"I am ____ in glory . . . I am the Lord of the Light . . . I am the victorious one . . . I am the heir of endless time . . . I, even I, am he that knoweth the path of heaven"
The quote above is Horus addressing his followers in KM.T; an extract of the 'Book of Going Forth By Day and Night'.
Amujale: The Horus quotation is an extract from the Egyptology textbook known as the Book of Going forth by Day and Night.
source: An extensive translation of Late Sir p. LE PAGE RENOUF, knt. continued and completed by Professor of Egyptology at the University of Geneva Prof. E. NAVILLE, D.C.L., cfc, &c.,.
Furthermore, anyone can study those Iconic characters to which was said the Jesus character shares distinct similarities.
i.e
Horus was born out of what can only possibly be called a sheer miracle and are the narrative of each every other one of the other religious[sic] chatacters.
There is aswell another distint relationship with Horus and the Jesus character, and that exist within Horus's relation ship with his mother Isis.
Now everyone has heard of the Jesus and Mary story, yet according to the evidence inside of ancient Egyptian Mythology, Horus and Isis is the inspiration behinde the authors of Abrahamic text that manufactured such
Daejoyoung: Well ask yourself this, if people were to make up names for the gospels, why use names like Mark, Matthew, and Luke, why not household names like Peter, James, and John? Also my question was about Paul( our earliest christian writer) writing about 20years after the event, how likely was it that he was writing about a fictitious james and Peter here:
Then after three years, l went up to Jerusalem to see Peter and remained with him fifteen days, but l saw none of the other apostles except james, the lord's brother. (Galatians 1v18-19).[b]
Or this:
[b]Now when Peter had come to Antioch, l withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed. (Galatians 2v11).
The author speaks of peter as though the people already knew who he was. Note that this letter is dated to around AD 50( 20 years after jesus).
Are you saying all of these are also fictitious,
Following the discussion, and one can only conclusion that the Christian bible is fake, false and countetintuitive.
Its already been proven that the Christian bible is one of the greatest falsehoods in all of Christiandom.
The Christian bible isnt what it claims to be, instead its a badly written bibliography; a compilation of ancient religious text, the contents of which have been repackaged, directly copied, plagiarised, sexed-up or outrightly fabricated.
Daejoyoung: Well ask yourself this, if people were to make up names for the gospels, why use names like Mark, Matthew, and Luke, why not household names like Peter, James, and John? Also my question was about Paul( our earliest christian writer) writing about 20years after the event, how likely was it that he was writing about a fictitious james and Peter here:
Then after three years, l went up to Jerusalem to see Peter and remained with him fifteen days, but l saw none of the other apostles except james, the lord's brother. (Galatians 1v18-19).[b]
Or this:
[b]Now when Peter had come to Antioch, l withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed. (Galatians 2v11).
The author speaks of peter as though the people already knew who he was. Note that this letter is dated to around AD 50( 20 years after jesus).
Are you saying all of these are also fictitious,
The authors of Abrahamic religious text are liars and fakers, and were Roman aristocrats.
Stop thinking in the terms of Peter, John, Mark, e.t.c because they are all fictional characters invented by the authors of Abrahamic text.
Amujale: Peter, James and John are all fake character invented by the authors of Abrahamic religious text.
Here they impersonate the authors in their own text; creating a situation wherby an author is creating authors in their own book.
All the authors of Abrahamic relugious text are dubious and wholly untrustworthy.
Daejoyoung: Actually the person you gave me as proof is not an historical scholar...
A Profesor of Egyptology?
The late Prof. Edouard Naville was one of the world's leading academics in Egyptology.
Just to be clear, you will find that all my sources on Egyptology are routinely reputable academics in the given field of study that is ancient Egyptian Mythology.
Daejoyoung: lol proven by who? lf jesus is fake, how did christianity arise in the middle of the first century, with paul writing letters just 20years after and claiming to have met the likes of Peter, James and John and writing about them as though his audience needed no introduction to who they were?
Historians have already determined the names of the authors of the Chistian bible, and their names arent Peter, James and John and they didnt exist in 50 CE.
That process is known as Euhemerism, whereby any modern character is transplanted into the past; sometimes using the names of real places and feed of the names of popular characters i.e Kings, Queens, kingdoms e.t.c
i.e The Moses character was invented by the Romans and euhemerised into the ancient Egypt scenario.
Moses is a fictitious character as proven in previous post.
