Anukulapo's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Anukulapo's Profile › Anukulapo's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (of 25 pages)
Ezedon:Share what the holy spirit inspired you with. |
1 Timothy 4:13 King James Bible Till I come, give attendance to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine. New International Version Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to preaching and to teaching. I have come across questions that have relationships with some of the points in the verse above. Paul, writing to his protege encouraged him to continue the ministry work AND particularly encouraging him to continue * Reading (the scripture) * Preaching (exhortation) * Teaching (doctrine) One of the questions I came across on the forum is about what the "scripture" is (holding that Paul is definitely not referring to his epistle(s) and other epistles). To put it forth, my question... 1) Which scripture was he referring to? OR what was he referring to generally to be read (if it was not the scripture) 2) What doctrines was he talking about? All teachers are welcome. Thanks. |
Torrent sites have been on the run lately, with raids and all manner of filtering by governments that are trying to control the internet. It doesn't work, as the folks who want access bad enough know the ways around these things. Two of the latest victims were The Pirate Bay and EZTV. The former remains dead, though signs of a comeback are present. The latter wasn't down for long following the raid. EZTV made a quick comeback, but problems have continued for the service, as Italian authorities closed in on its .IT domain. This has forced the organization to pack up shop and make a move to a new country where things will, hopefully, be calmer. The old site, EZTV.it, has fled to Switzerland, where it now resides under EZTV.ch. According to TorrentFreak, "Over the past several years it has maintained a steady user-base and with millions of users it’s undoubtedly the most used TV-torrent site on the Internet today". It's an alert to those who try to stop these things. Shutting down or blocking access only serves as a deterrent temporarily. Those who wish to find a way around will -- both the sites and those who use them. It's a ridiculous game that the MPAA and governments will never win. It's only a matter of time now before we watch the next move in this chess game. |
KoloOyinbo:What do you make of the verse below? Do you think it is also a custom of that time? Is that order optional? "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God." (1 Corinthians 11:3). "But if you choose to follow it fine and if you don't want to follow it there is nothing wrong with that." Does your point quoted above apply to 1 cor 11:3? **2** Did you miss this part of my post? "...his reference to the word "custom" was not with respect to the source of the practice." BUT "His reference to "custom" (as practiced by other churches) is just to backup his point. In other words, he was trying to say "this thing I'm telling you is not a big deal in other churches because they are practicing it too." It is a custom that can be observed in other churches." What do you say about the above post? |
. |
Hiswordxray:True,I don't think anyone is in danger of hell just because of head covering. Hiswordxray:Like I said earlier, the reference to custom of other churches is not the source of his teaching but a backup of his teaching. Hiswordxray:And at what point in the church history did it become optional? Who received the revelation that in this time,it is optional? -- We can refer to Paul about the "requirement" of that time And to be a part of the Church as at that time you must cover your hair as a woman. |
[quote author=KoloOyinbo post=29652361 But Paul said this is a custom. Custom tells you what you need to do to be a part of a group or a society.And to be a part of the Church as at that time [/b]you must cover your hair as a woman. Women covering hair is nothing but a [b]custom for believer as at the time that verse was written. But if you choose to follow it fine and if you don't want to follow it there is nothing wrong with that. How can it be any clearer than this?[/quote]You err because his reference to the word "custom" was not with respect to the source of the practice. Like was rightly pointed out, his teaching were either 1) directly from the Lord 2) from the wisdom that God gave him 3) just an advice (from a person that has obtained favour from the Lord) His reference to "custom" (as practiced by other churches) is just to backup his point. In other words, he was trying to say "this thing I'm telling you is not a big deal in other churches because they are practicing it too." It is a custom that can be observed in other churches. The source of his point is what you should seek (which should be one of the 3 above), then the usual argument can follow (whether he meant scarf/veil or he was referring to the hair as the veil). |
xpac01:Hum...a simple approach to what is written. |
egift:Sorry to inform you that PEGites and women right activist don't listen to this kind of news. |
nedu2000:Where has this mindset been all the while until sentiment took over the mind of Nigerians? |
Sexual harassment and assault. She is luck that it happened in our time where gender sentiment is above justice and equity. If it was during Father Moses' time, she for don lose her hands - sharia justice of righteousness. Her case would be judged similarly to: 11 If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, 12 you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity. Deuteronomy 25:11-12New International Version (NIV) |
