₦airaland Forum

Theflint1:
Freecoecamp is quite solid, although I think you might need some little experience with programming and web development to catch their curriculum quickly since it's more project-focused. You can also check out TheOdinProject, recently started on it, and it's mad exhaustive and from reviews on Reddit; if you're able to go through the program from beginning to end, you should be ready for entry-level developer roles.

Nostradamus1:
I seriously doubt.

I have not used any of the above before but to learn programing, you need a laptop with "preferably"8gb ram ( at least 4gb) . Then having VM with Ubuntu or Xubuntu is very important because terminal provides access easily to Git and rest. I seriously "doubt" any android app will scratch the surface.

liveLongNprospa:
You actually should read what you typed again

DissTroy:
Yes, but what does arguing here do for that broke person in the grand scheme of things? "Likes"? Can you monetise " likes"? That broke person is wasting valuable time arguing here.
The broke person can afford data, right? And watch comedy skits of Sabinus and Broda Shaggi?
HTML and CSS overview on Freecodecamp YouTube channel is 8 hours. That's about 2.5GB or less at 720p resolution.

Or that broke person should download Sololearn App, Mimo App and Code Editor app then start learning and practicing coding on his phone until he can afford a good laptop. He shouldn't be arguing here.

liveLongNprospa:
Bruh what?

Donjazet2:
Disstroy made sense but it had nothing to do with what livenprospar was saying.

Prosper is asking, should poor people not have opinions here or online?

Disstroy is now going about how poor people should spend better use of their time. While that is a good argument, it is mired in classism.

Who told him that poor people here are not making good use of their time? How is that good point of his linked with prospers position and question?

liveLongNprospa:
This is about to go sideways.

The tribalist thinks you have to be rich or comfortable to point out the flaw in him.

The other individual thinks you need to have your life put together before you can have an opinion.

I personally believe that evil must be called out upon by anyone .

raumdeuter:
A wise man once said

You are dragging raum while poverty is dragging you

At the end of the night you console your hunger with the knowledge that you dragged Otedola on Twitter

Theflint1:
Not really, it's just the data used the train it that was likely the issue.

Ellexy:
They don quickly delete the guy...

https://twitter.com/DavidHundeyin/status/1593503083027472385?t=IEZsugaOBmfcc6JLOwmZIw&s=19[/quote]Na wa o. I fear Naija under Tinubu. Lagos really needs deliverance from this desperate man.

GloriousGbola:
Google black people Id software.

GloriousGbola:
Will be interesting, as the guy could not even take the time to use black people for his images and there are often complaints that alot of software for ids does not take negroid features into consideration.

Ebukacute:
That was an ARMless comment nah

Android17:
The irony.

Android17:
As you rich ni, pay the money for me.

"The definition of being rich is giving someone money after they have insulted you"

- Broke intelleshual with H-factor.

Android17:
Better a rich debtor than a pseudo-intelleshual living la vi da broka

Christistruth00:
You don’t know the History


The Emir Of Zaria actually begged Missionaries to Stay and later when Opposition arose gave them Wusasa

Android17:
You are a failed agnostic. Should I treat all agnostics as failures just because you are one? How can you expect a reasonable answer from me when you are beneath my level of reasoning?

Android17:
Should the British government not have super-imposed Anglicanism on Catholicism since it was a tool of control?

Or maybe. . . Just maybe they realized religion was counter productive to their control agenda which is why they restricted missionaries from crusading in the north like someone else posited to you.

It is possible that intelligent people (even if they may be colonialists) can realize that the tenets of Christianity (which teaches that everyone is equal in God's eyes) will work against a subjugator's world view on such and therefore not be a tool of control?

How I wish this post was responding to an intelligent person.

nihilistjnr:
But you LITERALLY started this conversation by saying Africa was backwards because we did not participate in the European Age of Enlightenment.

Your positions lack intellectual merit, which is why you've ended up arguing against yourself in less than 10 posts

nihilistjnr:
No further comment. Good evening.