There are no records of a Moses character in all of ancient Egyptian history; and the ancient Egyptians are probably either first or second to the Romans when it comes to keeping records; we know that because we've studied every single strand of evidence to that effect.
And that is the unanimous conclusion from all the authorities on ancient Egyptian Mythology.
i.e Dr Raymond O Faulkner, Dr Maulana Karenga e.t.c
Daejoyoung: lmao, ok l'll make this easy for you. My question wasn't how they came to prominence, but rather how come all of a sudden they existed in the Roman Empire as early as AD 50.
Christianity was manufactured in the first century CE during the reign of the Flavians
Especially, the Roman Emperor Titus Vespasianus Augustus.
Some historians go far as pointing out the fact that it isnt a coincidence that the biblical movement of the Jesus character mirrors the military campaign of Emperor Titus himself.
Again, dont take my word for that, research that your self or watch the world reknowned historian Joseph Atwill disect an excerpt from his own book 'The Flavian Signature'.
Statement by Joseph Atwill - excerpt from "The Flavian Signature"
In his lecture, Joseph Atwill shows a comprehensive blue print on the typology the authors of Abrahamic religious text used during their invention of the Jesus character.
Proof Romans Invented the Jesus Character - The Flavian Signature.
Daejoyoung: lol proven by who? lf jesus is fake, how did christianity arise in the middle of the first century, with paul writing letters just 20years after and claiming to have met the likes of Peter, James and John and writing about them as though his audience needed no introduction to who they were?
Peter didnt write the Peter content, the Romans did.
James didnt write the James content in the Christian bible, the Romans did.
John didnt write John in the Christian bible, the Romans did.
Contrary to the false assertions the Romans made in the Bible, the Christian bible was manufactured in the first century CE.
Daejoyoung: lol proven by who? lf jesus is fake, how did christianity arise in the middle of the first century, with paul writing letters just 20years after and claiming to have met the likes of Peter, James and John and writing about them as though his audience needed no introduction to who they were?
Peter, James and John are all fake character invented by the authors of Abrahamic religious text.
Here they impersonate the authors in their own text; creating a situation wherby an author is creating authors in their own book.
All the authors of Abrahamic relugious text are dubious and wholly untrustworthy.
Daejoyoung: lol this is quite hilarious. Your so called similarities are weak, so you believe the gospel writers set out to recreate a myth of Horus, and all they could come up with was jesus? come on tell me something else.
No reputable scholar today believes jesus is a myth, because you cannot explain the existence of Paul, James and Christianity without Jesus. EOD.
Much of the Old Testaments of the Christian bible contains much content and characters thar are directly copied, plagiarised, sexed-up and fabricated.
All of the New Testaments are full of forgeries, fakery and outright fabrications.
There isnt one character or story inside of Abrahamic religious text that can claim to being original.
Its already been proven that Jesus is fake; and so are all the other made up characters inside of Abrahamic religious text.
None of the content of the Old testament are original to Christianity, whilst the New Testament was fabricated by the Romans.
"I am ____ in glory . . . I am the Lord of the Light . . . I am the victorious one . . . I am the heir of endless time . . . I, even I, am he that knoweth the path of heaven"
The quote above is Horus addressing his followers in KM.T; an extract of the 'Book of Going Forth By Day and Night'.
Amujale: The Horus quotation is an extract from the Egyptology textbook known as the Book of Going forth by Day and Night.
source: An extensive translation of Late Sir p. LE PAGE RENOUF, knt. continued and completed by Professor of Egyptology at the University of Geneva Prof. E. NAVILLE, D.C.L., cfc, &c.,.
Furthermore, anyone can study those Iconic characters to which was said the Jesus character shares distinct similarities.
i.e
Horus was born out of what can only possibly be called a sheer miracle and are the narrative of each every other one of the other religious[sic] chatacters.
There is aswell another distint relationship with Horus and the Jesus character, and that exist within Horus's relation ship with his mother Isis.
Now everyone has heard of the Jesus and Mary story, yet according to the evidence inside of ancient Egyptian Mythology, Horus and Isis is the inspiration behinde the authors of Abrahamic text that manufactured such
Daejoyoung: Well ask yourself this, if people were to make up names for the gospels, why use names like Mark, Matthew, and Luke, why not household names like Peter, James, and John? Also my question was about Paul( our earliest christian writer) writing about 20years after the event, how likely was it that he was writing about a fictitious james and Peter here:
Then after three years, l went up to Jerusalem to see Peter and remained with him fifteen days, but l saw none of the other apostles except james, the lord's brother. (Galatians 1v18-19).[b]
Or this:
[b]Now when Peter had come to Antioch, l withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed. (Galatians 2v11).
