johnydon22:
Lmao. . .take that up with big bang theorists or better still scientists.

Fun fact: Big bang theory was first postulated by a theist not just any theist but a christian, in fact a catholic priest named Georges Lemaître . . It is a scientific theory you just seem threatened by it because it goes contrary to your beliefs.

Evolution simply means development and for development to occur their must be changes.

Now you want to reconcile primitive men and modern with babies and and adult differences. .Good.

You continue to prove man's intellect developed with time and so primitive men were never as intelligent as modern man is now neither are we going to be as intelligent as coming generations of humans.

Development is a constant process..

ekemini606:


Like hunger, love, desired..e.t.c..don't u think that God also, was pre_installed in man (permitte my term).

KingEbukasBlog:


If your own understanding of existence means dwelling then you are on your own
Ossheeyy

Ebuka exists on Milky way galaxy but dwells on Andromeda galaxy Lmao. . now imagine how you will sound when you will try to distance God's existential dimension to it's dwelling place. . .Try it and murder yourself here..

The universe needs no creator is a mere assertion which you cannot prove

KingEbukasBlog:


I never told you to take up the explanation for God's existence with a priest . Am just a cool youth

Just like you a priest believes the existence of a God. .so just like the priest you are also bound to defend the existence of this existential God who somehow depends on you to argue it's existence...lmal

But unlike most theists and atheists who buy the theory of BIG BANG, i don't . so i cannot answer for another...

Maybe the explanation wasn't coherent enough

Take two containers of the same capacity but different volumes of the same liquid . The primitive man is a smart of the modern man if given the same level of education .

More clearly :

A" primitive baby " will do as well as the modern baby intellectually if they go through the same level of education

cold:

It's called 'special pleading bro. Desperately trying to make exemptions for their god. How can anybody hold tenaciously to the belief that everything must have a creator and almost immediately back pedal when you insist their god needs a creator too. It would have been ludicrous if it wasn't so preposterous. How do these folks say these things with a straight face? How do they sleep at night?

winner01:
[b]KingEbukasBlog, I think he's asking you to join their small Train keke napep of "I dont Know so lets remain ignorant",. I agree its not a bad thing to lack knowledge, but its odd to say the least to have the answers staring at you and you willingly go blind.

Like they popularly say, if everything must have a Creator, then it applies to God too. Man and insatiable needs tho, the created hasn't probed his existence and wants to make use of his created abilities to probe the existence of his Creator...Ironic.

Well, one of the most established principles of logic,science, reality is the principle of causality, i.e something that has a beginning has a sufficient cause. a cause has to be sufficient, or adequate . ‘You were found in a space engine’ is not a sufficient explanation for your existence.

Atheists make use of words like rational, reasonable and scientific in describing their beliefs, worse atheists believe that the beginning of the universe had no cause whatsoever! Some admit it is a problem, but they claim that saying ‘God did it’ explains nothing because you then have to explain where God came from.

The cause of the universe must have been non-material because if the cause was material/natural, it would be subject to the same laws of decay as the universe. That means it would have to have had a beginning itself and you have the same problem as cycles of births and deaths of universes. So the cause of the universe’s beginning must have been super-natural, i .e. non-material, non-natural or spirit, a cause outside of space-matter -time. Now such a cause would not be subject to the law of decay and so would not have a beginning. That is, the cause had to be eternal spirit .
Furthermore, the cause of the universe had to be incredibly powerful, the sheer size and energy seen in the universe together speak of that power; there had to be a sufficient cause. That sounds like the God of the Bible to me.

The Bible reveals the Creator of the universe as:

- Eternal
Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever you had formed the earth and the world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God. (Psalm 90:2)

-All- powerful
Yours, O LORD, is the greatness and the power and the glory and the victory and the majesty, for all that is in the heavens and in the earth is yours. Yours is the kingdom, O L ORD, and you are exalted as head above all . Both riches and honour come from you, and you rule over all. In your hand are power and might, and in your hand it is to make great and to give strength to all. (1Chronicles29: 11–12)

-Spirit (non-material)
God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth. (John 4:24)

Note that the Bible says , “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth ” (Genesis 1: 1 ). Here God created time itself . Only One who is outside of time, that is, timeless, or eternal, could do this.
To now ask where someone who is eternal, someone who had no beginning, came from (‘ Who created God ?’) is like asking, ‘To whom is the bachelor married?’ It is an irrational question.

