₦airaland Forum

xristos:
I recently came across a funny facts about the
number 9. There's something like a bad omen that is unfounded about the number.
So if you have 9 in your phone number or birthday you need to take this seriously.

We have 9 in the 419
We have 9 in the pandemic Covid 19
We have the 9-11 US disaster
We have 9 in F9 for failure
iPhone moved from 8 to X...skipped 9!
Windows moved from 8 to 8.1 to 10...skipped 9!

So what's it about it...feel free to add yours.

And if u're born n brought up in 9-ja

The last two call for serious investigation.

A pansexual's been digging Neymar's ma?

And dem dey curse the lebanese guy for putting his Nigerian maid for sale online. SMH for we people

Is it permitted for one to pray to die a mabtoon? Lukgaf

Corona virus don sharperly evolve.

shadeyinka:
Hi Buda,
Long time


Oh sorry for the use of the phrase "rodent family": I should have looked for a better name but I am no biologist. You know this occured almost 600million years ago and the parent rodents we had then are very different from the modern rodent such as rats.

Both the order Chiroptera and the order Rodentia are very modern and they evolved from the parent rodent stock.

LoL!

So many things can be hidden under this theory. It's the equivalent of the "God of the gaps"!
Hope you are clear now.

If you know the proper biological name, state it and I'll make the corrections. Thanks

C'mon...

Tamaratonye1:
If life on the planet did not occur naturally, then where did it come from?

What evidence do you have that magical flying sky beings are real and then capable of creating a universe?

Things don't just spring into existence from nowhere. But if you believe otherwise, you could show me what you have witnessed magically come into existence on earth.

I don't know of the 'magical flying beings' you speak of, but do believe the One that created our world is Lord over all 'magical flying beings' and us. And as for the evidence, the best we've hot is the scriptures, which I presume will not be enough for a sceptical materialist.

Suppose I were, I definitely won't, to take the trouble to lead to people who would open your eyes to realities beyond your wildest dreams, they still could not show you, if you retained your sanity, the Creator. No matter your efforts you will never see the Creator in this world.

TheMan3:
so what do we call yours, conformist theory?

This is brilliant. I'm gonna start using it.

otipoju:
Some of the legends we idolised actually have horrible characters.

Anyone who looks up to sport players, artistes, or other yeyebrities must lack wonderful real people in their lives.

Residents troop out en mass

Whether this is fake news or not, he deserves it.

Dani Alves is far better than Ronaldo simply because he has won Copa America and Europe League, and more trophies.

Are you happy now?

Original over fake anytime, any day

I hope it's true.

Off and on player. Mtcheew

Make dem leave this guy alone na. Do whatever you want with money hate.

This is common sense. De bruyne is a fine assist maker, CR7 is a fine scorer. By putting 1+1 together you get 2, which means more assists for De bruyne and more goals for CR7. But with Messi, that would be a different proposition entirely as Messi would outshine De bryune in both goal-scoring, and assist-making. Therefore, you have made an expected choice.

tintingz:
That's not my point, why will a designer design animals that will mate and die?

Imagine yourself as a designer, will you create a thing that when they have sex they die or give birth they die?

Shey you never hear say variety is the spice of life ni? If the designer make all of us the same, people like go say he's uncreative.

LordReed:
Did you read this:

Both Ronald Fisher (1890–1962) and Theodosius Dobzhansky (1900–1975), were Christians and architects of the modern evolutionary synthesis. Dobzhansky, a Russian Orthodox, wrote a famous 1973 essay entitled Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution espousing evolutionary creationism:

Are these not "peddlers"?

I must have missed it while rushing through the article. I'm sure there are more atheists doing it than Christians, as there are more Christians preaching spiritualism than spiritual atheists. And that is coming from my interactions with many people on different platforms.

Tamaratonye1:
I hope you are aware that even if you manage to disprove evolution today, it does not in anyway demonstrate that atheism is faulty?

Of course it doesn't. I just don't get why atheists are so hellbent on supplanting creation with a silly theory. Even if they're gonna kill creation they, at least, should demonstrate a considerable level of ingeniosusness doing so and come up with a more credible and laudable theory, not this cringeworthy guff.

EPL must finish this season. They should have pity on Liverpool

LordReed:
Wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by_religious_groups

As long as it cannot be found in their respective scrpitures, the positions of certain members on this are insignificant.

Besides, the article only talks about its acceptance by different religious bodies not peddlers of it

MrBrownJay1:
true...but Man City in 2018 got beaten twice, so regardless of how many points they had, they didnt dominate the game... IMHO, to DOMINATE any sport, you have to be unbeaten.

Different strokes for different folks, I guess..

Tamaratonye1:
Wetin concern atheism with evolution now?

Atheists seem to be the No 1 peddlers of the evolution nonsense, and they never present any concrete proofs for it.

Nickshrapnel:
The realization of all what his mother did/stood by to let happen to him sends him completely over the edge of sanity. You’d recall that the abused that was melted out on him was what caused his troubled mental state and disturbing laughs, so knowing that is mother had a hand in it was something he could never forgive

Yes, he was abused so was his mother. His mother probably feared the man abusing them more than anything else, which happened to most abused women of the time.
The killing of that sick old lady almost ruined the movie completely for me, for I was under the impression that he loved his mother very much.

Ohraykon:
it belongs to the extra terrestrial.

How? Can you recommend a book on this?

MrBrownJay1:
i think you are mistaking the word SUCCESSFUL with DOMINANT....you certainly cant be "dominant" if you lose 3 games, especially one 5-0



thats league success IMHO... to dominate the league is completely different, as you have to go unbeaten the whole season.



we are solely talking about the EPL here, dont mix apple with oranges...



name one team (apart from arsenal) who has NEVER lost a game during a season in the EPL.... just ONE.

Okay, league-only performances. To me I don't see the invincibles as more dominant than Man City of 2018 that finished the with unprecedented 100 points, and probably with even more goals than the invincibles.

Perocom:
They don't circumcise their girls, so they go about with elongated clits. ���

Woah! This is new to me

[quote author=Nickshrapnel post=88752978][/quote]I knew this, but it just didn't make sense. His mother was also mentally disturbed and he loved anyway. Why'd he then kill her 'cos of some misrepresentation of truth, which had more to do with her mental imbalance than anything else?

Of all the killings he did, this one seemed totally meaningless.

MrBrownJay1:
Arsenal was Dominant that year in achieving something that no other team in EPL history has ever done... not even Man utd at their best could come close! thats what a DOMINANT team is, they conquer over all.... a team that has been beaten by NOBODY! you certainly cant call Man Utd a dominant team while Chelsea trash them 5-0.... come on na!

A few losses don't make a dominant team less dominant.

When we're talking about league dominance, we're actually talking about a team that wins the league 3 times or more in succession. Man Utd were dominant in the league from '99 - 01, and '07-09. That is what you call dominance.

However, if we're to limit dominance to a season, Man Utd of '99 won the treble, and the invisibles did not.

If we limit it to just the league, there have been few more dominant teams than the invisibles, both in terms of points haul and point margins between league winners and second-placed team.

MrBrownJay1:
so you mean to say that a team who was unbeaten in the EPL in 04 was less dominant than one who was beaten THREE TIMES in 00 (and/or trashed by Chelsea that year 5-0)?! how exactly?!?!?!?!?!?

[img]https://media./images/7a059e812ebbac916587a247f96bda1a/tenor.gif[/img]

If you win the league for just a season, that does not make you dominant in the land. You're only dominant when you win the league for a stretch of seasons, which the invisibles never did.

If I hear say I no evolve into Superman, make evolution do lineal atavism for atheists