The author speaks of peter as though the people already knew who he was. Note that this letter is dated to around AD 50( 20 years after jesus).
Are you saying all of these are also fictitious,
Following the discussion, and one can only reach the conclusion that the Christian bible is fake, false and countetintuitive.
Its already been proven that the Christian bible is one of the greatest falsehoods in all of Christiandom.
The Christian bible isnt what it claims to be, instead its a badly written bibliography; a compilation of ancient religious text, the contents of which have been repackaged, directly copied, plagiarised, sexed-up or outrightly fabricated.
Daejoyoung: These are old claims and are no longer taken seriously by scholars, because the so called similarities have been blown out of proportion. Please do more research on this matter, l'm surprised you believe this.
Using an Abrahamic religious article as your evidence!?
What is the meaning of Pagan?
The term 'pagan' is a derogatory one that the all Abrahamic religions uses to wrongly demonize and victimise genuine philosophies; even unwittingly using these type of madeup terminologies to attack religions that they themselves copied from.
Was actually expecting a real citation or corroboration for Abrahamic religions that is outside of Abrahamic religious text.
Amujale: The Horus quotation is an extract from the Egyptology textbook known as the Book of Going forth by Night and Day.
source: An extensive translation of Late Sir p. LE PAGE RENOUF, knt. continued and conpleted by [b]Professor of Egyptology at the University of Geneva [/b]Prof. E. NAVILLE, D.C.L., cfc, &c.,.
Furthermore, anyone can study those Icon characters to which was said the Jesus character share distinct similarities.
i.e
Horus was born out of what can only possibly be called a sheer miracle and are the narrative of each every other one of the other religious[sic] chatacters.
There is aswell another distint relationship with Horus and the Jesus character, and that exist within Horus's relation ship with his mother Isis.
Now everyone has heard of the Jesus and Mary story, yet accirding to the evidence inside of ancient Egyptian Mythology, Horus and Isis is the inspiration behinde the authors of Abrahamic text that manufactured such story.
You dont need to take my word for that, go and research on Horus and the other Iconic chracters with the understanding that they all predate the Jesus character; and come up with your own conclusion.
You are simply proving my point for me.
Thank you.
Abrahamic religious text are tools of propaganda meant to brainwash innocent people.
Some level of brainwash is so destructive and toxic that it would take someone as us to knock the common sense back into ourselves.
Don't be afraid to be wrong.
Don't be afraid to be successful.
The Abrahamic religions are fake and that has been proven here time and time again.
Daejoyoung: please do more research, these are all old claims that have been debunked severally.
[b]The position that Christianity borrowed from the mystery religions was taught in the nineteenth century by the History of Religions School; however, by the mid-twentieth century, this view was shown to be false and thus abandoned even by those who believed Christianity was purely a natural religion.2 Ron Nash wrote, “During a period of time running roughly from about 1890 to 1940, scholars often alleged that primitive Christianity had been heavily influenced by Platonism, Stoicism, the pagan religions, or other movements in the Hellenistic world. Largely as a result of a series of scholarly books and articles written in rebuttal, allegations of early Christianity’s dependence on its Hellenistic environment began to appear much less frequently in the publications of Bible scholars and classical scholars. Today most Bible scholars regard the question as a dead issue.”3
Despite the fact that many of the arguments were rejected, this theory has once again emerged through the popular writings of skeptics. What makes Christianity unique among the world religions is that it is a historical faith based on the historical person of Christ who lived a miraculous life. In this essay, I will examine the alleged parallels and evaluate whether Christianity teaches a unique savior or is simply a copy of these pagan myths.. In this essay, I will examine the alleged parallels and evaluate whether Christianity teaches a unique savior or is simply a copy of these pagan myths. [/b]
https://probe.org › the-pagan-conne... Did Christianity Borrow from Pagan Religions? - Early Christianity and ...
It isnt in your power to reject.
The Flavian connection to the manufacture of Christianity and the Jesus character are facts that are proven beyond reasonable doubt.
These are not mere guesswork or fabrications, these conclusions are reached by genuine historians using historical artefacts, diaries of real people that have a recorded history, history textbooks, records and the account of witnesses; their are also material that corroborates the "Flavian connection" findings.
That video barely touches the surface, yet anyone could easily get the gist that the historians in the video talks about.
