stancydg:
I am watching with utter dismay the ongoing charade tagged screening by our senators, where assumptions(which I understand to be the lowest level of knowledge) is the order of the day. Imaginary portfolios have bn assigned to the candidates in a process that otherwise should have been a detailed, precise and coincise interview of the nominees. This goes to show the lack of depth of thought of our leaders, beginning from our President, who took so long to come up with this list without corresponding reasons to show for the time taken. In a serious clime, where the change mantra has been spuriously bandied, the nominees should be making to the nation today, precise presentations of their solutions to the challenges in their assigned but yet to be confirmed ministries. In a serious nation, the senate should forward that list back to the presidency requesting more details to enable her carry out a thorough process, as soon as Senator Ben Bruce described the process as based on assumptions and a danger. I am so grossly disappointed because these nominees will take a bow today and go ahead to again require another six to twelve months, just like their principal, to first and foremost understand their portfolios, when it is eventually assigned before even coming up with blueprints to tackling the various challenges. And the masses will have to wait almost until the electioneering year, which by the way is less than 36months from now, to experience this elusive change. Going by history, nothing much is usually done in the electioneering year in terms of development. So sad hearing a lot of 'ifs' during this sham tagged screening.

Here is our call to duty, as great minds to take action beyond the rhetorics of our grand independence day events, to push this failure of leadership in the face of our government and to suggest practical methods, ideas and concepts of doing things in a series of ways that will bring about the desired change. Otherwise, we ourselves will be grand hypocrites that talk more and act less.

martineverest:
Amina mohammed...a great woman in d making..best nominee so far

martineverest:
Amina came well prepared....confidence of the highest order.

TonyeBarcanista:
The Senate once again proved that they are nothing but glorified rubber stamp

stancydg:
I am watching with utter dismay the ongoing charade tagged screening by our senators, where assumptions(which I understand to be the lowest level of knowledge) is the order of the day. Imaginary portfolios have bn assigned to the candidates in a process that otherwise should have been a detailed, precise and coincise interview of the nominees. This goes to show the lack of depth of thought of our leaders, beginning from our President, who took so long to come up with this list without corresponding reasons to show for the time taken. In a serious clime, where the change mantra has been spuriously bandied, the nominees should be making to the nation today, precise presentations of their solutions to the challenges in their assigned but yet to be confirmed ministries. In a serious nation, the senate should forward that list back to the presidency requesting more details to enable her carry out a thorough process, as soon as Senator Ben Bruce described the process as based on assumptions and a danger. I am so grossly disappointed because these nominees will take a bow today and go ahead to again require another six to twelve months, just like their principal, to first and foremost understand their portfolios, when it is eventually assigned before even coming up with blueprints to tackling the various challenges. And the masses will have to wait almost until the electioneering year, which by the way is less than 36months from now, to experience this elusive change. Going by history, nothing much is usually done in the electioneering year in terms of development. So sad hearing a lot of 'ifs' during this sham tagged screening.

Here is our call to duty, as great minds to take action beyond the rhetorics of our grand independence day events, to push this failure of leadership in the face of our government and to suggest practical methods, ideas and concepts of doing things in a series of ways that will bring about the desired change. Otherwise, we ourselves will be grand hypocrites that talk more and act less.

drss:
Apart from amina mohammed who is more credible, all d rest dem na**** ogbpakako materials.
infact liar mohammed was asked to bow n go cos dem senate know say d guy empty for head completely. Na only lies remain for him brain. Dem no wan make e disgrace dem with more lies.

dayo23:
absolutely on point, but am assuring you by God grace the new ministers will perform really well!

