''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' - Politics (5)

Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,792 members, 7,820,785 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 09:33 PM

''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' - Politics (5) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' (46413 Views)

BBC Interview: Mrs Buhari Did What Mrs Jonathan Couldn’t Do -APC ‘spokesman’ / NAF Deploys Six Fighter Jets To End Boko Haram Insurgency / MTN Fueled Boko Haram Insurgency - President Buhari (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Namady(m): 10:40am On Sep 07, 2015

WailingWailer00:
Jonathan tried towards the end of his regime, Boko Haram was created by the Hausa's and let them face the full wrath of their creation
Tired of this their born to rule mentality

Thats the misconception you people have. You assume every northerner is hausa right?

Muhammad Yusuf was not a hausa man, Abubakar Shekau too is not hausa, they are northeners of course but not Hausas.

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Orikinla(m): 10:40am On Sep 07, 2015

It is the corruption of the corrupt and incompetent administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan that made the US, UK and allies to refuse to sell weapons to Nigeria, because of the misappropriations of the revenue allocations for the Ministry of Defence. And they found out that the weapons were also diverted to Hausa Fulani herdsmen and Boko Haram terrorists by their sponsors. The AK-47 guns used by Hausa Fulani herdsmen and Boko Haram terrorists were from the Nigerian Armed Forces. Nigerian government does not need new weapons to fight and end the insurgency of the Boko Haram. All the government needs to do is to cut off the suppliers of their weapons, vehicles, fuel, food and water as the Federal Government did to end the Biafran rebellion. The suppliers of the weapons, vehicles, fuel, food and water to Boko Haram terrorists are well known to President Muhammadu Buhari, IBB, and others in the north. The sponsors and suppliers of Boko Haram live in their mansions and use the same banks we use. Boko Haram terrorists have never attacked them and their families and they were informed of all the targets and attacks of Boko Haram for them and their families to stay away from the locations of the targets of the Boko Haram terrorists. How can Boko Haram terrorists travel in a convoy of Toyota Hilux jeeps, trucks and motorcycles for hours to attack villages and towns and the Nigerian Army and Airforce cannot see them? Who is fooling whom? These demonic and Satanic sponsors and suppliers of Boko Haram are still there. During the Liberian civil war, Nigerian military contractors supplied fake bullet proof vests to the ECOMOG soldiers and caused the unfortunate deaths of hundreds of Nigerian soldiers. Cultists have taken over the military leadership of Nigerian Armed Forces. America, British and allies have the information. That is why they will not sell anymore arms to Nigeria. Any idiot telling lies to the ignorant public is from hell.

1 Like 1 Share

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by SMEpromote: 10:40am On Sep 07, 2015

Seun:
The Christian president chose to forgo weapons rather than end human rights violations. The muslim president did the opposite. Very ironic.

See who is talking! Na waooo, It appears the gang-up against Jonathan was much deeper than percieved.

Waiting anxiously for this regime to defeat the terrorists, but it has been killings after another and more innocent souls have been killed by boko haram in last three months than any other 3 months in recent past.

The muteness of govt. regarding these killings is what borders me the most. And just few days ago news emerged that herds men massacred Children in plateu state which your site nairaland carried, but you later removed the story, but up to this memoment the government has not said anything about it, talk about human rights violation.

6 Likes 1 Share

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 10:42am On Sep 07, 2015

gidjah:
chukwudi,you be civilian,wetin I go share with you if not civilian matter,abeg leave that matter alone bro,and more over,since you seem to be blinded by ethnicism ,I shall not go beyond this with you.me to give you of my bosses corrupt practices evidence?WHO U BE SEFF??!!

Bros you made a serious allegation against the former COAS and is supposed to substantiate it!! Were it not that this is an anonymous forum,you could have gotten sued for libel!!

2 Likes

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by DrayZee: 10:43am On Sep 07, 2015

Reyginus:
So how does it mean I want it to pause and continue. Didn't you think I may be speaking of the Party's strategy if it gets worse? Wasn't that what happened in the last days of Jonathan? So explain to me how a party's victory strategy is my dream for the war?

Ok bro, I get it, it's not your dream for the war. I shall speak on this matter no more.

