Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,521 members, 7,819,873 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 04:29 AM

Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior - Culture (3) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Culture / Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior (106546 Views)

Black girl says Somalis & Ethiopians Are Beautiful Because Of their Features / The Reason Why Blacks Try So Hard To Claim Somalis/ethiopians / Do Somalis,ethiopians And Eritreans Consider Themselves As Whites? (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (23) (Go Down)

Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by PAPAAFRICA: 4:50pm On Jun 07, 2013
Don't test me again bitchboy.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by chukxie(m): 5:04pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9:


its not supposed when facts back it up

we have history, beauty and culture


if u have nothing to contribute then go back to your gorilla cave

Hhahaha! You're really funny! If you think i'm a gorilla it's your cup of tea! If you think and know you're an orangutang it's your cup of milkshake! Stop trying so hard to prove you're superior. Nobody cares!
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 10:20pm On Jun 08, 2013
am superior ask ur ownn people
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by coolzeal(m): 10:43pm On Jun 08, 2013
Can you please outline any history of horn of Africa that's greater than Timbuktu or Mansa Musa the richest man that ever live on earth.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 10:49pm On Jun 08, 2013
coolzeal: Can you please outline any history of horn of Africa that's greater than Timbuktu or Mansa Musa the richest man that ever live on earth.

Abyssinia, Kingdom of Kush, Aksum, Ajuuran, first to use canons in africa

never enslaved, never colonised, etc
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by PAPAAFRICA: 10:55pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9:

Abyssinia, Kingdom of Kush, Aksum, Ajuuran, first to use canons in africa

never enslaved, never colonised, etc
keep it within the horn please.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 10:56pm On Jun 08, 2013
PAPA AFRICA: keep it within the horn please.
PAPA AFRICA: keep it within the horn please.
PAPA AFRICA: keep it within the horn please.


that is the horn lol
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by coolzeal(m): 10:56pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9:

Abyssinia, Kingdom of Kush, Aksum, Ajuuran, first to use canons in africa

never enslaved, never colonised, etc

What history does East Africa have that West Africa doesn't? In fact, if I can spin this the other way what history does East Africa have that levels up to Mali, Songhay, Ghana, Mansa Musa, Timbuktu which was the greatest of world knowledge at one point, etc?

Perhaps you are talking about Atlantic slave trade then? Does East Africa not have the Arab slave trade? How would that Atlantic slave trade proof anything about West Africa other than it is the geographic portion of Africa on the Atlantic slave trade?

Now I have given you ample time to come up with something even half-tangible or conclusive to support your sweeping assertion of "West Africa is inferior to East Africa" (when in fact I myself would argue the opposite) and you have come up with nothing.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by PAPAAFRICA: 10:57pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9:


that is the horn lol
kush was not in the horn

1 Like

Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 10:59pm On Jun 08, 2013
PAPA AFRICA: kush was not in the horn

go back to school


kush is kushitic and thats what horners are

cushitic people live in somalia and ethiopia
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by PAPAAFRICA: 11:00pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9:

go back to school


kush is kushitic and thats what horners are

cushitic people live in somalia and ethiopia
stop claiming others history, its disgusting.

1 Like

Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 11:01pm On Jun 08, 2013
During Classical Antiquity, the Kushite imperial capital was at Meroe. In early Greek geography, the Meroitic kingdom was known as Ethiopia. The Kushite kingdom with its capital at Meroe persisted until the 4th century AD, when it weakened and disintegrated due to internal rebellion.

By 1st century AD The Kushite capital was subsequently captured by the Beja Dynasty, who tried to revive the empire. The Kushite capital was eventually captured and burnt to the ground by the kingdom of Axum. After the collapse of the Kushite empire several states emerged in its former territories, among them Nubia.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by PAPAAFRICA: 11:04pm On Jun 08, 2013
still not in the horn, so sorry somali.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 11:05pm On Jun 08, 2013
AXUM, KUSH’S successor, was situated in the Ethiopian highlands, not far from where the Red Sea empties out into the Gulf of Aden . The port city for AXUM was the Red Sea port of ADULIS . AXUM traded trinkets, wine, cloth and finished iron goods with the peoples of the interior for iron ore, hides, gold and enslaved Africans. These were shipped from the port of ADULIS and traded in Arabia , Persia , Constantinople and India .


i will let history speak for itself lol


the only people who are cushtic are somali beja oromo afar

somalia was settled by arabs and persians first before somalis

thats why mogadigu is persian
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by Nobody: 11:06pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9:

go back to school


kush is kushitic and thats what horners are

cushitic people live in somalia and ethiopia


No you id*t Kush=Kushite

Cush=Cushite


Kush DID NOT MEAN modern day Cushite speakers! The people of Kush didn't even speak a Afro Asiatic language! They were Nile Saharan. Stop claiming! Cush had a completely different meaning back then! Cush meant Ethiopian by the Greeks. Ethiopian meant burnt skin and Willy hair by the Greeks. Ethiopian meant black back then. By claiming Kush as Horner your d*mb@$$ is claiming the Horners as black. Ethiopia back then DID not mean modern Ethiopians.

