#

Like for Akpabio. Share for Tinubu

Geeman23:
You need to learn how to hold bias from affecting your sense of judgement. I Kno that maybe too hard because I can perceieve personality fanaticism in your brief so far.
Where in my post suggest I am a Muslim. I said my boss is one. You rush here without reading well to label me a Muslim to suit your relegious fundamentalism which I don't give a Bleep about. Mind you, I am a believer, son of God. I refer you to post script under my profile in that regard.
Secondly,You earlier laud the success of Tunde bakare as beign from his legal profession, is law not a field in the world, do you know crazy things we lawyers sometimes do to make our clients win.
Brother you need to grow mentally.

My mistake brother. I should have read thoroughly. I Apologize again. I am the smartest living human on earth, smarter than elon musk, through Christ Jesus. Trust me.

Geeman23:
your religious delusion is suppressing good reason. First, it is fallacy to say no Muslim imams are not doing well, how many do you know. It will shock you that people like A.G mallami who are far far richer in law and politics than Tunde bakare are even Imams in their local mosque. The principal of my firm is even a Muslim an imam at that, richer than pastor Tunde bakare. Islam doesn't encourage mass pilfering common among Pentecostal. Even if you are career imam, you are to be meagre and accountable not using common wealth to finance your personal agenda.

2nd The success of adeboye as lecturer which I give to him as I will give to everyone academician at that level doesn't justify or discard the "juice" literarily of the fortune religion brought him.
Religion gave him power, massive wealth, fame.
If he had remain a lecturer he wouldnt have gotten that.
And he acquired that by chance.
Respond critically.

Oh! So you are really a Muslim. I was correct when I thought a Christian could not post such comment. Next time after posting such unverified and caustic comment, indicate you are commenting as a Muslim. Meanwhile I am sorry if you felt offended. Thanks for furnishings me with facts about Imams who have accomplished things in the circular world. My comment was uninformed. I have modified my initial comment, you can go back and check.

Rastaramsey:
This is bullshit....

A so called pastor using the tithes of his members to buy presidential form

All of them are the same

Both Osinbajo and this slowpoke

Blood suckers

Who told you he used the church tithe?

''Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
NEVERTHELESS, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.'' 1Cor 7:1-3

'' I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.''
1 Corinthians 7:8-9

As you can see from the above verse of the scripture. It is good for a man not to touch a woman. By experience, you appear more focused on your ambitions, can think more clearly and can pursue your passions more aggressively. This seams to be one reason why most best graduating students are usually virgins or fellowship guys or people not given to much romance.

*However*, to avoid fornication (any sexual activity, including masturbation, outside marriage), you are adviced to marry. It appears that relieving sexual urge is a legimate reason to marry so don't let anyone guilt trip you by saying that you should not marry for sex. Sex is one of the most important reasons for marriage and should not be down played.

As a child of God, if you can stay celibate like Paul did, if you have the gift of celibacy, then no problem, you can stay single (marriage is not a ticket to heaven and some marriages may derail your heaven journey); otherwise, pls brother, go get married. You cannot eat your cake and have it. That pre- or extra- marital sex is cheap does not mean it's OK.

T

D

Not all instances of eating in the dream is demonic. It may be you are a just hungry, a glutton or that you think a lot about food. Isa 29:8 says ''It will be as when a hungry man dreams – and behold, he is eating; But when he awakens, his hunger is not satisfied, or, as when a thirst man dreams – and behold, he is drinking, but when he awakens, behold, he is faint and his thirst is not quenched.” In this case you may need to start eating before going to bed or practicing self control through fasting as the case may be.

However, many instances of eating in the dream are demonic. This is a means used to manipulate people in the physical realm. Some people discover that whenever they have sex or eat in the dream, their sex drive rockets and becomes uncontrollable during the day. The bible says ''...while men slept, the enemy came and sowed tares'' Matt 13:25.

We should therefore be careful not to dismiss events we do not understand without investigation.

The good news, however, is that believers in Christ are victorious because our Lord says in the book of Mark 16 about those who believe in him, ''and if they DRINK [or eat] any DEADLY thing, it WILL NOT hurt them.'' Take note of the word WILL NOT. Believe this and confess this. Many have received deliverance here.

So when many believers say that eating in the dream means nothing, they are saying it because of the knowledge of who they are in Christ.