Atheists not only have to believe that matter came into being without any cause, they also have to believe that life itself popped into existence without an adequate cause.
Even the simplest single - celled life is stupendously complex. A humble bacterium is full of incredibly sophisticated nano -machines that it needs to live. A cell needs a minimum of over 400 different proteins to make the machines that are absolutely essential for life. How could these protein-based machines make themselves, even if all the right ingredients (20 different amino acids, but many of each) could make themselves? The amino acids, often thousands of them, have to be joined together in the correct order for each protein to function.

Lets think about a single protein component, less than 10 % of the total. This protein is 329 amino acids in length. What would be the chance of getting this one protein by chance, assuming that the correct, and only the correct, amino acid ingredients were present?

We can calculate it this way: 1/ 20 x 1 / 20 x 1 / 20 … 329 times ! This is a probability of 1 in 10 428 … a number with 428 zeros after the 1 ! Even if every atom in the universe (1080 a number with 80 zeros ) represented an experiment for every molecular vibration possible (1012 per second ) for the supposed evolutionary age of the universe (14 billion years = 1018 seconds), this would allow only 10 110 experiments, a long, long way short of the number needed to have a ghost of a chance of getting just this one protein to form, let alone the over 400 others needed .

No wonder Richard Dawkins admits that scientists might never work out how life could arise by natural processes. Nevertheless, he rejects the creation explanation for the "fallacious" reason above.

Now think again, what sort of cause is sufficient to explain the origin of life? The cause must be incredibly intelligent, far beyond our intelligence. We marvel at the scientists who are discovering the nano - technology in living things and it is an astonishing enterprise. But what of the One who invented these things? How much more intelligent is He? This reminds me of another characteristic of the God whom the Bible reveals: He is omniscient (all knowing). Psalm 139: 2– 6, Isaiah 40 : 13 – 14.
We know sufficient about the Creator from His creation to be “without excuse” .

Romans 1: 18 – 22 explains why otherwise intelligent people choose to believe impossible things; that firstly the universe,
then life, just popped into existence without any adequate cause. They choose to illogically accept that their two ‘great
beginnings’ had no sufficient cause, rather than acknowledge and honour their Creator. [/b]

KingEbukasBlog:



This is just brilliant bro

Like I said its common sense that something that exists outside time and space caused our physical universe and I asked him if God lives in a material/physical world . If @johnydon22 should comprehend that this non - material world of God exists outside time - then its illogical to assert that it needs a creator . I didnt want to deal with ambiguity of both an uncreated God and uncreated NON - PHYSICAL/MATERIAL world and that eluded him .

Thanks again for this

nedu2000:
You can't have feeling for what doesn't exist....one hates a fellow human,a system,a policy,a soccer team et al. But something that doesn't in anyway arouse any kind of emotion due to its non-existence can't be loved or hated as the case maybe

winner01:


Anytime bro. These guys are just funny. Even Some have proposed one universe giving birth to another, but again, there cannot be an infinite series of such births and deaths, as each cycle must have less energy available than the last and if this had been happening for eternity, the death of everything would have already happened.
Atheists need to start exhibiting open-mindedness as they claim.

ekemini606:
The worst moment for an atheist, is when they feeling thankfully and there's no one to thank.

Anas09:
I want the Nl atheist to explain Conciousness to me. If there's no God, meaning there's no supernatural, and no afterlife, how can u explain a situation where someone dies, i mean clinically dead. Doctors confirms him dead. No pulse, no brain activites for hours, only for the person to jeck back to life to tell about his/her experience in the other world? They meet a relative or friend who had died long ago, who gives them information for his/her living folk, when he jerks back, when verified the info is found to be true? How was the dead guy able to retain that info wen his brian activities had stopped? This happened to my elder sister. She had etopic pregnancy that killed her, but she jerked back to life abt two or three hrs later to tell us abt our uncle who died months back pursuing her with a cane to go back, and he told her something for his immidiate family which was verified.
Secondly, I personally dream events before they happen. I mean, vivdly, clearly detailed before they happen. This is not a case of what you saw or experienced before. I mean future.
Early last month I dreamed, a contract am handling got terminated, because in real life here, the project manager had inflated the amount, I knew abt it, but said nothing. Last week, it was discovered, the guy is fired and my contract terminated.
Pls explain this to me.

Anas09:
If there's no God, meaning there's no supernatural, and no afterlife, how can u explain a situation where someone dies, i mean clinically dead. Doctors confirms him dead. No pulse, no brain activites for hours, only for the person to jeck back to life to tell about his/her experience in the other world?.

ekemini606:


there is God final!
And its not subject to argument.

dalaman:


Please can you provide the name of the person, hospital and doctors?