Neither did cush!
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by PAPAAFRICA: 11:07pm On Jun 08, 2013
PAPA AFRICA: still not in the horn, so sorry somali.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 11:09pm On Jun 08, 2013
lol cush and kush is the same, sudan is cushitic, so is ethiopia and somalia and eritrea thats why we all look the same



Ancient sources refer to a major military alliance between the Kingdom of Kush and one of its allies, the Kingdom of Punt, against the armies of Ancient Egypt. In the early Middle Ages, the Ajuuraan State expanded its territories and established its hegemonic rule through a skillful combination of warfare, trade linkages and alliances,[2] and fought the Portuguese in the Indian Ocean. The Kingdom of Ifat successfully conquered the Kingdom of Shewa in the same time-period. A hundred years later a major conventional war would commence during the Conquest of Abyssinia pitching the Kingdom of Adal allied by the Ottoman Empire against the Solomonic Dynasty supported by the Portuguese Empire. The conflict is the earliest example of cannon and matchlock warfare on the continent.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by Nobody: 11:10pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9: During Classical Antiquity, the Kushite imperial capital was at Meroe. In early Greek geography, the Meroitic kingdom was known as Ethiopia. The Kushite kingdom with its capital at Meroe persisted until the 4th century AD, when it weakened and disintegrated due to internal rebellion.

By 1st century AD The Kushite capital was subsequently captured by the Beja Dynasty, who tried to revive the empire. The Kushite capital was eventually captured and burnt to the ground by the kingdom of Axum. After the collapse of the Kushite empire several states emerged in its former territories, among them Nubia.

You fcking d*mb@$$ again Ethiopian DID NOT mean modern Ethiopians. It meant black SOUTH of Egypt by the Greeks! Anyone who was a black person was a Ethiopian. Horners weren't even called Ethiopian or were a part of Ethiopia you slowpoke.

Again the people of Kush WERE NOT afro-Asiatic!!
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by coolzeal(m): 11:13pm On Jun 08, 2013
This Somali illiterate wants to talk about history now.

When it comes to sense of enslavement, East Africa is still inferior to West. Sure the West might have the worst experience with new-age enslavement with the advancement of Western technology and the ensuing Atlantic slave trade, but African slavery has inherently been an eastern phenamenon from the times of antiquity to as recent as the Omani-Zanzibar control over the coast.

Who hasn't been enslaved in East Africa? From the coast of Sudan down to Mozambique, East African slave legacy sits from here to China. The same Abbysinians were are descended from, the so-called "Cushities" were the biggest source of slaves for the East. Look at even Islamic history and you read famous slaves such as Bilal were Abbysinian.

In fact, modern Somalis themselves only escaped being slaved in modern slavery because you are Muslims, otherwise you would have suffered the fate of your East African neighbors to the north as well as immediate south.

Dude reply my message and stop running away.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 11:15pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalis enslaved bantus cause they are subhuman


no somali was enslaved, even before islam cause somalis are gangsters
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by PAPAAFRICA: 11:15pm On Jun 08, 2013
in the horn? No? Alright then. you have your kingdoms in the horn, don't claim others. you restrict west africans to black west africa, you are restricted to the horn. see how that works?
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by Nobody: 11:16pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9: lol cush and kush is the same, sudan is cushitic, so is ethiopia and somalia and eritrea thats why we all look the same



Ancient sources refer to a major military alliance between the Kingdom of Kush and one of its allies, the Kingdom of Punt, against the armies of Ancient Egypt. In the early Middle Ages, the Ajuuraan State expanded its territories and established its hegemonic rule through a skillful combination of warfare, trade linkages and alliances,[2] and fought the Portuguese in the Indian Ocean. The Kingdom of Ifat successfully conquered the Kingdom of Shewa in the same time-period. A hundred years later a major conventional war would commence during the Conquest of Abyssinia pitching the Kingdom of Adal allied by the Ottoman Empire against the Solomonic Dynasty supported by the Portuguese Empire. The conflict is the earliest example of cannon and matchlock warfare on the continent.