When next you eat in the dream and feel it may be demonic, upon waking up, confess the words of Mark 16 out loud ''when I shall eat [or drink] a deadly thing, it will not hurt me. Therefore whatever I have eaten or drunk in the dream, you will not hurt me in Jesus name.'' Shout this out, believe it. You may even start literally throwing up. Never mind. Jesus is our answer. Happy Sunday.

DontBullshitMe:

UBA has offered to see you through school and UniUyo or whatever is your dream institution.

That's extremely laughable.

Can someone knock sense into her and direct her to the path of Unilag or UI?

University of Uyo is actually one of the best universities in Nigeria in Law and Medicine.

To the winner,
Congrats dear!

hisgrace090:
Next youll ask us wether youll go to toilet or not.

Unlikely.

Godada:
Depending on your workload and ability to cook. If you have time, cook but since you are asking its fair to assume that you haven't cooked much.

If you are really busy, make time to prepare your own meals, it's cheaper and more hygienic though time consuming but worth it.

Eating outside is expensive and you cannot vouch for the quality of ingredients or hygienic conditions.

In all the ball is your court

Thank you so much. However, regarding hygiene, what if I can vouch for the hygiene of where I go to eat? Second, is it really cheaper to cook, considering that N350 x 3 can get three square meals and I don't have to worry about kerosine, gas, and losing valuable time?

gaius01:

Depending on your reason for not cooking. If you are too busy you can buy food from a trust worthy person, but know the cost will be higher than when you cook. But like on Saturday you can cook at home, cook beans, rice and all arrange it in fridge so that when you are going to work you can microwave it and put it in cooler to work.

OK thank you

Pls I need an advice. Which is better: to spend valuable hours cooking my own meals or to eat out. Which is more cost and time effective?

post=96203498:


https://thenationonlineng.net/anambra-enugu-lagos-produce-best-pupils-in-neco-common-entrance-exam/

I presume the central tendency is to adopt a more veritable end plan.

H

E

eagleonearth:
You have to understand something. Every human being needs to confess that Jesus Christ is Lord unto forgiveness of sin so he/she can make heaven. It's individual and not something to be interceded for. This is the reason every one of us is encouraged to do this now that we are conscious because no-one knows what will happen the next minute.

A young man once said he will continue living his live in sin and just when he's about to die he will confess Christ but later on, he had a tragic accident that left him gasping for the very air and when he was trying so hard to confess Christ, breathing became difficult for him and he never did it as planned till his ghost left him.

Some of us think that God who created us and gave us eyes, ears and brain don't see, hear or reason

Going to church everyday and praying 24hrs is not a ticket to heaven. The only ticket to heaven is accepting the righteousness of Christ and the finished work at Calvary. That's the only time our names enter heaven's roll call

The best blessing I'm enjoying on earth is knowing my maker. It made me lose my deadly smoking and drinking habit. It made me lose my morbid fear and cowardice. It gave me direct access to the best and strongest being in the whole of heaven and earth. It gave me a beautiful angel as a wife. It gave me an eternal hope of everlasting life. It kept the forces of darkness running from me instead of me running from them. It turned the table, yes.

#ETERNALSECURITYISJESUS

How can I know this Jesus that you know that has made your life like this. Pls I want to know him.

I'm serious!
Drop your whatsapl contact or send a mail.

edoairways:

In your view, do you believe that there are some truth in that Dr's assertion?

Why not. She claims to have used it to treat over 300 people and takes it ourself. Other white doctors who were with her done similar. My friend uses it to treat his patients. It is also used in many countries including Nigeria. The drug is not a new drug in Nigeria. There have been some literarures, deprioritized by google anyway, that show it''s effectiveness. I counsel everyone to go on breitbart.com and watch the full video of the Drs. It was a two day program.

Obi1kenobi:


Who said anything about conforming to a "predetermined outcome"? Is that what I said or is that your own strawman distortion? I said that Google of course should prioritize medical consensus. Who said that medical consensus must conform to a predetermined outcome?
Retracted studies from Lancet were precipitated by the criticism of hundreds of professionals who found the data implausible. So it,s not just "this same group of Drs". Stop manufacturing credibility with falsehoods.

Everyone needs people to think for them because there is much that everyone doesn't know. Our ability to discern is limited by what we know. The point is in trying to dismiss the majority of scientists infinitely more credentialed than you are, you're kidding yourself ascribing knowledge to yourself that you do not possess. You don't know more than the powers that be at the US FDA, or Fauci's Institute of Infectious Diseases, or the WHO, or most of the intellegentsia in the top medical institutes in the world whose findings contradict your claims . You simply don't. If you're not doing serious groundbreaking medical or public health research, then stop kidding yourself - you have nothing productive to contribute to the discourse.

