jonbellion:
[/quote]



chaiii , which time I talk this one na [quote author=jonbellion post=51453434]

chaiii , which time I talk this one na

I can blaspheme about Eminem but not about slim shady
If I do I will be tormented forever in an abyss of pain and anguish
Because although Eminem is slim shady, slim shady is not Eminem
The Abrahamic God has one kind of serious mental disorder... .....

jonbellion:
I can blaspheme about Eminem but not about slim shady
If I do I will be tormented forever in an abyss of pain and anguish
Because although Eminem is slim shady, slim shady is not Eminem
The Abrahamic God has one kind of serious mental disorder... .....

I swear down , yaba left thinz.

........and if u believe in Eminem but not in slim shady, you would be tormented forever in an abyss of pain and anguish , because slim shady is not Eminem , even though Eminem is slim shady.



....,...........the inanity of Christianity

KingEbukaNaija:


You still have not shown me how that is irrational.

compare with this;

Multiverse theory is clearly fictional , infinite universes ? That's unrealistic and unscientific .

How is your "rational claim" different from this "fiction"?

BTW multiverse theory has not been refuted, even Michio Kaku is a big fan.

4kings:


compare with this;

How is your "rational claim" different from this "fiction"?

BTW multiverse theory has not been refuted, even Michio Kaku is a big fan.

Learn not to take KingEbukasBlog seriously. Only things that agree with his bias as true.

dalaman:


Learn not to take KingEbukasBlog seriously. Only things that agree with his bias as true.

His "portal" story really shocked me.
I expected him to come up with the regular excuse of "metaphor" or maybe an "apocrypha gospel" , but then he says it's based on reason, how is that different most religious sect.

4kings:

His "portal" story really shocked me.
I expected him to come up with the regular excuse of "metaphor" or maybe an "apocrypha gospel" , but then he says it's based on reason, how is that different most religious sect.

Reason? You can't put Ebuka and reason in the same sentence.

4kings:


compare with this;

How is your "rational claim" different from this "fiction"?

BTW multiverse theory has not been refuted, even Michio Kaku is a big fan.

Multi universe does not refute God . God could have created an ensemble of universes each of them governed by unique laws and possibilities .

dalaman:


Reason? You can't put Ebuka and reason in the same sentence.

KingEbukaNaija:


The universe is defined as the whole of matter, energy, planets, galaxies and space. Why would a tiny part of it strongly show a beginning and expansion and the rest would show otherwise ?

You didn't answer this question . Answer it , let's continue our discussion .

dalaman:


Reason? You can't put Ebuka and reason in the same sentence.

Well, he gives good points sometimes.
Open-mindedness is a virtue

KingEbukaNaija:


Multi universe does not refute God . God could have created an ensemble of universes each of them governed by unique laws and possibilities .

Agreed.
Then its not "fiction", but "rational opinions" that can be false like yours, right?

4kings:

Well, he gives good points sometimes.
Open-mindedness is a virtue

Truly he does

4kings:

His "portal" story really shocked me.
I expected him to come up with the regular excuse of "metaphor" or maybe an "apocrypha gospel" , but then he says it's based on reason, how is that different most religious sect.

I explained why I mentioned portals . Its left for you to understand or deny

KingEbukaNaija:

God is not a denizen of this universe , he dwells in an immaterial realm , in a different dimension .

Portals are gateways or doorways to different dimensions , different locations in the universe or outside it . Alien visitation stories or visits from extra-dimensional beings always include the use of portals as means of getting to earth and back to their abode .

So I simply applied the same reasoning here in the cases of the Towel of Babel , the Taking of Enoch and Elijah and the Ascension of Christ .

KingEbukaNaija:


What do you mean by the bible is wrong ?

of course not .how can the bible ever be wrong.its not like talking donkeys and snakes don't exist

4kings:

Agreed.
Then its not "fiction", but "rational opinions" that can be false like yours, right?