Android17:
The religion that spread to the Igbos during the colonialist rule of GB was Roman Catholicism. If your argument is that governments usher in religion as a subjugatory tool, does it not follow that GB ushered in Roman Catholicism to control the igbos?

Of course, to make your vacuous argument even slightly tenable you have to throw a blanket over Anglicanism and Catholicism. The only major issue that pokes out is that pesky word called British which no sensible person will ever relate with Catholicism. But you are not a sensible person so. . .

Android17:
You are arguing that governments institutionalize religion to control the denizens. Someone challenged you by demonstrating how within Nigeria, Roman Catholicism pervaded the Igbo nation and even made them more insubordinate to the British colonialists. You disagreed by using the blanket term "Christianity" to cover for the gap in your logic whilst forgetting that British missionaries who were almost entirely Anglican, could not have been responsible for spreading Roman Catholicism or any religion especially when it was counter productive to what the colonialists would have needed to subjugate their colonies.

So if the Igbos became predominantly catholic under British imperialists, it is nonsensical to blame the imperialists for their catholicism.

nihilistjnr:
I can only shake my head.

There is a Redeemed church in almost every country in the world. Is it the Nigerian Government that is opening Redeem parishes everywhere?

Mr man, apply some logic na?

If your position is that there were British Missionaries in Nigeria, I have never disputed that, and in fact I was the one that first discussed missionary spread in Nigeria.

If your position is that because the Missionaries were British, then they were sent by the same Government that was heavily restricting them in Nigeria, then bruv...

The British Government in Nigeria under the man who literally created the country and whose girlfriend gave us the name, was actively focused on preventing Missionaries from penetrating too deeply into Nigeria.

Lord Lugard even said with his own mouth that he believed Islam was better suited to Nigerians than Christianity because it allowed for polygamy and felt more like an indigenous religion for us.

So the logic of Christianity setting us back makes no sense at all. If anything, the colonial rulers clearly felt that Christianity was enlightening us too much

Android17:
Mr. Intelleshual.

British government in connivance with Anglican church used Roman Catholicism to control the Igbo tribe.

Once I read it in a book I am biased to believe (regardless of facts) it must be true.

nihilistjnr:
At no point did I ever say there were no missionaries in Nigeria.

You said:


There are 3 main tribes in Nigeria. I then pointed out that

1. The British actively vetoed missionary outreach to Hausa/Fulani
2. It was Catholic missionaries that penetrated Igboland. Great Britain is literally the inventor of the Anglican Church, and their Head of State is also the Global Head of Anglican Church. It stands to reason that Anglican church will send Anglican missionaries out, no?
3. Ajayi Crowther was the main Anglican missionary in Yoruba Land. He was a returned slave funded by CMS, yet Yoruba indigenous religion was and remained strong in his time.

So if in colonial times, we had an Anglican presence in only 1 of the 3 major tribes, then how were the Colonials using religion to control us?

Instead i will point you to accounts that showed the colonial government was actively restricting missionary activities. One colonial administrator sacked a traditional leader that converted to Christianity. Another one complained that Christian converts were becoming too difficult to govern because they now think they are equal to the white man. Lugard himself felt that the missionary schools were 'FRAUDS', his words not mine, and that Christianity was causing his populace to get too uppity

You can see that far from trying to introduce Christianity to us, the colonial administrators were ACTIVELY fighting it and trying to surpress the religion, which is why Lugard rushed to prevent Christianity from reaching the North.

If you the quotes of the actual colonial masters are not enough for you, but some random nobody in ohio is the evidence you're banking on, then bruv, I have nothing else to say.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]You are definitely the most intelligent African alive.

They have shown you indigenous religions that are in abject poverty, you have shifted the bar to "Chance".

You really have a skill of repeating a thing until it begins to sound true. I commend you for that[/color]

raumdeuter:
Chance will mean a few exceptions not almost an entire continent of Asia which has almost half of the entire world population

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Agree ke? Don't agree with me oh. Because currently, everyone is getting confused with your takes