₦airaland Forum

PaulOtl:
Ah... let's see...I'm here for it! *Smiles *

First off, nah...dense is a word that has been in my " vocab " for the longest time... Anyways, I know you're just throwing jabs...so, I'll not give it much of a thought.

Next...,
Hello..Aunty, they are having sex with men. Yes, men. Before you go all gender-battling on me, pause to think for an itsy bitsy moment who bears the brunt of the consequences ( since we're talking about pregnancies and abortions on this thread...duhh)
That's right...women. So, she should know she has more to risk than him - a miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, death (if it comes to that) and public ridicule (let's not deny the obvious)
Oh..hollup..how did I forget, pregnancy cramps and labour pains!! Ahh...Paul, stop playing!
To your next question.
I will totally date and bang and marry a single mother, so long she meets my taste. Why not? Ain't she a living person of the opposite sex?
Next... On whether I'd judge a single mother.
Definitely, I won't lie, I would. Yup... depending on the circumstances which led to her current state, and her attitude to it. Some deserve little-to-no pity. Others deserve all the pity there is to offer in the world (even the universe)
I beg, be using punctuation marks. Some of your sentences just feel exhausting to connect with, but I did what I had to.

Lastly, get lost too, hunny. And stay lost (your irredeemable, seeing that you support murder) So, I guess you're pretty much suited for that line. I still pray God finds you sha.

Shut up and go and learn biology and science before calling something murder because someone told you.
Before criticising something learn about it and know reasons why they do it and why it may be necessary. You cannot be having an intellectual debate and the only point you have is that in your brain it is murder. Even murder is sometimes state-sanctioned and necessary so keep quiet.
If a woman is the one to bear public ridicule and everything associated with pregnancy as you claim then shut up and not put your mouth in women's affairs as regards the choice they make to have abortions. It is already a difficult thing to decide but it is none of your business because nobody is forcing any woman to do it.

You get lost and stay lost. I dey mind my business you dey mention me.
Pray to God about your own salvation and don't bother about mine.

rickpat:
if you ain't ready to do things like these, DON'T MARRY because women find it cute to ask you to buy stuffs on your way back home...know this and know peace... marriage is for men not some silly poorly raised kids

Tell them

PaulOtl:
So dense.
Good heavens...why did you allow some women to inhabit this earth with us...
They love sex, but not the responsibility that follows.

Keep quiet, it seems the word "dense" was newly added to your dictionary because a dense person like you cannot even see the mirror.

They love sex and don't want to take responsibility who are they having the sex with? Animals I presume are you in favour of child support from men, compulsory responsibility on the part of men and have you told men to also take responsibility too because na two people do the thing. Would you marry a single mother or see a single mother and not judge her

Get lost jaare, na only women suppose dey suffer the consequences of sex you see how daft you are?
What about the married women having abortions too

PaulOtl:
Don't be fooled by the two likes to your senseless comments to that guy. The two likes were obviously from heartless women like you, who endorse abortions and have probably carried out several ones. They are hurt like you, and trying to support you to make themselves feel better. It won't change anything. Who is a LovePeddler, is always going to be a LovePeddler (unless she's now honestly born again)
PS: your use of tongue out emojis after sending a reprisal comment, only shows you are masking your hurt. That's an old move, girl. SMH.

By talking like an illiterate and embarrassing yourself how are you even better than the women you want to condemn for committing abortions?

PaulOtl:
Be there saying rubbish, and thinking you are smart.

Who told you that it had no life? Something that was already feeding off its mother's nutrients. You are dense, if you cannot see that it was alive from the very beginning.

Anyhoo, it will make little-to-no difference trying to make you see the fact. You may have aborted a few before, so, you won't see it as murder. Disgusting lots.

Keep quiet you dense being. A baby takes the first breath after birth and the foetus or embryo is not substantial or important than the women carrying the pregnancy.
You are so daft that you think being pro-choice means that I have done abortion
It cannot be equated to murder because it's dependent on another and it basically has no rights.
I am sure in complications where abortions are necessary the women are committing murders because they cannot save their lives again and the unborn's life is more substantial than their own.

folake4u:
Ahhh. That rule is the Golden Rule of this thread since Day 1.

Correction taken.

folake4u:
You're not supposed to quote a male on this thread.

I didn't know

I am so sorry.