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by informato: 10:44am On Sep 07, 2015

Seun:
The Christian president chose to forgo weapons rather than end human rights violations. The muslim president did the opposite. Very ironic.

you know nothing....just like your devilish religion

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 10:45am On Sep 07, 2015

DrayZee:

Ok bro, I get it, it's not your dream for the war. I shall speak on this matter no more.

Better.

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Obiwannn: 10:48am On Sep 07, 2015

kogirodent:
since a man with "political will" is now at the helm of affairs, has he ended the war? Instead we now hear of attacks everyday. And surprisingly these days, we never hear of when boko haram captures a town, we only hear of it when the army recaptures it. Abeg, face reality and stop apportioning blames.

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by gidjah(m): 10:48am On Sep 07, 2015

chukwudi44:

Bros you made a serious allegation against the former COAS and is supposed to substantiate it!! Were it not that this is an anonymous forum,you could have gotten sued for libel!!

Chukwudi chukwudi!!tribal ethnicism won't take this nation any where,people like you shouldn't be allowed to Mann public offices,pls grow up.FYI,I am not faceless,check my profile,you may contact me whenever however,you won't be surprised at all.

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by DrayZee: 10:51am On Sep 07, 2015

ogechieku:
During the period, why can't Nigeria start production of gun since the last 6 years that the book haram have been killing.

If you are denied of a product in international market it means it is a time to look inward.

We are selling virtually all the raw materials we could use to make these weapons. And I don't think we have experts on weapons fabrication.

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 10:52am On Sep 07, 2015

Orikinla:
It is the corruption of the corrupt and incompetent administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan that made the US, UK and allies to refuse to sell weapons to Nigeria, because of the misappropriations of the revenue allocations for the Ministry of Defence. And they found out that the weapons were also diverted to Hausa Fulani herdsmen and Boko Haram terrorists by their sponsors. The AK-47 guns used by Hausa Fulani herdsmen and Boko Haram terrorists were from the Nigerian Armed Forces. Nigerian government does not need new weapons to fight and end the insurgency of the Boko Haram. All the government needs to do is to cut off the suppliers of their weapons, vehicles, fuel, food and water as the Federal Government did to end the Biafran rebellion. The suppliers of the weapons, vehicles, fuel, food and water to Boko Haram terrorists are well known to President Muhammadu Buhari, IBB, and others in the north. The sponsors and suppliers of Boko Haram live in their mansions and use the same banks we use. Boko Haram terrorists have never attacked them and their families and they were informed of all the targets and attacks of Boko Haram for them and their families to stay away the locations of the targets of the Boko Haram terrorists. How can Boko Haram terrorists travel in a convoy of Toyota Hilux jeeps, trucks and motorcycles for hours to attack villages and towns and the Nigerian Army and Airforce cannot see them? Who is fooling whom? These demonic and Satanic sponsors and suppliers of Boko Haram are still there. America, British and allies have the information. That is why they will not sell anymore arms to Nigeria. Any idiot telling lies to the ignorant public is from hell.

I agree with all your points except the issue of corruption. The USA and her allies have been helping organizations and governments with worse cases of corruption. When I say help here I don't mean selling weapons to them but giving them weapons free for long term goals. No country in the world will ever refuse to sell you weapon because of monetary corruption in your country. No country is that morally alert.

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by aku626(m): 10:52am On Sep 07, 2015

Ammunition business is a very lucrative business and world leaders, top business owners and organizations are sometimes involved so we might be in for a tough battle. My perception

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 10:54am On Sep 07, 2015

gidjah:
Chukwudi chukwudi!!tribal ethnicism won't take this nation any where,people like you shouldn't be allowed to Mann public offices,pls grow up.FYI,I am not faceless,check my profile,you may contact me whenever however,you won't be surprised at all.

Bros what is so ethnic or tribal in you substantiating your allegations against Ihejirika? You said the man was very corrupt and i only asked you to substantiate.

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by emeka2847: 10:55am On Sep 07, 2015

I really hope this is not the same seun that is a MOD here. Joining the wahala about Christians and Muslims. Divide and rule.

