₦airaland Forum

Wapizy:
.....

You see as a foreign extreemist ideology has you texting giberrish.

I challenge you to provide us with one genuine piece of evidence for this fictional Jesus character.

Stay there following a fictitious character that never existed whilst Arabia and Europe continue to feast on our legacy.

Since the day you was born into this fabulous world of ours, point to me one tangible peace of anything that this demon called Jesus has done for Africa apart from plunder, death, misery, pain and slavery.

If you cannot point to one genuine historical piece of evidence to substantiate the existence of this imaginary character, then you're a bastard.


Follow the link below:

https://www.nairaland.com/5685899/what-true-image-jesus

tohe:
I don't know why you are bothered about Jesus real picture than his message? Does your baseless argument change the fact that Jesus existed a long time ago. Does it change the fact he had disciples. Does it change the fact he was Nazeteth

There isnt one shred of evidence to prove any of your assertions above.

Kindly provide one piece of genuine evidence to that effect.

I put it to you that the image of the Jesus character is fake and malicious.

Out of the images on display, choose what you perceive to be the correct image of Jesus.

tohe:
I don't know why you are bothered about Jesus real picture than his message?

Patience my brother, kindly take the time to read through the thread.

You make a good point.


Everything about the Jesus character is fake and malicious

The Jesus image is topical, as the thread proves.

The name 'Jesus' is topical as when one performs a thorough perusal we cuts across Europe touching Spanish, Greek and end up im Latin. As in the name has zero connection to the Christian Bible

The story of the Jesus character is all over the shop, running through Nigeria, KM.T, Italy, India, China, Greece and ends up in the UK. As in the Jesus story has zero connection to the character.

The Jesus character is all over the shop, running from KMT, Italy, India, China, Greece and ends up in the UK. As in the Jesus story has zero connection to the image of Jesus.

tohe:
You keep arguing about Jesus Christ real picture...

Because we need your input in this experiment.

What is the correct image of the Jesus character.

Make your choice from the choices on display.

tohe:
Orunmila/IFA, Sango, Oguns real picture before?

Create a thread about the Gods Orunmila, Oya, Sango, Ogun e.t.c and tag me.

Make certain that you arent being a bastard while you're at it, so as to not provoke the divine principles to descend on you.

Be at your best behaviour when you present yourselves amidst their glouriousness.

Trust me, the African Gods are the true and proper ones.

tohe:
Cause if you care to know Sango that is worshipped today was just a man like me. He's the second or third alafin of Oyo empire and he's mother was nupe.

Sango Olukoso Arabambi is the God that bring forth to the concept of Zeus and Thor.

What does you know about the Emperor Sango?

There are the God Sango and the mortal Sango; neither of which are evil.

Sango takes pleasure in defeating demons and all your fake gods.

tohe:
And you Mr Amu, with due respect Sir, have you seen Orunmila/IFA, Sango, Oguns real picture before? You keep arguing about Jesus Christ real picture but please argue about Orunmila etc.

Firstly, this thread is about the correct image of thr Jesus character.

Secondly, this thread is about the correct image of the Jesus character.


Furthermore, this thread is about the correct image of the Jesus character.

You write all that nonsensical gibberish and blindfold yourself to the question posed by the thread.

donnie:
Have you heard of the sumemrians?

The Anunaki?

Yes, most historians have heard of Sumeria.

We can account for the earliest civilisation in all parts of Asia, and they are all relatively young conpared to Africa.

KM.T predates the Sumerian civilisation in years that would amount in their thousands.

All the East, South and West African civilisations predates KM.T.

What is hard to understand here.

The African calendar is the oldest in the world.

According to the African calendar, the year is 6256 (AFK) - Whereby afk denotes 'After the Founding of KM.T'.

That is to say there are periods that existed prior to our founding of KM.T

And we know that to be true due the plethora of evidence available.

donnie:
I laugh because you probably think the world began in Egypt.

Did you even bother to follow the link i posted earlier.

https://www.nairaland.com/5795996/african-origin-civilisation


Humanity begins 'South of the Sahara', Africa.

KM.T was created by the various communities 'South of the Sahara' and that includes Nigeria, West Africa.

donnie:
I cannot throw away my history simply because it was stolen or because it does not support African science or Idolatory.

Firstly, idolatry is unAfrican.

The Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric warmongers came to our continent with their idolatry and attempt to bastardise history by slanderously naming our divine principles as some sort of Idolatry.

What really happened according to their own records is that they labelled any concept that didnt adhere to their evil and twisted ideology as Idolatry.

In other words, Christianity and Islam originate out of Idolatry whilst those of the African psyche are divine.

It is completely and utterly outrageous for foreigners to approach our sacred and divine principles from an evil and twisted mindset and attempt to label them anything other than divine.

