airmark:


Feel my pain + your own injury, you have crisis be that.

airmark:


What are you up to? you ducking again? Mumu boy.

Davidbanky:



Hehehehe hehehehe e lo sun ...

A40:

Efulefu. You shifted to asking if he played "more" instead of less and you are accusing me of ducking. You must be terminally mad.

Ibime:
Airmark and A40, Please what is the difference between LM and LW cos ayam not understanding

Chelseafan1:


Laugh ke, dude is pained and frustrated.

donjazet:
Did I miss the 666th page?

FBS:

Dude was laughing, smiling or just sorry for his team.

elrony:
I dedicate 666 to my loving Red Devils, we are the specialist in 6 tinz

airmark:


Marcelo Lippi adopted 4-4-2 double 6 formation during his period in juve. The left midfielder in this formation wouldn't be hugging the touch line like rashford and other wingers and crossing the ball. Rather, he is to feed the two strikers upfront good passes to score and also join the attack occasionally, trying to score himself. Many people see Nedved as a LW but he wasn't technically.

Ibime:


True. Not every 4-4-2 winger was a touchline hugger. Most teams had one out and out flyer and one more robust on the other side eg Giggs and Beckham. . . but still LW and LM are one and the same thing in 4-4-2.

airmark:


Yes generally you may call players on the left side of the midfield LW. However, 4-4-2 has been tweaked over the years and your LW in a 4-4-2 double 6 formation will never be a LW technically unless the formation will change to 4-2-4. For example diamond formation of 4-4-2 will never have LW, but LM. We all remember ancelotti's formation.