Baldwretch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Baldwretch's Profile › Baldwretch's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (of 25 pages)
lapintoz:Hahaha, looks like you don't know the amount at stake. Even the government of the US, the UK, France, China, the UAE, Kuwait, Italy, Switzerland Australia and Austria combined cannot SETTLe amounts equal to the stated sum in legal disputes. Heck, looks like you are asleep or dizzy when you typed this ba? |
Facebook would have to pay me more than double what Google is required to pay these Russians. Brace up guys, tough times, very, very tough times ahead. |
lonelydora:Who does that on their wedding day? You are kidding, right? |
It is well. |
Stopmyaddict:If you share your betting history, you can choose to blur some vital details like your name and phone number. A hacker needs more than what I just shared to hack a user's account. And just because you have my ticket ID, trade ID, time of wager and other miscellaneous details does not give you access to my account in anyway. Hackers are not magicians. They need some vital details about a user's account which can be blurred.
|
Stopmyaddict:No, sir. Actually, I don't have any reason to disbelieve him because he has not lied to me before but I refuse to believe everything (and anything) I see on the internet without corroborative proofs. This is applicable not just to him, but to every other person. On the internet, every claim is untrue until proven with concrete evidence to be true. It is very easy to claim that you have five brand new stadiums for sale in Singapore, you know where I am getting at, this is the internet. It has become the norm to cook up stories. I am not saying he's lying; people lose more than that in a day, in hours, but like other claims made by internet users online without corroborative proofs, I refuse to believe with just a screenshot until he's able to show his betting history and some lost bets he's made with the transaction ID clearly spelled out.. |
Tochi3:Oga, it is clearly stated in the headlines that it is still an allegation. Must you call out your political adversaries over every tittle even when they might be right? |
FindX:Hello @FindX, I actually find this very, very hard to believe. Before saying anything further, could you kindly share a screenshot of your betting app or account that corroborates what is in your screenshot. |
Merry100:You said that men should be grateful that women that women chose them. What a very mad-arse, crass thing to say. Is it that women should be grateful that men chose them or the reverse? What an absolute thoughtless statement! If God created the woman for the man, then it must stand to reason that it is the play thing that must be grateful to the played-upon. I don't know where you get your logic from. I do not proofread most of my comments too. Seun is not paying me to do that. ![]() |
Merry100:Lol. Wow, that's another verbal diarrhea. |
Allotrope69:Hmm. Not heard of that place. Are you based in the northern, central, or southern part of the state? |
leksymaxy:When I saw your pay I have to ask where you live. Where do you live? According to what I was told, in my domain, where I live you would not get more than 45k if you are just starting with the school. |
Allotrope69:Where in Nassarawa state? |
pharmagba:I don't agree with this method, sir. Yes, he should be strategic and reserve his energy, but delegating his duties as their teacher to the students is not okay. His red pen and only his red pen should be seen on the students' book or handbook and there are many good reasons why it should it be done this way. He should try to reach a compromise with the school management. Mathematics teachers need more idle time for many reasons. The authorities need an Econs teachers. It is as simple as that. |
samwheel:Your points are very valid. I agree. A player's goal should be coming home with the trophy. However, not everyone can take first place. Not every team or player would come home with the gold or silver or bronze medal. Only a slot is available for these positions especially for the gold medal which every other contestants strives for. Someone has to come last or second to the last. Their contribution in the interim is what matters. Especially as it has to do with what I mentioned before you replied. We must not get worked up over winning the medal. Coming first is an achievement, no doubt, a part of entertaining one's self, but there are other aspects which we often neglect especially as it has to do with individual brilliance. I already mentioned them. I would rather a team I support plays extremely good football, pass the ball around, dribble and hit the bar hundred times and lose than win every round-robin match with an incredibly streak of luck and then proceed to win the tournament. The trophy is not as important to me as the events before it. What you do in the interim is just as important, or more important, than the final result especially in the field of play. We all know that the final scoreline of most football matches is a combination of many factors. Many skillful players would often get called out, or even benched because they dribble or hold the ball for too long. You'd hear words like, that is not what we want! That is not what we called you to do! Pass the fucking ball. These are very, very good players that I would not trade for anything. Okocha, is a case study, but sadly many don't think this way. A player has to be under your radar to make mention of him or his achievements. Sadly, a very good player might fall out of favour with his employers/boss or they might not see him as good enough for certain roles. It's all perspectives. |