Where are the rules

folake4u:
Omooo. All these talks won't go anywhere oh.

At least, they're crying in their limousines. I'm still entering bike and keke.

We will see how it goes. Hopefully, Meghan doesn't divorce him or there is no trouble in Paradise. It would be such a shame, for now they should not go to the coronation.

GloriousGbola:
Gender fluid mode enabled

Considering Charles years of drama with Camilla, you'd think he have Harry's back.

Gender fluid mode disabled

When his son is embarrassing him. Harry's wife should have his back.

And Charles may have been a horrible father anyway.

folake4u:
Hmmm. Of course William and Kate won't come out to lament because he's the future King and enjoying the privileges.

Let's not forget William's infidelity acts. It's been reported by the British Media that William meets reporters to publish nasty reports about Meghan in order for the press to stay away from talking about his scandalous activities.

I read that on Twitter and even went to British gossip blog to read further on that story. Lots of people confirmed that story.


I don't think Meghan is a bad person though.

William and Kate will not come out because the Royal family has a policy and not because he is the future king. No member of the family reacts to public issues I have forgotten the name of the policy but there has been a policy for this before any of them you mentioned were a part of the family.
There is no proof of this so William will be so jobless to report about his sister in-law to who, where did you read that from and neither of the cheating allegations made have been proven who is the woman and why hasn't her identity been made known? So to stay away from nasty reports he is using Meghan if Meghan wasn't in the family who would he have used? This story is not storying.
Never you take Tabloids seriously, I don't even read them because their stories are fake. That is why I don't get why Harry and Meghan are alarmed at narratives that would always be drawn on public figures. My view of the pair stems from their statements and open disdain for their family which is now a profiting business for them. It is one reason I no longer believe them.
There was a time I did.

cococandy:
Since she’s not a working Royal I wonder why they couldn’t let her be. Why follow her around and harass her perpetually

Who is harassing her or following her around in LA, was Kate and other members of the family not followed around or allegedly harrassed did they form victimhood?

Either you are willfully turning a blind eye to the malicious viciousness they’ve meted out to her or you don’t have the complete picture

I used to see a glimpse of the viciousness until she went to the USA I no longer see it because she is in the public eye all by herself. It is part of what you get for being popular because people will chase or use whatever narrative they have.

If you had the complete picture you wouldn’t compare all these people to Meghan when not one them had 50 articles written about them in one day. All negative. All from the same source

Those people saw worse, unsolicited semi-naked pictures of Katherine were published online comparisons of her being an unaccomplished woman to Meghan have all been online. They are tabloids for goodness sake whose reporting or sources should be taken at face value because they are capable of lying and are ready to sell whatever story that will drive traffic to their pages. It did not start with Meghan. The media was horrible and wasn't her friend right, the tabloids don't have the so-called Royal sources anymore so why is she still in the news?

What I know is that the language of “playing victim” has been used by her aggressors frequently and is now a regurgitated talking point by those who have bought into their own version of things

That is because she is playing the victim card and is entirely blameless of anything. If it is not playing victim why do interviews and docuseries spilling the same things over and over again while telling us more breaking news to what end exactly?

That Netflix documentary is more than warranted because obviously you guys are more than excited to believe whatever negative thing you read about them. They have to tell their own side. And I’m very glad they did. Let posterity be the judge

The docuseries did not change or move a stone in how people view them because as a public figure you cannot always control the narrative. I don’t believe any negative thing about them their actions alone makes me even see it for myself because the constant silence from the Royal family is even making Harry threaten to spill more it tells me all I need to know. Their constant whining in the public eye is enough reason to even think that it is for profit making and they are enjoying it. If anything its not even bringing sympathy to them but fatigue and irritation because of the constant new series of stories we hear from Harry.

You don’t know her. Don’t have any proof of anything she actually did to anyone but you’re very certain she’s a problematic person

I can say the same about your perception of the Royal family. Why should I believe her and not them since neither of us know them or have any relationship with them. I called her problematic because she has issues with her family and same has applied to her husband's family who suddenly remembers that he has been a victim of privilege,the fact that they are never at fault in their perspectives makes me view her as one.

Do you realize your biases stem from what you read online which are all fueled by the British media? The British Media that’s in cahoots with her step mom-in-law

Is it the British media denying that he never called his family racist but rather unconscious bias? Is it the British media giving incoherencies that no longer match up with one another because the stories are becoming too old and familiar the contradictions seem to vary. They can have their own media and create their biases then if that is even true. The thing is they are the ones exposing themselves from constant whinning afterall it is even on American media I see them these days and I don't read British tabloids to get any biases.