Given that history records exactly what they did, they met our parents living glouriously and fantastically under all the universal and divine principles under our Sun and they sought to destroy them and swap them with fakery and falsehood that is being peddled today.

Secondly, the terms such as 'Idolatry', 'unclean', 'gentile', 'kaferi', non-believer are all Abrahamic religious concepts that are privy to their evil and twisted ideologies.

Furthermore, how can any one of these fake religions have the nerve to label our divine concepts with nonsensical terms such as Idolatry when in all reality their fake religion peddles exactly that.

For instance, the image of the Jesus character originates from a fake god of Ptolemaic Egypt.

The fake god they named Serapis.

It doesnt make any sense whatsover for any one of the Abrahamic religions to then attempt to associate our divine principles with such slanderous terminology.

https://www.nairaland.com/5795996/african-origin-civilisation

IMO01:
But the name of Jesus Christ has destroyed many shrines in Africa. you can't really say Christian religion is fake

Those shrines are in all reality sacred sites from where they copied and plagiarised their fake religion.

The Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric warmongers came to Africa, found about our divine principles and called them God.

What you state above is part of the totality in the horific attrocities against humanity that they partook; others include hunting our sacred text and literature in an attempt to burn, desecrate and or destroy all that they could find.

https://www.nairaland.com/5795996/african-origin-civilisation

donnie:
The actual name is YAKUBI and that's a Bantu name. Even my people bear the name.



ISRAEL is English. YISOLELE is the true name and that's Bantu. Even the Hebrew YASHAREL is actually Bantu.



JEHOVAH is English.
Letter J is recent, not more than 500 years old.

The name is YAHUAH and that's also Bantu. Also called NYAHMBI or NZAMBI.

YAH or YAHUAH is the name of the Creator. Translated as LORD all over the English Bible.
Do your own study.

Bantus bear His name YAH. Even Igbos praise him unknowingly when they say 'keleYAH".

The point is for our people to disassociate themselves from the Christian Biblical narrative of anything.

The narratives are fake, false and counterintuitive.

Those are my arguments anything outsidr of that doesnt concern me at this particular point in time.

Once we can get passed the fact the narratives of the Christian Bible is false, that the African narratives of African history are the only true and proper ones, then we are good.

Theres no need to try and justify a narrative that is in itself counterintuitive.

As discussed earlier, African history goes back millions of years; those are the type of narratives that ought to be mined and overstood.

Leave the Abrahamic narratives for the propagators and peddlers of the Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric agents of chaos and concentrate on the already available secular history that our Ancestors worked tirelessly to save for all of us.

donnie:
Just goan sit down somewhere first. When you're ready to learn, you come back and humbly seek knowledge.

I'm done with you for now

Bin all that Hellenist mumbojumbo and concentrate your focus on African history.

The African Gods are the only true and proper ones.

blueAgent:
Wake up.
Your Africa did not civilize themselves how much more the whole World.

Origin of Civilization is Mesoptomia present day Iraq then it moved to Egypt

When the Nile Civilisation began, there was no people living in Iraq.

Civilisation begins 'South of the Sahara', Africa and then it proceeded to trickle out to the rest of the world.

https://www.nairaland.com/5795996/african-origin-civilisation

donnie:
But we're not talking here about the origin of man. Yakubi (Jacob) or Israel (Yisolele/Yasharel) is thousands or years after the origin of man. If early man migrated out of Africa why is it strange to believe that a people migrated down into sub-saharan Africa. And yes the Bantus met indigenous populations like the Nilotics and pigmies as they migrated to their current location.

The Bantu migration is the Israelite migration into sub-saharan Africa. And that's a fact of history that can be proven historically when you're ready to defend your stand against mine with proof.

All that is based on the Roman version of Christianity.


Assuming your argument is based on the premise that they copied the Israelite story from African history, then yes, that would make sense.

But you ought to make that clear.

Trying to justify their false characters wont wash with me.


Was their a person known as the Biblical Jacob, same word?

Was their a people in human history known as the Israelites?

Was their a deity in African history kbown as Jehova?

It seems we are saying the same thing.

The thrust of my argument has always been that Christiamity is a fake Hellenist religion that exist as a result of the combination of fakery and falsehood.

And that they copied, plagiarised and sexed-up various older characters, concepts and stories from all around the world; especially Africa.

Is that what you are saying?

donnie:
If you ask your elders, they will tell you how they migrated to their current location if you are from sub-saharan Africa.

In terms of African history, i am representative of the Elders.

As in, all that is known, thaf is thought to be known has already been awarded to us by the very Elders to which you are refering to here.

blueAgent:
I can stop laughing at you.

You are really clueless.

There no point prolonging this argument , keep fooling yourself.

Exactly, since you know that your argument is baseless and lacks anysort of physical evidence

I can prove to anyone who can ve bothered to does the necessaey research that civilisation begins in Africa.