samwheel:Oga, dribbling, being extremely skillful, throwing that mad killer pass, a touch of acrobatic control, and many more are extremely useful and needed in football. We want to see more and more of these as we entertain ourselves with the game. Sadly, we don't see more of these in this generation of two sure odds that has extremely damaged men's psyche. All they want is for a player to put the ball at the back of the net and are threatening fire and brimstone for missed opportunities. |
I am a self-made multi-billionaire. I have several billions in different bank accounts today. I made it through gambling. If my memory does not fail me, I was able to correctly predict 15 correct scores including three 7 - 0s. ![]() You are free to ask me any questions. The floor is all yours guys. You are welcome. ![]() |
WoundedLamb:Exactly. This words of yours had sooner jumped out of my own lips before I had read them here. You are quite sound, mehn. What good is knowledge in and of itself? It is useless. To know this and that. Knowledge in and of itself is of no good and would only make one miserable in the long run. A recipe for disaster. I want the money oo jare. |
TellAll1:Hello OP. Are you an employee of UBA and did you write this yourself or you got it from someone? Are you a contract staff of UBA? If yes, for how long have you worked with them. |
Ibechris2: ![]() ![]() The Igbos are not the only credit-worthy borrowers. Lol. I understand, you might be talking from experience, but you need to shove that take.You need to understand that good virtues know no tribe. It knows no ethnicity or religion. Good virtues care very little for your skin colour, the region you're from or who you are. People are not credit-worthy because they are Igbos or because they come from certain regions. It might surprise that, at a point in your lending career, you assisted a cunning, despicable fellow who's everything but a non-credit worthy Igbo business man. I am not asking you to lower your guards or accommodate the request of every borrower who makes request; rather, I am saying -you should have a comprehensive system of doing your checks before disbursing your loans beyond being Igbo. There are cunning Igbos everywhere. |
jibsiddy456:No one can consistently predict the outcome of something futuristic. That is what being skilled in something of this nature entails. A man might predict 15 correct scores of a football fixture on a particular day and have 2, 000 tickets binged in the following week. I'm not even talking of predicting the result of 15 matches; I am talking of predicting the correct scores of 15 matches. If you do the Maths of someone achieving that feat, the probability of someone predicting that correctly, is almost zero. it is zero actually if I would not be economical with the truth, and yet, I can tell you with utmost confidence that such a fellow who does predict that correctly does not "sabi." Lol. |
jibsiddy456:Nothing like if you sabi am. Dem no dey "sabi" predictions. You need more than human knowledge to sabi am. In fact, you need foreknowledge to sabi am. Na only God get foreknowledge. If dem dey sabi am ni, all of us suppose dem sabi am na. ![]() |
Reggaero:If you didn't read my words, how do you know that it is nice? |
Ibechris2:Peer-to-peer lending is extremely risky because it depends on your borrowers acting in good faith towards you. Even if you are getting matched on a website, you're still at risk of losing all your investment. This, to me, would eventually lead to a zero-sum game where your profits and investment would get eaten by bad debtors. In fact, I'd say peer-to-peer lending is worse than a zero-sum because you're almost guaranteed to start from scratch at some point. Man is not as nice and honest as he claims to be no matter what he portrays himself to be. I would rather try my luck on Sporty. Lol. ![]() I think my comment on peer-to-peer lending is also applicable to mutual funds you talked about, or do I misunderstand the difference between them? If you have a shop that you rent out for profit, then you are good. Most of us are not privileged to own properties, much less rent them out. This is a nice side income. I think this also applies to capital gains from properties you talked about. In my opinion, this is the only viable side income you currently have. |
