Jamiuokolaa:


Theoretically,

A team can keep 38 clean sheets and relegate..

But a team that keeps 38 clean sheets and scores a paltry 38 goals (1 in every match) would be crowned champions

Fact check me..lol

oliverano:




I wanted to ask this but you beat me to it lol.

If you can keep 38 clean sheet in the premier league or any top league, the chances of survival is extremely high that's because 38 clean sheet doesn't mean 38 points!

Jamiuokolaa:


What's your opinion?

Peeps keep forgetting that a team can keep 38 clean sheets and still relegate

raumdeuter:


Imagine getting -12 to get Haaland and not captain him

I'm sure na RevfrEbuka and Segedinho carry my team name to Baba for village

popizaino:


It gave us our 2nd UCL but real madrid is on record 14th UCL with outscore your opponent mentality.


That is what you should aim for.

popizaino:


That you had to go back to the era Mourinho when was still the special one tells me all i need to know.

airmark:


If we want to compete for trophies Havertz shouldn't be starting our key games. The ball came to his favorite leg and he still put it off the goal.

Even that his controversial move, off which Spurs used to score 1st, he should have moved the ball away from the trailing defender, he put it in his path. They should have loaned him away and get better strikers..

airmark:


Better, he should work on his confidence in front of goal after that big miss against Udinese.

I don't want Havertz to lead the line this season, he kills the moral of the team with his lackadaisical play upfront.

airmark:


You are not serious. Havertz ko, Havard ni.

airmark:
Richarlison should be bought, I don't want to see that unproductive Havertz, leading the line next season.

airmark:


Relying on Havertz will expose Tuchel as a madman.

lordfalcao:
Jackson was not the reason you lost two points


Anyone who claimed to play football will know that this was a tight angle finish with a weaker foot. With the defender heavily on him.

The keeper made the difference with his arms

lordfalcao:
so na Jackson make you loose two points .

You no serious.


Your other attackers were busy missing chance.


And your defense conceded as sure banker

Rest

airmark:


Let's ask his multiple agents here on this platform.

I was here yesterday stating that Jackson wouldn't score the goal Havertz scored. Anytime he sees a keeper standing in his front under minimal pressure, his brain freezes.

We have seen so many excuses they gave to defend his big misses. The only one I may accept is that his legs are not straight. Why not just sign a better finisher, whose legs are straight?

Teams will try as much as possible to shut down our support cast/wide men and the wasteful striker (who is supposed to be our best finisher) playing closer to the post, will continue to be missing sitters as we saw today.

2 cheap points dropped, rinse and repeat.

popizaino:


Arsenal had the meanest defence last season but city won the title.

Man city scored the most goals last season and also won the title.

What are you saying about defence again?

popizaino:


This is the same stupid mentality that has made Mourinho less desirable for top clubs is what you are religiously clinging on to. Thank God you're not at the helm of affairs at the bridge.

Ibime:


We both got the highest points this game week and still drew. That's why FA Cup is luck of the draw

WhoDeyHause:

Boss We scored them in the 25th minute before our auxiliary and inverted wingers ft jackson couldn't put the game to bed, even the palace goal is one that you can't really fault any defender on except maybe gbanchez for his poor positioning, upon all that we still saw chances and could have had 3 points instead of one if the weapon fashioned against us to prosper today didn't snooze,so we should sit down in our own half and defend a goal scored early in the game when we could have sharply put the game to bed, at home against a team we beat home and away last season? it's not as if the defense is even great, your league champions conceded minutes after taking the lead, I didn't see them defending any one goal lead from the 9th minute. Let's just keep making excuses for some certain individuals, hopefully we'll have something good to celebrate by season end.

WhoDeyHause:

Yes you right, we shouldn't have even attempted to score, just camp in our box 18 at home against crystal freaking palace like all those eastern European teams till referee blow whistle, clean sheet for you, clean sheet for me everybody goes home happy.

airmark:


The same people did the same against me on Morata and when we threw him away after the havoc had been done, they went mute.

The same script is about to play out but I don't blame the ignorance of the fans here but the stupid club relying on a wasteful striker to spearhead our attack.

agrovick:


The errors in midfield not in defense, will need to re-watch City goals again but against Wolves the goals scored were due to nonsensical plays by both Caicedo and his partner in crime. CP's goal today was a worldie, my only argument would have been we should done a better job in preventing shots from outside the box, a job which belongs to either of Caicedo/Enzo.

Ibime:


You get luck say Zirkzee didn't score after Trent left the pitch. That was the one point I needed

Ibime:


Las Las we done draw 93-93

agrovick:


TBH, I don't really care for the defense vs attack discuss, I just want to see 3 points from every game we play but if anyone says our attack needs no fixing, the person is not being truthful because there is no world where a striker who is not in Senegal's 1st eleven should be Chelsea's leading striker.

If we had converted some of the chances we had in the first half, CP would have been down and out but what do I know. Although the defense is not world class but cut out those school boy errors and the express way in the middle of the park and the defense has less to worry.

agrovick:
So defence or attack

WhoDeyHause:
Today wey we no concede the usual two awoof goals, wetin come happen?

iamoyindamola:

Yes it's possible
2 concurrent users
But you need to know you can't stream football on TV only mobile but you can stream movies/series on tv


Cc popizaino take note of this too

iamoyindamola:

Register on web(show max)
Sub for epl or football it’s 2900 with your Mastercard
After download their app and login
They are currently on promo if you sub for football you get to stream movies/series for free for a month

Bluelines69:


He missed the final game of Brighton last season, city and wolves, he’s eligible to play I think

Neduzoma123456:
Just Download the app... And recharge by buy voucher at the nearest Gotv or Dstv center


Simple.

Bluelines69:
Be like Lavia and James done go again

Enzo5:
I am the one who said that, quote me anywhere, if you dont outscore your opponent you highest you get is a point, there's no extra point for perfect defence.

The argument originated about what chelsea should spend money on, attack or defence, I support the view that chelsea need to get a striker, some supported the improving supporting cast and attackers, while some focus mainly on defence like anybody was against improving our defence. Limited budget needs to be used wisely not wastefully, city bought haaland before they addressed their lb. Attack is the best form of defence

We chelsea complained about the era of bus packing and two to one goals, how one season we are good the next we are poo

I agree we need a cb but between a cb and a cf i am picking a cf that actually scores, because there is no cb that is an absolute defence, chelsea can defend as a team

Ballzproblem2:
🚨 BREAKING! Nicolas Jackson agrees contract extension at Chelsea, committing to Stamford Bridge until 2033. Senegal international’s terms included option to prolong + now secured for next 9yrs. 23yo seen by #CFC as key to central attacking core
( David Ornstein)

Pepper Dem, anybody wey no like am go start your own podcast