All I can do is pray for everyone that if they find themselves in such a situation that someone extends them kindness.

People say they are seeking attention but won’t stop talking negatively about them. Always writing articles, internet posts, topic after topic. All negative and they didn’t do ONE damn thing to you!

Lord have mercy

They are attention seekers profiting from unverified claims and they should learn a thing ir two from the Royal family and keep silent then maybe they would be no negative report to give. Since they put themselves in the open people are free to talk about them. So far they are embarrassing their families and are the ones doing the damage. It is sad to see if they had shame they should not go near Charles' coronation. My problem with them is not media driven I listen to them talk and I am disappointed in their attacks against their family when they know that the allegations will never be addressed because of the Royal family's policy. You don't take your family's private issues to the public.

folake4u:
I wasn't there, true but the Media wrote that the Royal Family was unwelcoming to her.

Hmm. Well I don't know.

Williams still get him own for body. All of them though.

Before we know it, Meghan will return back to acting.

From what I saw publicly they were. Even Harry himself said Meghan called Kate "baby brain" ordered Ice cream truck for her people and didn't bother about the Cambridges, took unsolicited pictures on Charlotte, all these made her at odds with Kate.

William and Kate get their own for body but we don't see them come on air to lament about their privileges.
Meghan should get back to her D-list acting instead of profiting off her husband's family and new found famed in the name of docuseries, etc.

cococandy:
Harry and Meghan can’t live a quiet life when the royal family is the using the British media as their mouthpiece. They write 50 articles about them a day but want them to live it down quietly.

I don’t understand why people don’t see these folks for who they are.
Seriously doubt any of there “talking too much” would have even occurred if they weren’t horribly mistreated in the beginning and are still being mistreated.

Dreadful people like these make horrible statements about Meghan and the RF invites them over for dinner to laugh and cozy up together. You want her to keep her head down under such a cloud of hate and be a good girl about it.

I don’t understand the absolute lack of empathy towards her.

They are no longer working Royals so I don't get that part of the Royal family using the British media to attack her or having any obligation not to have dinner with whomever they choose. She ran away from the hateful media for privacy but did a Netflix documentary and interview to achieve what exactly. When you are a public figure you cannot control the narrative, it is a futile effort Kate, Fergie and even Diana have all had their share or different narratives written about them and we have not heard Kate doing interviews to lament. Famous people most times don’t even respond to media scrutiny. They are living in LA I don't see who is mistreating. I believe she is a problematic person very good at victimhood. My issue is with Harry whom I believe needs help you don't do that to your family for dollars or public sympathy that you write and lament about how jealous you are of your brother being the heir and you being the spare. The book had to be fact checked and some of his claims are no longer coherent. I feel really sorry for both of them though, both at odds with their families but somehow they remain blameless on the issue.
Oh please.

folake4u:
Probably because of the way the Royal Family treated Meghan. And also there's sheer hatred for them too.

Lol. Honestly. They should live a quiet life. All these talks with Oprah and co is just irking and really irrelevant.

Were you there to know how they treated her?
Someone that as a fiancee got to spend Christmas with the family her mom was even invited and was given a trip and immediate meeting with the Queen something Catherine never even got.
Nah I think Meghan has a problem because she seems to have issues with a lot of people too she isn't blameless.

Their refusal to live a quiet life shows you the kind of people they both are and it is sad for Harry to sell his family for dollars.

folake4u:
Hello Topaz.

I adopt Mango's answer about the Trans women.
I haven't fully accepted them as women. I just see them for what they are which is Trans-women.


Hmmm. About Harry and Meghan.
I really like this couple. They're actually my favourite in the British family.

But...I think Harry is talking too much these days. I'm actually getting irritated by all these talks.
The sooner people realize he's not taking a stance against his colonialist family, but are just upset about not being able to participate in it the way they thought they would be able to, the freer we will all be.

Why do people want him to take a stance against his family?

Harry and his wife are attention seekers I am happy that you are admitting that they are talking too much and it is getting irritating they will win sympathies for the Royal family soon if they don't live a quiet life in California.

Magnoliaa:
Awwwwwwnnnnnn.