herald9:Guy,you funny die. LOL. Which of the 3 gifts? |
AreaFada2:Ahahahahahahaha. Over true dey worry your post |
Goshen360:LOL. No mind me o bro. Na joke I dey. I'm sure I learn a lot from it. I love driving and I hope I'll handle one of those long vehicles one day (just for the technicality of the driving sha) |
Congrats. I hope the fun part will be at chop sticks. Pick me up at 805 or yogurberry. LOL Have a blast celebrating. |
Ok. Please post for danfo drivers too. LOL |
gidyon:True BUT it doesn't mean a "good name" in the literal sense of it. It means that a person's prestige is better than gaining material things and be known for evil. |
Jabez's name was not changed OR was that part of my bible torn off? |
Nmeri17:Guy,you got me cracking so tey I almost puke for body. I don press report button finish thinking say na quote I dey press. I couldn't skip quoting your post. LWKMD |
...But there is "global harmattan" here in abuja. LOL Lagosians,change your way. |
On this fact,OBJ no miss am. Walahi. my friend and I still concluded the same fact this morning while analysing some political issues. |
Bidam:Bidam,cool down now. Listen to yourself carefully. Bidam:Yes,you are absolutely right BUT why is he encouraging them to? |
"Even so ye, forasmuch as ye are zealous of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the EDIFYING OF THE CHURCH. Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue (edifies himself) pray that he may interpret (because by interpreting,the CHURCH can be edified)." (1 Corinthians 14:12-13). |
Bidam:Ok,let me try to start from an earlier point. The bible is clear about the issue. The truth is, as for the choice of GRATIFICATION as the definite word (due to its literal meaning), it negates the truth of the scripture about tongues. However,it is possible that (some) right things can be done the right way for the wrong reason. Isn't it possible? "But he that prophesieth speaketh UNTO MEN TO (their) EDIFICATION, and exhortation, and comfort. He that speaketh in an unknown tongue EDIFIETH HIMSELF; but he that prophesieth EDIFIETH THE CHURCH." (1 Corinthians 14:3-4). Here is the drill;next verse: "I would that ye all spake with tongues (edify yourself), but rather that ye prophesied (edifies the church): for greater is he that prophesieth(edifies the church) than he that speaketh with tongues (edifies himself), EXCEPT he interpret, (so) that THE CHURCH may receive edifying." (1 Corinthians 14:5). EDIFICATION is common to both. * Like I said in my earlier post, I think the issue is about edification of 1) SELF or 2) CHURCH. SELF has a tendency/possibility to be selfish (about ones self without extension to others) while in edifying the church,all parts including the "self" is edified. |
Bidam:Tongues is meant for edification. |
Bidam:Please,tell me how it is that you do not understand it. Is it that the post is incomprehensible OR you seem not to find it related to the answer that you were expecting? Bidam:...Nevertheless at thy word,I will ask. Please Bidam, teach me about "...with the evidence of speaking in tongues" because that is the only part I seem not to understand. If I have questions,I hope I can ask...and my questions are usually kinda life application (or the answers that I usually require) I hope you won't be teaching in tongues o because that will not be profitable to me. Just kidding. LOL |
Bidam:When I consider your response, I feel like I'm getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. I don't know if I should accept that you really don't understand shdemidemi's point or you are on war of words. Though if it is a war of words,I understand. It is clear that Vooks is not at war with words because he clearly understands the issue (see quote below) vooks:What I understand (regardless of the choice of word whether SELF edification or gratification) is that it is about SELF or the body of christ even as it can be seen in one of the arguments of the role of the NT and OT prophets. |
Bidam:You know that Jesus died for the world and called out the "church" not a member of the "church". The manifestation of the spirit is for all to profit;that the body may be edified. While he was not out rightly condemning self edification, the man who spoke in tongues them all (paraphrasing) said he'll rather that they (the audience and by extension we too) PROPHESY rather than SPEAK IN TONGUES because he that prophesy edifies all BUT he that speaks in tongue edifies himSELF. For the most of it (IMO) tongues have been esteemed by todays believers just as circumcision was by the jews...and you know what Paul said about circumcision also "For neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the law; but desire to have you circumcised, that they may glory in your flesh." (Galatians 6:13). If the tongue talkers keep not the command of the lord,they just seek occasion to be different;more like new testament pharisees These 3 things abides forever, FAITH HOPE and LOVE. The greatest is love "He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth edifieth the church. I would that ye all spake with tongues, BUT rather that ye prophesied: for GREATER is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, EXCEPT he interpret, that THE CHURCH may receive edifying." (1 Corinthians 14:4-5). I hope that helps. Shalom. |
vooks: |
ayobase:Ha ha ha...I remember this picture. Eng'r Ayobase on rag. |
The opposition is just based on |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (of 25 pages)

the thought of it even makes me wanno puke