows.

It is not the responsibility of a party to an appeal to dictate or determine the date of hearing a particular application before the court. The sole responsibility of a party to an appeal is to file all the necessary applications that will enable a court of competent jurisdiction to deliver its judgment.


Dictating the date of hearing the Restoration Application is like taking over the responsibility of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in that regard. The Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria have discretionary powers over when to hear a particular application.


The argument whether the Supreme Court of Nigeria will entertain this Restoration Application on or before 7th of October, 2014 rests on the discretionary powers of the judges of the apex court of the land. Thank you.





Name: Yusuf Nurudeen (B. Sc, AAT, ACA)
Head Office Address:
CCNL Zonal Headquarters,
Position: CCNL Marketing Manager
Number 4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos State.
Ondo State Office:
Position: CCNL Ondo State Manager
No 32. Oba-Adesida Road,
Opposite Airtel Office,
S.O. Area,
Akure.
Mobil Number: +2347032522248
CCNL Twitter Handle: www.twitter.com/Comandlem_Nig
CCNL Facebook Name: Comandclem Patentees
CCNL Corporate Facebook Address: www.facebook.com/comandclemnigerialimited
CCNL Corporate Website: www.comandclemonline.com
CCNL Forum: www.comandclemonline.com/forum/index.php?

Hello mr yusuf nurudeen why u cannot come here and tell the word what happen to the king? My state manager told me that the king have died!

Let us know if truely our King is alright. Different rumour flying everywhere.

its official...the king is late..
may his gentle soul rest in perfect peace. I pray that his suffering will not be in vain...

Fellow Patentees let us not abandon the substance and start pursuing shadows. The management of Comandclem Nigeria Limited is updating us with information about our dismissed appeal which according to recent development has been re-filed for restoration. Our duties as patentees should not be to speculate on the health situation of King (Prof) CJA Uwemedimoh. I want to believe that if there is anything like that, the Company will issue an official statement to that regard. I am not saying that the information whether the King is alive is true or not but we have to realize that it is only Comandclem Nigeria Limited as the True and Statutory Inventors of Anti Corrosive Special Paint that can give us true and correct information about King Uwemedimoh. Remember that Prof. Dora Akunyili died many times before her death and death hoax is not a new thing in Nigeria. Even if the King is dead for instance, we should realize that Comandclem Nigeria Limited is a corporate body that is different from King Uwemedimoh as a person. There should not be any reason for panic. Let us wait and hear from the management.

Who Is Chasing Who?



Since time immemorial, a Domestic Hen and a Domestic Cockroach are enemies because the formal chases the latter for an immediate crush and subsequent consumption. A Domestic Cockroach is always a meat in the meal of a Domestic Hen.


There are occasions a Domestic Cockroach will escape the consumption attempts made by a Domestic Hen. In such situations, a Domestic Cockroach believes that he is wiser and more intelligent than a Domestic Hen.


But when the unfortunate befall the Domestic Cockroach, he walks in the daylight and confronts an angry and hungry Domestic Hen.


Guess what will happen? Casualties will be recorded.


This time around, on October 7th, 2014, in the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the Domestic Cockroach of Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited will walk in the daylight and casualties will be recorded on their party. Few days to 7th of October, 2014.




-usefulman

DOWNLOAD KEN ADVOCACY ANDROID APP FOR UP TO DATE ADVOCACY ARTICLES AND REPORTS

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bxk4C3EyyR8GaVZ4a0NoYklzdkE/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bxk4C3EyyR8GaVZ4a0NoYklzdkE/edit?usp=sharing

SUPREME COURT SUIT SC/69/2011 : A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY by Prince Ken

We must heed the clarion call. There is a Judicial Tsunami. A national Earthquake brimming. A Judicial induced National eruption of volcanic proportion. Will we only brace ourselves for the apocalypse or take precautions? The ball is in our court to do what is needful to forge a better life for ourselves and the future of our Nation. We must sail the Nigerian ship to a land of safety and greatness.

Already Nigeria has a very bad name. Foreign countries don’t want to associate with Nigeria except when we lure them with something juicy at our own detriment. The situation on home soil is nothing encouraging as our youths curse Nigeria on daily basis while they seek greener pastures abroad. Nigerians in Diaspora experience stigmatization and racism all over the globe and it is so unfortunate that their plight means nothing to the Government. We are our own undoing.

We have been blinded by personal gains and aggrandizement and that’s all we want from our involvement in politics. We are lost like a sheep without shepherd. Like a lost ship we wonder the oceans hoping for a water goddess to show us the way. There are a thousand experiences to cite as it is no more news that nothing is working in Nigeria.

It is a national disgrace. We should bow our heads in shame and rethink. Does anyone remember the response of President Barrack Obama to our plea for ZMMAP? An experimental drug famed to be the cure for Ebola virus that was used to treat two Americans on Ebola death row was requested for by the Federal Government and President Barrack Obama was not economical in his outright refusal. He landed a punch that left us sprawling with a bloody nose. He asserted that we have failed to build strong public infrastructures over the YEARS hence, we deserve no pity. Nigeria has since been excluded from various grants.