This is awesome.

Phew.

It's good to know there are many of us here.

I absolutely, absolutely, f with J.K. and CNA's views.

Infact, transwomen are men. No two ways about it. Because if you cede small, you'll continue to cede. And I think CNA is still even being respectable somewhat for some reasons known to her...'cause she I believe she did try to...how can I put it...I feel she didn't really put her stance down. She said, "Trans-women are transwomen", meaning that she doesn't fully yet accept them as women, and she's only saying they are still not men

But if even you tell that to the TRAs, they'll still drag you. And mind you, the TRAs are different from actual trans people. The true minority. It is the activists with the loudest voices that are f-ing things up.

So, I do not play around the words at all, as I even reject being called a 'cis' . No ifs. No buts. Period. Even biological female sef... like hold up...is there another kind of female that's not biological? So you see, words matter, as the transactivists themselves like to say

I am not a cisgender woman because I wasn't assigned a woman at birth till now. I was born a woman I did not choose to be a woman so my gender identity is not up for debate. Sex is biological and no two ways about it, it is why I cannot see trans-women as women because we are different there are things I would be comfortable discussing with women that I cannot discuss with a transwoman no matter how they want to call themselves women. I just call them trans and it does not make me transphobic, they should have their own sports, bathrooms etc because those spaces I am not comfortable sharing it with biological males who then became women. We can see how they have impregnated and abused women in prisons etc it is one reason I understand JK Rownlings opinion of it.

The above notwithstanding, I am all for EQUAL RIGHTS for everyone

Same here but let's not be stupid to mix women's issues with biological males. It's not the same so they cannot be women.

And don't mind me, lol. This topic is one I tend to be very vocal about. But when I am on Naija spaces, I keep mum about it because it is not a thing here. We still have girl child education and 'is a wife a cook' matter to attend to

And I didn't even peak. Never ever.

I have always knew, right from time that, if we cannot define woman and womanhood loses its meaning, then fem inism collapse

This is my fear, the moment we begin to conflate women's issues with biological men we are in trouble that is how words like birthing people, incubators and other demeaning words they want to substitute pregnant women for, the moment we think that women or sex is based on identity and not biology because some think it's based on patriarchy then they are all mad. I am a liberal and proud member of the woke community that is why I am woke that men are coming into women's spaces to try and erase women's struggles.

So I was never on the other side/bought into the 'trans' ideology. And I mean ideology, different from the actual thing (dysphoria, etc)

I have nothing against trans people but let activist not deceive them into thinking that they are women. They are inherently men and it still shows no matter the surgery, it shows in their voices and physiques

On Prince Harry (and Meghan by extension), tbh, I do not have an opinion on all their drama. And I also feel their issues have become polarised between the Left/Right that a common middle ground cannot be found again

I don't have an opinion too I have been indifferent about them because I am more concerned about social issues than the lives of celebrities however I am alarmed that Harry is embarrassing and betraying his family.It has really been polarised and I am left wing but I don't think I would be on Harry and Meghan's and I believe the anti-monarchies have used the issue as a wedge issue against the Royal family that since Harry and Meghan accused them of being racist anti-monarchist have now remembered colonialism and the Royal family being instrumental to it.

I simply follow them because;

- they are cute and look good together
- their 'love story' seems like something out a story book
- the aesthetics about them (I know they are really humans behind the screen, but really their lives is not my business, and I don't mean to s*** on their existences)

I don't follow them the internet, social media and the news media literally force them down my throat so I just decide to see for myself. I watched the Royal wedding though same way I watched William and Kate's wedding I followed the glam then.

I did not follow the Royal Drama right from time, so I believe whatever I read now will most definitely be tainted with the writer's bias - whether for or against[quote]I remember the British tabloids sharing crazy news about Meghan though and Harry warning the British press I remember a stupid journalist who was fired for sharing a monkey picture of Archie as the Royal baby it was a racist remark and it caused world wide condemnation. So back then I understood Harry and Meghan's decision to leave the UK. So I understood Megxit.

[quote]From the little I know, I see reasons in BOTH factions.

For HOW LONG has the Royal Family supposedly been fighting Harry, and portraying Meghan in a bad light? That will justify his right to speak back now.

I don't buy the idea of the Royal family portraying Meghan in bad light people who have worked in the institution have said that members of the family don't leak out information most times Royal sources are just workers in the Palace who leak observations to the press, truth or lie.