Weah96:


So in order to solve this problem of disappearing energy, you wave your hand and declare that there is a humanoid being who isn't subject to any of that rubbish? That's called hand waving, not problem solving. It's the enterprise of weak minded people who hate to spend long periods trying to solve a problem. Wishy washy people.

johnydon22:
You see one thing i have noticed is how naive you always sound.

When an atheist is feeling thankful he thanks the people who made the thing happen and not any imaginary thing.

We give credit to the people who deserve it, the doctors in the hospitals, the nurses going on shifts day and night, the teachers in the classrooms, the soldiers in the front, our friends, our families, ourselves.

These are the people who deserve to be given the credit because they actually make these things happen, too bad you give something imaginary credit for your actions and accomplishments of others around you.

We thank ourselves and the people who deserve it for our accomplishments because we know it is wrong to give someone else's credit to another let alone something imaginary.

We have many people to thank, it just doesn't include imaginary things.

Now am sure you realize how pathetic you sound......

dalaman:


There is no God but Allah that is final! Its not subject to argument.

KingEbukasBlog:


this guy there are a thousand and one cases like that . Were you born yesterday or are you being hypocritical as usual

johnydon22:
Hahahaha is this where it landed you? . . .Hmmm pity.

First you have not told us what outside time is exactly, you are still laying claim of which demands proof. .

It is not common sense, it is actually common insanity

dalaman:


Therr are a thousand and one cases yet you can't provide the name of one verifiable hospital that pronounced a person dead and was resurrected by being prayed upon? Are you trolling?

dalaman:


Therr are a thousand and one cases yet you can't provide the name of one verifiable hospital that pronounced a person dead and was resurrected by being prayed upon? Are you trolling?

No pulse, no brain activites for hours, only for the person to jeck back to life to tell about his/her experience in the other world? They meet a relative or friend who had died long ago, who gives them information for his/her living folk, when he jerks back, when verified the info is found to be true? How was the dead guy able to retain that info wen his brian activities had stopped? This happened to my elder sister. She had etopic pregnancy that killed her, but she jerked back to life abt two or three hrs later to tell us abt our uncle who died months back pursuing her with a cane to go back, and he told her something for his immidiate family which was verified.
Secondly, I personally dream events before they happen. I mean, vivdly, clearly detailed before they happen. This is not a case of what you saw or experienced before. I mean future.

Early last month I dreamed, a contract am handling got terminated, because in real life here, the project manager had inflated the amount, I knew abt it, but said nothing. Last week, it was discovered, the guy is fired and my contract terminated.
Pls explain this to me.

KingEbukasBlog:


Its like asking someone when was the last time he sneezed Its like a common testimony in my church so writing down a hospital to verify if its true after the names of the hospitals are mentioned sounds like a dumb thing to do , to me .

I blogged about this story sometime . You should start applying for a visa I guess

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3083373/Zack-Clements-Texas-claims-saw-Jesus-collapsing-gym-class-having-no-pulse-20-minutes.html

Better still enjoy the comments from the whites you worship

dalaman:


No where in the story does it say he was pronounced dead. Read my first comment on this topic.

KingEbukasBlog:


Weak minded people ? Humanoid being ? You guys are good at scrutinizing christian beliefs but cling to science has not provided an answer yet . LOL

Nothing gets better than a theory that denies the first cause or an always existing universe and abiogenesis or panspermia (redirects to abiogenesis )


All four hold no water

If you think scientific theories about the genesis of life shouldn't be subject to any rubbish , then God shouldn't be ( a simple deduction from your statement)

Shikena

Weah96:


Science is open to discussion. Theories are discussed over and over and over and many other scientists often suggest opposing ideas. That's the point.

You say that this invisible person you call God communicated with humans long ago and the result of that interaction is the immutable transcript you call the bible. No one sees the God person. There are no extant relatives of any of the supposed authors. The book itself is riddled with foolishness and malice, and punctuated by brief moments of wise words.

You love to bring up scientific theories as if the refutation of one somehow VALIDATES your own "let there be light" story. "Let there be light, and there was light" has nothing to do with abiogenesis. Scientific theories could all be refuted and your story will still remain kiddish.

KingEbukasBlog:


So suddenly you of all people dont understand what outside time is ? You have to be kidding me ! LOL . Well , something that exists outside time precludes infinite regression

KingEbukasBlog:



Let there be light and there was light - that was a divine command that restored the functionality of the sun on earth during the restoration of the earth 6,000 yrs ago . Better still it was an abstract representation of the scientific processes that took place at that moment .

I have money and I bought a car - do I need to tell you how I checked out other cars , chose the one I bought , paid for it , tipped the car sales guy and then drove it to my apartment ?

Where is you sense of reasoning ? Or do you have a predilection for ridiculing bible verses you have no understanding of ?