Seun:
The Christian president chose to forgo weapons rather than end human rights violations. The muslim president did the opposite. Very ironic.

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by DrayZee: 10:57am On Sep 07, 2015

AreaFada2:
Na GEJ hide them for Otuoke, otherwise our press up specialist CoAS would have released them by now. Blame GEJ for everything. Even the one that has jedi jedi, na GEJ fault.

Forget them abeg

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 11:00am On Sep 07, 2015

AnanseK:

Buhari was attacked with guns and bombs at Kaduna and was nearly killed.
It was either the work of BH or that of GEJ and his government. What you are forcing me to believe now is the latter. I hope that too will be investigated for us to know exactly who wanted Buhari dead.

they wanted, y didn't they succeed. My friend tht scenario was stage-managed. U gullible.

5 Likes

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Orikinla(m): 11:00am On Sep 07, 2015

SMEpromote:

See who is talking! Na waooo, It appears the gang-up against Jonathan was much deeper than percieved.

Waiting anxiously for this regime to defeat the terrorists, but it has been killings after another and more innocent souls have been killed by boko haram in last three months than any other 3 months in recent past.

The muteness of govt. regarding these killings is what borders me the most. And just few days ago news emerged that herds men massacred Children in plateu state which your site nairaland carried, but you later removed the story, but up to this memoment the government has not said anything about it, talk about human rights violation.

. The photographs of the massacres have been taken by Americans from their space stations in orbit and cannot be hidden from the foreign news media..

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by nigerianvenom(m): 11:01am On Sep 07, 2015

Seun:
The Christian president chose to forgo weapons rather than end human rights violations. The muslim president did the opposite. Very ironic.

And u think u are making sense

3 Likes

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by AnanseK(m): 11:02am On Sep 07, 2015

MyFlair:
they wanted, y didn't they succeed. My friend tht scenario was stage-managed. U gullible.

I will ignore this rubbish.

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by BrainnewsNg(f): 11:15am On Sep 07, 2015

yanabasee:
Sai Baba .
Sai scam.
Sai I love to travel.
Sai I am a scam.
Sai Nigeria will be islamised.
Sai my asset declaration is fake.
Sai Ghananians doesn't know I'm a tyrant
Sai I have just 1million naira.
Sai I love cows. That's why I think like a cow.
Sai I love propaganda.
Sai my party knows how to cover me up.
Sai I don't care about what Nigerians say about me.
Sai I'll deliver Nigeria when I'm 77years
Sai

RESPECT YOUR PRESIDENT!

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Joeoku78: 11:18am On Sep 07, 2015

Other countries refused to sell weapons to nigeria to combat boko haram insurgency because the then govt of jonathan was grossly and stupendously corrupt such that those countries refused to dent their image to do business with corrupt country like nigeria

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 11:18am On Sep 07, 2015

WailingWailer00:
Jonathan tried towards the end of his regime, Boko Haram was created by the Hausa's and let them face the full wrath of their creation
Tired of this their born to rule mentality

Just listen to your self, you sound like wailer, GEJ govt was a failure becos of incompetence, he had a unique opportunity to change the destiny of his people but he failed woefully becos a ogogoro, no wonder efforts were made to outlaw production of that abominable drink in rivers and bayelsa. cheesy

I dont expect to reason objectively cos your a weeping wailers which is only natural becos of your incompetent GEJ chose ogogoro over the nation.

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by charlesbailey(m): 11:20am On Sep 07, 2015

So where are the letters and proof that letters were really written?? i believe there are more appropriate and diplomatic ways of seeking arms trade than sitting in your office and writing 25 letters.. Abegi.. Are you a learner

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by yanabasee(m): 11:21am On Sep 07, 2015

BrainnewsNg:

RESPECT YOUR PRESIDENT!