The VAR called the referee's attention to an incident in the last minute of the game and he awarded a penalty after reviewing the incident on the VAR screen. In my opinion that is not a penalty. Seems some referee are incapable of independent thoughts once the VAR officials ask them to have a look for themselves. Your decision as a referee should be independent of what other officials think. One would hardly get contentious actions overturned once referees are asked to look at the screen. It is really sad. Manchester United did not deserve to lose today because of that referee's decision. They lost today's match because the referee was asked to review an incident, not because the referee, having reviewed the incident, saw merit or any gross misconduct in the field of play. We certainly didn't. This type of poor decision-making has cost me money today. |
Ibechris2:What is your side income? |
deltateam:This guy you just want to get at me. ![]() How would knowing how similar they are help anyone win their bet? ![]() |
Joeblaze26:Mr. man, you don't know shit and we are trying to educate you and you're still talking trash. A poster, not you, asked a question and I answered him correctly using another example, then all of you crawled out from where you came from and started talking trash about how I am a talkative and what nonsense. I even told you that the 2UP is a condition in a wager and not a market. The condition benefits you, not the bookies. If the match had to be settled at the final whistle then it didn't satisfy the conditions put forth. That should be common sense na. If the game had to wait till the full-time whistle to be settled, then clearly, it didn't satisfy the conditions of the bet. All bet would eventually be settled anyway, but not all bets are settled at full-time. Ask yourself, when the bet was settled at full-time, was it because they won the match or because they were 2UP? It was because they won the match obviously. Wining a match and being 2UP are entirely different things. A team may be 2UP and not win the match, it would still be settled as a won bet because it satisfies 2UP. Conversely, a team may win and not be 2UP. It would also be marked as a won bet, but not because 2UP was satisfied. It's because the 1x2 condition was satisfied which states that the team with the highest goal wins. If you play over2.5, for instance, and your bet has to be settled at full-time, then clearly you lost the bet (and didn't satisfy the condition) unless the team scores the third goal with the full whistle. All over2.5 are settled before the final whistle unless the team scores with the final whistle. Similarly, all 2UPs are settled before the final whistle unless the team scores the second goal margin at the final whistle. Clearly, your comprehension level is below par. Don't quote me again. |
Joeblaze26:Eyah, instead of admitting that you are being schooled. You, as usual, resort to insult. The 2UP is a condition and not a market. It can still be marked as a won bet regardless of the final outcome of the match, so you should be aware now, if you are not, that Brentford FC didn't win by the 2UP. Instead of just admitting that you just properly understood the 2UP option, you're throwing childish tantrums as if I am in competition with you. I no send you at all. You are very, very very inconsequential and all your opinion does not count at all. The only reason I would be lost from this thread is if all the guest who frequent this thread sign up and ask me to leave, but not till then bro. I am not just here to talk to you. If you are interested in having meaningful conversations, fine. If not, fine, too. All your talks of me being a talkative is nothing to me. Your opinion does not count. I am not going to be anything other than I am to please anyone. My content would continue to be as exhaustive as I can make them to be. Lol. ![]() How can I laugh in a way that pleases God? ![]() ![]() |
Joeblaze26:Lol. Both teams successfully did the 2UP option? Did Brentford FC score more than two goals in the match? Yes, they did. But was Brentford FC leading by two goals at any point in the match? No, of course not. They weren't. And even when they did finally scored the fourth goal, were they two goals up at that point? No, of course, they were not. The opponent had equalized at that point Would Brentford FC get your ticket ticked at any point before the final whistle if you chose them 2UP? No, they wouldn't. Would your ticket be marked as won after the match? Yes, of course, they did eventually win the match. Again, in the example I chose to use, although I didn't expressly make clear that Brentford FC is the chosen pick for the 2UP, shouldn't one infer that I might have that at the back of my mind since it would be a bit unreasonable to chose the underdogs to win a football match, which, in this case, is Ipwsich FC, as the odds portray them to be. Do I have to spell out the chosen pick word for word? If the person I am choosing to reply to chose Mancity instead of Southampton, would I use an example to show that he might as well have chosen Ipwsich Town instead of Brentford? Lol. Some fellows on this board sha. Clearly, I am talking about Brentford not satisfying the 2UP conditions at any point in the match. They did eventually win the match, but not by the 2UP option. The 2UP is a condition the bookies set for running games that enables your ticket to be marked as won even when the game is not completed yet ![]() You need to humble yourself and accept the ways of God my friend. Simple leading by two goals seems very, very difficult to understand and interpret. |
