KingEbukasBlog:


So how exactly did life come from the non living ?

KingEbukasBlog:

1. First ask your self if God lives in the same dimension as us

2. Then ask if He exists in a material/physical world

3. And where the hell did you read that the universe is infinite . There is no proof to that claim . Please stop making inane assumptions

kaybext:
They don't Because of The weakness of religious arguments, explanations, and apologetics and The fact that Religion runs in families. Religion only successful enslaved our mind and thought which scientist call CURIOSITY. Curiosity aid idea, creativity and development

989900:


The main point in my post is, logic and common sense.

Below are 2 submissions amongst many:







BTW, personally, I am of the Einstein and Ernst Chain school of thought that, we know next to nothing yet about ourselves, organisms, the universe or multiverse.

Our 'knowledge' is ephemeral at best.

Omotolu:
...I don't argue,fight for what I don't know. I don't insult other folk's opinion. That's theirs. And I don't impose my opinion on others. If you won't accept some reasonings until you see signs and wonders,that's your problem and business-that does not imply you are a fool. I am not a fanatic. I believe God should fight for Himself.

Joshuabase:


very simple, arrange non living nh4 atoms in complex self dependent branches and you've just synthesized protein - an organic compound. bring many of these self dependent branches together and you've got a cell - do that till you've got a super-complex life for

i repeat, anything that cannot be seen or measured is completely imaginary and doesn't exist

have you seen your god? if you haven't please stop trying to fabricate "where your imaginary god" might exist.

the number line is a property of the universe, the number line is infinite therefore the universe(existence) is infinite.

Joshuabase:


that school of thought means it is pointless to study the universe.

i think not

freecocoa:
Lets pretend I'm a lost sinner, you are trying to win me to god, what would you say to me?

KingEbukasBlog:


I will ask : "Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and personal Saviour?"

So what will be your response ?

989900:


You religious folks make the atheists freak out.

Joshuabase:


very simple, arrange non living nh4 atoms in complex self dependent branches and you've just synthesized protein - an organic compound. bring many of these self dependent branches together and you've got a cell - do that till you've got a super-complex life form




i repeat, anything that cannot be seen or measured is completely imaginary and doesn't exist

have you seen your god? if you haven't please stop trying to fabricate "where your imaginary god" might exist.

the number line is a property of the universe, the number line is infinite therefore the universe(existence) is infinite.

Mindfulness:


He was Jewish! Or at least his family was.

This is why he left Germany. He was fleeing from the Nazis.

Some of his letters have been published recently from which we know that he believed in God. You don't have to be Christian to believe in God.

KingEbukasBlog:


AbioJoshuabase ...hahahaha ... lmfao

This is serious ... sounds more like magic

So let me ask you . Has this knowledge of life coming forth from the non -living you evidently seem to possess being replicated in the labs . Did you create a living cell and then a super-complex life form ?

You seem to cook up scientific laws of your own .

989900:


If your reference is to Miller's work, that only validates creation -- trying to create life -- not per chance.

Left to time, chance, and their chemical properties, the bases of DNA and amino acids of proteins would react in ways that would prevent, not promote, the evolution of life. In the same way, reactions among molecules in Miller’s famous “spark chamber” would destroy any hope of producing life. Living systems must constantly repair the chemical damage done to them, and when biological order loses out to inherent chemical processes, death results.

KingEbukasBlog:


Deist ... huh ?

Joshuabase:

http://nypost.com/2015/05/08/scientists-grow-sperm-cells-in-a-lab-for-first-time/

https://www.google.com.ng/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCIQFjABahUKEwiCpJiimqnIAhXCJXIKHY8dCWg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FInfinity&usg=AFQjCNHbn96IBOobE5_XGS21FmJ3C34fEQ&sig2=DBmSZbRZS2KjcG3RLI8h0w

read the articles - once again, you're coming off as someone who doesnt really know anything about anything

KingEbukasBlog:


I will ask : "Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and personal Saviour?"

So what will be your response ?

Joshuabase:


atoms have had 13.8 billion years to dance around in the universe randomly colliding and reacting with other atoms, in all that time - life had to have been created,

starting from complex organic protein compounds and working it's way up to the first prokaryotic cell

KingEbukasBlog:



“At the end of 2014 the company was able to produce fully formed human spermatozoa in the laboratory setting, using patient testicular biopsies containing only immature germ cells, or spermatogonia,” the company said in a statement.

^^^ If this means bringing forth life from the non - living then you need to go back to school

https://www.google.com.ng/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCIQFjABahUKEwiCpJiimqnIAhXCJXIKHY8dCWg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FInfinity&usg=AFQjCNHbn96IBOobE5_XGS21FmJ3C34fEQ&sig2=DBmSZbRZS2KjcG3RLI8h0w



WTF ... infinity ?

I know what infinity means . And the universe being infinite was proposed by a scientist - that's no proof


You are becoming really desperate and its pathetic

Joshuabase:


atoms have had 13.8 billion years to dance around in the universe randomly colliding and reacting with other atoms, in all that time - life had to have been created,

starting from complex organic protein compounds and working it's way up to the first prokaryotic cell

freecocoa:
I will say no, I don't know who he is, why do I need a personal lord and saviour?

