TayserMahri: UG doesnt have any influence on/over Kenya or Ethiopia with their Su-30s. Dont get ahead of yourself. USA needs lots of arms because they are in an arms race with global powers and sworn enemies like Iran, N.Korea. Same goes to Russia, China, India etc. But not you and our neighbors Uganda. You have no foreign threats (actually UG has a more realistic foreign threat from DRC, Sudan and Rwanda). Your respective govts have a terrible sense of proprioception.
Classic chicken vs egg rat race/vicious cycle. Bh gets its tanks from Nigeria army bases after overruning them, then the army purchases Mi-35s to shoot the tanks
Yes, Little Birds are/can be armed with anti-tank missiles including the famous Hellfire missile as well as stingers and any other weapon you need to fight marauding terrorists, all of them laser guided, so you hardly miss. Your alphas could also do the job quite effectively with minimal risk but ofcourse being jets they cant engage for extensive periods like the Ah-6. Little birds are excellent due to their high maneuverability, flexibility and versatility. Just one them can engage a bunch of separate targets running helter skelter below, swiftly switching between targets. Thats why American Special Ops use them. They were used by the USAF to rescue injured American soldiers during black hawk dawn. You can check the vid below.
Kenya also employs the Russian doctrine in Somalia. Attack choppers are always lurking to provide air cover in case of an ambush. The issue here is at what cost are you providing aerial support against mere terrorists? In Nigeria you go for expensive, unsuitable, unsustainable, and evidently ineffective heavy duty arsenal to deal with ants, and neglect the boots on the ground who lack even basic military fatigues. In Kenya its the opposite. Our infantry are well equipped and well fatigued, you'll never encounter a complaint about neglect from them, and then we go for the least expensive, most effective proven hardware. Consequently, our soldiers are always in high morale. The other day a wounded Kenyan soldier recovering at a hospital pleaded with the president to redeploy him to Somalia immediately he recovers. That sort of morale! Your top army general complained how you've spent as much as $ 9 billion to fight BH with very little to show. Obviously your military top brass led by none other than his highness General Bubu are a bunch of clueless senile mofos. With that kind of money and proper strategy you should have eliminated BH, ISWAP, Delta avengers and any other terror group by now. Kenya has spent a mere $ 900m in Somalia since 2011, tentatively. Take note we get FULLY reimbursed all the costs by the AU, UN and EU so its basically a free training course for our soldiers, albeit very practical and the threat very real. Even if we decided to spend extravagantly we would still be reimbursed FULL AMOUNT but we choose not to with the aforementioned understanding in mind. Dont waste precious resources fighting jellyfish-brained terrorists. The best thing is to invest in well-trained, well-equipped, motivated boots on the ground to deny them territory.
Nope! Kdf has them but they dont perform the role of transporting troops. Besides attack, the only thing they do is evacuation. And we are yet to use them against terrorists because its a waste of resources. We use light attack choppers ; MD-500, MD-530F; AH-6, Harbin Z-9 and more rarely the Fennec AS350 B3.
This is sth our F-5 lumberjacks do on a regular basis. Hard to recount the number of times Kenyan Tigers have razed mujaheddin graduation ceremonies and terrorist camps to the ground, with casualties often approaching and even exceeding 100 at once. Nonetheless, you do it cheaper than us on that specific front with your equally outdated easy-to-handle trainer Alpha jets. I dont think Kenya ever purchased alpha trainers. Clearly you got them when you were a bit wiser. You should now arm them with Maverick anti-tank missiles and forget the expensive, crash-prone & slow attack Mi-35 helis. Ideally you'd only need half a dozen of the alphas to finish all the bh tanks but apparently you have about 2 dozen, some of which you acquired in a mysterious armsgate scandal whereby a dude named Dasuki pocketed a cool $1.7 B, and you're still acquiring more!! What for? Training?? At least we are not purchasing any more F-5s! And you mocked our crop dusters, which actually fit very well into our doctrine of not wasting resources in fighting technically inexhaustible enemies.
