1Sharon:


Why do you think the story is false?

If the man’s twin that was absorbed fathered the child....shouldn’t the scientist see the set of husband’s chromosome in the result.... after all twins will surely share DNA whether they are identical or fraternal.

Why wait for the marriage to scatter before revealing that part of the test.....

Either they just doctored the story a bit to dramatize the chimera phenomenon, or the lab scientist that ran the DNA test is ex of the woman..

They have started again o.
Maybe the story you cited was well before the current improvement in DNA fingerprinting
Your DNA is unique to you

Beautiful94:
Good evening people. I am a female lawyer hoping to go for nysc by the end of this year. I wish to serve in cbn enugu please does anybody have an idea or link on how i can achieve this, Please help me.

what do you need?

1Sharon:


Why do you think the story is false?

No where "twin cells" whether identical or fraternal can have dissimilar DNA. Fraternal twins may differ phenotypically but not genotypically. Similar DNA structures; similar genetic make up for both categories of twins.

Have a nice day.

advanceDNA:


If the man’s twin that was absorbed fathered the child....shouldn’t the scientist see the set of husband’s chromosome in the result.... after all twins will surely share DNA whether they are identical or fraternal.

Why wait for the marriage to scatter before revealing that part of the test.....

Either they just doctored the story a bit to dramatize the chimera phenomenon, or the lab scientist that ran the DNA test is ex of the woman..

No, no no. The story is absolutely true.

The reason why they could only detect his twin's DNA is because of where the sample was taken.

If they swabbed multiple areas of his body, they'd find his DNA aswell.

CaveAdullam:


No where "twin cells" whether identical or fraternal can have dissimilar DNA. Fraternal twins may differ phenotypically but not genotypically. Similar DNA structures; similar genetic make up for both categories of twins.

Have a nice day.

Wrong!

Mariangeles:
There’s one who’s a nairalander.

She absorbed her brother, but not totally.

Yeah I can recall that lady with woman leg and man leg

Don't argue with stupid people, the will drag you to their level and beat you with experience.


Women will always find some un-experimented, complicated and controversial theory to prove and validation their false claims...

1Sharon:


Wrong!

Just use this key: similar vs identical.

Perhaps, you're looking at it from a chromosomal level. All the same, they share similar genetic make up!

Surprisingly, people take time on this forum to disapprove and call something that has been scientific ally proven with all manners of Chromosomes and DNA argument when they can do well to google and research.

Hardworking youths indeed.

CaveAdullam:


Just use this key: similar vs identical.

Perhaps, you're looking at it from a chromosomal level. All the same, they share similar genetic make up!

You said they may differ phenotypically but not genetically. Implying they're the same.

Btw this chimerism thing only works for fraternal twins. If he was an identical twin. His twins DNA will almost be undetactable.

ppogba:
Surprisingly, people take time on this forum to disapprove and call something that has been scientific ally proven with all manners of Chromosomes and DNA argument when they can do well to google and research.

Hardworking youths indeed.

Don't mind them.

A fascinating and enlightening thread has been dismissed and reduced to mockery, all because they don't understand it.

cooltola:
The chance of Chimerism is a very rare thing- Most of the DNA are extremely accurate- A cheater will this an excuse

A cheater can only use that as an excuse, if he was an ACTUAL chimera.

1Sharon:


No, no no. The story is absolutely true.

The reason why they could only detect his twin's DNA is because of where the sample was taken.

If they swabbed multiple areas of his body, they'd find his DNA aswell.

Wait madam...
U know how DNA test works naaa...
Husband’s chromosome and wife’s chromosome is compared with the child’s chromosomes.. if all is well...the child should have 23 pairs since children inherit two copies of each gene, 23 from the father, 23 from the mother)

So let’s look at the scenario..

They checked the husband’s DNA with the child and said he’s not the father.. meaning they took the husband’s DNA from the start...if they had taken the twins DNA there wouldn’t have been a problem...it would shown a perfect match with the kid abi??.
.
Still, the absorbed twins DNA( which is present in the child) should have some identical relation to his brother...

So the DNA comparison shouldn’t have revealed completely zero similarity to the child......that’s why I said the lab scientist must be wicked..


Which is the samenthing caveadullam was saying
twin cells can’t have completely different DNA. Even if they are Fraternal twins with different phenotypic expression they must be similar at molecular or genetic level .

Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news Old news old news

advanceDNA:


Wait madam...
U know how DNA test works naaa...
Husband’s chromosome and wife’s chromosome is compared with the child’s chromosomes.. if all is well...the child should have 23 pairs since children inherit two copies of each gene, 23 from the father, 23 from the mother)

So let’s look at the scenario..