Do you actually know google, facebook and youtube's policies on Covid-19 researches and recommendation?

(1)Their policy summary states any research whose outcome deviates from the recommendations of the so-called Medical Consensus (actually WHO or CDC) should be deprioritized or even removed.

(2)That is for any research to be published, its recommendations must not disagree with the those of WHO or CDC.

(3)In other words, a research's outcome is already predetermined for it to be published.

You cannot support no.1 without supporting no.2 and no 3. It's simple logic.

Second. These were a team of Medical Doctors, some with many years of working experience, working at the frontline. It was just not an individual. It was therefore uncharitable of you to refer to them and other independent organizations as "every fringe radical and quack and kook and conspiracy theorist?" Do you know that CDC disagrees with WHo on many points. If that is true, why shouldn't others have disagreements with them. The knowlege of Covid-19 is still evolving. No one organization has the monopoly of knowledge.

"If you're not a top end, cutting edge researcher in these fields, you have nothing constructive to add to the debate other than listening and learning and taking your cues from tested, well-researched consensus"

Lol...I laugh to the above comment. You see my friend, it is not a rocket science. Now is especially in an era of information overload. Moreover you don't even know me. Not everyone is lazy. Some of us actually make out time to study outside our fields, get access to research, meta-analyze and thereby make sound deductions and meaningful contributions to public discourse.

Hermes119:


Well u didn't sound like u were referring to the use of HCQ for coronavirus as am off label therapy,it was more like it was already proven to be safe and efficacious since Trump and a few others have used it as you said.

I'm concerned about ur position on the woman's claim especially because u are a pharmacist going by what u said and ur comment here would be or rather should be an authority,others may speak the way they like no one holds them accountable but ur opinion counts and when someone spreads the world it would sound like "......a pharmacist said u can use hydroxychloroquine for cornavirus treatment" . As much as everyone out there I want a cure to be found as soon as possible,I have parents and loved who have comorbidities I have lost a person close to a friend to this disease who knows,tomorrow it could be a direct relative so it would be unreasonable not to wish for her claim not to be true,however any claim of a curative or palliative therapy has to be demonstrated. In this case trials have been conducted on Hydroxychloroquine an it has been ruled out as an alternative especially considering the side effects and now this woman comes up to lay these claims,I'm not saying she is wrong but she has a burden to proof what she has claimed and if I were to pick a side I would say she is insincere or ignorant considering that trials have been made by several credible bodies,except if you claim that all these bodies have some sinister intentions.
The summary is this,I'm concerned that you are in a haste to take sides when sufficient evidence is not available and the one which is to be held most credible is against the claim. You are a pharmacist u have a duty to stand against the misuse and abuse of drugs and also hesitation to administer drugs that would be of benefit to the patient. I hope you do this without bias or subjective feelings and opinion,until a drug is "sufficiently" proven to be of benefit for use in a particular condition be it a novel molecule or a product of drug repurposing I don't think its wise for u to take a definitive position.

You framed your question as though many drugs are not used everyday to treat "close friends, relatives and patients" of certain conditions without a sufficient prove (through medical trials) for use in such conditions. How else would you call such use of drug other than off-label? HCQ is presently being used as an off-label treatment for Covid-19. Do Dr's wait for sufficient prove before using drugs as off label? Knowlege of the mechanism of action, pathophysiology of the disease, Anecdotal evidence and evidence in practice are usually all they need to prescribe such drugs so far as the benefit of use outweighs the risk. This is clearly the case for covid19 and HCQ. I understand the need for sufficient prove as you said but we are not in normal times. We are in a pandemic, so timelines and standards for approval are relaxed to shorten the time effective candidates get to the patient.

Regarding the side effects, Chloroquine and its metabolite HCQ are not new molecules as you said. They have been around for over 50yrs and used for the treatment of malaria. It adverse effects are well documented but they are known to be generally save. WHO relied on the result of the now retracted research published on Lancet about the safety and efficacy of HCQ to discontinue its own research. So if these drugs are generally safe, and there are no proven treatments available, and there is an anecdotal evidence that these drugs treat and prevent covid-19 when used early, why deny Drs the right to prescribe these agent to patients as it is being done in the US? I am not encouraging abuse and misuse. I have stated clearly in one of my comments here that they shld be prescribed by a professional

Obi1kenobi:


Of course studies that don't have the consensus endorsement of physicians and public health officials should be deprioritized on Google. What are you expecting? That Google should amplify the voices of every fringe radical and quack and kook and conspiracy theorist? In matters of public health, that would be dangerous.