And that it is due to Christianity and Islam that Africans are being distracted from the reality of our greatness.

donnie:
Did your people come out of the ground? Did they not migrate from somewhere?

According to all the analytical, empirical and scientific evidence, humanity begins 'South of the Sahara', Africa.


It has been proven beyond doubt that human existed in the region of the world they call Africa for millions of years.


Civilisation moved up the Nile.


Our ancestors migrated from Africa in order to populate the other continents in want is popularly refered to as the 'Out of Africa' phenomenon.

Amujale:
He had melanated skin, brown curly hair and blue eyes, DNA tests suggest, supending a common assumption that Britain’s indigenous populations were all pale skinned with fair features.

The “Cheddar Man,” is Britain’s oldest complete skeleton, which was discovered in 1903 in Gough’s Cave near the village of Cheddar in Somerset, in southwest England. He lived about 10,000 years ago in the Mesolithic period, the middle part of the Stone Age.

Experts have now reconstructed his features, demonstrating that he was part of a population of ancient Western Europeans that, scientists have shown in recent years, had melanated skin.

Corresponding with modern day African historians that Africans are the first people to inhabit Europe thousands upon thousands of years ago.

blueAgent:
Crap as usual.

The picture of a black man in a lab, that lab looks western, is that how an African lab will look like?

Can you read?

The person in that lab is non other than Cheikh Anta Diop.

He is very much an African.

blueAgent:
Get a life, you need help.

Its you that needs help.

blueAgent:
How did Christianity enslave?

Christianity orchestrated the transatlantic slave trade.

Its pretty simple to understand.

For a period of over 500 years, they outlawed people from educating themselves in their own literacy and for the next 500 years, they forced their literacy onto people with the use of the Christian Bible.

That is to say, for a period that exceeds 100 years, the only book that was legally allowed for people to be read was the Christian Bible.

donnie:
Who's taking about Christianity or Islam? I'm not a Christian.

I'm talking about Christianity and Islam.

The point i was making is that Christianity and Islam are the worst ideologies ever to set foot onto the African continent.

Both these foreign ideologies was introduced to us by ways of slavery.

And as such, its counterintuitive to be adhering to their ideology.

blueAgent:
When the truth is that it was Christianity that built schools and universities that gave us knowledge about the mineral resources we have and how to extract and use them.

That is completely and utterly false.

You cannot give someone something that which the person already has.

Christianity stole the knowledge to build schools and universities and took it back home to better themselves whilst blocking and distrupting the sources of such knowledge and falsely claim that it was theirs.

They came to Africa and saw how we was living well and glouriously, became jealous and did what history recorded all the evil things that they did.

blueAgent:
What is the rationality for one to believe that religion especially Christianity was brought to Africa to enslave us.

Firstly, it isnt a believe, its a historical and documented fact.

Secondly, you seem to have unknowingly slightly misconscrued what i meant.

Christisnity wasnt merely brought to Africa so as to enslave people, Christianity was the enslaver.

As in, Christianty was responsible for the Transatlantic slavetrade.

donnie:
You're not saying anything new. They called themselves YAHUDAH or YAHUNDE (also found in Cameroon) which English calls JUDAH or Judeans.

What do you refer to as "Ancient times"? Kindly clarify and be ready to show historical records.

Dude, the Jews in the Christian Bible are fictitious people.

Anywhere you see the term used in European history, it often meant to refers different real tribe of people. i.e Germanic

donnie:
Are you ready to challenge me for a debate? Do you have your proofs and facts to counter my claims?

Absolutely, isnt this part of the debate right here?

The Jacob of the Christian Bible is fictitious chatacter that never existed.

donnie:
Nonsense. If you know anything about history, you'd know that Africa as we call it today is a continent of several nations and people's. Not all are indigenous.

The Jacob of the Christian Bible is a fictitious character that never existed.

All Africans are indegenous to Africasic

The Christian Bible is fake.

According to history, Africans have been in existence for millions of years.



Did you bother to follow the link i posted?

donnie:
It is clear from his letter that those who they came to meet knew the one true ELOHIYM and his commandments.

Yes, but that has nothing to does with either Christianity or Islam.

As i said earlier, the Hebrew Language was invented by Eurocentric writers in the early 1900's.

Dont you think its suspicious that Leopold Genocides millions of people using similar terminology and suddenly the Hebrew Language appears from know where in a written form?

1 + 1 = 2

Crbc:
come, what is your problem exactly??

What is your problem?

That is the real question

Are you ok?

Cover your ears, my response wasnt directed to you, was it?

Is your name Marvelous97?

You can jog along now.

Leopold of Belgium was a mass murdered that killed more than 50 million Africans without any justification.

What is the point of bringing that up?

donnie:
Africans okay. But there are Africans who are Jacob's descendants...

That is a fake story.

Jacob is a fictitious character that never existed.


Africans are ascendants of other Africans.