Daejoyoung: Sorry, l said give me scholarly work to show jesus is fiction. l mean real academia, not any random atheist website.
l am talking of scholarly research from Professors and Doctors of history.
The Horus quotation is an extract from the Egyptology textbook known as the Book of Going forth by Day and Night.
source: An extensive translation of Late Sir p. LE PAGE RENOUF, knt. continued and completed by Professor of Egyptology at the University of Geneva Prof. E. NAVILLE, D.C.L., cfc, &c.,.
Furthermore, anyone can study those Iconic characters to which was said the Jesus character shares distinct similarities.
i.e
Horus was born out of what can only possibly be called a sheer miracle and are the narrative of each every other one of the other religious[sic] characters.
There is aswell another distinct relationship with Horus and the Jesus character, and that exist within Horus's relation ship with his mother Isis.
Now everyone has heard of the Jesus and Mary story, yet according to the evidence inside of ancient Egyptian Mythology, Horus and Isis is the inspiration behinde the authors of Abrahamic text that manufactured such story.
You dont need to take my word for that, go and research on Horus and the other Iconic characters with the understanding that they all predate the Jesus character; and come up with your own conclusion.
Maximus69: My friend you're not here to convince me so i'm free to believe whatever i choose, whether i believe Jesus is God or whatever i make with Abrahamic religious text is none of your concern since you're not here to CONVINCE me!
You're wrong!
Answer this simple question.
Who owns the legacy of our great continent?
All the Abrahamic religions are the cause for some of the greatest attrocities in all of ancient human history.
The Abrahamic religions murdered their way into our continent and began to stoke up wars and conflict.
For the first time in our continents long, rich and relevant history, Nations began to war against one another based on false and deplorable ideologies; these all occur as a direct response of ancient Arabian and Eurocentric fundamentalist that were allowed to run riot on our sacred soils.
Kindly, go and study the real history of our world.
The people of our great continent and the next generations all jointly own our legacy.
The time to snap out of these type of spectacular fakery that are the Abrahamic religious text is NOW.
Lets concenrate our focus on us, our progress and the coming generations.
Its counterintuitive to buy into falsehood because that only distracts us from the reality that we need to dominate in order to swiftly make the world a better place for ourselves and the coming generations.
In order to ascertain the truth about the Abrahamic religions, one would need to study extensively with an open mind, and as such gravitate towards the study of real history.
Jesus is fake because he isnt original.
The Jesus character was invented by the Romans.
musicwriter: Of course, I also used to believe in Jesus when I was a fool. And if you really believe in the words in bold, then its arrogant of you talking about Jesus and the bible, instead of listening to the Jews who the Messiah were promised.
If you want to know why, who, when and where your bible came from and who wrote it, read the book Caesar's Messiah. It explains historically who wrote the bible. It was made into a documentary. See the documentary below.
CAESAR'S MESSIAH. Origin of Christianity- The Flavian Dynasty Connection
Watch the video with an open mind and make your own conclusions moving forward.
Horus is Original.
Osiris is Original
Ela is Original.
Buddha is Original
Merlin is Original.
Krishna is Original.
Each and every one of the above religious[sic] Icons predate the invention of Jesus in years that amount in their thousands, yet they share distinct similarities with the Jesus character.
Once we appreciate these similarities then it becomes clear that the Jesus character is fake.
Daejoyoung: What is your proof for this claim? Give me scholarly sources from actual historians who claim this, and the quotes with links.
The proof is in the above posts and here below:
Amujale: Everyone knows that Christianity was manufactured in the 1st century. Ancient Egypt mythology predates Christianity in years that amount in their hundreds and thousands.
The Jesus character was invented by the Romans
He takes out of various older characters, the most popular is Horus and this due to the striking characteristics they both possess.
The obvious one is the Mother-Child relationship,
Isis and Horus Mary and Jesus
Then you have them using similar terminology:
"I am Horus in glory . . . I am the Lord of the Light . . . I am the victorious one . . . I am the heir of endless time . . . I, even I, am he that knoweth the path of heaven"
Then you have the "Ankh", according to Ancient Egyptians is supposed to be the symbol of re-birth or reincarnation. The one Horus is holding in the depiction below.
The authors of Abrahamic text plagerized Ancient Egyptian text and religious concepts as they did with various many others.
These similar pattern is also identified with relationships between Jesus and Krishna, Jesus and Buddha e.t.c
Hence, the reason one can readily conclude that Jesus is a ficticious character.
Jesus is an adaptation of older iconic characters as expressed above.