With all due respect, you don't have any standing or qualification to declare these guys as speaking the truth. I'm not insulting you. I don't have the qualifications either. If you're not a top end, cutting edge researcher in these fields, you have nothing constructive to add to the debate other than listening and learning and taking your cues from tested, well-researched consensus.

This is the most unscientific thing I have heard. So for you every study must conform to a predetermined outcome and in a situation where the outcome of a legimate study deviates from predetermined outcome, then it should be censored or deprioritized? This is not science but
tyranny and should have no place in the scientific community. It should interest you to know that these are not laymen. These are professionals whose conclusions both from experience and study differs from the mainstream medical community. It would interest you to know that these same group of Drs unraveled faulty methodologies in a research that was published in The Lancet that HCQ is not effective for covid19, compelling them to issue an apology.

You do not even know me, how did you suddenly induce that I have no locus standi to contribute to the discourse because I am not a member of the global medical establishment? This is an adhominem. You need people to think for you but I do not anyone. I am capable of researching for myself and coming to conclusions after comparing facts.

Hermes119:


I assume since u are a pharmacist u should be aware that "he and close people" are not enough to conclude that the drug is effective

There is such a thing as anecdotal evidence and off-label medication use. The fact a drug does not have a marketing authorization for a particular use does not mean it is not effective for that purpose. A drug could be licensed solely for use for a particular condition but finds purpose for use in another it is not licensed for. You may not find it in any official formulary for that use, but you find Drs prescribing for such offlabel use based on evidenced in practice.

jacoik:
I love people who reason well. God bless you more because you reasoned well and not like so many goats I saw online tabbing trash

God bless you too.

9gerian:
I suspect there is already a vaccine, and they proponents are just going through the motions with the whole world.

Does it even make sense that Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and others alike are actually censoring posts? Yahoo actually stopped comments in its news site.

Where is the balance in reporting and the freedom of expression. This practice of censorship only promotes a few privileged people who want to control what the world hears, thinks or even discusses.

I’m not saying Dr Stella Immanuel is right or wrong, but let there be debates, and counter debates to prove what’s true or false. One of such debates include:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ua6meLlYJdY


If you are still undecided that there’s a sinister plan out there to promote an unholy agenda of fear and mass vaccination, try to listen to other experts other than those endorsed by CNN and other mainstream media organizations (that have made it their sole objective to remove Donald Trump from the position of president).

These guys are ready to burn down the whole US just to remove trump, which makes it more scary. What exactly are their plans that they need all the billionaires (including Trump) to kowtow the line of one world government? The only sad part is the teeming population of people who make themselves available to be used for a course that they do not have any idea about.

The left easily tout freedom of expression but turn violent at dissenting or divergent views. This is the only reason why trump still has supporters in spite of his uncouth utterances most times. Actions speaking louder than voice!

It's scary bro. Imagine also censoring the president of the US. Woe betides them Trump gets reelected, especially social media companies.

salford1:

Whether pressure or not. The point is that they use a mask.

It's a lie that Fauci uses it during conferences.
You can see below that he even has a mask on and that is not a conference.

It is for political expediency. The question is, why has he not been infected all this while he was not using a mask? Lol. Guy, don't let these guys use your head. I am not against using mask. But its just a smokescreen. You are more protected by taking HCQ as a preventive measure than by using a mask. What the dr was saying is, if you have or are taking the preventive, you do not need a mask. This is largely true. Fauci was has taken HCQ. Lol

salford1:

Fauci uses a mask though. Even Trump started using a mask. Even the woman saying not to wear mask uses mask

They started using recently because of political pressure. Fauci only uses it during conferences.

blowjohn:


Like?

We are on the same page. The president would not endorse what he and close people have not used and found to be effective.

ayaside:


Bless you fam! Really nothing can be done about the ignorant. I used to be Pro- lot of things and didn't really care about the other party up until I started LISTENING and realized that they are humans too. It made a whole lot of difference.

Yeah...me too. I try to listen to all parties and sift things. I lean conservative but do not agree with conservatives on all issues.

favor914:
In my neighborhood Walgreens, or CVS will ask for a prescription from a physician.

You can order online. Let the prescription I posted on the firstpage guide you. I posted it deliberately. Smart people know what to do with it.