No I never said uganda leaves planes to rot. They are actually quite war-conscious and never let their arms rot. They'd rather have Air Uganda collapse and rot but not their prized UPDF. All I was saying is Naija is known for poor maintenance culture judging by the rusted remains of okada airways, and your ill-equipped, ill-motivated soldiers. Saw a thread of your soldiers gearing up to fight bh and felt disheartened. They were to be transported in white minivans I think. Boss! They looked like walking corpses taking selfies. If indeed its not the case and you guys actually give your titanium-coated warplanes better care than the keratin skinned soldiers then you are of the alien kind.
Actually Kenya recently ordered 25 used f5s from Jordan.Again.It's like Kenya is their dustbin for used aircraft! Using hinds against bh isn't stupid.You keep comparing bh with alshaabab.Bh is powerful!! at least for a terrorist group.Not all those tanks were seized.Some were bought.Just say Kenya doesn't have money for aircraft.You kept shouting little bird,what will happen to them after bh? What will we use them for? And by the way USA uses a10 thunderbolt against terrorists.Now that's overkill.Not hinds.And from what you wrote Kenya uses USA not Russian doctrine(helicopter for each role) Our hinds first drop our troops in combat,then join the fight.Not just hover around in case they are needed.If the time comes they can head back and bring more troops and ammo.Thus solving the need for transport helicopters like Chinook. P.s. we're getting more hinds for our arsenal.
agboedeh: U are very right.They are mutts. I originally bot jack just for d love I had for dogs,but this dog kept amazing me more and more.His temperament was unique.I wanted to get another gsd after d death of the last one but decided to hold back and focus on my jack.Now I am looking for another local dog DAT has d same temperament with jack and exactly d same structure and fur colour(I have to keep on buying and studying each and every dog until I find wat I am looking for).By Gods grace I find another I'll continue from there. I want to create a specific type of hunting dog that can also be used as a family dog and guard dog.They might not be as big as our beloved exotic breeds but they will be special and more respected. I know it might take more than 15years but I am capable and ready.I av always loved dogs since I could remember and I think DAT alone will keep me going.
I hope you succeed.That your thread made me realise that local breeds could be used as guard dogs.As for welzyj2 comparing Pitt to kangal let me remind you that the Americans hyping Pitts don't know about dogs like kangal and co.So to them Pitt is like a god.When they came to Europe and basically fed their Pitts to kangals and co(the big dogs literally tore them limb from limb,a particular cauc ripped the Pitts jaw off its skull) they refused to accept and started glorifying the Pitts few victories( most times the big dogs got tired and ran away or just lay down after decimating the pitts) Later they started bringing modified 'pittbulls' some as heavy as 100lbs and still they still lost some fights.So you that has seen the big dogs and yet still hyping Pitts is just wrong.
Aren't you posting your malinois stuff again? Almost a week now.It's this mindless (but interesting I have to admit I've learnt a lot)argument that's keeping traffic.Or is that what you want to keep going on here? Just one pic and this thread is back on track.
space9880: let's leave sentiment and be realistic in this part of the world how many times have you heard of wolves attacking livestock? but robbers and burglers are rampant people get dog as personal security these days not to guide livestocks from wolves or wild beasts and as far as it is for personal protection malinois stands out truth is I rather get chased by a Caucasian than get chased by a malinois. do you think you can outrun a malinois or maybe climb on car to escape? Nah a malinois will follow you to any length even if you like jump enter lagoon. malinois is not a good guard dog but a good working dog so what is guarding or is guarding not work? malinois are very versatile and can fit almost any profile forget about all these strength or whatever If I have a gun I will take Anthony Joshua down in 2 seconds gra gra no dey win race
Yes,we all agree on this.Thank God you admitted big dogs were better guard dogs.Atleast you didnt dismiss that.Big dogs are better.But mostly in the fighting part.But if its to chase... I'd rather go for a gsd or malinois. I just wanted to add that one bullet can't kill a kangal or Caucasian.....unless it's to the head.