Daejoyoung: What is your proof for this claim? Give me scholarly sources from actual historians who claim this, and the quotes with links.
Amujale: ...That is exactly what Horus told his followers in ancient Egypt.
Jesus is an adaptation, an unsafe, unethical and unauthorised plagiarisation of the Horus and various other ancient characters. i.e Buddha, Dionysus, Ela, Krishna, Osiris, Merlin, Romulus e.t.c
There's only one true real history, all the other manufactured versions are false.
Again, according to all my international sources from Africa, Asia, the Americas, Australasia and Europe, humanity begins 'South of the Sahara', Africa. i.e anywhere within the vast regions 'South of the Sahara', Africa.
In this, various Ethnicities make their claims.
Given that i'm Nigerian, and that its already proven that humanity begins in our region of the world, its easy to accept the fact that humanity begins in Nigeria, West Africa.
Ethiopians claim its Ethiopia.
Zimbabwe claim its Zimbabwe.
There are no conflict of interest here, the main point is never in dispute.
The fact that hunanity begins 'South of the Sahara, Africa is never in dispute by genuine historians.
Question:
Why is there no disputing these facts?
Answer:
There's no disputing the fact that humanity begins 'South of the Sahara', Africa due to the fact that is what all the evidence affirms.
Here are a few of the evidence that goes further to prove the above points:-
(a) Apart from the ancient Egyptian mummies, black[sic] Africans own the oldest complete human fossils in all of human history.
(b) Our great continent harbours the oldest structures seen anywhere in the world.
(c) African languages are the oldest dialects in the world of today.
(d) African communities own the oldest known form of written text.
(e) African communities own the oldest known form of writing. Hence, the oldest written books are those of various African communities. e.t.c
Btw, its from the existence of these ancient written text that much of the evidence above is affirmed.
BdorianGray: 5. - At a reunion, a story was told, that the grandmothers of several of the present used to relate the following anecdote about witches: in the times of the Revolution some people found several pair of legs among the ashes of an oven or of the big braziers that were used in the large houses of that time; afraid of such discovery, they waited in order to see what was happening and were surprised that some time later the witches returned in their brooms, without their legs, and that they put them back by means of the art of magic; they celebrated there a strange ritual and then were gone to their houses like any normal people. These stories circulated by word of mouth between the neighbors of the region, causing astonishment. Would you be so kind to tell us whether these events were true?
R. - Distinguished gentleman, we have already spoken quite clearly about this and we could assert that such things are true. This type of tenebrous people, here in our Country, abandon their legs when they enter the Fourth Dimension.
6. - Only here in our Country?
R. - Yes, those of us who we have explored the different Metaphysical lands we know that this act, abandoning the legs, happens only in our homeland.
We have explored different countries and places and the investigation has taken us very far.
Permit me inform you that in smc, the Castle of...... exists, inside which the Workshop of Witchcraft functions; the harrowing witches, affiliated to that hole of darkness, attend their meetings and they don’t leave their legs in their beds, neither at the foot of the chimney, neither elsewhere. That class of people is becoming more and more perverse and they are finally thrown in the dark abyss where one can only hear the cries and the gnashing of teeth.
7. - In a certain place that I used to know in our Country, being on my bed face up, I felt noises in the part of the room where I was. I perceived an unpleasant scent that penetrated below the door, and minutes I later felt that a person sat on my chest paralyzing my whole body. I was not able to speak; neither to make any muscular movement.
After a few minutes I remembered that I could save myself making a Conjuration, but since I could not speak, the only thing I could make, mentally, was the sign of the Star of Five Points and the entity retired. Could you do me the favour of clarifying what class of entity was this, Sir?
R. - I will answer the distinguished gentleman his question. We know by direct experience that those abominable creatures of the witches’ Sabbath are accustomed to throw themselves on the bodies of their victims, in order to bite them in the body forming horrible stains in their skin, or in order to take out of the dense form the Soul and take it to any place of the world, or in order to torment them in any way.
In these cases, we have advised to pray with great vehemence, recite the Conjuration of the Seven of Solomon, or the Conjuration of the Four; this type of prayers is of extraordinary efficacy for the mental and physical defense. With these conjurations the harrowing harpies flee leaving us in peace.