. . DJWysitech.... Respect urself.... tongue

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by DONFASZY(m): 11:21am On Sep 07, 2015

yanabasee:
Sai Baba .
Sai scam.
Sai I love to travel.
Sai I am a scam.
Sai Nigeria will be islamised.
Sai my asset declaration is fake.
Sai Ghananians doesn't know I'm a tyrant
Sai I have just 1million naira.
Sai I love cows. That's why I think like a cow.
Sai I love propaganda.
Sai my party knows how to cover me up.
Sai I don't care about what Nigerians say about me.
Sai I'll deliver Nigeria when I'm 77years
Sai

Good definition of Bu HA RI SAI I guess

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by rigarmortis: 11:28am On Sep 07, 2015

Seun:
The Christian president chose to forgo weapons rather than end human rights violations. The muslim president did the opposite. Very ironic.

what are saying?....you are misinforming the public.

the human rights problem was grossly exargerated, there was human right abuse by isrealis in gaza, it didn't stop US from supporting isreal, there was same in Guantanamo bay, same in Iraq and Afghanistan, its war, not ludo, there is bound to be collateral human damages.

a top army official (rtd) from adamawa I think was interviewed on channels and he said he would have even ordered the on-sight executions of boko boys with no prisoners taken, he rubbished the amnesty report, these guys are a bunch of air heads who sit somewhere and play devils advocate for devil possessed people on pro bono cases, you give a dog a bad NAME TO HANG IT. that's what is playing out with jona boy.

away from the battle fields, civil human rights violation is going on till date, has amnesty done anything, have you not being reading the papers?

do you know how the war in Syria led to ISIS via US ''intervention" ?...........didn't know you were this naïve.

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 11:30am On Sep 07, 2015

Seun:
The Christian president chose to forgo weapons rather than end human rights violations. The muslim president did the opposite. Very ironic.

ur writings appear deep but it made no sense. Nigerians sha. wink

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by BrainnewsNg(f): 11:40am On Sep 07, 2015

yanabasee:
. . DJWysitech.... Respect urself....

Who?

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by yanabasee(m): 11:42am On Sep 07, 2015

BrainnewsNg:

Who?

. . Wareva!

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by bakila: 11:43am On Sep 07, 2015

chukwudi44:

Bros what is the status today!!! Have boko haram stopped killings people? The same boko haram just last week took over parts of Bornu state on horsebacks killings over 100 people!!!

Buhari is not doing any better!!! GEJ recovered every city before May 29 ,Buhari was supposed to have improved on that, what has he done so far?

The people the can kill is reduced. They HAVE STOPPED MESSING UP OUR TERRITORIAL INTERGRITY, HOISTING FLAGS IN OUR COUNTRY AT WILL.
Which part of Borno State they they take? Is it compared to taking over the house of the CDS from Maiduguri which is a distance of about 400kilometres?
GOODLUCK IS HISTORY, UNFORTUNATELY A LOT OF NIGERIANS WERE DISPLACED, KILLED AND RIDICULED UNDER HIS WATCH AND HIS NAME WILL STICK WITH THAT FAILURE AMONG OTHERS.

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 11:43am On Sep 07, 2015

Yep dats y dey wanted 2extend d state of emergency 2more states n till after d elections n waited till...n had2 postpone d elections b4 dey took serious efforts n u saw him snapping wt d troops forming desperado...my brother playing politics wt human lives is plain WICKED

1 Like

Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 11:47am On Sep 07, 2015

bakila:

The people the can kill is reduced. They HAVE STOPPED MESSING UP OUR TERRITORIAL INTERGRITY, HOISTING FLAGS IN OUR COUNTRY AT WILL.
Which part of Borno State they they take? Is it compared to taking over the house of the CDS from Maiduguri which is a distance of about 400kilometres?
GOODLUCK IS HISTORY, UNFORTUNATELY A LOT OF NIGERIANS WERE DISPLACED, KILLED AND RIDICULED UNDER HIS WATCH AND HIS NAME WILL STICK WITH THAT FAILURE AMONG OTHERS.

What exactly have reduced? About 68 people were killed last Tuesday, 30 on Friday and you say there are reducing!!! Go to Bornu and say that to the families of those victims. GEJ is no longer on power, V Buhari should take responsibility for his failures and stop blaming GEJ

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply)

Bola Tinubu Receives Governor Aregbesola And Oyetola After Apc's Victory. Photos / Killing People While Shouting Allahu Akbar Is Not Islam – Buhari / Giant Tilapias, Huge Cows, Rice Pyramid & Others Shown To Osinbajo In Kebbi

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 65
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.