stancydg:
I am watching with utter dismay the ongoing charade tagged screening by our senators, where assumptions(which I understand to be the lowest level of knowledge) is the order of the day. Imaginary portfolios have bn assigned to the candidates in a process that otherwise should have been a detailed, precise and coincise interview of the nominees. This goes to show the lack of depth of thought of our leaders, beginning from our President, who took so long to come up with this list without corresponding reasons to show for the time taken. In a serious clime, where the change mantra has been spuriously bandied, the nominees should be making to the nation today, precise presentations of their solutions to the challenges in their assigned but yet to be confirmed ministries. In a serious nation, the senate should forward that list back to the presidency requesting more details to enable her carry out a thorough process, as soon as Senator Ben Bruce described the process as based on assumptions and a danger. I am so grossly disappointed because these nominees will take a bow today and go ahead to again require another six to twelve months, just like their principal, to first and foremost understand their portfolios, when it is eventually assigned before even coming up with blueprints to tackling the various challenges. And the masses will have to wait almost until the electioneering year, which by the way is less than 36months from now, to experience this elusive change. Going by history, nothing much is usually done in the electioneering year in terms of development. So sad hearing a lot of 'ifs' during this sham tagged screening.

Here is our call to duty, as great minds to take action beyond the rhetorics of our grand independence day events, to push this failure of leadership in the face of our government and to suggest practical methods, ideas and concepts of doing things in a series of ways that will bring about the desired change. Otherwise, we ourselves will be grand hypocrites that talk more and act less.

TonyeBarcanista:
The Senate once again proved that they are nothing but glorified rubber stamp

missKiffy:
Wailers have been disappointed about the intelligence of the nominees, even Audu Ogbeh they were wailing about showed intelligence in his speech and his vast experience in Agriculture was greatly highlighted

Realist2:


They have all negotiated their soft landing in exchange,you know dog don't eat dog, its we the Nigerians populace that our hope has been sacrificed for the protection of their loot.

TonyeBarcanista:
The Senate once again proved that they are nothing but glorified rubber stamp

bignene:
lia muhamed really disapoint me,he cud nt express himself before d house,never knew he was such a block bload,notin upstairs.

IzonOwei:
a useless gathering of thieves and inept fellows....if this is the screening we all waited for then i wonder why there was a screening in the first place...i expected tough and critical questions(that should leave the nominees thinking critically to give answers) to be asked but behold, jejune questions that can be answered quickly by a secondary school student is what was thrown at our to be ministers...can Nigeria ever experience true change and development

Donariok:
nairalanders, today is my birthday. I'm not qoinq to beg for likes o. but pls just obey tradition biko

stancydg:
I am watching with utter dismay the ongoing charade tagged screening by our senators, where assumptions(which I understand to be the lowest level of knowledge) is the order of the day. Imaginary portfolios have bn assigned to the candidates in a process that otherwise should have been a detailed, precise and coincise interview of the nominees. This goes to show the[b] lack of depth of thought of our leaders, beginning from our President[/b], who took so long to come up with this list without corresponding reasons to show for the time taken. In a serious clime, where the change mantra has been spuriously bandied, the nominees should be making to the nation today, precise presentations of their solutions to the challenges in their assigned but yet to be confirmed ministries. In a serious nation, the senate should forward that list back to the presidency requesting more details to enable her carry out a thorough process, as soon as Senator Ben Bruce described the process as based on assumptions and a danger. I am so grossly disappointed because these nominees will take a bow today and go ahead to again require another six to twelve months, just like their principal, to first and foremost understand their portfolios, when it is eventually assigned before even coming up with blueprints to tackling the various challenges. And the masses will have to wait almost until the electioneering year, which by the way is less than 36months from now, to experience this elusive change. Going by history, nothing much is usually done in the electioneering year in terms of development. So sad hearing a lot of 'ifs' during this sham tagged screening.

Here is our call to duty, as great minds to take action beyond the rhetorics of our grand independence day events, to push this failure of leadership in the face of our government and to suggest practical methods, ideas and concepts of doing things in a series of ways that will bring about the desired change. Otherwise, we ourselves will be grand hypocrites that talk more and act less.