CONJURATION OF THE SEVEN
"In the name of Michael, may Jehovah command thee and drive thee hence, Chavajoth! In the name of Gabriel, may Adonai command thee, and drive thee hence, Bael! In the name of Raphael, begone before Elial, Samgabiel! By Samael Sabaoth, and in the name of Elohim Gibor, get thee hence, Andramelek! By Zachariel et Sachel-Melek, be obedient unto Elvah, Sanagabril! By the divine and human name of Shaddai, and by the sign of the Pentagram which I hold in my right hand, in the name of the angel Anael, by the power of Adam and Eve, who are Jotchavah, begone Lilith! Let us rest in peace Nahemah! By the holy Elohim and by the names of the genii Cashiel, Sehaltiel, Aphiel and Zarahiel, at the command of Orifiel, depart from us Moloch! We deny thee our children to devour! Amen. Amen. Amen."
Tbc,,,,
Christianity is fake.
Jesus is a fictitious character.
Anyone that attempts to use the contents from within Abrahamic religious text to either refute or advance a subject of great importance, ought to first be aware of the fact that all the Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive.
For instance, where does the term "Amen" originate?
What is the meaning of 'holy'?
What is the meaning of Virtuousness?
Does holy and virtuosness have the same meaning? If yes, why? If no, why?
Can you name any Abrahamic religion that can lay claim to being virtuous ?
blazepascal: The trinity consist of 3 God God the father is the almighty and the holy spirit and jesus are part of God when john was about to baptise jesus did u notice what happened the trinity took place immediately jesus is the son of God and he is still part of God
That is exactly what Horus told his followers in ancient Egypt.
Jesus is an adaptation, an unsafe, unethical and unauthorised plagiarisation of the Horus and various other ancient characters. i.e Buddha, Dionysus, Ela, Krishna, Osiris, Merlin, Romulus e.t.c
Its clear as a crystal that you have nothing sensible to say for yourself and instead here is supposedly your response, a response of a blockhead that cannot think straight as brain is fried due to being brainwashed.
People have no time for your type and their Eurocentric ideals, here is a continent everyone has the urge to build back the pride of our world in every way shape or form.
Therefore, let this act as a warning to you and anyone else with a warped ideology that is bent on spreading anti-African rhetoric.
Anyone embarking on acting as enemies of African progress should Stop and Think!, because all those enemies will fail eventually.
Anyone who's born or those that takes refuge on our great continent and without any logical justification sees it fit to attempt stifle the greatness of their own continent, such a person will always be doomed for failure.
There are limitless instances whereby African Gods are adapted into ancient Arabian and or Eurocentric ideologies; whereby lifting their fictitious characters to the status of a 'god' the most famous examples of these type of sadistic activities are the Abrahamic religious text.
sadistic: The authors of Abrahamic religious text found great pleasure and false gratification from adapting other peoples philosophical concepts and or characters and subsequently attempt to inflict the maximum amount of pain and or humiliation on their source(s).
i.e Ramesses the second vs Moses.
In the Abrahamic religious text, the fictitious character known as Moses was said to drown an entire army and their Pharoah!?#$@
Yet, according to African history, in “The Battle of Kadesh” Ramesses the second also known as ‘Ramesses the Great’ and the people of KM.T are victorious; defeating an agressive invading force and are said to have drove many of the invaders into the surrounding waters.
Here, a clasical African narrative not only plagiarised but bastardised at the same time; creating a whole new meaning to acts of plagiarisation.
These are some of the ways those dodgy writers that manufactured Abrahamic religious text are found to have done so.
20the century recopy of a wall painting owned by Ramesses II; ancient Egyptian Pharaoh of the 19th Dynasty; 1290–1224 BCE.
Depicting Ramesses The Great, in his chariot at the Battle of Kadesh.
Africa doesnt have any gods, assuming your searching for gods, then you ought to go and ask the Abrahamic religions and their real histories. i.e Abgal, Bacchus, Dionysus, Gilgamesh, Romulus e.t.c those are gods.
Assuming your searching for Gods, then you're actually in the correct continent.
Not to be confused with The Almighty God; that are within Themselves the one and only; are in Themselves the most important state of existence.
cuteboy2: Generalisation. You only feel safe when you put all 3 faiths in the same boat
All the Abrahamic religions are directly aswell as implicitly responsible for the attempt of wrecking our rich and relevant legacy.
A book with a hundred thousand pages wouldnt fit the writings of the attrocities partaken by these legacy wreckers and peddlers of fakery.
Starting from the exporting of the culture of international warring on our great continent that many nations were tricked into attacking their own kind, based on false and deplorable ideologies; Colonisation and the Transatlantic slavetrade up until this very today.
Stretching an underestimated period of atleast around 800 BCE to today Friday the 6th of December 2019.