jmaine:

Ndu,you don't need vague posts to play the ostrich.

The OP presented an email with the sender email clearly bloated out, yet he claimed it was his which was a lie.

You don't need to feign stubbornness in the face of simple factual truth.

Do well to prove to me the screen shot i presented is a lie

Bingo!!!! You finally got it. I cannot prove that your screen shot is a lie or whether it is truthful, just as you cannot prove that the OP's screen shot is a lie or is truthful. While you chose to believe that the Op's screen shot is a lie, I am willing to give the OP, the benefit of the doubt.

No one here, including you, has proved with 100% certainty that the OP's claim is false. I know it is difficult to admit error of judgement, so I'll let you have the last word and use the post to satisfy yourself.

Happy New Year to you.

defbond1:


Maybe I'm a bit silly today but tell me in your wisdom,
Wouldn't that affect police investigation if he gave the sender email add out?
Why should he give it to you a nincom*poop that can do absolutely nothing to help him?
In the first place he shouldn't even post the email on a forum like this while it is being investigated.
How old are you?

In the ops voice. ..I will not post anymore on this thread. Too much stupidity going on everywhere. That is why nigeria is like that. The leaders are as daft and clueless as the subjects. ..

Coming from a dolt who feels identifying a Gmail message connotes an IT whiz is quite rich . . .

. . .

jmaine:

Maybe you are the incompetent and silly expert who deceived the OP . . .

You may not have achieved much since you're unable to convince that an email wasn't sent.

ndu_chucks:

Bingo!!!! You finally got it. I cannot prove that your screen shot is a lie or whether it is truthful, just as you cannot prove that the OP's screen shot is a lie or is truthful. While you chose to believe that the Op's screen shot is a lie, I am willing to give the OP, the benefit of the doubt.

No one here, including you, has proved with 100% certainty that the OP's claim is false. I know it is difficult to admit error of judgement, so I'll let you have the last word and use the post to satisfy yourself.

Happy New Year to you.

You can Ndu and it is very simple . All you need to do is post a Gmail message screen of yours, and all will be well.

The OP wasn't expecting he will be found out cos he sent that mail to himself to score cheap points from fellows like you .

Happy new year to you also bruv. It is well . . . .

MalcolmX@ng:
You may not have achieved much since you're unable to convince that an email wasn't sent.

And you also proved it was sent right ? .

@Jmaine. Stop wasting time on brainless idiots. Even the clown scramjones knows his lies have been found out. Notice how the slightly intelligent APC e-rats have avoided this thread like a plague. These ones you are arguing with are extremely daft ones.
Please do something important with your time.

cramjones: I didn't need to go to the police to unravel this nonsensical email. The IP address that sent that email is 174.61.244.139 My computer expert has also traced this IP to a remote server in Lagos. Who ever sent that message is on Nairaland and I won't take it him/her serious!

Those your experts are quack www.myip.ms/view/ip_addresses/2923295744/174.61.244.0_174.61.244.255

We will advise OP to forward his allegation of threat to security personnel for investigation.

On this note, the thread is hereby closed while wishing everyone a save year.

OAM4J: On this note, the thread is hereby closed while wishing everyone a save year.

Why was this thread closed?

Seun: Why was this thread closed?

Because the thread was degenerating to e-fighting, name-calling and exchange of insults and I know thorough investigation to the alleged threat cannot be carried out on the pages of Nairaland, hence my advice for the OP to report the allegation to security officials.

OAM4J:

Because the thread was degenerating to e-fighting, name-calling and exchange of insults and I know thorough investigation to the alleged threat cannot be carried out on the pages of Nairaland, hence my advice for the OP to report the allegation to security officials.

That is contrary to our policy. Our policy is to ban the people who break the rules rather than to lock a thread because people broke the rules on it. Did you ban any of the individuals who broke the rules?

Seun: That is contrary to our policy. Our policy is to ban the people who break the rules rather than to lock a thread because people broke the rules on it. Did you ban any of the individuals who broke the rules?

I banned one or two people.

Its ok, I will unlock the thread.

In the USA, a citizen's arrest is an arrest made by a person who is not acting as a sworn law-enforcement official. In common law jurisdictions, the practice dates back to medieval England and the English common law, in which sheriffs encouraged ordinary citizens to help apprehend law breakers.

By virtue of my position as a Politics section regular forumite, though without the authority to ban or hide posts, I hereby issue a citizen's 1 day ban to OAM4J and Oga at the top, for going arround a locked thread and having a conversation while excluding the rest of us! As a matter of fact, I make that a 3-day ban, that will fix them.

If you people ban me for issuing my own ban, I have reserved 1 or 2 choice phrases in Igbo for an appropriate response. One phrase begins with with Mgbo piaf......

^Now am also becoming inclined to believe you are Aminu Gamawa/Zangiwa the lawyer and the harvard PhD student

OAM4J: ^Now am also becoming inclined to believe you are Aminu Gamawa/Zangiwa the lawyer and the harvard PhD student

That was a good one.

Please note however, that Harvard students do not do copy copy from wikipedia, my jurisprudence bit up there was lifted from here ==> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest . Lets hope you wouldn't then accuse me of making that entry in wiki.

^Who else knows the rules of Havard students better than a havard student himself. You can afford to break the rules anonymously online na, who go arrest you?

OAM4J: ^Who else knows the rules of Havard students better than a havard student himself. You can afford to break the rules anonymously online na, who go arrest you?

I would have used my scooby doo gif to laugh at the above; but I believe what you are saying can be succinctly sumarized by the animated
graphic below:





Thanks for the laughs.

OAM4J:

I banned one or two people.

Its ok, I will unlock the thread.

thank you so much... Pls ban as many people as you need to ban for as long as they need to be banned to enforce the rules.

It appears only three people are posting on this thread: Seun, OAM4J and ndu_chucks.

Seun: thank you so much... Pls ban as many people as you need to ban for as long as they need to be banned to enforce the rules.

I like this communication; however, it will be good if it's private between Admin & Mod. This will make ego issues not to come up.

Aminu Gamawa, Nasir El-Rufai, FFK, Rotimi Fashakin...Cramjones could be any of them, however, I still maintain Cramjones is Cramjones!

I like this [url=cramjones]old troll[/url] .