They checked the husband’s DNA with the child and said he’s not the father.. meaning they took the husband’s DNA from the start...if they had taken the twins DNA there wouldn’t have been a problem...it would shown a perfect match with the kid abi??.
.
Still, the absorbed twins DNA( which is present in the child) should have some identical relation to his brother...

So the DNA comparison shouldn’t have revealed completely zero similarity to the child......that’s why I said the lab scientist must be wicked..

They didn't take his DNA from the start. They took his twins.

It does have some relation and similarity to his brother. That's why the DNA test could determine the DNA sample received showed the man was his uncle and not his father.

The DNA showes some relation and similarity, but not enough closeness to be the father.

As I said before the DNA sample was likely swabbed from his semen which contained his own DNA.

A swab from his saliva or skin would reveal his brother's DNA.

Posts like this are funny!

The DNA results that I have seen come in percentages, if my uncle was my real father, our DNA will match to some 50%.

If the man was a chimera, his DNA would match with the kid to atleast 70 percent if the twins were not identical and to about 99% if the twin were identical.

A good doctor or lab scientist might have been fascinated by the result and probably make a research on that if they didn't know yet. So they would not need to go around and around before locating Chidera.

1Sharon:


Don't mind them.

A fascinating and enlightening thread has been dismissed and reduced to mockery, all because they don't understand it.

My comment is enough for you not to respond to any opinion doubting chimerism again. The more you do, the more you are made to prove what has been proven already.

Tell them to google.

Mariangeles:
There’s one who’s a nairalander.

She absorbed her brother, but not totally.

I was so curious about it & finally I have just read her stories honestly she's amazing and also beautiful soul .

ppogba:


My comment is enough for you not to respond to any opinion doubting chimerism again. The more you do, the more you are made to prove what has been proven already.

Tell them to google.

Thanks

They're only doubting because they don't understand it. Classic nairaland, when something is beyond them, they make jokes and mockery to feel they've made a contribution.

Un fūcking believable

1Sharon:


It does have some relation and similarity to his brother. That's why the DNA test could determine the DNA sample received showed the man was his uncle and not his father.

The DNA showes some relation and similarity, but not enough closeness to be the father.

As I said before the DNA sample was likely swabbed from his semen which contained his own DNA.

A swan from his saliva or skin would reveal his brother's DNA.

U ddnt get my point...I wasn’t trying to invalidate the story....

the story up there painted a scenario where the marriage crashed because of this issue ..the similarity was only later revealed when it could have been seen right from the start even without getting the invisible twin’s DNA...

The husband is the child’s uncle right??...during comparison...the lab scientist should have seen a slight similarity between between uncle and child....and raise question, instead of crashing someone’s marriage...

Which is why I joked that the lab scientist must be the woman’s ex

ednut1:
Lies. How did the brother semen enter his own

He has no semen; his brother is living through him. His utmost revenge... .

advanceDNA:


U ddnt get my point...I wasn’t trying to invalidate the story....

the story up there painted a scenario where the marriage crashed because of this issue ..the similarity was only later revealed when it could have been seen right from the start even without getting the invisible twin’s DNA...

The husband is the child’s uncle right??...during comparison...the lab scientist should have seen a slight similarity between between uncle and child....and raise question, instead of crashing someone’s marriage...

Which is why I joked that the lab scientist must be the woman’s ex

It was likely revealed after further testing. That's the way science works. They research all the way to the end.

He's the biological father but the initial DNA sample was likely taken from his hair or saliva and DNA from that area contained his twin's DNA.

If the DNA sample had been taken from his semen. They wouldn't have gotten into that mess.

IamAsiri:


He has no semen; his brother is living through him. His utmost revenge... .

Lol. He didn't kill his twin now

1Sharon:




It was likely revealed after further testing. That's the way science works. They research all the way to the end.

He's the biological father but the initial DNA sample was likely taken from his hair or saliva and DNA from that area contained his twin's DNA.

If the DNA sample had been taken from his semen. They wouldn't have gotten into that mess.

Lol...

ImoleNaija:
Well, here in Naija, the excuse wouldn't pass.

I wonder how this epistle would sit well with me.

I don't want to laugh, please leave me alone. The last line got me.

advanceDNA:


Lol...

Maybe they didn't do further DNA analysis from the beginning.. the sample just showed he wasn't the child's dad, but the test didn't reveal how closely related they were...

The site is a good alternative to Nairaland

iamoyindamola83: Anything Nairaland becomes boring, I will enter Ghana Up. Ghana. com

Kobojunkiee:
One of her legs is masculine?

Yes. She has a masculine and a feminine leg. Such a unique human

1Sharon:


@cindy222

Where is she

She's been on the quiet side lately. One of nature's rarest crafts

Remains me of this movie.