Kagawa10:

The fact that you're still bent on this your 250mil ish shows you have nothing to say.

elampiro:


I am talking about what Nani could be doing for us, you are talking about what he did in his first season with us.

From day one, Nani showed he could be a match winner when things are deadlock. I remember in the early part of 2007/2008 season when Rooney was injured. Our front line didn't blend enough to win games as Tevez was finding it hard. Nani won about three games for us. One thunder bolt from outside of his box. Then he had another great Assist.

As Rooney returned, we had Rooney, Ronaldo, Tevez as principal front players. Then Giggs and Nani with many starts.

When Ronaldo left, at some point Nani was doing almost the things Ronaldo did for us. At some point, even big oppositions in UCL find Valencia and Nani a big problem.

Martial is still a kid and not capable of retuning deadlock matched in our favour yet.

As for Depay, if he doing it against 3rd tier teams, why don't you think he could do it against top teams in two years to come?

chrisley024:
Even if we agree with you and say he spent 150mil. What good has it done United, how much did Leicester spend? How much did PSV and Wolfsburg that qualified from our group spend? After spending instead of moving forward we regressed badly.

Park one side jare.

elrony:


Tihiahiahiahaha
Nigga you's a clown homie! You ain't seen how dead we look with Papa and Foolaini at the middle?

I'd rather start a Morgan,schweini,herrera, or Morgan, Papa,Herrera.

In all both our assertions it is damn clear LVG the cretineous fukctard must leave for us to have peace!

Nothing else!!!!!

Kagawa10:

You don't want to know the money spent on Wolfsburg's Draxler, Kruse and others.
Another thing is that we have been playing with plenty of turnover machines (mostly Herrera, Mata) now and there's no one to replace them nor the old cargo (Carrick and Rooney) in our team.
Recently, the deployment of the young vibrant Rashford and the energetic Lingard to play in the place of Rooney and Mata, (atleast before Captain Rooney comes back) has been like a new dawn in the team.
But we still need someone to replace the aged Carrick and the bang average Herrera in the team. Granted Schneiderlin has been great in a box-box role than having to put Herrera there but what about the holding midfield role which is very essential in the team?

Kagawa10:

Because a talented young player at his age doesn't find it difficult to go past defenders, only their decision making are a let down at that age, not their obvious skills. This reminds me on how Depay failed to dribble past the Arsenal defence yet Januzaj managed to do that in a matter of seconds he was on the pitch.
You also failed to realise that Depay's game isn't based on Dribbling while at Psv, his game was based on his off the ball movement and drifting in to score goals like Ronaldo does at Madrid.
That being said, Nani was mostly inconsistent save for 2010/2011 season where he was our best player but after that, he went back to inconsistent self. Even Fergie in his latter years, often preferred the less talented industrious Valencia to the talented Nani, same for Moyes. You can't blame Van Gaal for eventually getting rid of him

chrisley024:
These teams didn't spend upto what we did last summer and have improved why we became worse(you can't provide answer to this) and you're here trying to shift the blames to Mata and Herrera as if we've fared better in games they missed.

Some of youngsters have done well and I hope they continue to improve but time will tell. We'll still find it hard to go far with them especially in Europe.

Kagawa10:

I repeat, we never had any problem with Carrick and Fellain midfield, it's just that Fellaini contributes little in the attack but Herrera on the other hand is a player who constantly looks like a kid out there whenever he's put under little pressure.
That's the fact on ground. It's either you back up your claim or we accept that your assertion are baseless.

elampiro:


Ferguson admitted that only Nani can do what he does. But he said he prefered Valencia for his ability to carry the ball with so much balance over a long distance. If you said Nani only played well in one or two seasons, that would be a lie.

Ferguson also caused Nani's dilemma by buying Ashley Young. Nani hates competition. Just leave him to do what he likes. He is like Di Maria, they need freedom and trust from their managers.

Again you admitted Martial cannot really boss games now. When we played against Liverpool in Europa, we were never matured despite pushing forward. No threats. Those days, even if we don't play well, but there was always real threat every time United went forward. Against West Ham, we were just lucky to find that equalizer. DDG and Wasteful Emenike are to be thanked.

elrony:


You don't know what you are saying please... Fellaini offers close to nothing in the midfield,thereby heaping the burden on an aged Carrick...this ain't just fact, it's reality mate!

Kagawa10:

LOL.
Apart from the one chance he had, he got no sniff. Infact, Westham created little chances other than punting long ball into our box, even Payet didn't have his regular game save for his free-kick.
And I never admitted the underlined part of your post.
Martial with a quality midfield like Scholes and a prime Carrick constantly freeing him up with passes that takes him away from crowded areas would be a nightmare for any defence to deal with.
The point is Nani had the opportunity of playing with quality midfield, Martial never did. The truth is Nani was an inconsistent player under Fergie and he's not pulling up trees at Fernaberche either.
I admit that Blind had a stinker in Watford and Westbrom but apart from the 2 games, he's been solid together with Smalling.