Read up the fcking definition of Kush and Ethiopian(during Greeks times) then come back to me. How the heck could Kush people horn when the people DID NOt speak and Afro-Asiatic language and around that time the Axumite empire was arising. How

Also KOK DID NOT extend into the horn at all!


The people who Kush are the ancestors of modern Nubians NOT horners. Stop stealing peoples history!

1 Like

Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 11:17pm On Jun 08, 2013
dude kingdom of cush is cushitic people


u do know somalis, sudanese, eritrans and ethios are cushitic people


somalis migrated to somalia, thats why the arabs in somalia are called reer xamar


meaning the original inhabitants
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by PAPAAFRICA: 11:18pm On Jun 08, 2013
[size=20pt]this false claiming Somali [/size] grin

2 Likes

Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by Nobody: 11:20pm On Jun 08, 2013
Also the Meroitic language that the people of Kush spoke was NOT Afro-Asiatic but Nile-Saharan. And experts state its more relayed toe the modern Nubian language and not no Cusite language!
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 11:23pm On Jun 08, 2013
KidStranglehold: Also the Meroitic language that the people of Kush spoke was NOT Afro-Asiatic but Nile-Saharan. And experts state its more relayed toe the modern Nubian language and not no Cusite language!
KidStranglehold: Also the Meroitic language that the people of Kush spoke was NOT Afro-Asiatic but Nile-Saharan. And experts state its more relayed toe the modern Nubian language and not no Cusite language!
KidStranglehold: Also the Meroitic language that the people of Kush spoke was NOT Afro-Asiatic but Nile-Saharan. And experts state its more relayed toe the modern Nubian language and not no Cusite language!


dude do u know any history?

aksum took over kush, and the capital of kush was later in modern ethiopia
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by Nobody: 11:24pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9: dude kingdom of cush is cushitic people


u do know somalis, sudanese, eritrans and ethios are cushitic people


somalis migrated to somalia, thats why the arabs in somalia are called reer xamar


meaning the original inhabitants


You insignificant slowpoke. It was called Kingdom of Kush NOT cush! KOK was derived from OlDER Nubian kingdoms like Kerma which had nothing to do with horners.

And BS! Somalia was inhibited as late as 9000bc!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Somalia#Ancient

Which waaaaay earlier than the KOK. Again stop claiming!
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 11:26pm On Jun 08, 2013
The Kingdom of Aksum or Axum, also known as the Aksumite Empire, was an important trading nation in the area which is now Eritrea and northern Ethiopia, existing from approximately 100–940 AD. It grew from the proto-Aksumite Iron Age period c. 4th century BC to achieve prominence by the 1st century AD, and was a major player in the commerce between the Roman Empire and Ancient India. The Aksumite rulers facilitated trade by minting their own currency, the state established its hegemony over the declining Kingdom of Kush and regularly entered the politics of the kingdoms on the Arabian peninsula, eventually extending its rule over the region with the conquest of the Himyarite Kingdom.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by Nobody: 11:28pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9:


dude do u know any history?

aksum took over kush, and the capital of kush was later in modern ethiopia

Do you know your history you freaking id*t? Axum did NOT take over Kush and the Axumite empire DID NOt extend into Kush!
[img]http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-aksum-map-0-700ad.jpg[/img]

You can clearly see from the map.
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by somalia9: 11:32pm On Jun 08, 2013
its funny ur tellin me history of horn


the capital of kush is in ethiopia u idiooot

Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by Nobody: 11:36pm On Jun 08, 2013
Again if people of Kush were horn than prove the Meroitic language was not Nile Saharan but Afro Asiatic...

I'll wait...
Re: Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreans Are Superior by Nobody: 11:39pm On Jun 08, 2013
somalia9: its funny ur tellin me history of horn


the capital of kush is in ethiopia u idiooot


Your own map debunks your dumb@$$...

It has the KOK as NUBIA where the Nubian people originated!

Why the h3ll would KOK be Horner when ancestors of the Nubian people have AlWAY occupied that land! Give up! Axumite only occupied PART again PART of Kush and your own map even STATES that. Again give up!

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (23)

Ethiopian Women + Nigerian Men (PICS) / Yoruba Words That Have Several Meanings / 45,000 Virgin Zulu Maidens Step Out Topless For Testing In South Africa (Photos)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 52
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.