Just30: we all know Nigeria is just our little sister who got some small money early and decided not to respect the elder sis (Ghana) who has guided her since independence.
Again with the little sister!! Stop denying the truth just30!! Nigeria>Ghana (at least in influence)
oluomoadebayo: No one is asking you not to hate them because you add no value to the breed even though you like them. Multiple agencies in the world cannot be wrong. The most guarded house in the world is US White House and they are using malinois to guide it. Bloodhound and the Retrievers are equally good trackers, yet, malinois are preferred. CO is a guard dogs like you claim but people are entrusting their lives with a Malinois. There is a saying that says “It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”
We have admitted over and over that malinois are better working dogs due to their intelligence,desire to please and stuff like that but bigger dogs like mastiffs are better guard dogs.Afterall that's what they were created for.Who would want a slow stubborn Caucasian as an attack dog?It can't even fit in a helicopter when going on missions! But it excels on defending livestock and property.Why would I want a malinois to defend my flock against wolves and bears?They'll rip it apart! But it's one of the best working dogs out there.This argument started with someone crossing malinois over to the guard dog role.And claiming they outclassed Rottweilers and mastiffs at it.No one said Caucasians and their kind were necessarily better than malinois.But they are better guard dogs.That's for sure.You also need to be able to largely subdue the target.Malinois seem to lack the size and strength to fully accomplish this task. Another thing is the overhyping.Malinois aren't the strongest or smartest dogs out there.You don't need to be an expert to know that.Yet some people were acting like they were extremely strong and powerful dogs that can take down anything that moves.We both know this isn't true.They are determined yes but im not sure they pack the punch to do such.Even gsd are stronger. That's what stretched this argument this far. I'll delete this comment soon to make space for relevant posts.
BlcoChina2018: Ghana is nobody’s little sister, ediot! How dare you! You sound like a fuelish magg0t! Nigeria is a certified shIthole! Nothing more, nothing less
Hey I didn't insult anyone I've been exchanging words with just30,your ambassador here for some time but he never insulted me.Atleast he gets that this whole argument is nothing serious. But deep down in your heart you know it's the truth.Stop deceiving yourself.Or is Nigeria Ghanas little sister then Those wings....
Eveezy: What makes a dog a good guard dog? Yall ve brought out fact about bite force, but are bites all what it takes to be a good guard dog? Caucasians and the rest are strong no doubt, but does it make it a good guard dog? Not every shreded guy can fight, If u are into fighting sports, u would know there are smaller guys who beat up giants due to thier skills. Malinois may not be as strong as a caucasian, but they are smart enuf to defeat a caucasian. I do not have an actual real life scenario to explain dis to u, but I will make reference to a movie, d movie showed wat will happen in a real life scenario, watch the movie "Max" two rottweillers were sent to take down a malinois, ofcourse in a show of strength dey will devour d malinois, but a malinois knows dis, it outsmarted dem by running them tired until he took his strike, nd it was severe.
Effectiveness is better dan muscles. Shreded men are used as bouncers to scare people away, but to take down a bad guy, espicially if its a chase, the smaller the better. And security agencies know dis. Work smart nd nt with power.
Gra gra no dey ever win race!
First of all max is a movie.Second it's a children's movie.Third it has a written and predetermined script.Fourth all the dogs were told what to do beforehand so it's not a good example.Fifth max was the hero of the movie so of course he was going to win.In real life that fight would have been ended very badly for max.And since it's a kid's film footage of a malinois strewn all over a place would have been disallowed.After all we have seen more unrealistic things happen in movies (small skinny girl beats up big burly man in so many films).A Rottweiler can stand its ground against 2 pittbulls or german shepherds(unless you're saying a malinois which is basically a smaller skinnier gsd can take out two pitts)Can a Doberman win an English mastiff?(Dobermans are kind of similar to malinois except they are more vicious,smarter,bigger and stronger and English mastiff likewise to rott) If the English mastiff wins then why can't two rotts decimate a single malinois?Yes malinois are good working dogs but let it stay there.Saying they are better guard dogs than dogs bred for that purpose is just silly.Basically every mastiff and lgd can win a malinois in a fight (They do it with wolves which are faster stronger and smarter than malinois) so i dont get the hype on this thread.Id sooner get a Pitt as a guard dog than a malinois.Stop hyping them.The hype is so much it's making me hate them.Comparing 30kg+ malinois to 200kg+ Caucasian Be honest,which would you pick to attack you? I tried resisting the temptation to derail this thread further but the hype was just getting out of hand.I'll delete this comment soon.