How has he been treated right from time?

I saw a photo collage of about 10-15 books written about Harry...by others, sensationalising his life. So the Twitter post accompanying that picture was that Harry has a right to tell his own story now

From what I know the Royal family has protected Harry he used to have a crazy lifestyle as a young lad, nude photo, partying, substance use, nazi dress etc which he has even confirmed in his book. He was in the public eye by himself and besides they are a famous family so it comes with the perks.

Then on the other hand, they said they wanted privacy and they are doing all of this?

For money na they wanted privacy to tell their story for money that is how they can survive outside of the monarchy.

Some people defended that by saying that there's a difference between having things about you fed to the media and you choosing which portions of your life you want to share, with your consent.

I watched a video of both Harry and Williams.

In the one of Harry's, he said he'll ask the royal family to put out a statement to defend him or something, and they'll say they cannot do that, and then they'll turn around to feed details to a newspaper correspondent, and at the bottom of the news, you'll see, "we've reached out to the RF for a comment, but did not get a response,' meanwhile the whole thing WAS their response

This is very funny because the family has been defending him from crazy things the media has reported about him years ago. And the people who have worked there have come out to disprove members of the family leaking anything to the press. It's usually workers who do that.

Now it may seem like it is Harry that has been going on and on in the ring, but if the above is any indication of truth, how do we know if the RF has not been responding back through the media? They'll definitely not want scandalous tabloid posts linked to them

The Royal family will never respond maybe they use the media there is truth there.

And then the Sussexs too (I hope that's their title) are confusing... a Netflix documentary and now an autobiography? It would seem they are trying to milk for whatever they can get since they no longer are affiliated with the RF. I am not sure. Abi, shebi they cut of ties with the family and stepped back from their duties? Then in the end of that Harry's video, he said he wants his family (the RF) back. And I was like, pick one now

They are still using their titles. The sentiments you share is one reason why I don't believe them and they have been caught lying too. The book he wrote has been fact-checked to have inaccuracies. For 2 years they claimed the Royal family is racist now Harry and back tracked and claimed that it was unconscious bias . He claimed that he never said that but kept silent for 2 years when the people who believed them called the family racist. How can I believe such people who both have problems with their families, never find fault with themselves and have no problem embarrassing their family and putting private issues in a book. The dude even says he has enough receipts for another book

Ohhhhh. Why am I forgetting the major fact that all of this was being done barely months after this queen's death? She might not have been a good person, but the timing doesn't sit right with me

He was writing the book and still had the nerve with his shameless wife to attend the funeral. Now they are not wanted at the coronation because his aunt and uncle are scared that Harry might report to the same media Harry claims to hate their personal stories and secrets they don't want the whole world to know. Harry has definitely broken their trust. It's why I am alarmed at the point he is heading and I feel like he would regret it. You want accountability but you are still attacking your family and you claim you want to make peace with them.

The one I saw of Williams was where he was addressing his grief over Diana's death. Especially as the older son who was forced into maturity. The person who posted that video was making the point that people tend to forget that D was his mother just as well...

So, I just picked these little examples from the hundreds of narratives out there.

W has his own cheating rumours (and now abuse allegations from Harry). Harry has his own war crimes. And Meghan, did she not just start identifying as a biracial??

So finally, I gush over them and look at sweet pictures.

I nor dey support anybody.

I am only for the gbas gbos whenever I get the chance to follow up.

**bows out**

It is only Harry milking the Diana situation, its like as if him and his brother had different mothers because we don't see William lamenting about his mom. Though I think the dude needed therapy back then. Maybe the cheating rumours which have not been verified will be in Harry's next book afterall he had more to reveal he said so himself but he is still considerate about his father and brother . The abuse allegations is stupid siblings fight all the time I don't even believe that one at all. Meghan always identified as bi-racial it is to play the race card that she remembered that she was a black woman who has Nigerian roots

I will not blame Meghan for Harry's recent attack against his family. He is an adult and knows what he is doing.

[quote author=chelsea1116 post=120035324][/quote]This your talk is emotional blackmail devoid of any facts, why are the potentials of the born not already being used and harnessed why do you have to bother about the potentials of the unborn who could end up being miscarried, stillborn or have fatal illnesses and other complications that could prompt abortions? our mothers didn't have choices as you claim.