KingEbukasBlog:


To escape God's judgement

freecocoa:
Judgement? Judgement for what exactly? Who is god to even start with?

I don't know this jesus, try introducing him atleast.

KingEbukasBlog:


Seriously ?

989900:


The presence of Oxygen alone would have destroyed that, "while oxygen is necessary for life, free oxygen would oxidize and thus destroy all organic molecules required for the origin of life", plus some other factors too.

Ironically, evolutionists seem to have a larger 'faith' than creationists for believing in this odds.

AnnieOakley:

Beautiful piece!

AnnieOakley:


You say he was not an atheist but I insist he was. I know he was never a Christian. Christianity goes beyond saying nice things about the faith. Everybody knows he doesn't even look Christian!

AnnieOakley:
In 1997, the science journal Nature reported that 40 percent of scientists in the U.S. believed in a personal God—the same amount as had believed eighty years prior. However, when those results were filtered to include only members of the National Academy of Sciences, the number dropped to 10 percent. A Pew survey taken in 2009 records that 33 percent of scientists believe in God and another 18 percent in a higher power, compared to 94 percent of the general public. On the list of long-ago scientists who believed in God are Galileo, Descartes, Pascal, and Newton; more modern names have been added, such as Lord Kelvin, Max Planck, and Francis Collins.

So, to say that scientists don't believe in God is a gross generalization. However, it is true that there are fewer believers in God among professionals in the scientific community than among the general public. Why?

For some scientists, atheism is a matter of faith, not of evidence. Hungarian biologist George Klein wrote to a Christian colleague, "I am indeed an atheist. My attitude is not based on science but rather on faith, just as you have your faith. The absence of a creator, the nonexistence of God is my childhood faith, my adult belief, unshakable and holy."

Other scientists deny God's existence because of a commitment to materialism. Francis Crick, a molecular biologist, biophysicist, and neuroscientist, was a materialist to the core. Materialism teaches that there is nothing in the cosmos besides matter and energy. The supernatural does not exist, and there is no such thing as thought, consciousness, or the soul. Crick even went so far as to predict that science would one day find that the act of prayer changes a neurotransmitter in the brain and induces a positive effect on the person praying.

Some scientists reject faith because of personal experiences. Marie Curie, the only scientist to win two Nobel Prizes in two different science categories, became an atheist or agnostic after the deaths of her mother and sister. It's possible that this loss influenced her theological beliefs. Alan Turing, a mathematician and groundbreaking computer scientist, lost faith in God after the death of his first love. Refusing to believe a loving God would allow her death, Turing embraced materialism.

Some scientists simply see no use for God. Paul Dirac was a forefather of quantum mechanics. He believed science was well on its way to describing the universe in detail, and he saw religion as a political tool. String-theorist Brian Greene says, "Most scientists like to operate in the context of economy. If you don't need an explanatory principle, don't invoke it."

Some atheistic scientists come from a religious background and purposefully reject it. Richard Leakey, a paleontologist and conservationist from Kenya, is the grandson of missionaries but was disillusioned with any kind of faith in God.

Some scientists see faith and science as mutually exclusive. James Watson, who with Francis Crick discovered the double-helix structure of DNA, thought belief in God would preclude his love of science. He loved science more than God.

There are scientists who simply don't bother thinking about God. Steven Weinberg, a Nobel Prize laureate for his work in particle physics, said, "The experience of being a scientist makes religion seem fairly irrelevant. Most scientists I know simply don't think about it very much. They don't think about religion enough to qualify as practicing atheists."

Some scientists are religious but deny any reality beyond tradition and ritual. Oliver Sacks, the neurologist portrayed by Robin Williams in the movie Awakenings, loves religion and feels comfortable in both Orthodox Jewish and Catholic settings. He explains that "nature itself seems so wonderful that I don't feel a hunger for any concept beyond it."

In short, scientists reject faith in God for the same reasons anyone else does. Their atheism is built on some foundational choices:

1) They choose to worship "created things rather than the Creator" (Romans 1:25 NIV).
2) They choose to embrace "opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge" (1 Timothy 6:20 NIV).
3) They choose to retain their sin instead of repenting (John 3:19).
4) They choose to limit their definition of truth to what can be empirically discovered. Unfortunately, the truth of God cannot be discovered via the scientific method. "The world through its wisdom did not know him" (1 Corinthians 1:21 NIV).
5) They choose pride over humility (James 4:6).

One other reason for their rejection of God has to do with the enemy of their souls. "The god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers" (2 Corinthians 4:4). We must never forget that we are involved in a spiritual battle. The human intellect, no matter how lofty, must be redeemed by Christ.

God gives grace to the humble. "For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards … But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise" (1 Corinthians 1:26-27).

Of course, not all scientists reject God. Dr. Francis S. Collins is the former head of the National Human Genome Research Institute. As a young man, Collins was well on his way to atheism when a woman dying of heart disease confronted him about his beliefs. He realized that none of his scientific work answered the bigger questions in life. Later, a minister gave him C. S. Lewis's Mere Christianity. Something about the irrefutability of natural moral law resonated with him, and he became a Christian.

chinoasa:
are u a writer?
D way u coordinate words is jut epic... U chop book finally! Choi
One chilled shot of vodka for u