Leroy19: Nigerians have been known for mistreating foreign teams who visit them, the same happened to Gor Mahia and our national football team!
Whats your point? it's just friendly rivalry.You think we aren't mistreated abroad? No one cares.Except maybe Kenyans since they are still rookies in football and all.
Danielnino00: Dear Ghanaian, your companies can't do Jacksh*t here... WtF is diamond cement? And Dunlop Ghana seriously? ..Do they make Dunlop slippers?
You are just making allegations without proof...
I wonder why your government aren't banning Nigerian products in their markets too? Dangote group is in Ghana... GT bank,zenith bank and others are in Ghana... Glo is in Ghana...Conoil is in Ghana... Silver bird group is in Ghana... Our entertainment industry dominate your airwaves.
Go ahead and show us power in West Africa by banning them
Oloshi
But seriously these Ghanaians are funny! the one that made be explode with laughter was when just30 claimed Ghana could snap a finger and Nigeria would cease to exist! Ghana! our internationally acknowledged little sister!! It's like our little sister is growing wings! they need to be plucked! Ghana snap finger!
edon21: is there any country that haven't experienced it? even United States. how many has alshabab killed. and alshabab is not as fortified as Boko Haram or, ISWA
He is here talking for getting how Kenya has lost up to 800 troops to a weaker alshaabab.Alshaabab that doesn't even own tanks.Every single country has casualties in battle no matter how powerful.
UyiIredia: I know of cars, APC's, infantry vehivles, unguided rockets, hangars and toothbrushes. From where do you have helicopters, drones and tractors?
Below are some locally made Nigerian choppers.Two were made by individual civilians while the last two are for our army with the prototype and design shown. We also make patrol boats now. (nns andoni)
kikuyu1: I've been ignoring childish ululating but its too much! Nigga,do you know how much a fvkcing Flanker costs!? A Su 30 mk 3 costs 75 mn$ with a yearly flight cost of 8 mn$. http://nationsdawnofanera.weebly.com/-fighter-aircraft.html A squadron of 12 would cost a billion dollars,mofo! Yes,you could buy a few and park them like the UPDF who bought 7 in 2012-guess how many are still flying??
Those flankers are mostly for influence.Probably to make a statement to our west African and African neighbors.When the time comes for combat we will reinstate them if they are bad.And don't you think the Nigerian govt thought about it before buying them? You think they just sat up one day and brought out 1.2bn $ to buy planes? We aren't as poor as Kenya or Uganda.We have the money to buy,fly and maintain them.It's embarrassing for an African power like Nigeria to still dwell on third gen fighters like our f7s(which are still flying) so we are upgrading to fourth gen (flanker,jf17 later frogfoot).After all S.A. bought 3 next to useless gripen jets.So why don't you attack them?It's all about the influence. I want to admire our future one more time
TayserMahri: Just like UG and their chest-thumping airforce. Uganda actually has six Su-30s but still ranks lower than Kenya both militarily and in development. Whats up with the chest thumping and misplaced priorities? The only thing you do with the Su-30s is costly servicing and most of them will rot due to disservice. Unless you use them to attack Ghana or bomb your civilians flying them on a regular basis to keep them in shape is actually too expensive.
