Ishilove:
U sef sharaap and go learn proper spelling. Its EVOLUTION,not eveoloution or woteva it is you were trying to spell up there

logicboy01:


You claim that God can not be understood by logic. Wouldnt that make God illogical and for the delusional?

davidylan:

and we are to believe you have been coherent so far?

davidylan:

Perfect. Since you are however very logical, i would suppose you should stop bothering about God no?

thehomer:

Ooh you're an agent of God and clearly bright yet you ask questions that have been resolved but due to your deep willful ignorance, you refuse to actually look around for the answers.
To tell you again, humans are apes. Your other questions are based on such a poor understanding of the theory of evolution that all one can do is to advice you to read an article on the theory in a trusted encyclopaedia first before you try to ask these questions.

logicboy01:


Who cares about God? My problem is with the sheep that believe in God that believe that atheists are Satanists or atheists are immoral.

Self preservation. I d not want to die at the hands of a fundamentalist christian (many of whom are your friends

FXKing2012:

My dear pls speak for yourself: you are an ape, not all humans cos I'm clearly not one; I'm a spirit being created by God which is why I'm very special. When you have no answers to tasking questions, you look for escape routes and tell pple to go read up. Why wld I waste my time reading up on what an atheist wrote based on his opinion? Very funny!

davidylan:

and you are worried about this "sheep" because?

logicboy01:


Who cares about God? My problem is with the sheep that believe in God that believe that atheists are Satanists or atheists are immoral.

Self preservation. I d not want to die at the hands of a fundamentalist christian (many of whom are your friends

logicboy01:





Because of the part in bold below;

davidylan:

What a joke this guy is. Afraid of being killed by a fundamentalist christian? You're an embarrassment.

FXKing2012:

My dear pls speak for yourself: you are an ape, not all humans cos I'm clearly not one; I'm a spirit being created by God which is why I'm very special. When you have no answers to tasking questions, you look for escape routes and tell pple to go read up. Why wld I waste my time reading up on what an atheist wrote based on his opinion? Very funny!

thehomer:

I hope you realize that for you to be human, you must be an ape. The only way for you to escape this is for you to claim that you're not human.

All humans are apes.
FXKing2012 is a human.
Therefore, FXKing2012 is an ape.

I know you're special - just like everyone else.
I know I don't have all the answers but you and your fellows are yet to actually ask these taxing questions so I'm yet to seek out any escape routes. Asking people to read in order for them to be able to ask relevant questions is not a bad thing you know.
Finally, I hope you learn that all opinions aren't equal but that some are more valid than others so your refusal to read even if it would grant you knowledge is a failing of yours in these modern times.

FXKing2012:

@bolded, that is the gospel according to thehomer (lol). You must a a really good stand-up comic. And that claim of yours is based on what, pls? Not every knowledge is worthy of getting, not every book is worth reading. I choose wat I read, wat I read dont choose me. Hope u know wat I mean.

thehomer:

Each premise is backed up by strong scientific evidence.
Choosing to be ignorant isn't a virtue you know.

logicboy01:


I'm an embarassment because I value my life? Unlike you, I dont believe in the fairytale called eternal life in paradise.

FXKing2012:

You keep talking about scientific evidence but u aint showing us any.

Ishilove: The Law of Biogenesis-As with Uranium 238, and its provable moment of beginning, the great pattern of all life is that it can only come from other pre-existing life. All first-year biology students know this.
 
When examining tiny organisms, such as protozoa and bacteria, it can be demonstrated that life only comes from life. There are many kinds of life, but each continues to reproduce the same kind over and over. This is indisputable.
 
Life can never come from inanimate (non-living) objects. Evolutionists theorize that inanimate objects, under certain unknown circumstances in the misty past, somehow spontaneously gave birth to very primitive life forms.This presents enormous problems for anyone familiar with the nature and complexity of simple cells.
 