While we have the resources and the skill to avoid our shameful begging and dependence on foreign aid, we still find ourselves in a sorry state. Why? A typical example is what brewed in our Judiciary in recent years. A classic case of how we sell our birthrights for a plate of porridge or morsel of bread. Suit: SC/69/2011 before the Supreme Court tells it all. While the United States basks in the glory and riches brought by various inventions including the recent ZMAPP we begged for, our judiciary and leaders are suppressing creativity and discouraging inventions.

Inventions and innovations during the Industrial Revolution were main contributing factors to the process of acceleration of the industrial development of Great Britain. Its industrial sector benefited from trade protection and other forms of government intervention in the trade flow through the Navigation Act and by means of political power and even military power. What has happened to our Patent and Designs Act? Bill Gates comes to mind for the effect of his invention on the United States economy and I will not forget in a hurry his financial grants towards eradication of Polio in Nigeria and many other various noble acts. In Nigeria we still apply for grants from the Bill Gate Foundation till date. Inventors are celebrated around the globe. America didn’t smile on the infringement of Apple Patents by South Korean owned
Samsung
brand. The court was not undecided to speedily do justice.

It is a different story in Nigeria. Suit: SC/69/2011 is a classic case of how Judges auction judgment for sale and jeopardize the future of our Nation and that of all stake holders. The Invention called the Anti-Corrosive Special Paint is the enabling paint that makes possible the Exploration of Crude oil offshore. It is being used by many Oil Multinationals in their daily operations has offshore oil drilling is impossible without it. The Proud Nigerian Inventor of this enabling paint has been cheated, humiliated and persecuted for more than 14 years by the Oil Multinationals that make use of the product, by the judiciary that has by ignorance and corruption denied him Justice and by the Federal Government that turned deaf ears to the cry for intervention in this cruel act. King Clement Uwemedimo the proud inventor of the Anti-Corrosive Special Paint is yet to get rewards for this invention.

We care less about our resources, leaving it to ravaging wolves to plunder while we beg for crumbs from abroad. The Patent RP 13522 issued by the Federal Government of Nigeria on the 5th of August 1999 is worth more than 150 Billion US Dollars. The Inventor had prepared a blueprint of how the royalties should be used. The building of refineries across the country, provision of stable electricity, industrialization, motor-able and safe roads, employment, a social security scheme that will put an end to abject poverty to mention a few. Despite these noble intentions of our rights, a few corrupt individuals are placing cogs in the wheel of progress.

It is a matter of National Security because the invention is a game changer. It carries the financial power to set Nigeria free of begging and solve our infrastructural and institutional problems. It has the capability to create employment in millions as designed by the Inventor. It will send a clear message to the outside world that we the citizens of Nigeria are not terrorists and scam artists. We are good people, hardworking and inventors.

We must all rise against the manipulators and auctioneers of judgment in SUIT: SC/69/2011 before the Supreme Court. This is our own invention worth more than ZMAPP and no one will take it from us. It will be a National Tsunami if the benefits of this Invention are lost to corruption in the Judiciary, nonchalance of public office holders and all Nigerian citizens who are stake holders and automatic beneficiaries of this messianic invention.

Prince Ken

http://kenadvocacy..com/2014/08/supreme-court-suit-sc692011-matter-of.html

[size=18pt] CCNL versus Mobil Oil: Barrister Jesse Daniels Uncovered Plans Of Mobil Oil To Confuse The Court On The Identity Of Anti-Corrosive Special Paint, RP 13522. [/size]




[size=16pt] Before we uncover the evil plans of Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited on the above subject matter to the general public in readiness for the hearing of 7th of October, 2014, the Management of Anti-Corrosive Vanguard considers it pertinent to implore educated among the CCNL Patentees who are well updated through this platform to as well inform other CCNL patentees who are illiterate, and cannot access pools of information through this platform on the progress reports achieved by Comandclem Nigeria Limited in the struggle to realize the unpaid royalty.


Patent Right Investors in the intellectual property of KING PROFESSOR CJA UWEMEDIMO can access pools of undiluted and non-fabricated information through the below links.


(1) Facebook Platform is www.facebook.com/ComandclemNigeriaLimited

(2) Twitter Handle is www.twitter.com/Comandlem_Nig

(3) WhatsApp is 07032522248

[4].
Comandclem Nigeria Limited Versus Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited - Nairaland / General (1) - Nairaland - https://www.nairaland.com/1286059/comandclem-nigeria-limited-versus-mobil/1

Thanks. [/size]







[size=16pt] Barrister Jesse Daniels Uncovered Plans Of Mobil Oil To Confuse The Court On The Identity Of Anti-Corrosive Special Paint, RP 13522.


(A). Produce samples of anti-corrosive special paint before the supreme court of Nigeria to enable the Supreme court judges to know at a glance whether Mobil Oil is still using the invention or not. Mike Ozekhome instated.


(B). Evidence is irrelevant and unnecessary on admitted allegations because there is no dispute on admitted allegations.


Mobil Oil never doubted the identity of anti-corrosive special paint throughout the trial because they claimed to have invented the product by the provision of section 2 (4) of the Patent and Design Act.


The identity of anti-corrosive special paint invented by CCNL and supplied to Mobil oil through exhibit 7, 7B &7C was never in doubt and was never in issue throughout the trial.


-Jesse Denials Advocated. [/size]





Keep in view for the blow by blow account on the above subject matter. Thanks



-usefulman