I'm not dogmatic about the "portal" explanation . I think a logical explanation .

Another could be abracadabra - Christ disappearing and appearing in Heaven .

KingEbukaNaija:




You didn't answer this question . Answer it , let's continue our discussion .

Its just an assumption on my part. The observable universe does not show that it has a beginning from nothing. It just shows that it started to expand from a source. What that source is, is what we don't know. A singularity is NOT nothing.

4kings:

Agreed.
Then its not "fiction", but "rational opinions" that can be false like yours, right?

Fine tuning needs a creator . Attributing it to chance is illogical since the probability is inconceivable .

KingEbukaNaija:


I explained why I mentioned portals . Its left for you to understand or deny

Every religious sect or weird theories, have explanations, its left for you to understand or deny

4kings:

Every religious sect or weird theories, have explanations, its left for you to understand or deny

I know lots of philosophical/theological doctrines and how many have you seen me rejecting ?

dalaman:


Its just an assumption on my part. The observable universe does not show that it has a beginning from nothing. It just shows that it started to expand from a source. What that source is, is what we don't know. A singularity is NOT nothing.

That means you have faith na . Yes or No ?

KingEbukaNaija:


I'm not dogmatic about the "portal" explanation . I think a logical explanation .

Another could be abracadabra - Christ disappearing and appearing in Heaven .

U just dey make me laff

Baba reexamine your belief, if u agree not to be dogmatic here then do the same to all, why do u refute young earth creationism and accept new age christian revisions.

KingEbukaNaija:


Fine tuning needs a creator . Attributing it to chance is illogical since the probability is inconceivable .

I never brought up chance

KingEbukaNaija:


That means you have faith na . Yes or No ?

I really do not care much about it. Origin sciences is something that I personally do not take seriously because it is riddled with so much conjecture and lack of consensus. It's just like evolution to me. Part of it makes sense and has evidence to support it, other parts are just a gaint leap which I consider ridiculous.

KingEbukaNaija:


I know lots of philosophical/theological doctrines and how many have you seen me rejecting ?

Every one that does not deify Christ, durrhhh

KingEbukaNaija:


You do realise this flagrant show of impiety is against Nairaland's rules . If you won't refrain from disrespecting people's beliefs I'll ignore you . By the way what do you care .

Jesus' resurrection involved a bodily transformation . Christ got into Heaven through a portal . Portals serve as gateways into dimensions .

but it isn't a problem when Christians create threads shattering Islamic beliefs.

double standards


can somebody please give ebuka the e pain am
despicable me meme

EyeHateGod:
Portal well this is new

don't mind him.
his just busy cooking up stuffs from his head

4kings:


U just dey make me laff

Baba reexamine your belief, if u agree not to be dogmatic here then do the same to all, why do u refute young earth creationism and accept new age christian revisions.

Not being dogmatic means that I am not saying that the portal theory is incontrovertibly true .

I never brought up chance

Do you how inconceivable the probability that the universe came by chance is ? To talk of several universes and each being fine tuned to sustain life and be functional .

4kings:

Every one that does not deify Christ, durrhhh

Urahara2:


don't mind him.

his just busy cooking up stuffs from his head

Its called thinking which obviously you are oblivious to . And I am not pontificating because I accepted that the theory could be wrong

KingEbukaNaija:


Not being dogmatic means that I am not saying that the portal theory is incontrovertibly true .

most bible claims are not true

Do you how inconceivable the probability that the universe came by chance is ? To talk of several universes and each being fine tuned to sustain life and be functional .

your point is ...?

KingEbukaNaija:

dogma in action

jonbellion:

Chaiiii!!!!!!!!!
See cognitive dissonance oooooooo
What is this star trek??

coming from the same ebuka that believes that motor park touts are atheists u shouldn't be surprised

KingEbukaNaija:


Its called thinking which obviously you are oblivious to . And I am not pontificating because I accepted that the theory could be wrong

OK , keep on " thinking "