Its understandable for countries like India and Pakistan and China et al to have them but for you its completely unnecessary. Even SA doesnt operate Sukhois, tho admittedly they have AS-39C Gripens to match (most of which btw they have had to ground due to high maintenance costs arising from regular flights to keep them in shape). A Su-30 is a total overkill in any part of Africa and a waste of resources. Typical African wastefulness! Just look at the African countries using them, they are either in PTSD + recovering from conflict or are borderline dictatorships. They use them to strike fear among their own citizens. Your Su-30s will never see action. Purchase relevant hardware. The biggest threat for Nigeria right now and in the very long foreseeable future is internal NOT external. Your entire airforce is irrelevant
No doubt Su-30 is superior, big fan too but this is unnecessary for Nigeria with your poor maintenance culture. That one is destined to rot in Nigerian army bases.
One of these crashed in Nigeria just a few weeks ago in pursuit of bh. As I told you, Mi-35 is not meant for terrorists. Its niche is similar to Apache, i.e regional/geopolitical & conventional warfare. Ugandans also purchased Mi-24s (Mi-35 variants) ostensibly to make a geopolitical point (to us especially), then ironically 3 of them embarrassingly crashed in Kenya (all of them into Mt Kenya!!) killing scores of their soldiers. They accused us of using electromagnetic weapons
You need extensive experience to safely operate them even in peacetime. Expect regular embarrassments in future for employing wrong hardware on the right targets. Instead of a Mi-35 that costs upwards of $36 million (plus high maintenance and training of crew) and is not ideal for your most pressing needs (BH) just purchase 18 AH-6 Little Birds for $2 million each and you have the entire north BH territory adequately covered. A single Mi-35 crash like the one you had this year amounts to a loss of over $36M!! and its more likely than little bird due to its filling the wrong niche. Mi-variants are actually very vulnerable to crashes, we also had a Mi-171 crash in 2011. None of our little birds have crashed in Somalia or even in Kenya despite operating continuously in the theatre since 2011, and its very effective for special operations, attack, reconnaissance missions conducted at night, high speeds, low altitudes, and on short notice.
Influence is one of the reasons for owning lots of jets.Take USA for example.Do they need all those planes?But yet they make new ones each year.And bh has a lot of armoured vehicles which I'm not sure a little bird or gazelle can destroy.Hence the mi35.They even own tanks. Nigeria uses Russian doctrine which requires a chopper to actively support troops during combat.They also need to be able to transport troops.That's why Russian choppers always have extra capacity for troops and/or ammo and fuel.They can even reload during missions! Even their mi28 which is basically a Russian apache has this capability. Americans on the other hand prefer having a chopper for every role i.e. apache combat,Chinook transport etc.That's not Nigeria's style. And Americans used apache and even a10 thunderbolts against terrorists for their reasons.That's the same with Nigeria. Even the cobras you want to buy were used in the jungles of Vietnam.So nothing's wrong with using hinds against bh.They are mostly for armoured columns.For foot soldiers we have our alpha jets.These planes are fond of decimating bh terrorists.Sometimes up to fifty to a single plane at one go.And Nigeria isn't Uganda that leaves planes to rot.That's one of our strengths.Take our f7s.They have probably never seen combat all their lives yet they are still functional or at least almost fly able.I doubt our Flankers will be any different.
TayserMahri: Any images of your chopper-in-making? good news but I have a feeling you guys have very lopsided priorities.
Which is your most advanced fighter jet?
Design of our locally made chopper. It's multi role so not as badass looking as apache or mi35 For reconnaissance and can be used in combat too. It can also carry troops. Still think our air force is worse?
TayserMahri: LIke which one? I dont see anything advanced in your airforce.
Nigerian su30 flanker (yet to be painted in our colours) This plane can go up against American planes of its class(f15,f18,f16) our painted jf17 mi35 (seeing action against bh) alpha jet (fourth best attacker on earth,also seeing action regularly)
TayserMahri: Any images of your chopper-in-making? good news but I have a feeling you guys have very lopsided priorities.
Which is your most advanced fighter jet?
I'll upload images soon. Our most advanced fighter is the su30. Next would be the Chinese jf17.like a Chinese f16. We don't deal on 'lumberjacks' no more!