Biologists understand that all cells can only come from pre-existing cells. Here is why. Cells, even in their simplest and most rudimentary form, are extremely complex. Consider: “The simplest organism capable of independent life, the prokargote bacterial cell, is a masterpiece of miniaturized complexity which makes a spaceship seem rather low-tech” (Darwin on Trial, PhilipJohnson, p. 102). The next source is equally powerful in explaining both the complexity of the cell and its origin: The cell needs all its basic parts with their various functions, for survival; therefore, if the cell had evolved, it would have meant that billions of parts would have had to come into existence at the same time, in the same place, and then simultaneously come together in a precise order.
 
Will sceptics ignore the truth that it is impossible to have life without a LIFEGIVER? Only God has Life inherent in Himself. This is, after all, what makes Him God. No one created God, because He has Life inherent in Himself. But is this God merely some kind of blind power, some kind of dumb “first force?” Keep fooling yourselves y'all

logicboy01:


Copy and paste. Evolution starts with the first life (unicellular organisms); life from life.


Stop your copy and paste arguments, the are haphazard and foolish.

Ishilove:
Since I am copying and pasting,pls pray tell,where exactly did this "life from life" originate from? This unicellular organisms must have come from somewhere,an origin of some sort.

Please educate me since I am copying and pasting and the homer says "thinking is too difficult" for me. Let me leave you to do the thinking

logicboy01:


Copy and paste. Evolution starts with the first life (unicellular organisms); life from life.


Stop your copy and paste arguments, the are haphazard and foolish.

logicboy01:



evolutionist, Scienitists can not 100% the explain the very origin of the first life on earth. We dont know yet. What we definitely know is that the earth is very old and that animals have been evolving and have evolved to his present day.

logicboy01:



evolutionist, Scienitists can not 100% the explain the very origin of the first life on earth. We dont know yet. What we definitely know is that the earth is very old and that animals have been evolving and have evolved to his present day.

FXKing2012:

You keep talking about scientific evidence but u aint showing us any.

davidylan:

nah he's going to tell you to go and read eh?

Ishilove: The Law of Biogenesis-As with Uranium 238, and its provable moment of beginning, the great pattern of all life is that it can only come from other pre-existing life. All first-year biology students know this.

Ishilove:
When examining tiny organisms, such as protozoa and bacteria, it can be demonstrated that life only comes from life. There are many kinds of life, but each continues to reproduce the same kind over and over. This is indisputable.

Ishilove:
Life can never come from inanimate (non-living) objects. Evolutionists theorize that inanimate objects, under certain unknown circumstances in the misty past, somehow spontaneously gave birth to very primitive life forms.This presents enormous problems for anyone familiar with the nature and complexity of simple cells.

Ishilove:
Biologists understand that all cells can only come from pre-existing cells. Here is why. Cells, even in their simplest and most rudimentary form, are extremely complex. Consider: “The simplest organism capable of independent life, the prokargote bacterial cell, is a masterpiece of miniaturized complexity which makes a spaceship seem rather low-tech” (Darwin on Trial, PhilipJohnson, p. 102). The next source is equally powerful in explaining both the complexity of the cell and its origin: The cell needs all its basic parts with their various functions, for survival; therefore, if the cell had evolved, it would have meant that billions of parts would have had to come into existence at the same time, in the same place, and then simultaneously come together in a precise order.

Ishilove:
Will sceptics ignore the truth that it is impossible to have life without a LIFEGIVER? Only God has Life inherent in Himself. This is, after all, what makes Him God. No one created God, because He has Life inherent in Himself. But is this God merely some kind of blind power, some kind of dumb “first force?”

Ishilove:
They believe themselves to be apes,chimpanzees,gorillas and what not,they claim they are the products of a "cosmic accident",dumb luck,and they are here on earth for only God knows what reason. It is mind boggling people keep on demanding proofs of the existence of a Supreme God when they THEMSELVES are living,breathing proofs.

Ishilove:
Keep fooling yourselves y'all. I hope it will not be too late when you are finally 'convinced'.