Kagawa10:

Back up your claim na.
Fellaini's obvious lack of creativity is apparent however, his awareness, off the ball movement and anticipation has been better than Herrera.
And he doesn't look like a kid out there unlike Herrera because he often uses his big stature to his advantage. Fellaini's average technical skills may let him down but his physicality doesn't and he uses it quite well.
My conclusion is both of them (Herrera and Fellaini) shouldn't be starting for Manutd but I would take Fellaini over Herrera any day except maybe against teams that are unlikely to press our midfield which is quite rare.

elampiro:


We didn't have Scholes and Carrick at the start of 2011/2012 season when Nani destroyed everything on his way until injury to Anderson, Cleverley and some of the defenders spoilt that set up. It was a team that Beat Barca in the presason, came from 0-2 down at half time to beat City 3-2 in the Shield. Nani running half the length of the pitch to score the winner after robbing the two City centre defenders of the ball.

Infact we were 0-2 down at half time when Carrick was substituted, and we went to win 3-2 without Carrick. Cleverley, Jones and Evans were introduced at half time.

We didn't have Scholes and Carrick when we beat Arsenal 8-2, beatTottenham with Bale 3-0, beat Bolton 5-0,beat Chelsea 3-1, etc. So your argument is null and void. Nani didn't require any one to play his game.

West Ham had more than one chance. Not to talk of Ighalo who could have scored three goals for Watford. Our defence is horrible. DDG has been the hero.

Lastly, how is Nani not flying when he is Super league second best player, and his team best player?


You no know ball

elrony:
Lest I forget, when you have a Smalling as the marshal leading ya defence week in week out it goes a long way to show you that we have a problem in that department.

elrony:


I'd take a top form Herrera over a super form cretineous fukctard like Fellaini!
Now I see why you want LVG till 2019

Kagawa10:

The team hitting a second gear in the community shield was as a result of the introduction of Cleverley.
The team were by no means poor in the first half of the community shield play off (we had more possession than City and one of city's 2 goal came through a lucky free-kick), we just needed to hit into the second gear and the vibrant movement of the young Cleverley in the holding role alongside Anderson provided that.
No wonder the moment he got injured against Bolton, the team totally collapsed and when he returned back, his partner, Anderson had his own injury, and Cleverley was shouldered with the responsibility to pull the strings and acts as the creative force in the midfield which isn't his forte compared to Scholes/Anderson.
Anderson was also in his best form of his life at that time and we all know an inform Anderson has the best visionary passes out there except that he always undo his good work by suddenly getting injury and then returning back as a fat pig while taking a long time to rediscover his earlier form.
That being said, Nani wasn't even as good as Young in those games mentioned, Young was far better than him. Infact, after Anderson, Young was our best player with Welbeck running close.

elampiro:
Our first draw of the season came when Rooney was absent. Probably rested for a UCL fixture or with an injury. Nani was our man on the day.

The next match Rooney returned and he propelled us to a win.


Ashley Young ko Ashley Young ni

Kagawa10:

Na you sabi.
The Belgium coach disagree with you and he's done well with Fellaini in his team so far.
Both Fellaini and Herrera are obviously not good enough to start for a top club like ours but if I were to be a coach of a small club with little resources and I happened to choose between Fellaini and Herrera for little price, I would go for Fellaini all day.

Kagawa10:

LOL!
It is as if you don't check your scrren shot before pasting it here! Young was better than Nani vs Arsenal, Sunderland, Westbrom, Welbeck was better than Nani against Spurs. Ando was still better than him against Bolton.
The only match Nani was better than the three were against Chelsea and Stoke. This still backup my claim that the 3 players were consistently better
than Nani.
And the moment Anderson, our consistently best player in majority of the games got injured, Nani form diminish which still brings us back to my claim that Nani's form was relative to the visionary passes from either Scholes/an inform Ando.

sinizia:

Dude let that guy be. You are wasting your energy on irrelevant issues. Even rival fans are praying for LVG to stay so that more woes from him can befall United.

A coach that sells Chicharito simply coz he missed a penalty is not worthy of being at United.
A coach that sells Falcao, Persie and Chicharito so he can make Rooney our main and sole striker at the age of 30 with worn-out legs and less pace, is not worthy of being at Utd.
A coach that overlooks the likes of Vidal, Matuidi and co to buy a washed up Schweinsteiger with a lengthy record of injury is a móron.
A coach that pairs 2 SNAILS, Carrick and Teiger against a fast paced AssAnal players, should be killed with food poisoning.
A coach whose DM is hinged on a 34-year-old Carrick should be beheaded.
A coach that doesn't have a first 11 for 3 consecutive matches is bàstard!!
A coach that has a more deadly Ashely Young for our left wing but plays him in the RB position is not fit to coach Enyimba.
A coach that sold Rafeal for NO SANE REASON is not better than Moyes.


If there was any justice in the world, 7 ewoks would rape LVG to death. I blame the owners of United that can't have the balls to sack the sick Idíot!!

SIRcumalot:
naija match na 9.00PM.

SIRcumalot:
naija match na 9.00PM.

elampiro:

Rooney scored in every league match that period. Hit hatrick twice. Denied by woodwork in a couple of times.

Nani scored two beautiful goals against City in the Shield. Almost always rated than Young.

Yet you believe Young was our best player talking from hindsight. Rooney hardly gets the credit he deserves.