Also, abortion isn't murder because something unborn without life/breath cannot be killed.

Rayban25:
Oya I've heard just close your legs ...put your mother to shame by not following her footsteps

Otondo with 1cm p**is get lost.
Product of oloshoism have you talked to your mother

Rayban25:
Close your legs...olosho...no wonder why you were dodging the question

After your 1cm p**is has been closed.
Brolosho

Rayban25:
Chai e pain am oo ...like mother like daughter take heart ...olosho defending olosho

When they have nothing else to say they result to imaginary pains that they do not see
I have dealt with your type on this forum.

Product of oloshoism keep quiet and get lost

Rayban25:
Did I emphasize about wether the abortion is legal or illegal...its simple since you are okay with a lady doing her body her choice, you should be okay with your brother or son waiting them up...again stop trying to be clever by half...because you're not...you're only stupid for defending her because she is olosho just like you learned from your mom

You are still an illiterate don't conflate the issue and take corrections.
How does my opinion shape the choices of my brother or son? Do I look like them to make such decisions or choices for them? Don't you see how daft you are?
It is your mother and the unfortunate women in your family that are oloshos.

Magnoliaa and folake4u, I trust that you are both fine.

I have two questions for you.

1). What is your view on Prince Harry's book "Spare" which seems to be making sales and how do you view what he is doing to his family?

2). Do you think or believe that Trans-women are women or are you like me who views them as trans-women only aka the JK Rowling and Chimamanda Adichie whose views on Trans-women I share.

Rayban25:
You're trying to be clever by half and it's clearly not working...if it all you have no problem then may your son or brother marry a girl with a damaged womb through abortions

You are just an illiterate whoever taught you that wombs are damaged through legal and safe abortions needs to be reoriented and you need to ask for a refund of your fees.

Before trying to embarrass yourself and curse your family members on an online forum try and learn that abortions done safely and legally do not lead to damaged wombs. I blame Nollywood for deceiving you.

Rayban25:
What I asked was a simple yes or no question stop deflecting

There is no yes or no answer to that question because I am not in anyway concerned or affected with her decision as someone who is pro-choice. I have already answered the question as I can.

folake4u:
Topaz!!! Wetin be this abeg.

Nor be lie na, Nigerians matter dey tire me see as e dey condemn her like say na him give her belle

Which kind meme be this

Rayban25:
So in summary you're in support of what she did?

Is it not her body and her choice how does it in anyway affect you?

chelsea1116:
U re not ashamed u killed a baby? A baby some women cry to have one for 10 to 20 years of not being able. And u re not ashamed of terminating 2?

There are somethings u just shut up about, open book my foot.

Since she did not want the pregnancy you should have carried them for her.

StrongandMighty:
Peter obi for president! Whatever happens at the state or senatorial level is none of my business!

What happens at the National Assembly level should be your business too because there is little a president can do without legislative support. That is why they go hand in hand.

ZooOga:
I didn't, wiki clearly mentioned it. Naomi Osaka was born on October 16, 1997, in Chūō-ku, Osaka in Japan to Tamaki Osaka (大坂 環, Ōsaka Tamaki). I simply focused on your accusation that's she's not black.
You are free to use your fingers and thumbs to post a pic of her mom.

She is mixed or biracial at best. Unless she wants to completely identify as black like Obama who has biracial roots. You can't really call her black. I don't know why some blacks like to claim some mixed race people exclusively as their own . Osaka can even identify as Japanese if she wants to, it's part of the perks that follow biracial people


That's what 1sharon is stating.

grandstar:
Where's the husband? Yes, I am conservative.

She is a bad role model. She should learn something from Serena Williams whom she trounced on court.

Child after marriage.

Here's a sidenote, adults personal choices should be none of your business sha

Cosmatikka:
I also in my own little way sponsored a small medical outreach for Obi this Christmas in Kogi state in order to sensitize ppl about a new Nigeria.

This is the first time I'm spending money on a politician and I'm happy doing it.

A new Nigeria is POssible with Obi/Dhatti

God bless you for this act of service.

Klass99, happy new year to you and may this year bring forth everything good for you and your loved ones.
As for big brother I don't think I would have time to follow it up. The timing in January coupled with elections next month is a bad one but then we will see.
And Nigeria has a better voting power than South Africans but I think the election may take the attention of the youths away from the show it's one reason I view the timing bad.