Ishilove:
Since I am copying and pasting,pls pray tell,where exactly did this "life from life" originate from? This unicellular organisms must have come from somewhere,an origin of some sort.

Please educate me since I am copying and pasting and the homer says "thinking is too difficult" for me. Let me leave you to do the thinking

davidylan:
. . . .

2. Animals have been evolving... ok and why then do we still have the same unicellular organisms as they existed 15m yrs ago? those forgot to "evolve"?

. . . .

Ishilove: The Law of Biogenesis-As with Uranium 238, and its provable moment of beginning, the great pattern of all life is that it can only come from other pre-existing life. All first-year biology students know this.
 
When examining tiny organisms, such as protozoa and bacteria, it can be demonstrated that life only comes from life. There are many kinds of life, but each continues to reproduce the same kind over and over. This is indisputable.
 
Life can never come from inanimate (non-living) objects. Evolutionists theorize that inanimate objects, under certain unknown circumstances in the misty past, somehow spontaneously gave birth to very primitive life forms.This presents enormous problems for anyone familiar with the nature and complexity of simple cells.
 
Biologists understand that all cells can only come from pre-existing cells. Here is why. Cells, even in their simplest and most rudimentary form, are extremely complex. Consider: “The simplest organism capable of independent life, the prokargote bacterial cell, is a masterpiece of miniaturized complexity which makes a spaceship seem rather low-tech” (Darwin on Trial, PhilipJohnson, p. 102). The next source is equally powerful in explaining both the complexity of the cell and its origin: The cell needs all its basic parts with their various functions, for survival; therefore, if the cell had evolved, it would have meant that billions of parts would have had to come into existence at the same time, in the same place, and then simultaneously come together in a precise order.
 
Will sceptics ignore the truth that it is impossible to have life without a LIFEGIVER? Only God has Life inherent in Himself. This is, after all, what makes Him God. No one created God, because He has Life inherent in Himself. But is this God merely some kind of blind power, some kind of dumb “first force?”

They believe themselves to be apes,chimpanzees,gorillas and what not,they claim they are the products of a "cosmic accident",dumb luck,and they are here on earth for only God knows what reason. It is mind boggling people keep on demanding proofs of the existence of a Supreme God when they THEMSELVES are living,breathing proofs.

Keep fooling yourselves y'all. I hope it will not be too late when you are finally 'convinced'.

thehomer: Good. You've finally decided an attempt at presenting what you think are inconsistencies to the theory of evolution.



Actually, this so-called "law of biogenesis" isn't a scientific law because we know that at a certain point in time, there wasn't life in the universe but now there is.



Sure we see now that cells come from other cells this doesn't mean that they couldn't have come from "protocells" in the past.
What is a kind?



Two errors here, life did come from inanimate objects. And the theory of evolution doesn't talk about the origin of life. That is a common misconception those opposed to the theory keep presenting.



Again, the origin of the cell isn't really a problem for the theory of evolution since that isn't what the theory of evolution is for. The theory of evolution explains the reasons for the diversity of life observed on earth.



Is your God alive?



You know you never addressed my response to the previous design argument you made yet you're making it again. There is nothing wrong in asking for evidence of your God if he is supposed to have done something here on earth.



I think it is usually good for one to come to know what is true irrespective of how long it took them to come to that conclusion.

Ishilove:
So that will mean your ancestors were animals? That your unique and powerful mind and consciousness 'evolved' to its present state? That you, logicboy01, are the product of an 'accident'?

Have you ever sat down to really examine how foolish,how totally insane those assertions are?
You insult yourself by suggesting that your extraordinary creative powers of intelligence, reason, logic, thought, volition and ingenuity are a product of mere dumb luck! Smh

FXKing2012:

You keep dancing about in confusion, pls in one statement tell us where life came from. Since life coulnt have come from inanimate object does that not show you that there must be a life-giving being somewhere? Even a complete dumb shld know this.